Abstract
The mechanisms by which histones are disassembled and reassembled into nucleosomes and chromatin structure during DNA replication, repair and transcription are poorly understood. A better understanding of the processes involved is, however, crucial if we are to understand whether and how histone variants and post-translationally modified histones are inherited in an epigenetic manner. To this end we have studied the interaction of the histone H3–H4 complex with the human retinoblastoma-associated protein RbAp48 and their exchange with a second histone chaperone, anti-silencing function protein 1 (ASF1). Exchange of histones H3–H4 between these two histone chaperones has a central role in the assembly of new nucleosomes, and we show here that the H3–H4 complex has an unexpected structural plasticity, which is important for this exchange.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Gruss, C., Wu, J., Koller, T. & Sogo, J.M. Disruption of the nucleosomes at the replication fork. EMBO J. 12, 4533–4545 (1993).
Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T.J., Flaus, A.J., Waye, M.M. & Richmond, T.J. Characterization of nucleosome core particles containing histone proteins made in bacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 272, 301–311 (1997).
Strahl, B.D. & Allis, C.D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403, 41–45 (2000).
Prior, C.P., Cantor, C.R., Johnson, E.M. & Allfrey, V.G. Incorporation of exogenous pyrene-labeled histone into Physarum chromatin: a system for studying changes in nucleosomes assembled in vivo. Cell 20, 597–608 (1980).
Jackson, V. Deposition of newly synthesized histones: hybrid nucleosomes are not tandemly arranged on daughter DNA strands. Biochemistry 27, 2109–2120 (1988).
Xu, M. et al. Partitioning of histone H3–H4 tetramers during DNA replication-dependent chromatin assembly. Science 328, 94–98 (2010).
Tagami, H., Ray-Gallet, D., Almouzni, G. & Nakatani, Y. Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell 116, 51–61 (2004).
English, C.M., Adkins, M.W., Carson, J.J., Churchill, M.E. & Tyler, J.K. Structural basis for the histone chaperone activity of Asf1. Cell 127, 495–508 (2006).
Natsume, R. et al. Structure and function of the histone chaperone CIA/ASF1 complexed with histones H3 and H4. Nature 446, 338–341 (2007).
Annunziato, A.T. Split decision: what happens to nucleosomes during DNA replication? J. Biol. Chem. 280, 12065–12068 (2005).
Parthun, M.R., Widom, J. & Gottschling, D.E. The major cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase in yeast: links to chromatin replication and histone metabolism. Cell 87, 85–94 (1996).
Verreault, A., Kaufman, P.D., Kobayashi, R. & Stillman, B. Nucleosomal DNA regulates the core-histone-binding subunit of the human Hat1 acetyltransferase. Curr. Biol. 8, 96–108 (1998).
Smith, S. & Stillman, B. Purification and characterization of CAF-I, a human cell factor required for chromatin assembly during DNA replication in vitro. Cell 58, 15–25 (1989).
Verreault, A., Kaufman, P.D., Kobayashi, R. & Stillman, B. Nucleosome assembly by a complex of CAF-1 and acetylated histones H3/H4. Cell 87, 95–104 (1996).
Martinez-Balbás, M.A., Tsukiyama, T., Gdula, D. & Wu, C. Drosophila NURF-55, a WD repeat protein involved in histone metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 132–137 (1998).
Barak, O. et al. Isolation of human NURF: a regulator of Engrailed gene expression. EMBO J. 22, 6089–6100 (2003).
Wade, P.A., Jones, P.L., Vermaak, D. & Wolffe, A.P. A multiple subunit Mi-2 histone deacetylase from Xenopus laevis cofractionates with an associated Snf2 superfamily ATPase. Curr. Biol. 8, 843–846 (1998).
Zhang, Y. et al. Analysis of the NuRD subunits reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA methylation. Genes Dev. 13, 1924–1935 (1999).
Kuzmichev, A., Jenuwein, T., Tempst, P. & Reinberg, D. Different EZH2-containing complexes target methylation of histone H1 or nucleosomal histone H3. Mol. Cell 14, 183–193 (2004).
Kaji, K., Nichols, J. & Hendrich, B. Mbd3, a component of the NuRD co-repressor complex, is required for development of pluripotent cells. Development 134, 1123–1132 (2007).
Shen, X. et al. Jumonji modulates polycomb activity and self-renewal versus differentiation of stem cells. Cell 139, 1303–1314 (2009).
Hennig, L., Taranto, P., Walser, M., Schonrock, N. & Gruissem, W. Arabidopsis MSI1 is required for epigenetic maintenance of reproductive development. Development 130, 2555–2565 (2003).
Lejon, S. et al. Insights into association of the NuRD complex with FOG-1 from the crystal structure of an RbAp48.FOG-1 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 1196–1203 (2011).
Schmitges, F.W. et al. Histone methylation by PRC2 is inhibited by active chromatin marks. Mol. Cell 42, 330–341 (2011).
Song, J.J., Garlick, J.D. & Kingston, R.E. Structural basis of histone H4 recognition by p55. Genes Dev. 22, 1313–1318 (2008).
Murzina, N.V. et al. Structural basis for the recognition of histone H4 by the histone-chaperone RbAp46. Structure 16, 1077–1085 (2008).
Nowak, A.J. et al. Chromatin-modifying complex component Nurf55/p55 associates with histones H3, H4 and Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 subunit Su(z)12 through partially overlapping binding sites. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23388–23396 (2011).
Ma, X.J., Wu, J., Altheim, B.A., Schultz, M.C. & Grunstein, M. Deposition-related sites K5/K12 in histone H4 are not required for nucleosome deposition in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6693–6698 (1998).
Shibahara, K., Verreault, A. & Stillman, B. The N-terminal domains of histones H3 and H4 are not necessary for chromatin assembly factor-1- mediated nucleosome assembly onto replicated DNA in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7766–7771 (2000).
Ward, R., Bowman, A., El-Mkami, H., Owen-Hughes, T. & Norman, D.G. Long distance PELDOR measurements on the histone core particle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1348–1349 (2009).
Bowman, A., Ward, R., El-Mkami, H., Owen-Hughes, T. & Norman, D.G. Probing the (H3–H4)2 histone tetramer structure using pulsed EPR spectroscopy combined with site-directed spin labelling. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 695–707 (2010).
Bode, B.E. et al. Counting the monomers in nanometer-sized oligomers by pulsed electron-electron double resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 6736–6745 (2007).
Banks, D.D. & Gloss, L.M. Folding mechanism of the (H3–H4)2 histone tetramer of the core nucleosome. Protein Sci. 13, 1304–1316 (2004).
Jasencakova, Z. & Groth, A. Restoring chromatin after replication: how new and old histone marks come together. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 231–237 (2010).
Ransom, M., Dennehey, B.K. & Tyler, J.K. Chaperoning histones during DNA replication and repair. Cell 140, 183–195 (2010).
Donham, D.C. II, Scorgie, J.K. & Churchill, M.E. The activity of the histone chaperone yeast Asf1 in the assembly and disassembly of histone H3/H4-DNA complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 5449–5458 (2011).
Campos, E.I. et al. The program for processing newly synthesized histones H3.1 and H4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1343–1351 (2010).
Tang, Y. et al. Structure of a human ASF1a-HIRA complex and insights into specificity of histone chaperone complex assembly. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 921–929 (2006).
Groth, A. et al. Regulation of replication fork progression through histone supply and demand. Science 318, 1928–1931 (2007).
Shibahara, K. & Stillman, B. Replication-dependent marking of DNA by PCNA facilitates CAF-1-coupled inheritance of chromatin. Cell 96, 575–585 (1999).
Bowman, A. et al. The histone chaperones Nap1 and Vps75 bind histones H3 and H4 in a tetrameric conformation. Mol. Cell 41, 398–408 (2011).
DeLano, W. The PyMOL molecular graphics system (DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, California, USA, 2002).
Sobott, F., McCammon, M.G., Hernandez, H. & Robinson, C.V. The flight of macromolecular complexes in a mass spectrometer. Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 363, 379–389 discussion 389–391 (2005).
Ward, R., Keeble, D.J., El-Mkami, H. & Norman, D.G. Distance determination in heterogeneous DNA model systems by pulsed EPR. ChemBioChem 8, 1957–1964 (2007).
Jeschke, G. et al. DeerAnalysis2006—a comprehensive software package for analyzing pulsed ELDOR data. Appl. Magn. Reson. 30, 473–498 (2006).
Park, Y.J., Dyer, P.N., Tremethick, D.J. & Luger, K. A new fluorescence resonance energy transfer approach demonstrates that the histone variant H2AZ stabilizes the histone octamer within the nucleosome. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 24274–24282 (2004).
Kenakin, T.P. Pharmacological Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interaction 205–244 (Raven Press, New York, 1987).
Swillens, S. Interpretation of binding curves obtained with high receptor concentrations—practical aid for computer analysis. Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 1197–1203 (1995).
Hulme, E.C. & Trevethick, M.A. Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 161, 1219–1237 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We thank I. Berger (European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Grenoble, France) for insect cell expression vectors, R. Marmostein (Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, USA) for the plasmid expressing human ASF11–159, K. Luger (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA) for advice on suitable buffers for fluorescence experiments, S. McLaughlin and N. Royle for purification of preliminary samples of histones H3–H4 and ASF1, A. Murzin for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript, the Protein & Nucleic Acid Chemistry Facility (PNAC; Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge), and J. McCullagh and C. Schofield (Chemistry Department, University of Oxford, UK) for access to the Synapt instrument for nondenaturing MS experiments. We thank the Wellcome Trust, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) for their support of this research: 082010/Z/07/Z (E.D.L., N.V.M.) 092441/Z/10/Z (A.A.W.), BB/D526088/1 (M.T.), EC FP7 277899 (E.D.L., F.S.), BB/E022286/1 (D.G.N., R.W.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
W.Z., M.T., R.W., F.S., J.M., A.A.W. and O.F. performed experiments. A.S.M. expressed recombinant RbAp48 protein. A.B., T.O.-H., H.E.M., N.V.M. and D.G.N. provided technical and conceptual advice. E.D.L. supervised the work and prepared the manuscript, with assistance from the other authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 980 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, W., Tyl, M., Ward, R. et al. Structural plasticity of histones H3–H4 facilitates their allosteric exchange between RbAp48 and ASF1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20, 29–35 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2446
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2446
This article is cited by
-
The MuvB complex binds and stabilizes nucleosomes downstream of the transcription start site of cell-cycle dependent genes
Nature Communications (2022)
-
RbAp48 expression and neuronal damage in the gerbil hippocampus following 5 min of transient ischemia
Laboratory Animal Research (2019)
-
Epigenetic regulation of HIV-1 latency: focus on polycomb group (PcG) proteins
Clinical Epigenetics (2018)
-
The Cac2 subunit is essential for productive histone binding and nucleosome assembly in CAF-1
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Histone chaperone networks shaping chromatin function
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2017)