Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Structure of the Dom34–Hbs1 complex and implications for no-go decay

Abstract

No-go decay (NGD) targets mRNAs with stalls in translation elongation for endonucleolytic cleavage in a process involving the Dom34 and Hbs1 proteins. The crystal structure of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe Dom34–Hbs1 complex reveals an overall shape similar to that of eRF1–eRF3–GTP and EF-Tu–tRNA–GDPNP. Similarly to eRF1 and GTP binding to eRF3, Dom34 and GTP bind to Hbs1 with strong cooperativity, and Dom34 acts as a GTP-dissociation inhibitor (GDI). A marked conformational change in Dom34 occurs upon binding to Hbs1, leading Dom34 to resemble a portion of a tRNA and to position a conserved basic region in a position expected to be near the peptidyl transferase center. These results support the idea that the Dom34–Hbs1 complex functions to terminate translation and thereby commit mRNAs to NGD. Consistent with this role, NGD at runs of arginine codons, which cause a strong block to elongation, is independent of the Dom34–Hbs1 complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The overall structure of the Dom34–Hbs1 complex.
Figure 2: Comparison of Dom34–Hbs1 with EF-Tu–tRNA–GDPNP and eRF1–eRF3–GTP.
Figure 3: Comparison of Hbs1 in complex.
Figure 4: Conformational changes of Dom34.
Figure 5: The Dom34–Hbs1 interface.
Figure 6: GTP and Dom34 bind to Hbs1 cooperatively and Dom34 acts as a GDI.
Figure 7: NGD at CGA codons is independent of the Dom34–Hbs1 complex.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Referenced accessions

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. Doma, M.K. & Parker, R. RNA quality control in eukaryotes. Cell 131, 660–668 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Isken, O. & Maquat, L.E. Quality control of eukaryotic mRNA: safeguarding cells from abnormal mRNA function. Genes Dev. 21, 1833–1856 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maquat, L.E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: splicing, translation and mRNP dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 89–99 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Hoof, A., Frischmeyer, P.A., Dietz, H.C. & Parker, R. Exosome-mediated recognition and degradation of mRNAs lacking a termination codon. Science 295, 2262–2264 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frischmeyer, P.A. et al. An mRNA surveillance mechanism that eliminates transcripts lacking termination codons. Science 295, 2258–2261 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doma, M.K. & Parker, R. Endonucleolytic cleavage of eukaryotic mRNAs with stalls in translation elongation. Nature 440, 561–564 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Passos, D.O. et al. Analysis of Dom34 and its function in no-go decay. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 3025–3032 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gandhi, R., Manzoor, M. & Hudak, K.A. Depurination of Brome mosaic virus RNA3 in vivo results in translation-dependent accelerated degradation of the viral RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 32218–32228 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cole, S.E., LaRiviere, F.J., Merrikh, C.N. & Moore, M.J. A convergence of rRNA and mRNA quality control pathways revealed by mechanistic analysis of nonfunctional rRNA decay. Mol. Cell 34, 440–450 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noble, C.G. & Song, H. Structural studies of elongation and release factors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 1335–1346 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Negrutskii, B.S. & El'skaya, A.V. Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 α: structure, expression, functions, and possible role in aminoacyl-tRNA channeling. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 60, 47–78 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stansfield, I. et al. The products of the SUP45 (eRF1) and SUP35 genes interact to mediate translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 14, 4365–4373 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhouravleva, G. et al. Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. EMBO J. 14, 4065–4072 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Atkinson, G.C., Baldauf, S.L. & Hauryliuk, V. Evolution of nonstop, no-go and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and their termination factor-derived components. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 290 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Inagaki, Y. & Ford, D.W. Evolution of the eukaryotic translation termination system: origins of release factors. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 882–889 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wallrapp, C. et al. The product of the mammalian orthologue of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HBS1 gene is phylogenetically related to eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3) but does not carry eRF3-like activity. FEBS Lett. 440, 387–392 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carr-Schmid, A., Pfund, C., Craig, E.A. & Kinzy, T.G. Novel G-protein complex whose requirement is linked to the translational status of the cell. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2564–2574 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Song, H. et al. The crystal structure of human eukaryotic release factor eRF1–mechanism of stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. Cell 100, 311–321 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kong, C. et al. Crystal structure and functional analysis of the eukaryotic class II release factor eRF3 from S. pombe. Mol. Cell 14, 233–245 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng, Z. et al. Structural insights into eRF3 and stop codon recognition by eRF1. Genes Dev. 23, 1106–1118 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alkalaeva, E.Z., Pisarev, A.V., Frolova, L.Y., Kisselev, L.L. & Pestova, T.V. In vitro reconstitution of eukaryotic translation reveals cooperativity between release factors eRF1 and eRF3. Cell 125, 1125–1136 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Graille, M., Chaillet, M. & van Tilbeurgh, H. Structure of yeast Dom34: a protein related to translation termination factor Erf1 and involved in no-go decay. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 7145–7154 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, H.H. et al. Structural and functional insights into Dom34, a key component of no-go mRNA decay. Mol. Cell 27, 938–950 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frolova, L.Y. et al. Mutations in the highly conserved GGQ motif of class 1 polypeptide release factors abolish ability of human eRF1 to trigger peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. RNA 5, 1014–1020 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adham, I.M. et al. Disruption of the pelota gene causes early embryonic lethality and defects in cell cycle progression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 1470–1476 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xi, R., Doan, C., Liu, D. & Xie, T. Pelota controls self-renewal of germline stem cells by repressing a Bam-independent differentiation pathway. Development 132, 5365–5374 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dimitrova, L.N., Kuroha, K., Tatematsu, T. & Inada, T. Nascent peptide-dependent translation arrest leads to Not4p-mediated protein degradation by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 10343–10352 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mitkevich, V.A. et al. Termination of translation in eukaryotes is mediated by the quaternary eRF1*eRF3*GTP*Mg2+ complex. The biological roles of eRF3 and prokaryotic RF3 are profoundly distinct. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 3947–3954 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schmeing, T.M. et al. The crystal structure of the ribosome bound to EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA. Science 326, 688–694 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kononenko, A.V. et al. GTP-dependent structural rearrangement of the eRF1:eRF3 complex and eRF3 sequence motifs essential for PABP binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 548–558 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rodnina, M.V., Gromadski, K.B., Kothe, U. & Wieden, H.J. Recognition and selection of tRNA in translation. FEBS Lett. 579, 938–942 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hauryliuk, V., Zavialov, A., Kisselev, L. & Ehrenberg, M. Class-1 release factor eRF1 promotes GTP binding by class-2 release factor eRF3. Biochimie 88, 747–757 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pisareva, V.P., Pisarev, A.V., Hellen, C.U., Rodnina, M.V. & Pestova, T.V. Kinetic analysis of interaction of eukaryotic release factor 3 with guanine nucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 40224–40235 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Salas-Marco, J. & Bedwell, D.M. GTP hydrolysis by eRF3 facilitates stop codon decoding during eukaryotic translation termination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 7769–7778 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nissen, P. et al. Crystal structure of the ternary complex of Phe-tRNAPhe, EF-Tu, and a GTP analog. Science 270, 1464–1472 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  36. CCP4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760–763 (1994).

  37. Song, H., Parsons, M.R., Rowsell, S., Leonard, G. & Phillips, S.E. Crystal structure of intact elongation factor EF-Tu from Escherichia coli in GDP conformation at 2.05 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1245–1256 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miller, R., Gallo, S.M., Khalak, H.G. & Weeks, C.M. SnB: crystal structure determination via shake-and-bake. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 27, 613–621 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  39. De la Fortelle, E. & Bricogne, G. Maximum-likelihood heavy-atom parameter refinement for multiple isomorphous replacement and multiwavelength anomalous diffraction method. Methods Enzymol. 276, 472–494 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Perrakis, A., Morris, R. & Lamzin, V.S. Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 458–463 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Brünger, A.T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905–921 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Murshudov, G.N., Vagin, A.A. & Dodson, E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D 53, 240–255 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Davis, I.W. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375–W383 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Laskowski, R.A., Moss, D.S. & Thornton, J.M. Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 231, 1049–1067 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the beamline scientists at ID23-1 (European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), France) for assistance and access to synchrotron radiation facilities. This work is financially supported by the Biomedical Research Council of A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research) (H.S.), European Regional Development Fund through the Center of Excellence in Chemical Biology (V.H.) and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (R.P.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.C. solved the crystal structure and performed mutagenesis studies; D.M. carried out NGD assays; V.H. and V.S. performed kinetics assays; Z.C. and M.K.L. carried out cloning and initial purification of Hbs1 and Dom34 proteins; R.P. and H.S. designed the studies, interpreted data and wrote the paper with contributions from L.C. and V.H.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Roy Parker or Haiwei Song.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 (PDF 771 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, L., Muhlrad, D., Hauryliuk, V. et al. Structure of the Dom34–Hbs1 complex and implications for no-go decay. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17, 1233–1240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1922

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1922

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing