Abstract
For proteins, understanding tertiary interactions involved in local versus global unfolding has become increasingly important for understanding the nature of the native state ensemble, the mechanisms of unfolding, and the stability of both the native and intermediate states in folding. In this work we have addressed related questions with respect to RNA structure by combining chemical denaturation and hydroxyl radical footprinting methods. We have determined unfolding isotherms for each of 26 discrete sites of protection located throughout the Tetrahymena thermophila group I ribozyme. The cooperativity of folding, m-value, and the free energy, ΔG°N−U, associated with formation of each tertiary contact was determined by analysis of the isotherms. The ΔG°N−U values measured in this study vary from 1.7 ± 0.2 to 7.6 ± 1.2 kcal mol−1. Thus, the stability of these discrete tertiary contacts vary by almost 104. In addition, an intradomain contact and three interdomain contacts show high cooperativity (m-values of 1.1 ± 0.2 to 1.7 ± 0.3 kcal mol−1 M−1) indicating that these contacts exhibit global cooperatively in their folding behavior. This new approach to examining RNA stability provides an exciting comparison to our understanding of protein structure and folding mechanisms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kay, M.S. & Baldwin, R.L. Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 439–445 (1996).
Llinas, M., Gillespie, B., Dahlquist, F.W. & Marqusee, S. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 1072–1078 (1999).
Chamberlain, A.K., Handel, T.M. & Marqusee, S. Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 782–787 (1996).
Milne J.S., Xu Y., Mayne, L.C. & Englander S.W. J. Mol. Biol. 290, 811–822 (1999).
Bai, Y., Milne, J.S., Mayne, L. & Englander, S.W. Proteins 20, 4–14 (1994).
Silverman, S.K. & Cech, T.R. Biochemistry 38, 8691–8702 (1999).
Doherty, E.A. & Doudna, J.A. Biochemistry 36, 3159–3169 (1997).
Laggerbauer, B., Murphy, F.L. & Cech, T.R. EMBO J. 13, 2669–2676 (1994).
Rook, M.S., Treiber, D.K. & Williamson, J.R. J. Mol. Biol. 281, 609–620 (1998).
Doherty, E.A., Herschlag, D. & Doudna, J.A. Biochemistry 38, 2982–2990 (1999).
Szewczak, A.A., Podell, E.R., Bevilacqua, P.C. & Cech, T.R. Biochemistry 37, 11162–11170 (1998).
Cate, J.H. et al. Science 273, 1678–1685 (1996).
Golden, B.L., Gooding, A.R., Podell, E.R. & Cech, T.R. Science 282, 259–264 (1998).
Lehnert, V., Jaeger, L., Michel, F. & Westhof, E. Chem. Biol. 3, 993–1009 (1996).
Greene, R.F. & Pace, C.N. J. Biol. Chem. 249, 5388–5393 (1974).
Schellman, J.A. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 16, 115–137 (1987).
Santoro, M.M. & Bolen, D.W. Biochemistry 31, 4901–4907 (1992).
Tanford, C. Adv. Protein Chem. 24, 1–95 (1970).
Shelton, V.M., Sosnick, T.R. & Pan, T. Biochemistry, 38, 16831–16839 (1999).
Latham, J.A. & Cech, T.R. Science 245, 276–282 (1989).
Tullius, T. D., Dombroski, B. A., Churchill, M. E. & Kam, L. Methods Enzymol. 155, 537–558 (1987).
Dixon, W. J., et al. Methods Enzymol. 208, 380–413 (1991).
Sclavi, B., Sullivan, M., Chance, M.R., Brenowitz, M. & Woodson, S.A. Science 279, 1940–1943 (1998).
Downs, W.D. & Cech, T.R. Biochemistry 29, 5605–5613 (1990).
Myers, J.K., Pace, C.N. & Scholtz, J.M. Protein Sci. 4, 2138–2148 (1995).
Pan, T. & Sosnick, T.R. Nature Struct. Biol. 4, 931–938 (1997).
Weeks, K.M. & Cech, T.R. Science 271, 345–348 (1996).
Celander, D.W. & Cech, T.R. Science 251, 401–407 (1991).
Sclavi, B., Sullivan, M., Chance, M.R., Brenowitz, M. & Woodson, S.A. J. Mol. Biol. 266, 144–159 (1997).
Wu, M. & Tinoco, I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 11555–11560 (1998).
Pan, J., Thirumalai, D. & Woodson, S.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6149–6154 (1999).
Sadqi, M. et al. Biochemistry, 38, 8899–8906 (1999).
Latham, J.A., Zaug, A.J. & Cech, T.R. Methods Enzymol. 181, 558–569 (1990).
Zaug, A.J., Grosshans, C.A. & Cech, T.R. Biochemistry 27, 8924–8931 (1988).
Lingner, J. & Keller, W. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 2917–2920 (1993).
Emerick, V.L. & Woodson, S.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 9675–9679 (1994).
Ralston, C.Y. et.al. Methods Enzymol. 317, 353–368 (2000).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to S. Woodson for providing the DNA templates used for transcription of the Tetrahymena ribozyme and the P4-P6 subdomain of the ribozyme. We also thank M. Deras and J. Swisher for advice and help in the preparation and handling of RNA samples. This work was supported by grants from the NIH Institute for General Medical Sciences and the Biomedical Technology Program of the Division of Research Resources. The National Synchrotron Light Source at Brookhaven National Laboratory is supported by the Department of Energy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ralston, C., He, Q., Brenowitz, M. et al. Stability and cooperativity of individual tertiary contacts in RNA revealed through chemical denaturation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 7, 371–374 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/75139
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/75139