Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Surgery

Robotic prostatectomy proven to provide sexual outcome benefit

A recent prospective, randomized study comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostatectomy provides some of the best contemporary evidence of the superiority of the robotic procedure in terms of postoperative erectile function. A similarly high-quality comparison of robotic and open prostatectomy must now be warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Asimakopoulos, A. D. et al. Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J. Sex. Med. 8, 1503–1512 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowrance, W. T. et al. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J. Urol. 183, 1366–1372 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang, D. C., Hardee, M. F., Fesperman, S. F., Stoffs, T. L. & Dahm, P. Low quality evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature. Eur. Urol. 57, 930–937 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Herrell, S. D. & Smith, J. A. Jr . Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology 66 (5 Suppl.), 105–107 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tewari, A. K., Jhaveri, J. K., Surasi, K., Patel, N. & Tan, G. Y. Benefit of robotic assistance in comparing outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 4999–5000 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong, Y. M., Sutherland, D. E., Linder, B. & Engel, J. D. “Learning curve” may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol. 24, 473–477 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coelho, R. F. et al. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon's series of 2,500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying standardized grading system. Eur. Urol. 57, 945–952 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blumenthal, K. B., Sutherland, D. E., Wagner, K. R., Frazier, H. A. & Engel, J. D. Bladder neck contractures related to the use of Hem-o-lock clips in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 72, 158–161 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Engel, J. D., Sutherland, D. E., Williams, S. B., Wagner K. R. Changes in penile length after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol. 25, 65–69 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author has received grants/research support from Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Timm Medical Technologies and Vivus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engel, J. Robotic prostatectomy proven to provide sexual outcome benefit. Nat Rev Urol 8, 357–358 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.91

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.91

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing