Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

Kidney cancer in 2011

Objectifying risk for localized renal masses

Contemporary treatment guidelines for the localized renal mass are largely driven by expert opinion and retrospective observational data. Three articles published in 2011 add important information to the existing body of literature, enabling improved objectification of risk and individualization of clinical tradeoff decisions for patients presenting with localized renal tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Go, A. S., Chertow, G. M., Fan, D., McCulloch, C. E. & Hsu, C. Y. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 1296–1305 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, S. C. et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J. Urol. 182, 1271–1279 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Poppel, H. et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 59, 543–552 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simhan, J. et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. 60, 724–730 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dindo, D., Demartines, N. & Clavien, P. A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 240, 205–213 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kutikov, A. & Uzzo, R. G. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J. Urol. 182, 844–853 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollingsworth, J. M., Miller, D. C., Daignault, S. & Hollenbeck, B. K. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98, 1331–1334 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chawla, S. N. et al. The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J. Urol. 175, 425–431 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jewett, M. A. et al. Active surveillance of small renal masses: progression patterns of early stage kidney cancer. Eur. Urol. 60, 39–44 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smaldone, M. C. et al. Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Cancer http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26369.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Uzzo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smaldone, M., Uzzo, R. Objectifying risk for localized renal masses. Nat Rev Urol 9, 70–72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.195

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.195

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer