Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The social (media) side to rheumatology

This article has been updated

Abstract

A revolution is underway in the fields of education and health practice. Social media are now considered by the new generations of students, doctors and patients as a useful tool for learning and for doctor–doctor, doctor–patient and patient–patient communications. However, should we be excited by this revolution or afraid of it? Advantages and challenges of such new tools for medicine in general and rheumatology in particular are discussed in this Perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Personal view on the evolution of the flow of knowledge and health information reaching patients.

Change history

  • 21 March 2014

    In the version of this article initially published online, the article incorrectly stated that the first email was sent via the World Wide Web. The error has been corrected for the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Meltzer, T. & Phillips, S. From the first email to the first YouTube video: a definitive internet history. Guardian (London) 23 Oct 2000.

  2. Pew Research Center. Older adults and social media. The Pew Research Center [online], (2010).

  3. Van De Belt, T. H., Engelen, L. J., Berben, S. A. & Schoonhoven, L. Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 12, e18 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis III, C. H. F., Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C. & Conche, M. S. G. Social media in higher education: a literature review and research directions. Academia.edu [online], (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heiberger, G. H. & Harper, R. Have youfacebooked Astin lately? Using technology to increase student involvement. New Directions for Student Services 124, 19–35 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Junco, R., Heiberger, G. & Loken, E. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. J. Comput. Assist. Learning 27, 119–132 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waldrop, M. M. Education online: the virtual lab. Nature 499, 268–270 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parr, C. Moocs: smaller universities fear missing out. Times Higher Education [online], (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheston, C. C., Flickinger, T. E. & Chisolm, M. S. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Academic Medicine 88, 893–901 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cartledge, P., Miller, M. & Phillips, B. The use of social-networking sites in medical education. Med. Teach 35, 847–857 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bodenheimer, T., Lorig, K., Holman, H. & Grumbach, K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 288, 2469–2475 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koehn, C. L. & Esdaile, J. M. Patient education and self-management of musculoskeletal diseases. Best Pract. Res Clin. Rheumatol. 22, 395–405 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ackerman, I. N., Buchbinder, R. & Osborne, R. H. Factors limiting participation in arthritis self-management programmes: an exploration of barriers and patient preferences within a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology 52, 472–479 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brand, C. A., Ackerman, I. N., Bohensky, M. A. & Bennell, K. L. Chronic disease management: a review of current performance across quality of care domains and opportunities for improving osteoarthritis care. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 39, 123–143 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorig, K. R., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D. D. & Plant, K. The internet-based arthritis self-management program: a one-year randomized trial for patients with arthritis or fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 59, 1009–1017 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruehlman, L. S., Karoly, P. & Enders, C. A randomized controlled evaluation of an online chronic pain self management program. Pain 153, 319–30 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinberg, D. M., Levine, E. L., Askew, S., Foley, P. & Bennett, G. G. Daily text messaging for weight control among racial and ethnic minority women: randomized controlled pilot study. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e244 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Merolli, M., Gray, K. & Martin-Sanchez, F. Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: A literature review and analysis of affordances. J. Biomed. Inform. 46, 957–969 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eysenbach, G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J. Med. Internet Res. 10, e22 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Puolakka, K., Sokka, T. & Kautiainen, H. Cell phone based automated monitoring of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum. 64 (Suppl. 10), 375 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, A. T., Sandhu, N. P., Wittich, C. M., Mandrekar, J. N. & Beckman, T. J. Using social media to improve continuing medical education: a survey of course participants. Mayo Clin. Proc. 87, 1162–1170 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez-Perez, B., de la Torre-Diez, I. & Lopez-Coronado, M. Mobile health applications for the most prevalent conditions by the World Health Organization: review and analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e120 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Frangou, C. Twitter for Gastros. Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News [online], (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bernstein, J., Ahn, J. & Veillette, C. The future of orthopaedic information management. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 94, e95 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Google+. Rheumatology World [online], (2014).

  26. M. Laccheo and SBL Productions. The Rheumatology Podcast [online], (2014).

  27. Mansfield, S. J. et al. Social networking and health. Lancet 377, 2083 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anikeeva, O. & Bywood, P. Social media in primary health care: Opportunities to enhance education, communication and collaboration among professionals in rural and remote locations. Aust. J. Rural Health 21, 132–134 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Radiological Society of North America. RSNA 2013 virtual meeting. Radiological Society of North America [online], (2013).

  30. Kata, A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm—an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine 30, 3778–3789 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bosslet, G. T. Commentary: the good, the bad, and the ugly of social media. Acad. Emerg. Med. 18, 1221–1222 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chretien, K. C. & Kind, T. Social media and clinical care: ethical, professional, and social implications. Circulation 127, 1413–1421 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Farnan, J. M. et al. Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards. Ann. Intern. Med. 158, 620–627 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ryan, M. Guiding principles for physician use of social media. Mayo Clinic [online], (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Visser, B. J., Huiskes, F. & Korevaar, D. A. A social media self-evaluation checklist for medical practitioners. Indian J. Med. Ethics 9, 245–248 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. The New England Journal of Medicine. Social media and physicians. The New England Journal of Medicine [online], (2011).

  37. Battafarano, D. F. The role of social media in the rheumatology practice. The Rheumatologist [online], (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Prasad, B. Social media, health care, and social networking. Gastrointest. Endosc. 77, 492–495 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. PatientsLikeMe. Patientslikeme [online], (2014).

  40. US D National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov[online], (2014).

  41. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. PatientsLikeMe selects first pilot users for open research exchange. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [online] (2013).

  42. Google. Google.org Flu Trends [online], (2014).

  43. Eysenbach, G. Infodemiology: The epidemiology of (mis)information. Am. J. Med. 113, 763–765 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schmidt, C. W. Trending now: using social media to predict and track disease outbreaks. Environ. Health Perspect. 120, A30–A33 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chew, C. & Eysenbach, G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE 5, e14118 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Scanfeld, D., Scanfeld, V. & Larson, E. L. Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics. Am. J. Infect. Control 38, 182–188 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Khan, A. S., Fleischauer, A., Casani, J. & Groseclose, S. L. The next public health revolution: public health information fusion and social networks. Am. J. Public Health 100, 1237–1242 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Lariviere, V. & Sugimoto, C. R. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE 8, e64841 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. Generation M2—media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation [online], (2010).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Berenbaum.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Example of users of Twitter interested in rheumatology* (DOCX 26 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berenbaum, F. The social (media) side to rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 10, 314–318 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.20

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing