Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Arachnodactyly—a key to diagnosing heritable disorders of connective tissue


Arachnodactyly literally means spidery fingers, and describes the long, slender fingers typical of patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Many clinicians regard arachnodactyly as pathognomonic of MFS; however, this view is misleading as arachnodactyly is a key element of the marfanoid habitus, which is present in several heritable disorders of connective tissue (HDCTs). Other features of the marfanoid habitus include long hands and feet, increased skin stretch, joint hypermobility and characteristic changes in the physiology of the pectum. Here, we focus on the differential diagnosis of diseases with features of the marfanoid habitus. Ectopia lentis (lens dislocation) and aortic root dilation or dissection are cardinal features of MFS. Distinguishing MFS from other HCDTs has important implications for treatment, as cardiovascular and ocular complications commonly seen in patients with MFS are not seen in all HDCTs. Joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers–Danlos syndrome are also HDCTs, neither of which is associated with ectopia lentis or aortic changes. Some of the rarer forms of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome are associated with severe vascular, dental and skin pathologies. This Review serves as a guide for correctly diagnosing members of the HDCT family.

Key Points

  • Arachnodactyly is a key feature of the marfanoid habitus and thus a reliable pointer to the presence of a heritable disorder of connective tissue (HDCT)

  • Joint hypermobility syndrome is the most commonly seen HDCT

  • The differential diagnosis of arachnodactyly is wide and extends to include many rare genetic syndromes

  • Incomplete forms of the marfanoid habitus are highly prevalent and can be benign, but should lead to an assessment for the presence of an HDCT

  • Neither arachnodactyly nor the marfanoid habitus on its own can be regarded as pathognomonic of Marfan syndrome in the absence of either cardiac or ocular involvement

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Arachnodactyly.
Figure 2: Selected features of the marfanoid habitus.
Figure 3: Increased skin stretch in a patient with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome during phase of taking up slack.
Figure 4: Decision tree for diagnosing patients with heritable disorders of connective tissue.


  1. Steinberg, I. A simple screening test for the Marfan syndrome. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 97, 118–124 (1966).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker, B. A. & Murdoch, J. L. The wrist sign. A useful physical finding in the Marfan syndrome. Arch. Intern. Med. 126, 276–277 (1970).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eldridge, R. The metacarpal index. A useful aid in the diagnosis of the Marfan syndrome. Arch. Intern. Med. 113, 248–254 (1964).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McKusick, V. A. The Marfan Syndrome. Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue, 4th edn 61–223 (C. V. Mosby, St Louis, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beighton, P. H., Solomon, L. & Soskolne, C. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 32, 413–417 (1973).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. The Harpenden skinfold caliper. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 13, 743–746 (1955).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grahame, R. & Beighton, P. Physical properties of the skin in the Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 28, 246–251 (1969).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farmer, A. D., Douthwaite, M. A., Gardiner, S., Aziz, Q. & Grahame, R. A novel in vivo skin extensibility test for joint hypermobility. J. Rheumatol. 37, 1513–1518 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loeys, B. L. et al. The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 47, 476–485 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beighton, P., De Paepe, A., Steinmann, B., Tsipouras, P. & Wenstrup, R. J. Ehlers–Danlos syndromes: revised nosology, Villefranche, 1997. Ehlers–Danlos National Foundation (USA) and Ehlers–Danlos Support Group (UK). Am. J. Med. Genet. 77, 31–37 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grahame, R., Bird, H. A. & Child, A. The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS). J. Rheumatol. 27, 1777–1779 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beighton, P., Grahame, R. & Bird, H. A. Hypermobility of Joints, 4th edn (Springer, London, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Paepe, A., Devereux, R. B., Dietz, H. C., Hennekam, R. C. & Pyeritz, R. E. Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 62, 417–426 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tinkle, B. T. et al. The lack of clinical distinction between the hypermobility type of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome and the joint hypermobility syndrome (a.k.a. hypermobility syndrome). Am. J. Med. Genet. A 149A, 2368–2370 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross, J. & Grahame, R. Joint hypermobility syndrome. BMJ 342, c7167 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hakim, A. J. & Grahame, R. Non-musculoskeletal symptoms in joint hypermobility syndrome: indirect evidence for autonomic dysfunction. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43, 1194–1195 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zarate-Lopez, N. et al. Unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms and joint hypermobility: is connective tissue the missing link? Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 22, 252–262 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bulbena, A. et al. Anxiety disorders in the joint hypermobility syndrome. Psychiatry Res. 46, 59–68 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malfait, F., Hakim, A. J., De Paepe, A. & Grahame, R. The genetics of joint hypermobility syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45, 502–507 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Homocystinuria due to cystathionine β-synthase deficiency. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [online], (2012).

  21. Familial ectopia lentis. National Marfan Foundation [online], (2012).

  22. Loeys, B. L. et al. Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-β receptor. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 788–789 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Hemelrijk, C. Renard, M. & Loeys, B. The Loeys–Dietz syndrome: an update for the clinician. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 25, 546–551 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Loeys, B. L. & Dietz, H. C. Loeys–Dietz syndrome. In: GeneReviews (eds Pagon, R. A. et al.) [online], (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. MASS phenotype. National Marfan Foundation [online], (2012).

  26. Glesby, M. J. & Pyeritz, R. E. Association of mitral valve prolapse and systemic abnormalities of connective tissue. A phenotypic continuum. JAMA 262, 523–528 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Familial mitral valve prolapse. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [online], (2012).

  28. Greally, M. T. et al. Shprintzen–Goldberg syndrome: a clinical analysis. Am. J. Med. Genet. 76, 202–12 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van den Ende–Gupta syndrome. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [online], (2012).

  30. Putnam, E. A., Zhang, H., Ramirez, F. & Milewicz, D. M. Fibrillin-2 (FBN2) mutations result in the Marfan-like disorder, congenital contractural arachnodactyly. Nat. Genet. 11, 456–458 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Callewaert, B. L. et al. Comprehensive clinical and molecular assessment of 32 probands with congenital contractural arachnodactyly: report of 14 novel mutations and review of the literature. Hum. Mutat. 30, 334–341 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Buggenhout, G. & Fryns, J. P. Lujan–Fryns syndrome (mental retardation, X-linked, marfanoid habitus). Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 1, 26 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rose, P. S. et al. Stickler syndrome: clinical characteristics and diagnostic criteria. Am. J. Med. Gen. A 138, 199–207 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stickler, G. B., Hughes, W. & Houchin, P. Clinical features of hereditary arthro-ophthalmopathy (Stickler syndrome): a survey. Genet. Med. 3, 192–196 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank their patients whose photographs have been used in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



R. Grahame and A. J. Hakim made substantial contributions to discussions of content and review/editing of the manuscript before submission, and R. Grahame researched data for the article and wrote the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodney Grahame.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1

Identifying some of the features of the marfanoid habitus. (PDF 6949 kb)

Supplementary Box 1

The nine-point Beighton hypermobility scoreS1 (DOC 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grahame, R., Hakim, A. Arachnodactyly—a key to diagnosing heritable disorders of connective tissue. Nat Rev Rheumatol 9, 358–364 (2013).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing