The treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and of end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) has a high societal cost
Insufficient efforts are being made to promote the use of cost-effective renal replacement therapies (RRT), such as transplantation and home dialysis (including peritoneal dialysis)
In CKD and in many other chronic diseases, the time has come to decrease investment in curative approaches and to focus on prevention
The relative costs and benefits of each approach should be carefully analysed before a preventive or curative method is favoured
A need exists for more health-economic studies of primary and secondary prevention in CKD to be conducted, and for the quality of such research to be improved
The treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) imposes substantial societal costs. Expenditure is highest for renal replacement therapy (RRT), especially in-hospital haemodialysis. Redirection towards less expensive forms of RRT (peritoneal dialysis, home haemodialysis) or kidney transplantation should decrease financial pressure. However, costs for CKD are not limited to RRT, but also include nonrenal health-care costs, costs not related to health care, and costs for patients with CKD who are not yet receiving RRT. Even if patients with CKD or ESRD could be given the least expensive therapies, costs would decrease only marginally. We therefore propose a consistent and sustainable approach focusing on prevention. Before a preventive strategy is favoured, however, authorities should carefully analyse the cost to benefit ratio of each strategy. Primary prevention of CKD is more important than secondary prevention, as many other related chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, liver disease, cancer, and pulmonary disorders could also be prevented. Primary prevention largely consists of lifestyle changes that will reduce global societal costs and, more importantly, result in a healthy, active, and long-lived population. Nephrologists need to collaborate closely with other sectors and governments, to reach these aims.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $17.42 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Klarenbach, S. W., Tonelli, M., Chui, B. & Manns, B. J. Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 10, 644–652 (2014).
Wang, V., Vilme, H., Maciejewski, M. L. & Boulware, L. E. The economic burden of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Semin. Nephrol. 36, 319–330 (2016).
Collins, A. J., Foley, R. N., Gilbertson, D. T. & Chen, S. C. United States Renal Data System public health surveillance of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. Suppl. 5, 2–7 (2015).
Pippias, M. et al. The changing trends and outcomes in renal replacement therapy: data from the ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 31, 831–841 (2016).
Kerr, M., Bray, B., Medcalf, J., O'Donoghue, D. J. & Matthews, B. Estimating the financial cost of chronic kidney disease to the NHS in England. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27 (Suppl. 3), iii73–iii80 (2012).
Carney, E. F. Epidemiology: Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 reports that disability caused by CKD is increasing worldwide. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 11, 446 (2015).
Correa-Rotter, R., Wesseling, C. & Johnson, R. J. CKD of unknown origin in Central America: the case for a Mesoamerican nephropathy. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 63, 506–520 (2014).
European Kidney Health Alliance. Recommendations for sustainable kidney care. http://ekha.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/EKHA-Recs-for-Sustainable-Kidney-Care-25.08.2015.pdf (2015).
Ortiz, A. et al. Epidemiology, contributors to, and clinical trials of mortality risk in chronic kidney failure. Lancet 383, 1831–1843 (2014).
Vanholder, R. et al. Clinical management of the uraemic syndrome in chronic kidney disease. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 4, 360–373 (2016).
Wyld, M. L. et al. Cost to government and society of chronic kidney disease stage 1-5: a national cohort study. Intern. Med. J. 45, 741–747 (2015).
Dormont, B., Grignon, M. & Huber, H. Health expenditure growth: reassessing the threat of ageing. Health Econ. 15, 947–963 (2006).
Hill, N. R. et al. Global prevalence of chronic kidney disease — a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0158765 (2016).
O'Callaghan, C. A., Shine, B. & Lasserson, D. S. Chronic kidney disease: a large-scale population-based study of the effects of introducing the CKD-EPI formula for eGFR reporting. BMJ Open 1, e000308 (2011).
Kramer, A. et al. Renal replacement therapy in Europe: a summary of the 2013 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report with a focus on diabetes mellitus. Clin. Kidney J. 9, 457–469 (2016).
Hirth, R. A. The organization and financing of kidney dialysis and transplant care in the United States of America. Int. J. Health Care Finance Econ. 7, 301–318 (2007).
Manns, B. J., Mendelssohn, D. C. & Taub, K. J. The economics of end-stage renal disease care in Canada: incentives and impact on delivery of care. Int. J. Health Care Finance Econ. 7, 149–169 (2007).
Tomson, C. R. Recent advances: nephrology. BMJ 320, 98–101 (2000).
Jha, V. et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet 382, 260–272 (2013).
Vanholder, R., Van Biesen, W. & Lameire, N. Renal replacement therapy: how can we contain the costs? Lancet 383, 1783–1785 (2014).
Vanholder, R., Lameire, N., Annemans, L. & Van Biesen, W. Cost of renal replacement: how to helpas many as possible while keeping expenses reasonable? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 31, 251–1261 (2016).
United States Renal Data System. US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report. Chapter 13: international comparisons. https://www.usrds.org/2016/view/v2_13.aspx (2016)
Heckman, J. J. The developmental origins of health. Health Econ. 21, 24–29 (2012).
Grossman, M. Concept of health capital and demand for health. J. Polit. Econ. 80, 223–225 (1972).
Hennessy, D. A. et al. The Population Health Model (POHEM): an overview of rationale, methods and applications. Popul. Health Metr. 13, 24 (2015).
Flanagan, W. M. et al. Potential impact of population-based colorectal cancer screening in Canada. Chronic Dis. Can. 24, 81–88 (2003).
Turin, T. C. et al. Chronic kidney disease and life expectancy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27, 3182–3186 (2012).
Shinzawa, M. et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy, household smoking after the child's birth, and childhood proteinuria at age 3 years. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 12, 253–260 (2017).
Haller, M., Gutjahr, G., Kramar, R., Harnoncourt, F. & Oberbauer, R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of renal replacement therapy in Austria. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 2988–2995 (2011).
Wong, G. et al. Comparative survival and economic benefits of deceased donor kidney transplantation and dialysis in people with varying ages and co-morbidities. PLoS ONE 7, e29591 (2012).
Laupacis, A. et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 50, 235–242 (1996).
Tonelli, M. et al. Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes. Am. J. Transplant. 11, 2093–2109 (2011).
Schold, J. D. & Segev, D. L. Increasing the pool of deceased donor organs for kidney transplantation. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 8, 325–331 (2012).
Friedman, A. L. & Friedman, E. A. A step toward solving the long-term care dilemma for living kidney donors. Transplantation 94, 988–989 (2012).
Van Biesen, W., van der Veer, S. N., Murphey, M., Loblova, O. & Davies, S. Patients' perceptions of information and education for renal replacement therapy: an independent survey by the European Kidney Patients' Federation on information and support on renal replacement therapy. PLoS ONE 9, e103914 (2014).
International Summit on Transplant Tourism and Organ Trafficking. The Declaration of Istanbul on organ trafficking and transplant tourism. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3, 1227–1231 (2008).
Shepherd, L., O'Carroll, R. E. & Ferguson, E. An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study. BMC Med. 12, 131 (2014).
Howard, K. et al. Preferences for policy options for deceased organ donation for transplantation: a discrete choice experiment. Transplantation 100, 1136–1148 (2016).
Abadie, A. & Gay, S. The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: a cross-country study. J. Health Econ. 25, 599–620 (2006).
SwissInfo. Government rejects presumed consent. http://www.swissinfo.ch/directdemocracy/organ-transplants_government-rejects-presumed-consent/35180768 (2013).
Dutch News. Dutch MPs vote for 'yes unless' organ donor register. http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2016/09/dutch-mps-vote-for-yes-unless-organ-donation-register/ (2016).
Ministry of Health Singapore. Increasing Singapore's organ transplant rate. https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/pressRoom/Parliamentary_QA/2016/increasing-singapore-s-organ-transplant-rate.html (2016).
Zivcic-Cosic, S. et al. Development of the Croatian model of organ donation and transplantation. Croat. Med. J. 54, 65–70 (2013).
Metzger, R. A. et al. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 3 (Suppl. 4), 114–125 (2003).
Abramowicz, D. et al. Does pre-emptive transplantation versus post start of dialysis transplantation with a kidney from a living donor improve outcomes after transplantation? A systematic literature review and position statement by the Descartes Working Group and ERBP. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 31, 691–697 (2016).
Horvat, L. D. et al. Global trends in the rates of living kidney donation. Kidney Int. 75, 1088–1098 (2009).
Haller, M. C., Kainz, A., Baer, H. & Oberbauer, R. Dialysis vintage and outcomes after kidney transplantation: a retrospective cohort study. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 12, 122–130 (2016).
Mandelbrot, D. A. & Pavlakis, M. Living donor practices in the United States. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 19, 212–219 (2012).
Vanholder, R. et al. Reimbursement of dialysis: a comparison of seven countries. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 1291–1298 (2012).
Medicare. Dialysis information for people with end-stage renal disease. https://www.medicare.gov/people-like-me/esrd/dialysis-information.html (2017)
Ludlow, M. J., Lauder, L. A., Mathew, T. H., Hawley, C. M. & Fortnum, D. Australian consumer perspectives on dialysis: first national census. Nephrology (Carlton) 17, 703–709 (2012).
Golper, T. A. The possible impact of the US prospective payment system (“bundle”) on the growth of peritoneal dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 33, 596–599 (2013).
Van Biesen, W., Lameire, N., Peeters, P. & Vanholder, R. Belgium's mixed private/public health care system and its impact on the cost of end-stage renal disease. Int. J. Health Care Finance Econ. 7, 133–148 (2007).
van de Luijtgaarden, M. W. et al. Global differences in dialysis modality mix: the role of patient characteristics, macroeconomics and renal service indicators. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 28, 1264–1275 (2013).
Karopadi, A. N., Mason, G., Rettore, E. & Ronco, C. Cost of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis across the world. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 28, 2553–2569 (2013).
Swanepoel, C. R., Wearne, N. & Okpechi, I. G. Nephrology in Africa — not yet uhuru. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 9, 610–622 (2013).
Walker, R. C. et al. The economic considerations of patients and caregivers in choice of dialysis modality. Hemodial. Int. 20, 634–642 (2016).
Chow, K. M. & Li, P. K. Dialysis: Choice of dialysis — what to do with economic incentives. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 8, 495–496 (2012).
Kleophas, W. & Reichel, H. International study of health care organization and financing: development of renal replacement therapy in Germany. Int. J. Health Care Finance Econ. 7, 185–200 (2007).
Mendelssohn, D. C., Langlois, N. & Blake, P. G. Peritoneal dialysis in Ontario: a natural experiment in physician reimbursement methodology. Perit. Dial. Int. 24, 531–537 (2004).
Tantivess, S., Werayingyong, P., Chuengsaman, P. & Teerawattananon, Y. Universal coverage of renal dialysis in Thailand: promise, progress, and prospects. BMJ 346, f462 (2013).
van de Luijtgaarden, M. W. et al. Effects of comorbid and demographic factors on dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in Europe. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 2940–2947 (2011).
Chazot, C. et al. Pro and con arguments in using alternative dialysis regimens in the frail and elderly patients. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 47, 1809–1816 (2015).
Oliver, M. J. Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 71, 673–678 (2007).
Brown, E. A. & Wilkie, M. Assisted peritoneal dialysis as an alternative to in-center hemodialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 1522–1524 (2016).
Iyasere, O. U. et al. Quality of life and physical function in older patients on dialysis: a comparison of assisted peritoneal dialysis with hemodialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 423–430 (2016).
Bechade, C., Lobbedez, T., Ivarsen, P. & Povlsen, J. V. Assisted peritoneal dialysis for older people with end-stage renal disease: the French and Danish experience. Perit. Dial. Int. 35, 663–666 (2015).
Farrington, K. et al. Clinical practice guideline on management of older patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b or higher (eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2). Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 31 (Suppl. 2), ii1–ii66 (2016).
Huisman, R. M. The deadly risk of late referral. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 19, 2175–2180 (2004).
Levin, A. Consequences of late referral on patient outcomes. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 15 (Suppl. 3), 8–13 (2000).
Blunt, I., Bardsley, M. & Strippoli, G. F. Pre-dialysis hospital use and late referrals in incident dialysis patients in England: a retrospective cohort study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 30, 124–129 (2015).
Wauters, J. P., Lameire, N., Davison, A. & Ritz, E. Why patients with progressing kidney disease are referred late to the nephrologist: on causes and proposals for improvement. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 20, 490–496 (2005).
Spillman, B. C. & Lubitz, J. The effect of longevity on spending for acute and long-term care. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1409–1415 (2000).
Wiener, J. M. & Tilly, J. Population ageing in the United States of America: implications for public programmes. Int. J. Epidemiol. 31, 776–781 (2002).
Drey, N., Roderick, P., Mullee, M. & Rogerson, M. A population-based study of the incidence and outcomes of diagnosed chronic kidney disease. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 42, 677–684 (2003).
Canaud, B. et al. Clinical practices and outcomes in elderly hemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6, 1651–1662 (2011).
Ellwood, A. D. et al. Early dialysis initiation and rates and timing of withdrawal from dialysis in Canada. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 8, 265–270 (2013).
Carson, R. C., Juszczak, M., Davenport, A. & Burns, A. Is maximum conservative management an equivalent treatment option to dialysis for elderly patients with significant comorbid disease? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 1611–1619 (2009).
Jassal, S. V. & Watson, D. Dialysis in late life: benefit or burden. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 2008–2012 (2009).
Johansen, K. L., Chertow, G. M., Jin, C. & Kutner, N. G. Significance of frailty among dialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 2960–2967 (2007).
Kurella Tamura, M. et al. Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1539–1547 (2009).
Chandna, S. M. et al. Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 1608–1614 (2011).
Wong, S. P. et al. Decisions about renal replacement therapy in patients with advanced kidney disease in the US Department of Veterans Affairs, 2000–2011. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 1825–1833 (2016).
Morton, R. L. et al. Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care to treat end-stage kidney disease. CMAJ 184, E277–E283 (2012).
Murtagh, F. E., Burns, A., Moranne, O., Morton, R. L. & Naicker, S. Supportive care: comprehensive conservative care in end-stage kidney disease. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 1909–1914 (2016).
Muthalagappan, S., Johansson, L., Kong, W. M. & Brown, E. A. Dialysis or conservative care for frail older patients: ethics of shared decision-making. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 28, 2717–2722 (2013).
Cooper, B. A. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 609–619 (2010).
Tattersall, J. et al. When to start dialysis: updated guidance following publication of the Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL) study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 2082–2086 (2011).
Lameire, N. & Van Biesen, W. The initiation of renal-replacement therapy — just-in-time delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 678–680 (2010).
Harris, A. et al.: Cost-effectiveness of initiating dialysis early: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 57, 707–715 (2011).
Manns, B. J. & Quinn, R. R. Early dialysis of no benefit to the patient or the health care system. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 57, 649–650 (2011).
Bello, A. K. et al. Effective CKD care in European countries: challenges and opportunities for health policy. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 65, 15–25 (2015).
Satcher, D. The prevention challenge and opportunity. Health Aff. (Millwood) 25, 1009–1011 (2006).
Woolf, S. H. A closer look at the economic argument for disease prevention. JAMA 301, 536–538 (2009).
Maciosek, M. V. et al. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: methods. Am. J. Prev. Med. 31, 90–96 (2006).
Vandevijvere, S., Annemans, L., Van Oyen, H., Tafforeau, J. & Moreno-Reyes, R. Projected reduction in healthcare costs in Belgium after optimization of iodine intake: impact on costs related to thyroid nodular disease. Thyroid 20, 1301–1306 (2010).
Meier, T. et al. Healthcare costs associated with an adequate intake of sugars, salt and saturated fat in Germany: a health econometrical analysis. PLoS ONE 10, e0135990 (2015).
Smith-Spangler, C. M., Juusola, J. L., Enns, E. A., Owens, D. K. & Garber, A. M. Population strategies to decrease sodium intake and the burden of cardiovascular disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 152, 481–487 (2010).
Selmer, R. M. et al. Cost and health consequences of reducing the population intake of salt. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 54, 697–702 (2000).
Brouwer, W. B., Niessen, L. W., Postma, M. J. & Rutten, F. F. Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ 331, 446–448 (2005).
Parouty, M. B., Le, H. H., Krooshof, D. & Postma, M. J. Differential time preferences for money and quality of life. Pharmacoeconomics 32, 411–419 (2014).
Bonneux, L., Barendregt, J. J., Nusselder, W. J. & der Maas, P. J. Preventing fatal diseases increases healthcare costs: cause elimination life table approach. BMJ 316, 26–29 (1998).
Divajeva, D. et al. Economics of chronic diseases protocol: cost-effectiveness modelling and the future burden of non-communicable disease in Europe. BMC Public Health 14, 456 (2014).
Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases Collaboration. Cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mortality burden of cardiometabolic risk factors from 1980 to 2010: a comparative risk assessment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2, 634–647 (2014).
Gerovasili, V., Agaku, I. T., Vardavas, C. I. & Filippidis, F. T. Levels of physical activity among adults 18–64 years old in 28 European countries. Prev. Med. 81, 87–91 (2015).
de Vroome, E. M. et al. Burden of sickness absence due to chronic disease in the Dutch workforce from 2007 to 2011. J. Occup. Rehabil. 25, 675–684 (2015).
Danaei, G. et al. The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med. 6, e1000058 (2009).
Lim, S. S. et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380, 2224–2260 (2012).
Strong, K., Mathers, C., Leeder, S. & Beaglehole, R. Preventing chronic diseases: how many lives can we save? Lancet 366, 1578–1582 (2005).
Asaria, P., Chisholm, D., Mathers, C., Ezzati, M. & Beaglehole, R. Chronic disease prevention: health effects and financial costs of strategies to reduce salt intake and control tobacco use. Lancet 370, 2044–2053 (2007).
Parrott, S. & Godfrey, C. Economics of smoking cessation. BMJ 328, 947–949 (2004).
Ejerblad, E. et al. Association between smoking and chronic renal failure in a nationwide population-based case-control study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15, 2178–2185 (2004).
Yacoub, R. et al. Association between smoking and chronic kidney disease: a case control study. BMC Public Health 10, 731 (2010).
Orth, S. R. et al. Smoking as a risk factor for end-stage renal failure in men with primary renal disease. Kidney Int. 54, 926–931 (1998).
Lu, J. L. et al. Association of age and BMI with kidney function and mortality: a cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 3, 704–714 (2015).
Dunkler, D. et al. Population-attributable fractions of modifiable lifestyle factors for CKD and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 68, 29–40 (2016).
McCullough, M. L. et al. Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, 1261–1271 (2002).
Dunkler, D. et al. Modifiable lifestyle and social factors affect chronic kidney disease in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int. 87, 784–791 (2015).
Soderland, P., Lovekar, S., Weiner, D. E., Brooks, D. R. & Kaufman, J. S. Chronic kidney disease associated with environmental toxins and exposures. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 17, 254–264 (2010).
Lubitz, J., Cai, L., Kramarow, E. & Lentzner, H. Health, life expectancy, and health care spending among the elderly. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 1048–1055 (2003).
Glass, T. A., de Leon, C. M., Marottoli, R. A. & Berkman, L. F. Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans. BMJ 319, 478–483 (1999).
Scitovsky, A. A. “The high cost of dying”: what do the data show? 1984. Milbank Q. 83, 825–841 (2005).
Zweifel, P., Felder, S. & Meiers, M. Ageing of population and health care expenditure: a red herring? Health Econ. 8, 485–496 (1999).
Mozaffarian, D. et al. Global sodium consumption and death from cardiovascular causes. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 624–634 (2014).
He, J. et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion and CKD progression. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 1202–1212 (2016).
Humalda, J. K. & Navis, G. Dietary sodium restriction: a neglected therapeutic opportunity in chronic kidney disease. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 23, 533–540 (2014).
Thomas, M. C. et al. The association between dietary sodium intake, ESRD, and all-cause mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 34, 861–866 (2011).
Liu, N. et al. Association between sodium intakes with the risk of chronic kidney disease: evidence from a meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8, 20939–20945 (2015).
Vegter, S. et al. Sodium intake, ACE inhibition, and progression to ESRD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 165–173 (2012).
Chrysant, G. S., Bakir, S. & Oparil, S. Dietary salt reduction in hypertension — what is the evidence and why is it still controversial? Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 42, 23–38 (1999).
Mente, A. et al. Associations of urinary sodium excretion with cardiovascular events in individuals with and without hypertension: a pooled analysis of data from four studies. Lancet 388, 465–475 (2016).
O'Donnell, M. et al. Dietary sodium and cardiovascular disease risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2404–2408 (2016).
Cogswell, M. E., Mugavero, K., Bowman, B. A. & Frieden, T. R. Dietary sodium and cardiovascular disease risk — measurement matters. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 580–586 (2016).
Joffres, M. R., Campbell, N. R., Manns, B. & Tu, K. Estimate of the benefits of a population-based reduction in dietary sodium additives on hypertension and its related health care costs in Canada. Can. J. Cardiol. 23, 437–443 (2007).
European Commission. Survey on Members' States implementation of the EU salt reduction framework. http://ec.europa.eu/health/nutrition_physical_activity/docs/salt_report1_en.pdf.
Garrett, S. et al. Are physical activity interventions in primary care and the community cost-effective? A systematic review of the evidence. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 61, e125–e133 (2011).
Isaacs, A. J. et al. Exercise Evaluation Randomised Trial (EXERT): a randomised trial comparing GP referral for leisure centre-based exercise, community-based walking and advice only. Health Technol. Assess. 11, 1–165 (2007).
Anis, A. H. et al. Obesity and overweight in Canada: an updated cost-of-illness study. Obes. Rev. 11, 31–40 (2010).
Schmid, A., Schneider, H., Golay, A. & Keller, U. Economic burden of obesity and its comorbidities in Switzerland. Soz. Praventivmed. 50, 87–94 (2005).
Verhaeghe, N., De Greve, O. & Annemans, L. The potential health and economic effect of a body mass index decrease in the overweight and obese population in Belgium. Public Health 134, 26–33 (2016).
Neubauer, S. et al. Mortality, morbidity and costs attributable to smoking in Germany: update and a 10-year comparison. Tob. Control 15, 464–471 (2006).
Cohen, D., Alam, M. F. & Jarvis, P. S. An analysis of the economic impact of smoking cessation in Europe. BMC Public Health 13, 390 (2013).
van Baal, P. H. et al. Lifetime medical costs of obesity: prevention no cure for increasing health expenditure. PLoS Med. 5, e29 (2008).
Vanholder, R. et al. Chronic kidney disease as cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 20, 1048–1056 (2005).
Matsushita, K. et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria for prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 3, 514–525 (2015).
Matsushita, K. et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet 375, 2073–2081 (2010).
Pignone, M., Earnshaw, S., Tice, J. A. & Pletcher, M. J. Aspirin, statins, or both drugs for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease events in men: a cost-utility analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 144, 326–336 (2006).
Smith, D. H., Gullion, C. M., Nichols, G., Keith, D. S. & Brown, J. B. Cost of medical care for chronic kidney disease and comorbidity among enrollees in a large HMO population. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15, 1300–1306 (2004).
Parving, H. H. et al. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 870–878 (2001).
Palmer, A. J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of early irbesartan treatment versus control (standard antihypertensive medications excluding ACE inhibitors, other angiotensin-2 receptor antagonists, and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) or late irbesartan treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and renal disease. Diabetes Care 27, 1897–1903 (2004).
Adarkwah, C. C., Gandjour, A., Akkerman, M. & Evers, S. To treat or not to treat? Cost-effectiveness of ace inhibitors in non-diabetic advanced renal disease — a Dutch perspective. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 37, 168–180 (2013).
Hogan, T. J., Elliott, W. J., Seto, A. H. & Bakris, G. L. Antihypertensive treatment with and without benazepril in patients with chronic renal insufficiency: a US economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 20, 37–47 (2002).
Asselbergs, F. W. et al. Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria. Circulation 110, 2809–2816 (2004).
Hillege, H. L. et al. Urinary albumin excretion predicts cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in general population. Circulation 106, 1777–1782 (2002).
Atthobari, J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening for albuminuria with subsequent fosinopril treatment to prevent cardiovascular events: a pharmacoeconomic analysis linked to the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study and the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease intervention trial (PREVEND IT). Clin. Ther. 28, 432–444 (2006).
Komenda, P. et al. Cost-effectiveness of primary screening for CKD: a systematic review. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 63, 789–797 (2014).
Manns, B. et al. Population based screening for chronic kidney disease: cost effectiveness study. BMJ 341, c5869 (2010).
Boulware, L. E., Jaar, B. G., Tarver-Carr, M. E., Brancati, F. L. & Powe, N. R. Screening for proteinuria in US adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA 290, 3101–3114 (2003).
Boersma, C. et al. Screen-and-treat strategies for albuminuria to prevent cardiovascular and renal disease: cost-effectiveness of nationwide and targeted interventions based on analysis of cohort data from the Netherlands. Clin. Ther. 32, 1103–1121 (2010).
Boersma, C. et al. Baseline albuminuria predicts the efficacy of blood pressure-lowering drugs in preventing cardiovascular events. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 65, 723–732 (2008).
Sharma, P. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for adults with early (stage 1 to 3) non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10, CD007751 (2011).
O'Hare, A. M. The management of older adults with a low eGFR: moving toward an individualized approach. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 53, 925–927 (2009).
Akizawa, T. et al. Effect of a carbonaceous oral adsorbent on the progression of CKD: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 54, 459–467 (2009).
Hayashino, Y. et al. Cost-effectiveness of administering oral adsorbent AST-120 to patients with diabetes and advance-stage chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 90, 154–159 (2010).
Schulman, G. et al. Randomized placebo-controlled EPPIC trials of AST-120 in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 26, 1732–1746 (2015).
Cha, R. H. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of oral intestinal sorbent AST-120 on renal function deterioration in patients with advanced renal dysfunction. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 559–567 (2016).
Baigent, C. et al.: The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 377, 2181–2192 (2011).
Mihaylova, B. et al. Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin plus ezetimibe for cardiovascular prevention in CKD: results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). Am. J. Kidney Dis. 67, 576–584 (2016).
Trivedi, H. S., Pang, M. M., Campbell, A. & Saab, P. Slowing the progression of chronic renal failure: economic benefits and patients' perspectives. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 39, 721–729 (2002).
Erickson, K. F., Chertow, G. M. & Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D. Cost-effectiveness of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 159, 382–389 (2013).
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Tolvaptan for treating autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta358/resources/tolvaptan-for-treating-autosomal-dominant-polycystic-kidney-disease-82602675026629 (2015).
Gansevoort, R. T. et al. Recommendations for the use of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a position statement on behalf of the ERA-EDTA Working Groups on Inherited Kidney Disorders and European Renal Best Practice. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 31, 337–348 (2016).
Fink, H. A. et al. Screening for, monitoring, and treatment of chronic kidney disease stages 1 to 3: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann. Intern. Med. 156, 570–581 (2012).
Hoerger, T. J. et al. A health policy model of CKD: 2. The cost-effectiveness of microalbuminuria screening. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 55, 463–473 (2010).
Moyer, V. A. Screening for chronic kidney disease: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 157, 567–570 (2012).
Stevens, L. A. & Levey, A. S. Measured GFR as a confirmatory test for estimated GFR. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20, 2305–2313 (2009).
Miller, W. G. et al. Current issues in measurement and reporting of urinary albumin excretion. Clin. Chem. 55, 24–38 (2009).
Vart, P., Reijneveld, S. A., Bultmann, U. & Gansevoort, R. T. Added value of screening for CKD among the elderly or persons with low socioeconomic status. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 562–570 (2015).
Qaseem, A., Hopkins, R. H. Jr, Sweet, D. E., Starkey, M. & Shekelle, P. Screening, monitoring, and treatment of stage 1 to 3 chronic kidney disease: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann. Intern. Med. 159, 835–847 (2013).
Molitoris, B. A. Screening: screening for kidney disease — a lost opportunity. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 10, 6–8 (2014).
Levin, A., Stevens, P. E., Coresh, J. & Levey, A. Screening, monitoring, and treatment of stage 1 to 3 chronic kidney disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 161, 81–82 (2014).
Lambers Heerspink, H. J., Gaillard, C. J. & Gansevoort, R. T. Screening, monitoring, and treatment of stage 1 to 3 chronic kidney disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 161, 82–83 (2014).
Dunkler, D. et al. Risk prediction for early CKD in type 2 diabetes. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 1371–1379 (2015).
Rombach, S. M., Hollak, C. E., Linthorst, G. E. & Dijkgraaf, M. G. Cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 8, 29 (2013).
Barrett, A., Roques, T., Small, M. & Smith, R. D. How much will Herceptin really cost? BMJ 333, 1118–1120 (2006).
Haller, M. C., Vanholder, R., Oberbauer, R., Zoccali, C. & Van Biesen, W. Health economics and European Renal Best Practice — is it time to bring health economics into evidence-based guideline production in Europe? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 29, 1994–1997 (2014).
Broce, J. C., Price, L. L., Liangos, O., Uhlig, K. & Jaber, B. L. Hospital-acquired acute kidney injury: an analysis of nadir-to-peak serum creatinine increments stratified by baseline estimated GFR. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6, 1556–1565 (2011).
Lameire, N. H. et al. Acute kidney injury: an increasing global concern. Lancet 382, 170–179 (2013).
Hoste, E. A. et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med. 41, 1411–1423 (2015).
Rewa, O. & Bagshaw, S. M. Acute kidney injury — epidemiology, outcomes and economics. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 10, 193–207 (2014).
Kerr, M., Bedford, M., Matthews, B. & O'Donoghue, D. The economic impact of acute kidney injury in England. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 29, 1362–1368 (2014).
Chawla, L. S., Eggers, P. W., Star, R. A. & Kimmel, P. L. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease as interconnected syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 58–66 (2014).
Heung, M. et al. Acute kidney injury recovery pattern and subsequent risk of CKD: an analysis of Veterans Health Administration data. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 67, 742–752 (2016).
Rifkin, D. E., Coca, S. G. & Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Does AKI truly lead to CKD? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 979–984 (2012).
Hsu, R. K. & Hsu, C. Y. The role of acute kidney injury in chronic kidney disease. Semin. Nephrol. 36, 283–292 (2016).
Silver, S. A. & Wald, R. Improving outcomes of acute kidney injury survivors. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 21, 500–505 (2015).
Monteiro, C. A., Levy, R. B., Claro, R. M., de Castro, I. R. & Cannon, G. Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 14, 5–13 (2011).
Weaver, C. M. et al. Processed foods: contributions to nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 99, 1525–1542 (2014).
Langellier, B. A. et al. Corner store inventories, purchases, and strategies for intervention: a review of the literature. Calif. J. Health Promot. 11, 1–13 (2013).
Juul, F. & Hemmingsson, E. Trends in consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity in Sweden between 1960 and 2010. Public Health Nutr. 18, 3096–3107 (2015).
Rao, M., Afshin, A., Singh, G. & Mozaffarian, D. Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 3, e004277 (2013).
Storcksdieck Genannt Bonsmann, S. & Wills, J. M. Nutrition labeling to prevent obesity: reviewing the evidence from Europe. Curr. Obes. Rep. 1, 134–140 (2012).
Dalstra, J. A. et al. Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: an overview of eight European countries. Int. J. Epidemiol. 34, 316–326 (2005).
Rijksoverheid. Roadmap for action on food product improvement. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/formulieren/2016/02/22/roadmap-for-action-on-food-product-improvement (2016).
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Nutrition and weight status. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/nutrition-and-weight-status (2014).
Cowburn, G. & Stockley, L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 8, 21–28 (2005).
Campos, S., Doxey, J. & Hammond, D. Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 14, 1496–1506 (2011).
Neuhouser, M. L., Kristal, A. R. & Patterson, R. E. Use of food nutrition labels is associated with lower fat intake. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 99, 45–53 (1999).
Euractiv. Mediterranean diet could suffer from UK 'traffic light' labels, Italy claims. https://www.euractiv.com/section/agriculture-food/news/mediterranean-diet-could-suffer-from-uk-traffic-light-labels-italy-claims/ (2013).
Garcia-Fernandez, E., Rico-Cabanas, L., Rosgaard, N., Estruch, R. & Bach-Faig, A. Mediterranean diet and cardiodiabesity: a review. Nutrients 6, 3474–3500 (2014).
Eat for Health. How to understand food labels. https://www.eatforhealth.gov.au/eating-well/how-understand-food-labels (2015).
US Food and Drug Administration. Changes to the nutrition facts label. https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm385663.htm#dates (2017).
Roodenburg, A. J., Popkin, B. M. & Seidell, J. C. Development of international criteria for a front of package food labelling system: the International Choices Programme. Eu. J. Clin. Nutr. 65, 1190–1200 (2011).
Roodenburg, A. J., van Ballegooijen, A. J., Dotsch-Klerk, M., van der Voet, H. & Seidell, J. C. Modelling of usual nutrient intakes: potential impact of the choices programme on nutrient intakes in young Dutch adults. PLoS ONE 8, e72378 (2013).
Lewis, J. E. et al. Food label use and awareness of nutritional information and recommendations among persons with chronic disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 90, 1351–1357 (2009).
Grunert, K. G. et al. Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries. Z. Gesundh. Wiss. 18, 261–277 (2010).
Palmer, S. C. et al. Dietary and fluid restrictions in CKD: a thematic synthesis of patient views from qualitative studies. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 65, 559–573 (2015).
Devraj, R. et al. Relationship between health literacy and kidney function. Nephrology 20, 360–367 (2015).
Ricardo, A. C. et al. Limited health literacy is associated with low glomerular filtration in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study. Clin. Nephrol. 81, 30–37 (2014).
Lantz, P. M. et al. Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tob. Control 9, 47–63 (2000).
Lam, M. H. & Leung, A. Y. The effectiveness of health literacy oriented programs on physical activity behaviour in middle aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Psychol. Res. 4, 5595 (2016).
van Ansem, W. J., Schrijvers, C. T., Rodenburg, G., Schuit, A. J. & van de Mheen, D. School food policy at Dutch primary schools: room for improvement? Cross-sectional findings from the INPACT study. BMC Public Health 13, 339 (2013).
Sharma, L. L., Teret, S. P. & Brownell, K. D. The food industry and self-regulation: standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. Am. J. Public Health 100, 240–246 (2010).
Smed, S., Scarborough, P., Rayner, M. & Jensen, J. D. The effects of the Danish saturated fat tax on food and nutrient intake and modelled health outcomes: an econometric and comparative risk assessment evaluation. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 70, 681–686 (2016).
Torjesen, I. BMA calls for 20% sugar tax to subsidise cost of fruit and vegetables. BMJ 351, h3803 (2015).
WHO Regional Committee for Europe 66th Session. Action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in the WHO European region. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/315398/66wd11e_NCDActionPlan_160522.pdf?ua=1 (2016).
Engstrom, H. et al. Reinvesting in health post-2015. Lancet 382, 1861–1864 (2013).
The European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA) is a strategic alliance of European nonprofit organizations representing all European key stakeholders in kidney health: patients, nephrologists, researchers and allied health workers. Its full members are the European Kidney Patient's Federation (EKPF) (formerly CEAPIR); European Dialysis & Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA-ERCA); the International Federation of Kidney Foundations (IFKF); and European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA). In addition, several European national and other non-profit kidney organizations are Associate Members. EKHA's principal aims are to raise awareness of the importance of kidney health and the growing societal burden of CKD at the European level, and to influence European strategies for early detection and prevention, and for scientific research into chronic kidney disease. The 2016 EKHA Kidney Forum was supported financially by an unrestricted grant from Baxter Health Care, B. Braun, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca and Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma. The remaining activities of EKHA are funded by the member societies. The Management Committee of EKHA is currently composed of: R. Vanholder (chair); N. Lameire (past Chair); M. Murphy, L. Skar (EKPF); M. Eleftheroudi, A. Gorke (EDTNA-ERCA); T. Oostrom, M. Ubbink (IFKF); and A. Wiecek and M. Fontana (ERA-EDTA).
R.V. has received speakers' and consultancy honoraria and travel support from Nikisho, Nipro, Fresenius Medical Care, Bayer and Astra-Zeneca. L.A. has received speakers' and consultancy honoraria from Sanofi, Bayer, Novartis and Astra-Zeneca. E.B. has received speakers' honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care and Baxter Health Care. R.G. is member of steering committees of randomized controlled trials (co)sponsored by Bayer, Genzyme-Sanofi, Ipsen and Otsuka, and has received research grants from these companies as well as from Abbvie, Baxter and the Dutch Kidney Foundation. R.O. has consulted for Astellas, Fresenius Medical Care, TEVA and Pfizer and his unit has received research grants from Astellas, TEVA, Pfizer, Amgen and Novartis. M.J.P. has received grant funding from Sigma Tau, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, MundiPharma, GMASOL, Ingress Health, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, MSD, Sanofi and Astra, and received honoraria from Vertex, Pfizer, Quintiles, Mapi, Astellas, Novartis, OptumInsight, Swedish Orphan, Innoval, Jansen, Sanofi, Intercept, Pharmerit, GSK and MSD, and has stocks in Ingress Health. W.V.B. has received honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care, Gambro and Baxter Healthcare, and is a member of the steering committee of clinical studies sponsored by Fresenius Medical Care and Baxter Healthcare. J.J.G.-Z., N.L., R.L.M, M.T. and C.Z declare no competing interests.
- Opportunity costs
The health benefits that could have been achieved had the money been spent on the best alternative option.
Any intervention for which the results offer added financial or health-related value.
- Quality-adjusted life year
(QALY) A life year adjusted for its utility. The plural (QALYs) is a measure of the utility of individual life years lived multiplied by duration (survival).
The reduction in the value of a future cost or benefit at a prespecified 'discount rate', which depends on its temporal distance from the starting point.
An economic evaluation in which the incremental costs of an intervention are compared with the incremental benefits.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
The difference between costs of two interventions divided by the difference in the outcomes.
- Direct medical costs
Costs of resources in the health-care sector (for example, drugs).
- Indirect medical costs
Medical costs that arise from the life years gained.
- Markov model
A decision model that enables transitions between different health states over a period of time (often defined as life long).
The measure of the preference or value that an individual or society attribute to a health state. This is a quality of life score that ranges from 0 for death to 1 for perfect health, with negative scores being allowed for states considered worse than death.
About this article
Cite this article
Vanholder, R., Annemans, L., Brown, E. et al. Reducing the costs of chronic kidney disease while delivering quality health care: a call to action. Nat Rev Nephrol 13, 393–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2017.63
Nature Reviews Nephrology (2021)
Nature Reviews Nephrology (2021)
A System-Wide Population Health Value Approach to Reduce Hospitalization Among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: an Observational Study
Journal of General Internal Medicine (2020)
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (2020)