Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Timing of dialysis initiation in transplant-naive and failed transplant patients

Abstract

Over the past two decades, most guidelines have advocated early initiation of dialysis on the basis of studies showing improved survival in patients starting dialysis early. These recommendations led to an increase in the proportion of patients initiating dialysis with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >10 ml/min/1.73 m2, from 20% in 1996 to 52% in 2008. During this period, the percentage of patients starting dialysis with an eGFR ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m2 increased from 4% to 17%. However, recent studies have failed to substantiate a benefit of early dialysis initiation and some data have suggested worse outcomes for patients starting dialysis with a higher eGFR. Several reasons for this seemingly paradoxical observation have been suggested, including the fact that patients requiring early dialysis are likely to have more severe symptoms and comorbidities, leading to confounding by indication, as well as biological mechanisms that causally relate early dialysis therapy to adverse outcomes. Patients with a failing renal allograft who reinitiate dialysis encounter similar problems. However, unique factors associated with a failed allograft means that the optimal timing of dialysis initiation in failed transplant patients might differ from that in transplant-naive patients with chronic kidney disease. In this Review, we discuss studies of dialysis initiation and compare risks and benefits of early versus late initiation and reinitiation of dialysis therapy.

Key Points

  • Late initiation of dialysis is not associated with worse mortality in transplant-naive patients with chronic kidney disease compared with mortality in patients who start dialysis early

  • Current guidelines suggest that the majority of transplant-naive patients will be symptomatic and need to start dialysis with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the 6–9 ml/min/1.73 m2 range

  • In patients with a failing kidney transplant, there is a paucity of evidence for or against early reinitiation of dialysis treatment

  • Factors such as predialysis care, late referral, dialysis dose, timing of immunosuppression reduction and residual function of the renal allograft might modify the association between dialysis reinitiation and outcomes in failed transplant recipients

  • Several biological factors, including hemodynamic instability, loss of residual renal function and a high infection rate, might contribute to the increased mortality risk associated with dialysis initiation

  • Starting dialysis early solely based on eGFR is not justified and could in fact be harmful in some cases; therefore, alternative and more reliable measures of a patient's clinical condition are required

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Landmark studies of early versus late initiation of dialysis treatment in transplant-naive patients with chronic kidney disease and in failed kidney transplant patients.
Figure 2: Potential factors associated with early initiation of dialysis treatment.
Figure 3: Outcomes associated with early versus late dialysis initiation in transplant-naive and failed kidney transplant patients.
Figure 4: Number of patients returning to dialysis therapy after renal transplant failure.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. [No authors listed] NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. National Kidney Foundation. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 30, S67–S136 (1997).

  2. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy, vascular access. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 48 (Suppl. 1), S1–S322 (2006).

  3. European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on Hemodialysis, European Renal Association. European Best Practice Guidelines for Haemodialysis (Part 1). When to start dialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 17 (Suppl. 7), S10–S11 (2002).

  4. Tattersall, J. et al. on behalf of the ERBP Advisory Board. When to start dialysis: updated guidance following publication of the Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL) study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 2082–2086 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2010 Annual Data Report [online], (2010).

  6. Rosansky, S. J., Eggers, P., Jackson, K., Glassock, R. & Clark, W. F. Early start of hemodialysis may be harmful. Arch. Intern. Med. 171, 396–403 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2009 Annual Data Report [online], (2009).

  8. Korevaar, J. C. et al. for the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis Study Group. When to initiate dialysis: effect of proposed US guidelines on survival. Lancet 358, 1046–1050 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Traynor, J. P., Simpson, K., Geddes, C. C., Deighan, C. J. & Fox, J. G. Early initiation of dialysis fails to prolong survival in patients with end-stage renal failure. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 2125–2132 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beddhu, S. et al. Impact of timing of initiation of dialysis on mortality. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14, 2305–2312 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kazmi, W. H. et al. Effect of comorbidity on the increased mortality associated with early initiation of dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 46, 887–896 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson, B. et al. Optimal timing of initiation of chronic hemodialysis? Hemodial. Int. 11, 263–269 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stel, V. S. et al. Residual renal function at the start of dialysis and clinical outcomes. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 24, 3175–3182 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sawhney, S., Djurdjev, O., Simpson, K., Macleod, A. & Levin, A. Survival and dialysis initiation: comparing British Columbia and Scotland registries. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 24, 3186–3192 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lassalle, M. et al. Age and comorbidity may explain the paradoxical association of an early dialysis start with poor survival. Kidney Int. 77, 700–707 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright, S. et al. Timing of dialysis initiation and survival in ESRD. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5, 1828–1835 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper, B. A. et al. for the IDEAL Study. A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 609–619 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Evans, M. et al. No survival benefit from early-start dialysis in a population-based, inception cohort study of Swedish patients with chronic kidney disease. J. Intern. Med. 269, 289–298 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao, P. S. et al. Survival on dialysis post-kidney transplant failure: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 49, 294–300 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cáldes Ruisánchez, S. et al. Dialysis after kidney transplant failure: do patients start in a worse condition than the general population with chronic kidney disease? Nefrologia 31, 51–57 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Jonge, H., Bammens, B., Lemahieu, W., Maes, B. D. & Vanrenterghem, Y. Comparison of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis after renal transplant failure. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 21, 1669–1674 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Badve, S. V. et al. for the ANZDATA Registry PD Working Committee. Effect of previously failed kidney transplantation on peritoneal dialysis outcomes in the Australian and New Zealand patient populations. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 21, 776–783 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mujais, S. & Story, K. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in patients with failed renal allograft: a case-control study. Kidney. Int. Suppl. 103, S133–S137 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Duman, S. et al. Patients with failed renal transplant may be suitable for peritoneal dialysis. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 36, 249–252 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sasal, J., Naimark, D., Klassen, J., Shea, J. & Bargman, J. M. Late renal transplant failure: an adverse prognostic factor at initiation of peritoneal dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 21, 405–410 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davies, S. J. Peritoneal dialysis in the patient with a failing renal allograft. Perit. Dial. Int. 21 (Suppl. 3), S280–S284 (2001).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonomini, V. et al. Residual renal function and effective rehabilitation in chronic dialysis. Nephron 16, 89–102 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonomini, V., Vangelista, A. & Stefoni, S. Early dialysis in renal substitutive programs. Kidney Int. Suppl. 8, S112–S116 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bonomini, V., Feletti, C., Scolari, M. P. & Stefoni, S. Benefits of early initiation of dialysis. Kidney. Int. Suppl. 17, S57–S59 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ratcliffe, P. J., Phillips, R. E. & Oliver, D. O. Late referral for maintenance dialysis. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 288, 441–443 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jungers, P. et al. Late referral to maintenance dialysis: detrimental consequences. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 8, 1089–1093 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tattersall, J., Greenwood, R. & Farrington, K. Urea kinetics and when to commence dialysis. Am. J. Nephrol. 15, 283–289 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. [No authors listed] Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7, 198–207 (1996).

  34. Cooper, B. A. et al. The Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL) study: study rationale and design. Perit. Dial. Int. 24, 176–181 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosansky, S. J., Clark, W. F., Eggers, P. & Glassock, R. J. Initiation of dialysis at higher GFRs: is the apparent rising tide of early dialysis harmful or helpful? Kidney Int. 76, 257–261 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McCusker, F. X., Teehan, B. P., Thorpe, K. E., Keshaviah, P. R. & Churchill, D. N. How much peritoneal dialysis is required for the maintenance of a good nutritional state? Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Kidney Int. Suppl. 56, S56–S61 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Churchill, D. N. An evidence-based approach to earlier initiation of dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 30, 899–906 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Beddhu, S. et al. Creatinine production, nutrition, and glomerular filtration rate estimation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14, 1000–1005 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kalantar-Zadeh, K. et al. The obesity paradox and mortality associated with surrogates of body size and muscle mass in patients receiving hemodialysis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 85, 991–1001 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Molnar, M. Z. et al. Associations of body mass index and weight loss with mortality in transplant-waitlisted maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Transplant. 11, 725–736 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Noori, N. et al. Novel equations to estimate lean body mass in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 57, 130–139 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosansky, S., Glassock, R. J. & Clark, W. F. Early start of dialysis: a critical review. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6, 1222–1228 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cockcroft, D. W. & Gault, M. H. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16, 31–41 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lindholm, B. & Davies, S. End-stage renal disease in 2010: Timing of dialysis initiation and choice of dialysis modality. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 7, 66–68 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Faust, J. & Schreiner, O. Early versus late initiation of dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 2368–2369 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Korevaar, J. C. et al. Evaluation of DOQI guidelines: early start of dialysis treatment is not associated with better health-related quality of life. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 39, 108–115 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dhaun, N. & Kluth, D. Early versus late initiation of dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 2369 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gill, J. S., Abichandani, R., Kausz, A. T. & Pereira, B. J. Mortality after kidney transplant failure: the impact of non-immunologic factors. Kidney Int. 62, 1875–1883 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Perl, J. et al. Impact of dialysis modality on survival after kidney transplant failure. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6, 582–590 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ojo, A. et al. Prognosis after primary renal transplant failure and the beneficial effects of repeat transplantation: multivariate analyses from the United States Renal Data System. Transplantation 66, 1651–1659 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Johnston, O., Zalunardo, N., Rose, C. & Gill, J. S. Prevention of sepsis during the transition to dialysis may improve the survival of transplant failure patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 1331–1337 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gill, J. S., Abichandani, R., Khan, S., Kausz, A. T. & Pereira, B. J. Opportunities to improve the care of patients with kidney transplant failure. Kidney Int. 61, 2193–2200 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Almond, M. K., Tailor, D., Marsh, F. P., Raftery, M. J. & Cunningham, J. Increased erythropoietin requirements in patients with failed renal transplants returning to a dialysis programme. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 9, 270–273 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. López-Gómez, J. M. et al. Presence of a failed kidney transplant in patients who are on hemodialysis is associated with chronic inflammatory state and erythropoietin resistance. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15, 2494–2501 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wanner, C., Zimmermann, J., Schwedler, S. & Metzger, T. Inflammation and cardiovascular risk in dialysis patients. Kidney Int. Suppl. 80, 99–102 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Molnar, M. Z. et al. Association of the malnutrition-inflammation score with clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 58, 101–108 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rambod, M. et al. Association of malnutrition-inflammation score with quality of life and mortality in hemodialysis patients: a 5-year prospective cohort study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 53, 298–309 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Perl, J. & Bargman, J. M. The importance of residual kidney function for patients on dialysis: a critical review. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 53, 1068–1081 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Molnar, M. Z. et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at re-initiation of dialysis and mortality in failed kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. (in press).

  60. Mendelssohn, D. C., Malmberg, C. & Hamandi, B. An integrated review of “unplanned” dialysis initiation: reframing the terminology to “suboptimal” initiation. BMC Nephrol. 10, 22 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Chan, M. R., Dall, A. T., Fletcher, K. E., Lu, N. & Trivedi, H. Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease referred late to nephrologists: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Med. 120, 1063–1070 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Johnston, O., Rose, C., Landsberg, D., Gourlay, W. A. & Gill, J. S. Nephrectomy after transplant failure: current practice and outcomes. Am. J. Transplant. 7, 1961–1967 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bloembergen, W. E. et al. Relationship of dialysis membrane and cause-specific mortality. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 33, 1–10 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Chavers, B. M., Solid, C. A., Gilbertson, D. T. & Collins, A. J. Infection-related hospitalization rates in pediatric versus adult patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 952–959 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Allon, M. et al. for the HEMO Study Group. Impact of dialysis dose and membrane on infection-related hospitalization and death: results of the HEMO Study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14, 1863–1870 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Orofino, L. et al. Epidemiology of symptomatic hypotension in hemodialysis: is cool dialysate beneficial for all patients? Am. J. Nephrol. 10, 177–180 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Cukor, D. et al. Depression and anxiety in urban hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2, 484–490 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Liberek, T. et al. When to initiate dialysis—is early start always better? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 2087–2091 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Grootendorst, D. C. et al. for the NECOSAD Study Group. The MDRD formula does not reflect GFR in ESRD patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 1932–1937 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Noori, N. et al. Survival predictability of lean and fat mass in men and women undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 92, 1060–1070 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Kalantar-Zadeh, K. et al. Diets and enteral supplements for improving outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 7, 369–384 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Noori, N. et al. Mid-arm muscle circumference and quality of life and survival in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5, 2258–2268 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Gaspari, F. et al. on behalf of the MY. S. S. Study Investigators. Performance of different prediction equations for estimating renal function in kidney transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 4, 1826–1835 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Coresh, J., Walser, M. & Hill, S. Survival on dialysis among chronic renal failure patients treated with a supplemented low-protein diet before dialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6, 1379–1385 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Barreto, F. C. et al. on behalf of the European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox). Serum indoxyl sulfate is associated with vascular disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 1551–1558 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Niwa, T. et al. The protein metabolite hypothesis, a model for the progression of renal failure: an oral adsorbent lowers indoxyl sulfate levels in undialyzed uremic patients. Kidney Int. Suppl. 62, S23–S28 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Niwa, T. Uremic toxicity of indoxyl sulfate. Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 72, 1–11 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Pergola, P. E. et al. for the BEAM Study Investigators. Bardoxolone methyl and kidney function in CKD with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 327–336 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. de Brito-Ashurst, I., Varagunam, M., Raftery, M. J. & Yaqoob, M. M. Bicarbonate supplementation slows progression of CKD and improves nutritional status. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20, 2075–2084 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Phisitkul, S., Hacker, C., Simoni, J., Tran, R. M. & Wesson, D. E. Dietary protein causes a decline in the glomerular filtration rate of the remnant kidney mediated by metabolic acidosis and endothelin receptors. Kidney Int. 73, 192–199 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Mahajan, A. et al. Daily oral sodium bicarbonate preserves glomerular filtration rate by slowing its decline in early hypertensive nephropathy. Kidney Int. 78, 303–309 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M. Z. Molnar received grants from the National Development Agency (KTIA-OTKA-EU 7KP-HUMAN-MB08-A-81231) from the Research and Technology Innovation Fund, and was also supported by the Hungarian Kidney Foundation. K. Kalantar-Zadeh was supported by research grants from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (K24 DK091419 and R01 DK078106) and a philanthropic grant from H. Simmons.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M. Z. Molnar and K. Kalantar-Zadeh researched data to include in the manuscript. M. Z. Molnar, C. P. Kovesdy and K. Kalantar-Zadeh contributed to discussion of content for the article. All authors contributed equally to the writing of the article and to the reviewing and editing of the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molnar, M., Ojo, A., Bunnapradist, S. et al. Timing of dialysis initiation in transplant-naive and failed transplant patients. Nat Rev Nephrol 8, 284–292 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.36

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.36

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing