The brain faces many complex problems when dealing with odorant signals. Odours are multidimensional objects that we usually experience as unitary percepts. They are also noisy and variable, but we can classify and identify them well. The olfactory system therefore solves complicated pattern-learning and pattern-recognition problems.
I propose that part of the solution relies on a particular architecture that imposes a dynamic format on odour codes. According to this hypothesis, the olfactory system actively creates a large coding space in which to place odour representations and simultaneously optimize their distribution within it.
This process uses both oscillatory and non-periodic dynamic processes that serve complementary roles: slow non-periodic processes allow decorrelation (that is, the reduction of the overlap between odour representations); fast oscillations allow sparsening (that is, a reduction in the size of the coding assemblies) and feature binding (that is, the representation of multiple and co-occurring features by the spikes of single neurons).
The prominent role of oscillatory synchronization in the process of sparsening is reviewed. Briefly, sparsening is achieved through a process that involves periodic input, coincidence detection, fan-in and fan-out connection patterns, and delayed feedforward inhibition. These mechanisms together lead to the appearance of rare but highly selective neuronal responses, which synthesize specific combinations of input features.
The coding aspects, advantages, disadvantages and possible uses of these interlocked and dynamic integrative phenomena are discussed in the context of olfaction and other systems in which complex sensory objects must be represented, learned and recognized.
The brain faces many complex problems when dealing with odorant signals. Odours are multidimensional objects, which we usually experience as unitary percepts. They are also noisy and variable, but we can classify and identify them well. This means that the olfactory system must solve complicated pattern-learning and pattern-recognition problems. I propose that part of the solution relies on a particular architecture that imposes a dynamic format on odour codes. According to this hypothesis, the olfactory system actively creates a large coding space in which to place odour representations and simultaneously optimizes their distribution within it. This process uses both oscillatory and non-periodic dynamic processes with complementary functions: slow non-periodic processes underlie decorrelation, whereas fast oscillations allow sparsening and feature binding.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Kauer, J. S. & White, J. Imaging and coding in the olfactory system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 963–979 (2001).
Hansson, B. S. (ed.) Insect Olfaction (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
Knudsen, J. T., Tollsten, L. & Bergstrom, L. G. Floral scents — a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by headspace techniques. Phytochemistry 33, 253–280 (1993).
Laing, D. G. in The Human Sense of Smell (eds Laing, D. G., Doty, R. L. & Breipohl, W.) 241–259 (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
Chandra, S. & Smith, B. H. Analysis of synthetic processing of odour mixtures in the bee (Apis mellifera). J. Exp. Biol. 201, 3113–3121 (1998).
Livermore, A. & Laing, D. G. Influence of training and experience on the perception of multicomponent odor mixtures. J. Exp. Psychol. 22, 267–277 (1996).
Duchamp-Viret, P. & Duchamp, A. Odor processing in the frog olfactory system. Prog. Neurobiol. 53, 561–602 (1997).
Friedrich, R. & Laurent, G. Dynamical optimization of odor representations in the olfactory bulb by slow temporal patterning of mitral cell activity. Science 291, 889–894 (2001).A paper showing the decorrelation of odour representations by MC assemblies resulting from slow MC temporal patterning. The data indicate that activity across MCs is redistributed across the population so that overlap between the representations of similar odours decreases as a function of time within the first ∼800 ms of a response.
Wellis, D. P., Scott, J. W. & Harrison, T. A. Discrimination among odorants by single neurons of the rat olfactory bulb. J. Neurophysiol. 61, 1161–1177 (1989).
Burrows, M., Boeckh, J. & Esslen, J. Physiological and morphological properties of interneurons in the deutocerebrum of male cockroaches with responses to female pheromones. J. Comp. Physiol. A 145, 447–457 (1982).
Meredith, M. Patterned response to odor in mammalian olfactory bulb: the influence of intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 56, 572–597 (1986).
Buonviso, N., Chaput, M. A. & Berthommier, F. Temporal pattern analyses in pairs of neighboring mitral cells. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 417–424 (1992).
Laurent, G., Wehr, M. & Davidowitz, H. Temporal representations of odors in an olfactory network. J. Neurosci. 16, 3837–3847 (1996).
Macrides, F. & Chorover, S. L. Olfactory bulb units, activity correlated with inhalation cycles and odor quality. Science 175, 84–87 (1972).References 14 and 19 are among the first papers to indicate that mammalian and non-mammalian vertebrate MCs show slow temporal patterning in response to odours.
Yokoi, M., Mori, K. & Nakanishi, S. Refinement of odor molecule tuning by dendrodendritic synaptic inhibition in the olfactory bulb. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3371–3375 (1995).
Motokizawa, F. Odor representation and discrimination in mitral tufted cells of the rat olfactory bulb. Exp. Brain Res. 112, 24–34 (1996).
Adrian, E. Olfactory reactions in the brain of the hedgehog. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 100, 459–473 (1942).One of the first papers to indicate the existence of oscillatory dynamics in the mammalian olfactory system.
Laurent, G. & Davidowitz, H. Encoding of olfactory information with oscillating neural assemblies. Science 265, 1872–1875 (1994).
Kauer, J. S. & Moulton, D. Responses of olfactory bulb neurones to odour stimulation of small nasal areas in the salamander. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 243, 717–737 (1974).
Spors, H. & Grinvald, A. Spatio-temporal dynamics of odor representations in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron 34, 301–315 (2002).
Stopfer, M., Bhagavan, S., Smith, B. H. & Laurent, G. Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies. Nature 390, 70–74 (1997).This paper indicates that oscillatory synchronization is required for fine odour discrimination. The authors used selective pharmacological blockade of oscillatory synchronization in the honeybee AL, and behavioural assessments to determine its consequences for odour discrimination.
Perez-Orive, J. et al. Oscillations and sparsening of odor representations in the mushroom body. Science 297, 359–365 (2002).The first description of responses of MB KCs to odours. This paper provides direct physiological evidence that oscillatory synchronization is a dynamic mechanism used by a brain circuit to bind separate elements in a sensory representation and so sparsen that representation.
Wehr, M. & Laurent, G. Odor encoding by temporal sequences of firing in oscillating neural assemblies. Nature 384, 162–166 (1996).
Friedrich, R. W. & Korsching, S. I. Combinatorial and chemotopic odorant coding in the zebrafish olfactory bulb visualized by optical imaging. Neuron 18, 737–752 (1997).
MacLeod, K. & Laurent, G. Distinct mechanisms for synchronization and temporal patterning of odor-encoding neural assemblies. Science 274, 976–979 (1996).
Bazhenov, M. et al. Model of transient oscillatory synchronization in the locust antennal lobe Neuron 30, 553–567 (2001).
Bazhenov, M. et al. Model of cellular and network mechanisms for temporal patterning in the locust antennal lobe. Neuron 30, 569–581 (2001).
Rabinovich, M. et al. Dynamical encoding by networks of competing neuron groups: winnerless competition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 068102 (2001).
Gray, C. Synchronous oscillations in neuronal systems, mechanisms and function. J. Comput. Neurosci. 1, 11–38 (1994).
Engel, A. K., Fries, P. & Singer, W. Dynamic predictions, oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 704–716 (2001).References 29 and 30 are good reviews of synchronous periodic phenomena in various brain areas and circuits.
Gelperin, A. & Tank, D. W. Odour-modulated collective network oscillations of olfactory interneurons in a terrestrial mollusc. Nature 345, 437–440 (1990).
Laurent, G. & Naraghi, M. Odorant-induced oscillations in the mushroom bodies of the locust. J. Neurosci. 14, 2993–3004 (1994).
MacLeod, K., Bäcker, A. & Laurent, G. Who reads temporal information contained across synchronized and oscillatory spike trains? Nature 395, 693–698 (1998).The authors examine the consequences of a pharmacological blockade of synchronization on the specificity of neuronal responses downstream of the desynchronized assemblies. This paper complements references 21 and 22 in testing directly the possible function of oscillatory synchronization in a brain circuit.
Laurent, G. et al. Odor encoding as an active, dynamical process: experiments, computation and theory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 263–297 (2001).
Abeles, M. Role of the cortical neuron, integrator or coincidence detector? Isr. J. Med. Sci. 18, 83–92 (1982).This paper and reference 36 make the case for coincidence detection as a key to understanding transformations by cortical neurons. According to this view, neurons exploit cellular and biophysical properties, as well as the spatiotemporal format of their inputs, to transform representations.
König, P., Engel, A. K. & Singer, W. Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of the cortical neuron revisited. Trends Neurosci. 19, 130–137 (1996).
Von der Malsburg, C. & Schneider, W. A neural cocktail party processor. Biol. Cybern. 54, 29–40 (1986).
Linster, C. & Smith, B. H. Generalization between binary odor mixtures and their components in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 66, 701–707 (1999).
Schidberger, K. Local interneurons associated with the mushroom bodies and the central body in the brain of Acheta domesticus. Cell Tissue Res. 230, 573–586 (1983).
Grünewald, B. Morphology of feedback neurons in the mushroom body of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. J. Comp. Neurol. 404, 114–126 (1999).
Marr, D. A theory of cerebellar cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 202, 437–470 (1969).Marr examines the consequences of cerebellar architecture on the possible format of memories and on the management of overlaps between memories.
Kanerva, P. Sparse Distributed Memory (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988).Kanerva examines (more generally than Marr) the case of sparse and distributed representations and the application of this thinking to cerebellar architecture. This book and reference 41 are interesting reading in general, and especially in view of experimental findings summarized in the current review.
Freeman, W. J. Neurodynamics: an Exploration in Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics (Springer, London, 2000).
Buck, L. B. Information coding in the vertebrate olfactory system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 517–544 (1996).
Axel, R. The molecular logic of smell. Sci. Am. 273, 130–137 (1995).
Mombaerts, P. et al. Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell 87, 675–686 (1996).
Vassar, R. et al. Topographic organization of sensory projections to the olfactory bulb. Cell 79, 981–991 (1994).
Stopfer, M. & Laurent, G. Short-term memory in olfactory network dynamics. Nature 402, 664–668 (1999).
Dong, D. W. & Atick, J. J. Temporal decorrelation — a theory of lagged and nonlagged responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 6, 159–178 (1995).
Dan, Y., Atick, J. J. & Reid, R. C. Efficient coding of natural scenes in the lateral geniculate nucleus: experimental test of a computational theory. J. Neurosci. 16, 3351–3362 (1996).
Vinje, W. E. & Gallant, J. L. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 287, 1273–1276 (2000).
Bergman, H. & Bar-Gad, I. Stepping out of the box, information processing in the neural networks of the basal ganglia. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 689–695 (2001).
Schürmann, F. W. On the functional anatomy of the corpora pedunculata in insects. Exp. Brain Res. 19, 406–432 (1974).
Zars, T. et al. Localization of a short-term memory in Drosophila. Science 288, 672–675 (2000).
Dubnau, J., Grady, L., Kitamoto, T. & Tully, T. Disruption of neurotransmission in Drosophila mushroom body blocks retrieval but not acquisition of memory. Nature 411, 476–480 (2001).
McGuire, S. E., Le, P. T. & Davis, R. L. The role of Drosophila mushroom body signaling in olfactory memory. Science 293, 1330–1333 (2001).References 54–56 report recent experiments geared towards identifying the locus or loci of olfactory/associative memories in Drosophila . All point to KCs as being crucial cellular elements, although it is still unclear which synaptic sites are modified and what their roles are for memory or recall.
Cajal, S. R. Histology of the Nervous System (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1995).
DeVries, S. H. & Baylor, D. A. Synaptic circuitry of the retina and olfactory bulb. Cell 72, 139–149 (1993).A good review summarizing the proposal that local circuits in the OB serve to sharpen the tuning curves of MCs in a process akin to that which occurs in retinal local circuits. This paper and reference 15 are focused on single neuron data and on the traditional tuning-curve assessment of neuronal responses; they are to be contrasted with the systems and dynamic perspective that is proposed in the current review.
Mori, K., Kishi, K. & Ojima, H. Distribution of dendrites of mitral, displaced mitral, tufted and granule cells in the rabbit olfactory bulb. J. Comp. Neurol. 219, 339–355 (1983).
Orona, E., Rainer, E. C. & Scott, J. W. Dendritic and axonal organization of mitral and tufted cells in the rat olfactory bulb. J. Comp. Neurol. 226, 346–356 (1984).
Hansson, B. S., Anton, S. & Christensen, T. A. Structure and function of antennal lobe neurons in the male turnip moth, Agrotis segetum (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 5, 547–562 (1994).
Stocker, R. F. The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster — a review. Cell Tissue Res. 275, 3–26 (1994).
Chen, W., Midtgaard, J. & Shephard, G. Forward and backward propagation of dendritic impulses and their synaptic control in mitral cells. Science 278, 463–467 (1997).
The work from my laboratory reviewed here was funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders, and the McKnight, Keck, Sloan and Sloan-Swartz Foundations. I thank M. Stopfer, R. Friedrich, K. McLeod, M. Wehr, J. Perez-Orive, O. Mazor, S. Cassenaer, R. Wilson, G. Turner, C. Pouzat, V. Jayaraman, S. Farivar, H. Davidowitz, R. Jortner, A. Holub, M. Rabinovich, H. Abarbanel, R. Huerta, T. Nowotny, V. Zighulin, A. Bäcker, M. Bazhenov, P. Perona and E. Schuman for the privilege of working on these problems with them. I thank P. Cariani for pointing me to Kanerva's book on sparse distributed memories, K. Heyman for secretarial assistance and S. Farivar for Golgis in figure 4.
- LABELLED LINES
A term that is used to describe a simple connectivity, whereby a set of identically and sharply tuned receptor neurons converge uniquely onto a set of postsynaptic neurons, which in turn project uniquely onto a set of common targets (and so on). Each channel (labelled line) can unambiguously inform the brain about the presence or absence of the signal it conveys.
- CODING SPACE
An abstract space that is defined by the features used to embody the code. If a neural system contains n neurons, one coding space can be viewed as an n-dimensional space, where each dimension represents the state of each neuron.
- LOCAL FIELD POTENTIAL
The extracellular potential between two points in a brain region, resulting from synaptic and other current flow at and around the recording electrodes. It usually reflects input better than output.
The trajectory that is defined by a dynamical system, or its motion within state space. When applied to a system of neurons, an orbit is an abstract description of the states of all the neurons and the evolution of those states as a function of time.
- BODIAN STAIN
A reduced-silver impregnation technique that is used for neuroanatomical studies of fixed brain tissue.
An extracellular electrode that comprises four juxtaposed recording channels, which can be used to disambiguate the signals emitted by individual point sources. Because each neuron occupies a unique position in space, its spikes are 'seen' slightly differently by each electrode, providing a unique signature. This technique allows the identification of many more neurons than there are sampling electrodes.
The membrane hyperpolarization that follows the occurrence of an action potential.
- HAMMING DISTANCE
The number of bits by which two n-bit vectors differ. For example, the Hamming distance between 001101 and 001110 is 2. It is also the square of the Euclidian distance.
- HOPFIELD NETWORK
A type of trainable, asynchronous artificial neural network with symmetrical connections that defines sets of attractor states. Given a certain input set, a Hopfield network can therefore be made to settle into a given attractor, in a process akin to pattern completion.
Given a dynamical system and the state space in which it lives (that is, all the possible states that this system can occupy), an attractor is a preferred region of state space; that is, a state or set of states to which the system moves inexorably as time approaches infinity.
About this article
Cite this article
Laurent, G. Olfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci 3, 884–895 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn964
Scientific Reports (2021)
Cell and Tissue Research (2021)
Cell and Tissue Research (2021)
Scientific Reports (2020)
Nature Communications (2020)