Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Science and Society
  • Published:

Neuroscience and education: myths and messages

Nature Reviews Neuroscience volume 15, pages 817–824 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

For several decades, myths about the brain — neuromyths — have persisted in schools and colleges, often being used to justify ineffective approaches to teaching. Many of these myths are biased distortions of scientific fact. Cultural conditions, such as differences in terminology and language, have contributed to a 'gap' between neuroscience and education that has shielded these distortions from scrutiny. In recent years, scientific communications across this gap have increased, although the messages are often distorted by the same conditions and biases as those responsible for neuromyths. In the future, the establishment of a new field of inquiry that is dedicated to bridging neuroscience and education may help to inform and to improve these communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Imaging studies of interventions are of particular interest to education.

References

  1. Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P. & Jolles, J. Neuromyths in education: prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Front. Psychol. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429 (2012).

  2. Deligiannidi, K. & Howard-Jones, P. in International Conference on New Horizons in Education. 44 (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Howard-Jones, P. A., Franey, L., Mashmoushi, R. & Liao, Y.-C. The Neuroscience Literacy of Trainee Teachers. British Educational Research Association Annual Conference [online], (Univ. of Manchester, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karakus, O. & Howard-Jones, P. in International Conference on New Horizons in Education. 29 (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosh, P. in Newsnight: The Dyslexia Myth. [television documentary] British Broadcasting Corporation (Mills Productions, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hermida, M. J., Segretin, M. S. & Lipina, S. J. in Seminars on Child Development of the Unit of Applied Neurobiology 18, 1–10 (UNA, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pei, X., Zhang, S., Liu, X., Jin, Y. & Howard-Jones, P. in International Conference on New Horizons in Education.64 (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goswami, U. Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 406–413 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Howard-Jones, P. A. Introducing Neuroeducational Research: Neuroscience, Education and the Brain from Contexts to Practice. (Routledge, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruer, J. Education and the brain: a bridge too far. Educ. Res. 26, 4–16 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, A. J. The credentials of brain-based learning. J. Philos. Educ. 38, 21–36 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crockard, A. Confessions of a brain surgeon. New Scientist 2061, 68 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Understanding the Brain: Towards a New Learning Science. (OECD Publications, 2002).

  14. Jorgenson, O. Brain scam? Why educators should be careful about embracing 'brain research'. Educ. Forum 67, 364–369 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Novella, S. Psychomotor patterning. Connecticut Skept. 1, 6 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beyerstein, B. in Mind Myths (ed. Della Salla, S.) 59–82 (John Wiley and Sons, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Valtin, H. “Drink at least eight glasses of water a day.” Really? Is there scientific evidence for “8 × 8”? Am. J. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 283, 993–1004 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cheuvront, S. N. & Kenefick, R. W. Dehydration: physiology, assessment, and performance effects. Compr. Physiol. 4, 257–285 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Masento, N. A., Golightly, M., Field, D. T., Butler, L. T. & van Reekum, C. M. Effects of hydration status on cognitive performance and mood. Br. J. Nutr. 111, 1841–1852 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Politano, C. & Paquin, J. Brain-based learning with class. (Portage & Main, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. & Ecclestone, K. Report No. 041543. Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review. (Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geake, J. G. Neuromythologies in education. Educ. Res. 50, 123–133 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kratzig, G. P. & Arbuthnott, K. D. Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: a test of the hypothesis. J. Educat. Psychol. 98, 238–246 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Najjar, L. J. Principles of educational multimedia user interface design. Hum. Factors 40, 311–323 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stitch, S. The Fragmentation of Reason. (MIT press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Springer, S. P. & Deutsch, G. Left brain, right brain. (Freeman, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. McCarthy, B. The 4MAT system: teaching to learning styles with right/left mode techniques. (Excel, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  28. McCarthy, B. A tale of four learners: 4MAT's learning styles. Educat. Leadership 54, 46–51 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sloan, T., Daane, C. J. & Giesen, J. Mathematics anxiety and learning styles: what is the relationship in elementary preservice teachers? School Sci. Math. 102, 84–87 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoffman, E. Introducing children to their amazing brains. (LTL Books, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gardner, H. Frames of the mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. (Basic Books, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gardner, H. Multiple intelligences: new horizons. (Basic Books, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Waterhouse, L. Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: a critical review. Educat. Psychol. 41, 207–225 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson, C. N. & Wellman, H. M. Children's developing conceptions of the mind and brain. Child Dev. 53, 222–234 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bering, J. M. & Bjorklund, D. F. The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity. Dev. Psychol. 40, 217–233 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J. & DeWall, C. N. Prosocial benefits of feeling free: disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35, 260–268 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Forstmann, M. Burgmer, P. & Mussweiler, T. “The mind is willing, but the flesh is weak”: the effects of mind–body dualism on health behavior. Psychol. Sci. 23, 1239–1245 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Park, A., Clery, E., Curtice, J., Phillips, M. & Utting, D. (eds) British Social Attitudes 28 2011–2012 edition (NatCen Social Research, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hirschon, R. in When God Comes to Town: Anthropological Perspectives on Religion and Secularization (eds Pixten, R. & Dikomitis, L.) 3–16 (Berghahn, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E. & Gray, J. The seductive lure of neuroscience explanations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 470–477 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lindell, A. K. & Kidd, E. Consumers favor “right brain” training: the dangerous lure of neuromarketing. Mind Brain Educ. 7, 35–39 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dennison, P. E. & Dennison, G. E. Brain Gym teacher's edition — revised. (Edu–Kinesthetics, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hyatt, K. J. Brain Gym: building stronger brains or wishful thinking? Remedial Spec. Educ. 28, 117–124 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Blakemore, S. J. & Frith, U. The Learning Brain. (Blackwell, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Byrnes, J. P. Minds, Brains, and Learning. (The Guildford Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Understanding the Brain: Birth of a New Learning Science. (OECD, 2007).

  47. Royal Society. Brain Waves Module 2: Neuroscience: implications for education and lifelong learning. (Royal Society, 2011).

  48. James S. McDonnell Foundation. The Santiago Declaration [online], (2007).

  49. Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Bruer, J. T. The brain/education barrier. Science 317, 1293–1293 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kurdziel, L., Duclos, K. & Spencer, R. M. C. Sleep spindles in midday naps enhance learning in preschool children. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17267–17272 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Twardosz, S. & Lutzker, J. R. Child maltreatment and the developing brain: a review of neuroscience perspectives. Aggress. Violent Behav. 15, 59–68 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hackman, D. A. & Farah, M. J. Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 65–73 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Goswami, U. Mind, brain, and literacy: biomarkers as usable knowledge for education. Mind Brain Educ. 3, 176–184 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Shonkoff, J. P. & Phillips, D. A. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. (National Academies Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bruer, J. The Myth of the First Three Years: A New Understanding of Early Brain Development and Lifelong Learning. (The Free Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Twardosz, S. Effects of experience on the brain: the role of neuroscience in early development and education. Early Educ. Dev. 23, 96–119 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Quart, A. Extreme parenting: does the baby genius edutainment complex enrich your child's mind or stifle it? Atlant. Monthly 127, 110–113 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Howard-Jones, P. A., Washbrook, E. V. & Meadows, S. The timing of educational investment: a neuroscientific perspective. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, S18–S29 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wachs, T. D., Georgieff, M., Cusick, S. & McEwen, B. S. Every child's potential: integrating nutrition and early childhood development interventions Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1308, 89–106 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mervis, J. Giving children a head start is possible — but it's not easy. Science 333, 956–957 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Duncan, G. J. & Sojourner, A. J. Can intensive early childhood intervention programs eliminate income-based cognitive and achievement gaps? J. Hum. Resources 48, 945–968 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Heckman, J. J. Schools, skills, and synapses. Econ. Inq. 46, 289–324 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Centre for Social Justice. Making sense of early intervention: A framework for professionals. (Centre for Social Justice, 2011).

  64. Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J. & Schennach, S. M. Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica. 78, 883–931 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Allen, G. Early Intervention: The Next Steps. (UK Goverment, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Saul, R. ADHD does not exist. (Harper Collins, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  67. McCoy, T. H. Richard Saul says AHD does not exist. Not everyone agrees. Newsweek [online], (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nicolson, R. Dyslexia: beyond the myth. Psychol. 18, 658–659 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M. & Cantrell, E. B. Are preservice teachers prepared to teach struggling readers? Ann. Dyslexia 61, 21–43 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hornstra, L., Denessen, E., Bakker, J., van den Bergh, L. & Voeten, M. Teacher attitudes toward dyslexia: effects on teacher expectations and the academic achievement of students with dyslexia. J. Learn. Disabil. 43, 515–529 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Moats, L. C. The missing foundation in teacher education — knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Ann. Dyslexia 44, 81–102 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J. & Scanlon, D. M. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 45, 2–40 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Irlen, H. Reading by the colors: overcoming dyslexia and other reading disabilities through the Irlen method. (Avery Publishing Group, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  74. McIntosh, R. D. & Ritchie, S. J. in Neuroscience in Education: the good, the bad and the ugly (eds Della Sala, S. & Anderson, M.) 230–243 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Adcock, R. A., Thangavel, A., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Knutson, B. & Gabrieli, J. D. Reward-motivated learning: mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation. Neuron 50, 507–517 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Howard-Jones, P. A., Demetriou, S., Bogacz, R., Yoo, J. H. & Leonards, U. Toward a science of learning games. Mind Brain Educ. 5, 33–41 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Fiorillo, C. D. Transient activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by reward risk. Neuroscience 197, 162–171 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Ozcelik, E., Cagiltay, N. E. & Ozcelik, N. S. The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments. Computers Educ. 67, 12–20 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Bjork, J. M., Smith, A. R., Chen, G. & Hommer, D. W. Adolescents, adults and rewards: comparing motivational neurocircuitry recruitment using fMRI. PLoS ONE 5, e11440 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Soni-Garcia, A. & Howard-Jones, P. in European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction Special Interest Group on Neuroscience and Education. 82 (Göttingen, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Meurk, C., Carter, A., Hall, W. & Lucke, J. Public understandings of addiction: where do neurobiological explanations fit? Neuroethics 7, 51–62 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Bell, V. The unsexy truth about dopamine. The Observer [online], (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kotler, S. & Olds, J. Addicted to bang: the neuroscience of the gun. Forbes [online], (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sloan, J. Are cupcakes as addictive as cocaine? The Sun[online], (2012).

  85. Crocker, P. Do you have these four small business addictions? Ninemsn[online], (2014).

  86. Nordegren, T. The A-Z Encyclopedia of Alcohol and Drug Abuse (Brown Walker, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Hagenauer, M. H., Perryman, J. I., Lee, T. M. & Carskadon, M. A. Adolescent changes in the homeostatic and circadian regulation of sleep. Dev. Neurosci. 31, 276–284 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Hansen, M., Janssen, I., Schiff, A., Zee, P. C. & Dubocovich, M. L. The impact of school daily schedule on adolescent sleep. Pediatrics 115, 1555–1561 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Wahistrom, K. Changing times: findings from the first longitudinal study of later high school start times. NASSP Bull. 86, 3–21 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Owens, J. A., Belon, K. & Moss, P. Impact of delaying school start time on adolescent sleep, mood, and behavior. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 164, 608–614 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Blakemore, S. J. Imaging brain development: the adolescent brain. Neuroimage 61, 397–406 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Steinberg, L. A. Dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Dev. Psychobiol. 52, 216–224 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. White, A. M. The changing adolescent brain. Educ. Canada 45, 4–8 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Payne, M. A. “All gas and no brakes!”: helpful metaphor or harmful stereotype? J. Adolescent Res. 27, 3–17 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Greene, J. & Cohen, J. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 359, 1775–1785 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Woolard, J., Graham, S. & Banich, M. Reconciling the complexity of human development with the reality of legal policy: reply to Fischer, Stein, and Heikkinen. Am. Psychol. 64, 601–604 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Cunha, F., Heckman, J., Lochner, L. & Masterov, D. in Handbook of the Economics of Education Vol. 1 (eds Hanushek, E. & Welch, F.) 697–812 (Elsevier, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Kucian, K. et al. Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. Neuroimage 57, 782–795 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paul A. Howard-Jones is at the Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, 35 Berkeley Square, Bristol BS8 1JA, UK.,

    Paul A. Howard-Jones

Authors
  1. Paul A. Howard-Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Howard-Jones.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howard-Jones, P. Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nat Rev Neurosci 15, 817–824 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing