Review Article | Published:

The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping

Nature Reviews Neuroscience volume 15, pages 670682 (2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

Despite global increases in diversity, social prejudices continue to fuel intergroup conflict, disparities and discrimination. Moreover, as norms have become more egalitarian, prejudices seem to have 'gone underground', operating covertly and often unconsciously, such that they are difficult to detect and control. Neuroscientists have recently begun to probe the neural basis of prejudice and stereotyping in an effort to identify the processes through which these biases form, influence behaviour and are regulated. This research aims to elucidate basic mechanisms of the social brain while advancing our understanding of intergroup bias in social behaviour.

Key points

  • Prejudice is a fundamental component of human social behaviour that represents the complex interplay between neural processes and situational factors. Hence, the domain of intergroup bias, which encompasses prejudice, stereotyping and the self-regulatory processes they often elicit, offers an especially rich context for studying neural processes as they function to guide complex social behaviour.

  • The sociocognitive processes involved in prejudice, stereotyping and the regulation of intergroup responses engage different sets of neural structures that seem to comprise separate functional networks.

  • Prejudice is an evaluation of, or an emotional response towards, a social group based on preconceptions. Prejudiced responses range from the rapid detection of threat or coalition and subjective visceral responses to deliberate evaluations and dehumanization — processes that are supported most directly by the amygdala, orbital frontal cortex, insula, striatum and medial prefrontal cortex.

  • Stereotypes represent the cognitive component of intergroup bias — the conceptual attributes associated with a particular social group. Stereotyping involves the encoding of group-based concepts and their influence on impression formation, social goals and behaviour. These processes are primarily underpinned by the anterior temporal lobes and the medial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices.

  • Expressions of prejudice and stereotyping are often regulated on the basis of personal beliefs and social norms. This regulatory process involves neural structures that are typically recruited for cognitive control, such as the dorsal anterior cingulate and lateral prefrontal cortices, as well as structures supporting mentalizing and perspective taking, such as the rostral anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortices.

  • Situated at the interface of the natural and social sciences, the neuroscience of prejudice offers a unique context for understanding complex social behaviour and an opportunity to apply neuroscientific advances to pressing social issues.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The psychology of prejudice: ingroup love and outgroup hate? J. Soc. Issues 55, 429–444 (1999).

  2. 2.

    & Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 616–626 (2003).

  3. 3.

    & Seeing “us versus them”: minimal group effects on the neural encoding of faces. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 298–301 (2013).

  4. 4.

    The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, 1954).

  5. 5.

    in The Handbook of Social Psychology Vol. 2, 4th edn (eds Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G.) 357–411 (McGraw Hill, 1998).

  6. 6.

    & Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 652–661 (2006).

  7. 7.

    Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56, 5–18 (1989).

  8. 8.

    , , & Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 1013–1027 (1995).

  9. 9.

    & Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 102, 4–27 (1995).

  10. 10.

    The social neuroscience of intergroup relations. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 19, 1–54 (2008).

  11. 11.

    & The neural correlates of race. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 524–531 (2009). In a field dominated by fMRI studies, this review presents important research on ERP approaches to probing the neural underpinnings of sociocognitive processes involved in prejudice and stereotyping.

  12. 12.

    , & The neuroscience of race. Nature Neurosci. 15, 940–948 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Can neuroscience advance social psychological theory? Social neuroscience for the behavioral social psychologist. Soc. Cogn. 28, 695–716 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 59–63 (2006).

  15. 15.

    & in The Social Self: Cognitive, Interpersonal, and Intergroup Perspectives (eds Forgas, J. P. & Williams, K. D.) 309–326 (Psychology Press, 2002).

  16. 16.

    & Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 770–789 (2005).

  17. 17.

    & What is the amygdala? Trends Neurosci. 21, 323–331 (1998).

  18. 18.

    Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 155–184 (2000).

  19. 19.

    Neural systems involved in fear and anxiety measured with fear-potentiated startle. Am. Psychol. 61, 741–756 (2006).

  20. 20.

    & The neuroanatomical and neurochemical basis of conditioned fear. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 23, 743–760 (1999).

  21. 21.

    , , & Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear. J. Neurosci. 8, 2517–2529 (1988).

  22. 22.

    & Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 65–73 (1999).

  23. 23.

    & Altered food preferences after lesions in the basolateral region of the amygdala in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 83, 248–259 (1973).

  24. 24.

    Fear, faces, and the human amygdala. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 166–172 (2008).

  25. 25.

    et al. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 729–738 (2000). An early fMRI investigation of neural correlates of implicit prejudice, focusing on the amygdala. Relative differences in amygdala activity in response to black compared with white faces were associated with a behavioural index of implicit prejudice and startle responses to black versus white faces.

  26. 26.

    et al. Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup versus ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport 11, 2351–2355 (2000).

  27. 27.

    , & Individual differences in the activation and control of affective race bias as assessed by startle eyeblink responses and self-report. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 738–753 (2003). The first reported difference in amygdala activity in response to black compared with white (and Asian) faces. By using the startle-eyeblink method to assess amygdala activity related to the CeA, the results link implicit prejudice more directly to a Pavlovian conditioning mechanism of learning and behavioural expression.

  28. 28.

    & A memory systems model of implicit social cognition. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 143–148 (2011).

  29. 29.

    & Reducing automatically-activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32, 421–433 (2006).

  30. 30.

    , , & (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 957–971 (2007).

  31. 31.

    & Intergroup anxiety effects on implicit racial evaluation and stereotyping. Emotion 12, 1273–1280 (2012).

  32. 32.

    , , & A review of neuroimaging studies of race-related prejudice: does amygdala response reflect threat? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 179 (2014).

  33. 33.

    et al. The effects of skin tone on race-related amygdala activity: an fMRI investigation. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 39–44 (2007).

  34. 34.

    , , & Eye-gaze direction modulates race-related amygdala activity. Group Process. Interg. Relat. 11, 233–246 (2008).

  35. 35.

    , , & The neural origins of superficial and individuated judgments about ingroup and outgroup members. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31, 150–159 (2010).

  36. 36.

    , , & Negative stereotype activation alters interaction between neural correlates of arousal, inhibition, and cognitive control. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 771–781 (2012).

  37. 37.

    et al. Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychol. Sci. 15, 806–813 (2004).

  38. 38.

    , , & Amygdala sensitivity to race is not present in childhood but emerges in adolescence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 25, 234–244 (2013).

  39. 39.

    , & The impact of childhood experience on amygdala response to perceptually familiar black and white faces. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26, 1992–2004 (2014).

  40. 40.

    , , & The role of social group in the persistence of learned fear. Science 309, 785–787 (2005).

  41. 41.

    & The threat of appearing prejudiced and race-based attentional biases. Psychol. Sci. 19, 98–102 (2008).

  42. 42.

    , & Situation-based social anxiety enhances the neural processing of faces: evidence from an intergroup context. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. (2013).

  43. 43.

    & Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 811–832 (1998).

  44. 44.

    & Intergroup anxiety. J. Soc. Issues 41, 157–175 (1985).

  45. 45.

    , , , & An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals. Nature Neurosci. 8, 720–722 (2005).

  46. 46.

    & Controlling racial prejudice: social-cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychol. Sci. 16, 56–63 (2005).

  47. 47.

    , & The neural substrates of in-group bias: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychol. Sci. 11, 1131–1139 (2008). This study compared the independent effects of race and coalition (team membership) on amygdala responses to faces and showed that when team membership was salient, the amygdala responded to coalition (subject's team or other team) and not race (black or white). This finding demonstrated that the amygdala response to race is not inevitable but rather corresponds to the subject's particular task goal.

  48. 48.

    et al. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nature Neurosci. 6, 1323–1328 (2003).

  49. 49.

    , & Evaluative versus trait representation in intergroup social judgments: distinct roles of anterior temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 50, 3600–3611 (2012). Using fMRI, the authors distinguished neural processes involved in stereotyping and prejudiced attitudes. Stereotype-based judgements of black compared with white people uniquely involved the mPFC; affect-based judgements uniquely involved the OFC.

  50. 50.

    , , & Differential fusiform responses to same- and other-race faces. Nature Neurosci. 4, 845–850 (2001). The first demonstration of race effects in visual processing, using fMRI. Differences in fusiform responses to black and white faces predicted the degree of 'own race bias' in memory in white subjects.

  51. 51.

    , , & Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender and race. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 915–930 (2007).

  52. 52.

    , & Implicit race bias decreases the similarity of neural representations of black and white faces. Psychol. Sci. 24, 160–166 (2013).

  53. 53.

    & Huxtables on the brain: an fMRI study of race and norm violation. Polit. Psychol. 33, 313–330 (2012).

  54. 54.

    Fear, vigilance, and ambiguity: initial neuroimaging studies of the human amygdala. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 7, 177–188 (1998).

  55. 55.

    , & Nonlinear amygdala response to face trustworthiness: contributions of high and low spatial frequency information. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 519–528 (2009).

  56. 56.

    , & Affective flexibility: evaluative processing goals shape amygdala activity. Psychol. Sci. 19, 152–160 (2008).

  57. 57.

    , & Intact performance on an indirect measure of race bias following amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia 41, 203–208 (2003).

  58. 58.

    , & Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 10, 295–307 (2000).

  59. 59.

    , , , & Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neurosci. 4, 95–102 (2001).

  60. 60.

    , , , & Frontal cortex and reward-guided learning and decision-making. Neuron 70, 1054–1069 (2011).

  61. 61.

    , , , & The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 594–604 (2003).

  62. 62.

    & Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268–277 (2006).

  63. 63.

    & The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. Cereb. Cortex 10, 206–219 (2000).

  64. 64.

    et al. The Quadruple Process model approach to examining the neural underpinnings of prejudice. Neuroimage 43, 775–783 (2008).

  65. 65.

    How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 655–666 (2002).

  66. 66.

    How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 10, 59–70 (2009).

  67. 67.

    & Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuro-imaging responses to extreme outgroups. Psychol. Sci. 17, 847–853 (2006).

  68. 68.

    et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004).

  69. 69.

    et al. Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 439, 466–469 (2006).

  70. 70.

    , & How do we empathize with someone who is not like us? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 362–376 (2010).

  71. 71.

    , , & Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. J. Neurosci. 29, 8525–8529 (2009). In a demonstration of racial bias in empathy, mPFC and ACC activity linked to empathy was observed only when subjects viewed members of their own racial group being exposed to painful stimuli.

  72. 72.

    & Bounded empathy: neural responses to outgroup targets' (mis)fortunes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 3791–3803 (2011).

  73. 73.

    , & Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 357–381 (1986).

  74. 74.

    , , & Anticipation of monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci. 21, RC159 (2001).

  75. 75.

    et al. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304, 452–454 (2004).

  76. 76.

    et al. Race and reputation: perceived racial group trustworthiness influences the neural correlates of trust decisions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 744–753 (2012).

  77. 77.

    , & Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15238–15243 (2002).

  78. 78.

    Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 829–858 (2009).

  79. 79.

    , & The medial prefrontal cortex mediates social event knowledge. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 103–109 (2009).

  80. 80.

    & Interacting minds—a biological basis. Science 286, 1692–1695 (1999).

  81. 81.

    , & Us and them: intergroup failures of empathy. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 149–153 (2011).

  82. 82.

    , & From agents to objects: sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 540–551 (2011).

  83. 83.

    & in Handbook of Social Cognition Vol. 2, 2nd edn (eds Wyer, R. S. Jr & Srull, T. K.) 1–68 (Erlbaum, 1994).

  84. 84.

    , , & Social cognition and the anterior temporal lobes: a review and theoretical framework. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 123–133 (2013).

  85. 85.

    & Stereotypes and stereotyping: what's the brain got to do with it? Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 22, 215–273 (2011). A comprehensive review of neuroscience research on social stereotyping processes.

  86. 86.

    Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49, 87–115 (1998).

  87. 87.

    The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 25–45 (2007).

  88. 88.

    , & Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 976–987 (2007).

  89. 89.

    et al. Exploring the neural correlates of social stereotyping. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 1560–1570 (2009).

  90. 90.

    , & The enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing. Brain 130, 1718–1731 (2007).

  91. 91.

    et al. Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 6430–6435 (2007).

  92. 92.

    , , & Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts. Cortex 48, 82–96 (2012).

  93. 93.

    , & Dissociable neural correlates of stereotypes and other forms of semantic knowledge. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 764–770 (2012). An fMRI study on the neural underpinnings of stereotyping that distinguishes the role of trait inference processes from that of object knowledge representation.

  94. 94.

    , , , & Noninvasive brain stimulation reduces prejudice scores on an implicit association test. Neuropsychology 25, 185–192 (2011).

  95. 95.

    & Ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions in humans eliminate implicit gender stereotyping. J. Neurosci. 21, 1–6 (2001).

  96. 96.

    , & Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50, 655–663 (2006).

  97. 97.

    et al. Stereotype-based modulation of person perception. Neuroimage 57, 549–557 (2011).

  98. 98.

    et al. Identifying temporal and causal contributions of neural processes underlying the Implicit Association Test. (IAT). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 320 (2012).

  99. 99.

    Social psychology as a natural kind. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 246–251 (2009).

  100. 100.

    et al. Distinct regions of medial rostral prefrontal cortex supporting social and nonsocial functions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 217–226 (2007).

  101. 101.

    , , & Involvement of the mentalizing network in social and non-social high construal. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 817–824 (2014).

  102. 102.

    Uniquely human social cognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 235–239 (2006).

  103. 103.

    & Implicit and explicit processes in social cognition. Neuron 60, 503–510 (2008).

  104. 104.

    , , & The self and social cognition: the role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 153–157 (2007).

  105. 105.

    et al. Functional mapping of human memory using PET: comparisons of conceptual and perceptual tasks. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 50, 42–56 (1996).

  106. 106.

    & in Handbook of Neuropsychology Vol. 10 (eds Boller, F. & Grafman, J.) 439–466 (Elsevier, 1995).

  107. 107.

    et al. Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. J. Neurosci. 15, 5870–5878 (1995).

  108. 108.

    Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where”. Neuropsychologia 41, 280–292 (2003).

  109. 109.

    , & The prefrontal cortex: categories, concepts and cognition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1123–1136 (2002).

  110. 110.

    , & The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making. J. Neurosci. 27, 8161–8165 (2007).

  111. 111.

    , , & Neural correlates of stereotype application. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 594–604 (2009).

  112. 112.

    , & Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 170–177 (2004).

  113. 113.

    , & Negative affect and social perception: the differential impact of anger and sadness. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 24, 45–62 (1994).

  114. 114.

    , , & Prejudice from thin air: the effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 15, 319–324 (2004).

  115. 115.

    , & The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 108, 2242–2263 (2012).

  116. 116.

    , & Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 215–222 (2000).

  117. 117.

    , & Conflict-induced behavioral adjustment: a clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 10, 141–152 (2009).

  118. 118.

    , , , & A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol. Sci. 4, 385–390 (1993).

  119. 119.

    , , , & Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 402, 179–181 (1999).

  120. 120.

    , , , & Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652 (2001).

  121. 121.

    et al. The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 12, 154–167 (2011).

  122. 122.

    & in Self Control in Society, Mind and Brain (eds Hassin, R. R., Ochsner, K. N. & Trope, Y.). 49–75 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

  123. 123.

    et al. Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychol. Sci. 15, 88–93 (2004). This study demonstrated the role of the ACC in the control of racial bias. Using ERPs, the authors found an increase ACC activity to stereotype-based conflict that predicted enhanced control of bias in behaviour.

  124. 124.

    , , & Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal versus external cues. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 1, 26–36 (2006).

  125. 125.

    , & Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: the role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 60–74 (2008).

  126. 126.

    , & Stereotype activation and control of race bias: cognitive control of inhibition and its impairment by alcohol. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 272–287 (2006).

  127. 127.

    , & Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: the role of threat perception and cognitive control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42, 120–128 (2006).

  128. 128.

    , , , & Accounting for successful control of implicit racial bias: the roles of association activation, response monitoring, and overcoming bias. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37, 1534–1545 (2011).

  129. 129.

    , , , & Neural correlates of experienced moral emotion: an fMRI investigation of emotion in response to prejudice feedback. Soc. Neurosci. 9, 203–218 (2014).

  130. 130.

    , , & Moral concerns increase attention and response monitoring during IAT performance: ERP evidence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 141–149 (2014).

  131. 131.

    The prefrontal cortex—an update: time is of the essence. Neuron 2, 319–333 (2001).

  132. 132.

    & D'Esposito, M. Is the rostro–caudal axis of the frontal lobe hierarchical? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 10, 659–669 (2009).

  133. 133.

    , & The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 302, 1181–1185 (2003).

  134. 134.

    The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 13, 214–228 (2007).

  135. 135.

    , & Sequence of information processing for emotions based on the anatomic dialogue between prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Neuroimage 34, 905–923 (2007).

  136. 136.

    Coordinated roles of motivation and perception in the regulation of intergroup responses: frontal cortical asymmetry effects on the P2 event-related potential and behavior. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 2609–2617 (2010). This study demonstrated the role of the PFC in the behavioural control of racial bias and showed that this effect involves changes in early perceptual attention to racial cues. The study provided initial evidence for a 'motivated perception' account of self-regulation.

  137. 137.

    , & A dynamic model of guilt: implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychol. Sci. 18, 524–530 (2007).

  138. 138.

    , , , & Dissociable effects of prefrontal and anterior temporal cortical lesions on stereotypical gender attitudes. Neuropsychologia 47, 2125–2132 (2009).

  139. 139.

    & Neurons in medial prefrontal cortex signal memory for fear extinction. Nature 420, 70–74 (2002).

  140. 140.

    The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 119, 3–22 (1996).

  141. 141.

    , , , & Just say no (to stereotyping): effects of training on the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 871–888 (2000).

  142. 142.

    , & Verbal instruction abolishes fear conditioned to racial out-group faces. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 1303–1307 (2009).

  143. 143.

    Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B 20, 219–231 (1994).

  144. 144.

    , , , & The regulation of explicit and implicit racial bias: the role of motivations to respond without prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 835–848 (2002).

  145. 145.

    , & The control-freak mind: stereotypical biases are eliminated following conflict-activated cognitive control. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 498–503 (2014).

  146. 146.

    , , & Putting the brakes on prejudice: on the development and operation of cues for control. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 1029–1050 (2002).

  147. 147.

    , & Reducing the expression of implicit stereotypes: reflexive control through implementation intentions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 36, 512–523 (2010).

  148. 148.

    et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 449–454 (2006).

  149. 149.

    , & Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard). J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 3343–3354 (2011).

  150. 150.

    , , , & Visualizing minimal ingroup and outgroup faces: implications for impressions, attitudes, and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106, 897–911 (2014).

  151. 151.

    & Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9079–9084 (2014).

  152. 152.

    , & Seeing race: N170 responses to race and their relation to automatic racial attitudes and controlled processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 3152–3161 (2011).

  153. 153.

    , , , & The importance of skin color and facial structure in perceiving and remembering others: an electro-physiological study. Brain Res. 1388, 123–133 (2011).

  154. 154.

    , , & Event-related potentials and time course of the 'other-race' face classification advantage. Neuroreport 15, 905–910 (2004).

  155. 155.

    et al. Face versus non-face object perception and the 'other-race' effect: a spatiotemporal event-related potential study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 515–528 (2003).

  156. 156.

    & The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: an ERP study of race and gender perception. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 5, 21–36 (2005).

  157. 157.

    , , & Social contact and other-race face processing in the human brain. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 3, 16–25 (2008).

  158. 158.

    , & Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased. Biol. Psychol. 81, 103–109 (2009).

  159. 159.

    , & Multivoxel patterns in fusiform face area differentiate faces by sex and race. PLoS ONE 8, e69684 (2013).

  160. 160.

    , & Is race erased? Decoding race from patterns of neural activity when skin color is not diagnostic of group boundaries. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 750–755 (2013).

  161. 161.

    , , & Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. meta-analysis of predictive validity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97, 17–41 (2009).

  162. 162.

    Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 181–192 (2001).

  163. 163.

    , & Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the Implicit Association Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480 (1998).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work on this article was supported by a National Science Foundation grant (BCS 0847350). The author thanks members of the NYU Social Neuroscience Laboratory, J. Freeman, K. Ratner and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. New York University, Department of Psychology, 6 Washington Place, New York, New York 10003, USA.

    • David M. Amodio

Authors

  1. Search for David M. Amodio in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Amodio.

Glossary

Social motivations

Motives that operate in social contexts and satisfy basic, often universal, goals and aspirations, such as to affiliate (for example, form relationships and communities) or to achieve dominance (for example, within a social hierarchy).

Stereotypes

Conceptual attributes associated with a group and its members (often through over-generalization), which may refer to trait or circumstantial characteristics.

Prejudices

Evaluations of or affective responses towards a social group and its members based on preconceptions.

Self-regulation

The process of responding in an intentional manner, often involving the inhibition or overriding of an alternative response tendency.

Configural face encoding

The visual encoding of a face in terms of its basic structural characteristics (for example, the eyes, nose, mouth and the relative distances between these elements). Configural encoding may be contrasted with featural encoding, which refers to the encoding of feature characteristics that make an individual's face unique.

Instrumental responses

Actions performed to achieve a desired outcome (that is, goal-directed responses).

Implicit bias

Prejudiced or stereotype-based perceptions or responses that operate without conscious awareness.

Deliberative judgements

Judgements that result from thoughtful considerations (often involving cognitive control) as opposed to rapid, gut-level, 'snap' judgements.

Event-related potential

(ERP). An electrical signal produced by summated postsynaptic potentials of cortical neurons in response to a discrete event, such as a stimulus or a response in an experimental task. Typically recorded from the scalp in humans, ERPs can be measured with extremely high temporal resolution and can be used to track rapid, real-time changes in neural activity.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3800