Neuroscience addresses questions that, if resolved, will reveal aspects of our individuality. Therefore neuroscientific knowledge is not solely constrained within laboratories, but readily captures the attention of the public at large. Ideas, concepts and images in neuroscience widely circulate in culture and are portrayed in literature, film, works of art, the mass media and commercial products, therefore shaping social values and consumer practices. The interaction between art and science offers an opportunity to make the scientific community and the public aware of the social and ethical implications of the scientific advances in neuroscience.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Journal of Physiological Anthropology Open Access 24 April 2015
BMC Neurology Open Access 06 February 2013
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Anker, S. & Frazzetto, G. Neuroculture, an exhibition at the Westport Arts Center, Westport, CT US. Neuroculture [online], (2006).
Frazzetto, G. Neural networking in Manhattan. Nature 451, 769 (2008).
Mora, F. Neurocultura. Una cultura basada en el cerebro. (Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 2007).
Abi-Rached, J. The rise of neurosocieties. The ethical, social, economic, and political implications of the new brain sciences. EMBO rep. 9, 1158–1162 (2009).
Dawson, G. Soldier Heroes: British Adventure, Empire and the Imagining of Masculinities. (Routledge, London, 2004).
Anker, S. Cultural Imaginaries and Laboratories of the Real: representing the Genetic Sciences forthcoming in The Genetics Handbook (Routledge, Cesagen Collection, London, 2009).
Vidal, F. Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity, Hist. Hum. Sci. 22, 5–36 (2009).
McEwan, I. Saturday (Jonathan Cape, London, 2005).
Reiner, C. The Man with Two Brains. Warner Bros (1983).
Gondry, M. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Focus Features (2004).
Zeki, S. Inner vision: an exploration of art and the brain (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
Freedberg, D. & Gallese, V. Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 197–203 (2007).
Onians, J. Neuroarthistory. From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2007).
Stafford, B. Echo objects. The cognitive work of images (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007).
Vidal, F. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and the Cultural History of the Self. WerkstattGeschichte 45, 96–109 (2007).
Vidal, F. Ectobrains in the movies in The Fragment: an incomplete history (ed. Tronzo, W.) 193–211 (Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, 2009).
Feist, F. E. Donovan's Brain. United Artists (1953).
Shiels, M. The man who sold his brain, BBC News (27 Oct 2003).
Nelkin, D. & Lindee, M. S. The DNA mystique (Freeman, New York, 1995).
Keller, E. F. The Century of the Gene (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
Nelkin, D. & Anker, S. The influence of genetics on contemporary art. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 967–971 (2002).
Anker, S. & Nelkin, D. The Molecuar Gaze: Art in the Genetic Age (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York, 2004).
Mauron, A. Renovating the house of being: genomes, souls and selves. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1001, 240–252 (2003).
Wingate, R. & Kwint, M. Imagining the brain cell: the neuron in visual culture. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 745–752 (2006).
Dodt, H. U. et al. Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain. Nature Methods 4, 331–336 (2007).
Verveer, P. J. et al. High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of large specimens with light sheet based microscopy. Nature Methods 4, 311–313 (2007).
Livet, J. et al. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature, 450, 56–62 (2007).
Lichtman, J. W., Livet, J. & Sanes, J. R. A technicolour approach to the connectome. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9, 417–422 (2008).
McGinn, C. Can we solve the mind-body problem? Mind, 98, 349–366 (1989).
Aldworth, S. Diary entry describing the artist's experience of a cerebral angiogram [online], (2001).
Illes, J., Kirschen, M. P. & Gabrieli, J. D. From neuroimaging to neuroethics, Nature Neurosci., 6, 205 (2003).
Uttal, W. R. The New Phrenology. The Limits of Localising Cognitive Processes in the Brain (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001).
Racine, E, Bar-Ilan, O. & Illes, J. fMRI in the public eye, Nature. Rev. Neurosci, 6, 159–156 (2005).
Dumit, J. Picturing Personhood. Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004).
Wood, N. Brainstorm (1983).
Tarr, M. J. & Warren, W. H. Virtual reality in behavioural neuroscience and beyond. Nature Neurosci.,5, 1089–1092
De Carvalho, M. R., Freire, R. C. & Nardi, A. E. Virtual reality as a mechanism for exposure therapy. World J. Biol. Psychiatry, 31, 1–11 (2008).
Gregg, L. & Tarrier, N. Virtual reality in mental health: a review of the literature. Soc. Psychiatry Epidemiol. 42, 343–354 (2007).
Agid, Y. et al. How can drug discovery for psychiatric disorders be improved? Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 6, 189–201 (2007).
Rose, N. The neurochemical self and its anomalies in Risk and Morality (ed. Ericson, R.) 407–437 (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2003).
Schimmel, P. & Mark, L. G. Ecstasy: In and about altered states (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005).
Michaux, H. Miserable Miracle (Editions Gallimard, Paris, 1972).
Wolpe, P. Treatment, enhancement, and the ethics of neurotherapeutics. Brain Cogn. 50, 387–395 (2002).
Parens, E. (ed.) Enhancing Human Traits. Ethical and Social Implications (Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, 1998).
Farah, M. J. Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends in Cogn. Sci. 9, 34–40 (2005).
Conrad, P. The Medicalization of Society (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2007).
Frazzetto, G. & Gross, C. Beyond Susceptibility. EMBO rep. 8, S3–S6 (2007).
Slater, L. Prozac Diary (Penguin Books, New York, 1999).
Skjoldbjaerg, E. Prozac Nation. Miramax (2001).
Martin, E. The pharmaceutical person. BioSocieties 1, 273–287 (2006).
Mintzes, B. et al. Influence of direct to consumer pharmaceutical advertising and patients' requests on prescribing decisions: two site cross sectional survey. BMJ, 324, 278–279 (2002).
Koerner, B. I. Disorder made to order. Mother Jones, 58–81 (2002).
Lane, C. Shyness: How normal behavior became a sickness (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2007).
Anker, S. & Talasek, J. D (eds) Introduction to Online Symposium on Visual Culture and Bioscience (National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington DC, 2008).
Arnold, K. & Wallace, M. Head On: Art with the Brain in Mind. Exhibition Catalogue (2002).
McLennan, R. & Gould, S. State of Mind [online] (2005).
Lehrer, J. Proust was a neuroscientist (Houghton Books, New York, 2007).
We thank J. Abi-Rached, F. Gillette and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on previous versions of this manuscript.
The condition of being rather than having a brain. Denoting a brain-based type of personhood regards the brain as the only organ in our body that we need in order to be ourselves (see also Supplementary information S1 (box) and Further information). It defines human beings as 'cerebral subjects'.
- Cerebral subject
A term used to equate human beings with their brains.
- Cultural imaginary
Term defined by the cultural historian Graham Dawson as a set of 'discursive themes, images, motifs and narrative forms that are publicly available within a given culture at any one time, and articulate its psychic and social dimensions'5.
The study of art (in its conception, execution and appreciation) and aesthetic experience in neuroscientific terms16.
- Neurochemical self
Refers to how, in light of increasing biological knowledge of behaviour, we are recruited to a way of living in which our life is understood in chemical terms. Rather than implying essentialism or determinism, being a neurochemical self implies freedom and responsibility to alter our states of mind and choosing among a large selection of means to optimise our capacities and performance36.
Broadly refers to the incorporation of neuroscience knowledge into our life, culture and intellectual discourses. Several new terms with a 'neuro-' prefix have been used to designate the set of transformations taking place in society in light of advances in neuroscience (for example, neurosociety). In 2006, we used the term neuroculture to denote how neuroscience has specifically penetrated into popular culture and artistic expression1.
Combines the fields of neuroscience, psychology and economics for the study of how people evaluate gains, losses and rewards in economic decision-making. It adopts economic models and brain imaging techniques to identify the brain areas that become active when making a decision. It is to be distinguished from 'neuromarketing' that specifically adopts imaging tools to investigate customer choices for marketing purposes (for example, the study of brain responses to TV commercials).
Aims at developing novel teaching and learning methods combining pedagogy and findings in neurobiology and cognitive sciences. It involves the efforts of scientists and teachers and it stresses the importance of early-age brain modifications for the development of learning capacities and adult behaviour.
Investigates neural phenomena underlying the subjective experience of spiritual phenomena and religious behaviour, such as prayer or ecstatic trance. It also uses brain-imaging tools and is based on the assumption of the universality and consistency of spiritual experiences across cultures and religions.
Is the condition of being an individual person. It includes essential human properties such as consciousness, the ability to reason and self-awareness.
- Rorschach test
Is a psychological test that examines personality characteristics and emotional states on the basis of the patients' perception of ambiguous images.
About this article
Cite this article
Frazzetto, G., Anker, S. Neuroculture. Nat Rev Neurosci 10, 815–821 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2736
This article is cited by
Journal of Physiological Anthropology (2015)
BMC Neurology (2013)