Review Article | Published:

Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect

Nature Reviews Neurosciencevolume 4pages2636 (2003) | Download Citation



Hemispatial neglect is a common, disabling disorder that results from brain damage, most frequently stroke. Research on patients with neglect has provided important insights into normal brain mechanisms involved in directing attention, representing space and controlling movement. Although much work has focused on the lateralized components of neglect, recent investigations have also revealed deficits that are not spatially lateralized, consistent with new findings from functional imaging, human neuropsychological and monkey electrophysiological studies. Here we propose that understanding the interactions between spatially lateralized and non-lateralized mechanisms provides important insights into the neglect syndrome and the normal functions of brain structures that are commonly damaged in neglect patients, and will contribute to the development of treatments for the condition.

Key Points

  • Neglect patients suffer pronounced spatially lateralized impairments, involving difficulties in perceiving and responding to items on the side of space opposite to the side of brain damage. So far, most research has focused on these lateralized deficits. Here we propose that neglect patients typically also have deficits that are not necessarily worse towards one side of space and that such impairments exacerbate their difficulties. Understanding these non-spatially lateralized mechanisms might help to clarify the variability found among patients, lead to improved therapy and improve our understanding of the intact human brain.

  • We review the spatially lateralized deficits that are typically seen in patients suffering from neglect. We argue that a lateralized deficit is necessary, but perhaps not sufficient, to describe the behavioural deficits seen in neglect.

  • Neglect patients show perceptual deficits on tasks that do not require spatially lateralized orienting or selection. Recent studies have highlighted problems with non-spatially lateralized selective attention, sustained attention, and trans-saccadic working memory. Although not all neglect patients show all such deficits, each deficit alone could aggravate the lateralized deficits seen in neglect.

  • Functional imaging data also show that non-lateralized tasks often involve the regions of the brain that are damaged in neglect patients. Furthermore, different tasks appear to activate neighbouring but anatomically distinct regions, suggesting that a number of different functional modules might often be involved in neglect.

  • We propose that non-spatially lateralized and lateralized deficits might combine to produce the impairments seen in individual patients. Future studies should examine both types of deficit. On the basis of neuroimaging research, we predict that the patterns of impairment will correspond with the extent and location of the lesions.

  • Acknowledging and understanding the non-spatially lateralized functions of the brain regions involved in neglect leads to clear implications for rehabilitation. Once these mechanisms are understood, a patient's individual pattern of deficit might be dealt with more effectively, using pharmacological and/or behavioural interventions.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Bisiach, E., Perani, D., Vallar, G. & Berti, A. Unilateral neglect: personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia 24, 759–767 (1986).

  2. 2

    Bisiach, E., Vallar, G., Perani, D., Papagno, C. & Berti, A. Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 24, 471–482 (1986).

  3. 3

    Stone, S. P. et al. The assessment of visuo-spatial neglect after acute stroke. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 54, 345–350 (1991).

  4. 4

    Vallar, G. Extrapersonal visual unilateral spatial neglect and its neuroanatomy. Neuroimage 14, S52–58 (2001).

  5. 5

    Husain, M. & Kennard, C. Visual neglect associated with frontal lobe infarction. J. Neurol. 243, 652–657 (1996).

  6. 6

    Husain, M., Shapiro, K., Martin, J. & Kennard, C. Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature 385, 154–156 (1997).

  7. 7

    Karnath, H. O., Ferber, S. & Himmelbach, M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 411, 950–953 (2001). A controverisal paper suggesting that the crucial lesion location for neglect is in the superior temporal gyrus.

  8. 8

    Perani, D., Vallar, G., Cappa, S., Messa, C. & Fazio, F. Aphasia and neglect after subcortical stroke. A clinical/cerebral perfusion correlation study. Brain 110, 1211–1229 (1987).

  9. 9

    Karnath, H. O., Himmelbach, M. & Rorden, C. The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain 125, 350–360 (2002).

  10. 10

    Hillis, A. E. et al. Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: the role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain 125, 1094–1104 (2002). An elegant study using MR perfusion to demonstrate overlying cortical hypoperfusion in neglect patients with subcortical lesions.

  11. 11

    Gainotti, G., Messerli, P. & Tissot, R. Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 35, 545–550 (1972).

  12. 12

    Stone, S. P., Patel, P., Greenwood, R. J. & Halligan, P. W. Measuring visual neglect in acute stroke and predicting its recovery: the visual neglect recovery index. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 55, 431–436 (1992).

  13. 13

    Denes, G., Semenza, C., Stoppa, E. & Lis, A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain 105, 543–552 (1982).

  14. 14

    Jehkonen, M. et al. Visual neglect as a predictor of functional outcome one year after stroke. Acta Neurol. Scand. 101, 195–201 (2000).

  15. 15

    Cherney, L. R., Halper, A. S., Kwasnica, C. M., Harvey, R. L. & Zhang, M. Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: relationship with unilateral neglect. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 322–328 (2001).

  16. 16

    Mesulam, M. M. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 354, 1325–1346 (1999). | PubMed

  17. 17

    Heilman, K. M. & Watson, R. T. in Clinical Neuropsychology (eds Heilman, K. M. & Valenstein, E.) 243–293 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2001).

  18. 18

    Bisiach, E. & Vallar, G. in Handbook of Neuropsychology (ed. Rizzolatti, G.) 459–502 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000).

  19. 19

    Pouget, A. & Driver, J. Relating unilateral neglect to the neural coding of space. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 242–249 (2000).

  20. 20

    Halligan, P. W. & Marshall, J. C. Toward a principled explanation of unilateral neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11, 167–206 (1994).

  21. 21

    Robertson, I. H. & Marshall, J. C. Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, 1993).

  22. 22

    Rafal, R. D. Neglect. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 231–236 (1994).

  23. 23

    Milner, A. D. in Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space (eds Thier, P. & Karnath, H.-O.) 3–22 (Springer, Berlin, 1997).

  24. 24

    Bartolomeo, P. & Chokron, S. Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 217–234 (2002).

  25. 25

    Calton, J., Dickinson, A. R. & Snyder, L. H. Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neurosci. 5, 580–588 (2002).

  26. 26

    Bisiach, E. Mental representation in unilateral neglect and related disorders: the twentieth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 46, 435–461 (1993).

  27. 27

    Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Coslett, B., Whelan, H. & Watson, R. T. Directional hypokinesia: prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology 35, 855–859 (1985).

  28. 28

    Mattingley, J. B., Husain, M., Rorden, C., Kennard, C. & Driver, J. Motor role of human inferior parietal lobe revealed in unilateral neglect patients. Nature 392, 179–182 (1998).

  29. 29

    Husain, M., Mattingley, J. B., Rorden, C., Kennard, C. & Driver, J. Distinguishing sensory and motor biases in parietal and frontal neglect. Brain 123, 1643–1659 (2000).

  30. 30

    Bisiach, E. & Luzzatti, C. Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 14, 129–133 (1978).

  31. 31

    Behrmann, M. & Tipper, S. P. Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 83–100 (1999).

  32. 32

    Karnath, H. O., Schenkel, P. & Fischer, B. Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralateral' deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. Brain 114, 1997–2014 (1991).

  33. 33

    Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., Goodrich, S. J. & Rafal, R. D. Axis-based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 32, 1353–1365 (1994).

  34. 34

    Kinsbourne, M. in Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies (eds Robertson, I. H. & Marshall, J. C.) 63–86 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, 1993).

  35. 35

    Smania, N. et al. The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients. Brain 121, 1759–1770 (1998).

  36. 36

    Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J. & Rafal, R. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J. Neurosci. 4, 1863–1874 (1984).

  37. 37

    Duncan, J., Humphreys, G. & Ward, R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 255–261 (1997).

  38. 38

    Friedrich, F. J., Egly, R., Rafal, R. D. & Beck, D. Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychology 12, 193–207 (1998). A follow-up to reference 36, showing that the critical lesion location for the attentional disengagement deficit is the temporo-parietal junction.

  39. 39

    Bisiach, E. et al. Dissociation of ophthalmokinetic and melokinetic attention in unilateral neglect. Cereb. Cortex 5, 439–447 (1995).

  40. 40

    Mark, V. W., Kooistra, C. A. & Heilman, K. M. Hemispatial neglect affected by non–neglected stimuli. Neurology 38, 1207–1211 (1988).

  41. 41

    Niemeier, M. & Karnath, H. O. Exploratory saccades show no direction-specific deficit in neglect. Neurology 54, 515–518 (2000).

  42. 42

    Husain, M. et al. Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. Brain 124, 941–952 (2001).

  43. 43

    Eglin, M., Robertson, L. C. & Knight, R. T. Visual search performance in the neglect syndrome. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1, 372–385 (1989).

  44. 44

    Luria, A. R. Disorders of 'simultaneous perception' in a case of bilateral occipito-parietal brain injury. Brain 83, 437–449 (1959).

  45. 45

    Humphreys, G. W., Romani, C., Olson, A., Riddoch, M. J. & Duncan, J. Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobes in humans. Nature 372, 357–359 (1994).

  46. 46

    Robertson, L. C., Lamb, M. R. & Knight, R. T. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. J. Neurosci. 8, 3757–3769 (1988). Local bias in patients with right temporo-parietal lesions is often underestimated as a potential contributor to the neglect syndrome.

  47. 47

    Duncan, J., Ward, R. & Shapiro, K. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature 369, 313–315 (1994).

  48. 48

    Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L. & Arnell, K. M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 849–860 (1992).

  49. 49

    Shapiro, K., Hillstrom, A. & Husain, M. Control of visuotemporal attention by inferior parietal and superior temporal cortex. Curr. Biol. 12, 1320–1325 (2002).

  50. 50

    Duncan, J. et al. Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 128, 450–478 (1999).

  51. 51

    Battelli, L. et al. Unilateral right parietal damage leads to bilateral deficit for high-level motion. Neuron 32, 985–995 (2001).

  52. 52

    Cusack, R., Carlyon, R. P. & Robertson, I. H. Neglect between but not within auditory objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 1056–1065 (2000).

  53. 53

    Coull, J. T. & Frith, C. D. Differential activation of right superior parietal cortex and intraparietal sulcus by spatial and nonspatial attention. Neuroimage 8, 176–187 (1998).

  54. 54

    Wojciulik, E. & Kanwisher, N. The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron 23, 747–764 (1999). A carefully conducted functional imaging study revealing parietal involvement in both spatial and non-spatial functions.

  55. 55

    Marois, R., Chun, M. M. & Gore, J. C. Neural correlates of the attentional blink. Neuron 28, 299–308 (2000).

  56. 56

    Coull, J. T. & Nobre, A. C. Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. J. Neurosci. 18, 7426–7435 (1998).

  57. 57

    Sarter, M., Givens, B. & Bruno, J. P. The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res. Rev. 35, 146–160 (2001).

  58. 58

    Parasuraman, R., Warm, J. S. & See, J. E. in The Attentive Brain (ed. Parasuraman, R.) 221–256 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998).

  59. 59

    Samuelsson, H., Hjelmquist, E., Jensen, C., Ekholm, S. & Blomstrand, C. Nonlateralized attentional deficits: an important component behind persisting visuospatial neglect? J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 20, 73–88 (1998).

  60. 60

    Wilkins, A. J., Shallice, T. & McCarthy, R. Frontal lesions and sustained attention. Neuropsychologia 25, 359–365 (1987).

  61. 61

    Rueckart, L. & Grafman, J. Sustained attention deficits in patients with right frontal lesions. Neuropsychologia 34, 953–963 (1996).

  62. 62

    Rueckart, L. & Grafman, J. Sustained attention deficits in patients with lesions of posterior cortex. Neuropsychologia 36, 653–660 (1998).

  63. 63

    Robertson, I. H. et al. Auditory sustained attention is a marker of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 35, 1527–1532 (1997). The first clear demonstration of a sustained attention deficit in neglect that correlates with spatial severity.

  64. 64

    Hjaltason, H., Tegner, R., Tham, K., Levander, M. & Ericson, K. Sustained attention and awareness of disability in chronic neglect. Neuropsychologia 34, 1229–1233 (1996).

  65. 65

    Maguire, A. M. & Ogden, J. A. MRI brain scan analyses and neuropsychological profiles of nine patients with persistent unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 40, 879–887 (2002).

  66. 66

    Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T. & Raichle, M. E. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature 349, 61–64 (1991).

  67. 67

    Hager, F. et al. Challenging the anterior attentional system with a continuous performance task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 248, 161–170 (1998).

  68. 68

    Sturm, W. et al. Functional anatomy of intrinsic alertness: evidence for a fronto-parietal-thalamic-brainstem network in the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 37, 797–805 (1999).

  69. 69

    Johannsen, P. et al. Cortical sites of sustained and divided attention in normal elderly humans. Neuroimage 6, 145–155 (1997).

  70. 70

    Vandenberghe, R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B. & Mesulam, M. M. Functional specificity of superior parietal mediation of spatial shifting. Neuroimage 14, 661–673 (2001). This study provides evidence for an antomical dissociation between spatial shifting and sustained attention in human parietal cortex.

  71. 71

    Adler, C. M. et al. Changes in neuronal activation with increasing attention demand in healthy volunteers: an fMRI study. Synapse 42, 266–272 (2001).

  72. 72

    Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M. & Goldberg, M. E. The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 391, 481–484 (1998).

  73. 73

    Constantinidis, C. & Steinmetz, M. A. Neuronal responses in area 7a to multiple-stimulus displays: I. neurons encode the location of the salient stimulus. Cereb. Cortex 11, 581–591 (2001). An electrophysiological study demonstrating the sparse encoding of only salient stimuli within parietal cortex.

  74. 74

    Knight, R. T., Scabini, D., Woods, D. L. & Clayworth, C. C. Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3. Brain Res. 502, 109–116 (1989).

  75. 75

    Barcelo, F., Suwazono, S. & Knight, R. T. Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans. Nature Neurosci. 3, 399–403 (2000).

  76. 76

    Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J. & Davis, K. D. A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 615–620 (2002).

  77. 77

    Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J. & Davis, K. D. The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 14, 1256–1267 (2001).

  78. 78

    Clark, V. P., Fannon, S., Lai, S., Benson, R. & Bauer, L. Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 3133–3139 (2000).

  79. 79

    Marois, R., Leung, H. C. & Gore, J. C. A stimulus-driven approach to object identity and location processing in the human brain. Neuron 25, 717–728 (2000).

  80. 80

    Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Gray, J. R., Molfese, D. L. & Snyder, A. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cereb. Cortex 11, 825–836 (2001).

  81. 81

    Linden, D. E. et al. The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. Cereb. Cortex 9, 815–823 (1999).

  82. 82

    Behrmann, M., Watt, S., Black, S. E. & Barton, J. J. Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia 35, 1445–1458 (1997).

  83. 83

    Wojciulik, E., Husain, M., Clarke, K. & Driver, J. Spatial working memory deficit in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 39, 390–396 (2001).

  84. 84

    Driver, J. & Husain, M. in The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect (eds Karnath, H.-O., Milner, A. D. & Vallar, G.) 351–362 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2002).

  85. 85

    Husain, M. et al. Impaired spatial working memory contributes to unilateral neglect. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 73, 221 (2002).

  86. 86

    Husain, M. et al. Trans-saccadic spatial working memory deficit in neglect patients. Soc. Neurosci. Meeting 16.7 (2002).

  87. 87

    Heide, W. et al. Activation of frontoparietal cortices during memorized triple-step sequences of saccadic eye movements: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 1177–1189 (2001). An important functional imaging study localizing areas that are related to trans-saccadic updating of spatial representation.

  88. 88

    Tobler, P. N. et al. Functional organisation of the saccadic reference system processing extraretinal signals in humans. Vision Res. 41, 1351–1358 (2001).

  89. 89

    Duhamel, J. R., Goldberg, M. E., Fitzgibbon, E. J., Sirigu, A. & Grafman, J. Saccadic dysmetria in a patient with a right frontoparietal lesion. The importance of corollary discharge for accurate spatial behaviour. Brain 115, 1387–1402 (1992).

  90. 90

    Heide, W., Blankenburg, M., Zimmermann, E. & Kompf, D. Cortical control of double-step saccades: implications for spatial orientation. Ann. Neurol. 38, 739–748 (1995).

  91. 91

    Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Shulman, G. L. & Petersen, S. E. A PET study of visuospatial attention. J. Neurosci. 13, 1202–1226 (1993).

  92. 92

    Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 201–215 (2002). An interesting review providing an alternative perspective on parietal and frontal functions.

  93. 93

    di Pellegrino, G., Basso, G. & Frassinetti, F. Visual extinction as a spatio-temporal disorder of selective attention. Neuroreport 9, 835–839 (1998).

  94. 94

    Husain, M. in The Limits of Attention (ed. Shapiro, K.) 229–246 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2001).

  95. 95

    Cassidy, T. P., Lewis, S. & Gray, C. S. Recovery from visuospatial neglect in stroke patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 64, 555–557 (1998).

  96. 96

    Robertson, I. H., Mattingley, J. B., Rorden, C. & Driver, J. Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness. Nature 395, 169–172 (1998).

  97. 97

    Weinberg, J. et al. Visual scanning training effect on reading-related tasks in acquired right brain damage. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 58, 479–486 (1977).

  98. 98

    Rossetti, Y. et al. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 395, 166–169 (1998). An innovative study showing improvement in left neglect after adaptation to rightward deviating prisms.

  99. 99

    Frassinetti, F., Angeli, V., Meneghello, F., Avanzi, S. & Ladavas, E. Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 125, 608–623 (2002).

  100. 100

    Robertson, I. H., Tegner, R., Tham, K., Lo, A. & Nimmo-Smith, I. Sustained attention training for unilateral neglect: theoretical and rehabilitation implications. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 17, 416–430 (1995).

  101. 101

    Robbins, T. W. Arousal systems and attentional processes. Biol. Psychol. 45, 57–71 (1997).

  102. 102

    Andersen, R. A. Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352, 1421–1428 (1997). | PubMed

  103. 103

    Williams, S. & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. Modulation of memory fields by dopamine D1 receptors in prefrontal cortex. Nature 376, 572–575 (1995).

  104. 104

    Grujic, Z. et al. Dopamine agonists reorient visual exploration away from the neglected hemispace. Neurology 51, 1395–1398 (1998).

  105. 105

    Fleet, W. S., Valenstein, E., Watson, R. T. & Heilman, K. M. Dopamine agonist therapy for neglect in humans. Neurology 37, 1765–1771 (1987).

  106. 106

    Marshall, J. C., Fink, G. R., Halligan, P. W. & Vallar, G. Spatial awareness: a function of the posterior parietal lobe? Cortex 38, 253–257; discussion 258–260 (2002). | PubMed |

  107. 107

    Bisiach, E., Geminiani, G., Berti, A. & Rusconi, M. L. Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology 40, 1278–1281 (1990).

  108. 108

    Milner, A. D. in Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect (ed. Jeannerod, M.) 259–288 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987).

  109. 109

    Marshall, J. W. et al. Clomethiazole protects against hemineglect in a primate model of stroke. Brain Res. Bull. 52, 21–29 (2000).

  110. 110

    Husain, M. & Jackson, S. R. Vision: visual space is not what it appears to be. Curr. Biol. 11, R753–755 (2001).

  111. 111

    Duhamel, J. R., Colby, C. & Goldberg, M. E. The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science 255, 90–92 (1992).

  112. 112

    Colby, C. & Goldberg, M. E. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 319–349 (1999).

Download references


This research is funded by a grant to M.H. from the Wellcome Trust. We thank J. Driver, C. Kennard, P. Malhotra, S. Mannan, D. Mort & A. Parton for their help.

Author information


  1. Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK

    • Masud Husain
  2. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, WC1N 3AR, UK

    • Masud Husain
  3. School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

    • Chris Rorden


  1. Search for Masud Husain in:

  2. Search for Chris Rorden in:

Related links

Related links


Encyclopedia of Life Sciences


MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences


eye movements and visual attention

visual neglect



Brain damage that is caused by a lack of blood supply, as a result of either blockage or rupture of a cerebral blood vessel.


A bedside clinical task in which patients have to find and mark targets that are usually displayed on a sheet of paper either on their own or with distracting non-targets.


A rapid eye movement that brings the fovea (the central retinal area with the highest resolution) to view a point of interest in a visual scene.


A rare disorder following bilateral parieto-occipital lesions in which the patient has difficulties in directing the eyes to visual objects (ocular apraxia), misreaching to peripheral visual targets (optic ataxia) and perceives only one object at a time (simultanagnosia).


Sometimes also referred to as 'simultagnosia', this is the inability to perceive more than one object at one time.


The ability to hold 'on-line' and manipulate information regarding the location of an object.

About this article

Publication history

Issue Date


Further reading