Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Incorporating sex as a biological variable in neuroscience: what do we gain?

New policies requiring preclinical studies to incorporate sex as a biological variable are impacting neuroscience research. It is too soon to know whether this change justifies the administrative and financial burdens that it imposes; however, the potential gains in fundamental knowledge and therapeutic target identification are likely to outweigh the potential costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Becker, J. B., Prendergast, B. J. & Liang, J. W. Female rats are not more variable than male rats: a meta-analysis of neuroscience studies. Biol. Sex Differ. 7, 34 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy, M. M. Multifaceted origins of sex differences in the brain. Philos. Trans. R Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20150106 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorge, R. E. et al. Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1081–1083 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Golden, L. C. & Voskuhl, R. The importance of studying sex differences in disease: the example of multiple sclerosis. J. Neurosci. Res. 95, 633–643 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tabatadze, N., Huang, G., May, R. M., Jain, A. & Woolley, C. S. Sex differences in molecular signaling at inhibitory synapses in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 35, 11252–11265 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Amateau, S. K. & McCarthy, M. M. Induction of PGE2 by estradiol mediates developmental masculinization of sex behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 643–650 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oberlander, J. G. & Woolley, C. S. 17β-estradiol acutely potentiates glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus through distinct mechanisms in males and females. J. Neurosci. 36, 2677–2690 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret M. McCarthy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

Canadian Institute of Health Research Sex, Gender and Health Research Guide

Gendered Innovations list of sex and gender policies at major granting agencies world wide

NIH notice

Open FDA

United States GAO report

Wonkblog Bad Medicine: the awful drug reactions Americans report

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCarthy, M., Woolley, C. & Arnold, A. Incorporating sex as a biological variable in neuroscience: what do we gain?. Nat Rev Neurosci 18, 707–708 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.137

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.137

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing