Abstract
Neuroethics research can contribute a level of conceptual clarity to international brain research initiatives that is essential for their ethics management as well as for the interpretations, applications and management of their emerging neuroscientific findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Neuroethics and Philosophy in Responsible Research and Innovation: The Case of the Human Brain Project
Neuroethics Open Access 07 June 2018
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Gray matters: integrative approaches for neuroscience, ethics and society Vol. 1 bioethics.govhttp://www.bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/Gray%20Matters%20Vol%201.pdf (2014).
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Gray matters: topics at the intersection of neuroscience, ethics and society Vol. 2 bioethics.govhttp://bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/GrayMatter_V2_508.pdf (2015).
Rose, N. et al. Data protection and privacy. humanbrainproject.euhttps://www.humanbrainproject.eu/documents/10180/1384155/EthicsandSocietyOpinionDataProtectionandPrivacy.pdf/3612d948-fc33-4e57-baf3-a9cfe2cd673c (2016).
Evers, K. Toward a philosophy for neuroethics. EMBO Rep. 8, S48–S51 (2007).
Evers, K. in Open Mind: Philosophy and the Mind Sciences in the 21st Century (eds Metzinger, T. & Windt, J. M.) (MIT Press, 2016).
Evers K. & Changeux, J.-P. Proactive epigenesis and ethical innovation: a neuronal hypothesis for the genesis of ethical rules. EMBO Rep. 17, 1361–1364 (2016).
Dudai, Y. & Evers, K. To simulate or not to simulate: what are the questions? Neuron 84, 254–261 (2014).
Farisco, M. & Evers, K. (eds) Neurotechnology and Direct Brain Communication. New Insights and Responsibilities Concerning Speechless but Communicative Subjects (Routledge, 2016).
Evers K. Neurotechnological assessment of consciousness disorders: five ethical imperatives. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 18, 155–162 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 720270 (Human Brain Project (HBP) SGA1). The author thanks J.-P. Changeux, M. Farisco and A. Salles for their contributions to this Comment, and K. Ramos, US National Institutes of Health (NIH), for editing the information on the US BRAIN (Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies) Initiative.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evers, K. The contribution of neuroethics to international brain research initiatives. Nat Rev Neurosci 18, 1–2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.143
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.143
This article is cited by
-
Moral Framing and Mechanisms Influence Public Willingness to Optimize Cognition
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement (2021)
-
Neuroethics and Philosophy in Responsible Research and Innovation: The Case of the Human Brain Project
Neuroethics (2019)