Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The contribution of neuroethics to international brain research initiatives

Abstract

Neuroethics research can contribute a level of conceptual clarity to international brain research initiatives that is essential for their ethics management as well as for the interpretations, applications and management of their emerging neuroscientific findings.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Gray matters: integrative approaches for neuroscience, ethics and society Vol. 1 bioethics.govhttp://www.bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/Gray%20Matters%20Vol%201.pdf (2014).

  2. 2

    The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Gray matters: topics at the intersection of neuroscience, ethics and society Vol. 2 bioethics.govhttp://bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/GrayMatter_V2_508.pdf (2015).

  3. 3

    Rose, N. et al. Data protection and privacy. humanbrainproject.euhttps://www.humanbrainproject.eu/documents/10180/1384155/EthicsandSocietyOpinionDataProtectionandPrivacy.pdf/3612d948-fc33-4e57-baf3-a9cfe2cd673c (2016).

  4. 4

    Evers, K. Toward a philosophy for neuroethics. EMBO Rep. 8, S48–S51 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Evers, K. in Open Mind: Philosophy and the Mind Sciences in the 21st Century (eds Metzinger, T. & Windt, J. M.) (MIT Press, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Evers K. & Changeux, J.-P. Proactive epigenesis and ethical innovation: a neuronal hypothesis for the genesis of ethical rules. EMBO Rep. 17, 1361–1364 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Dudai, Y. & Evers, K. To simulate or not to simulate: what are the questions? Neuron 84, 254–261 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Farisco, M. & Evers, K. (eds) Neurotechnology and Direct Brain Communication. New Insights and Responsibilities Concerning Speechless but Communicative Subjects (Routledge, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Evers K. Neurotechnological assessment of consciousness disorders: five ethical imperatives. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 18, 155–162 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 720270 (Human Brain Project (HBP) SGA1). The author thanks J.-P. Changeux, M. Farisco and A. Salles for their contributions to this Comment, and K. Ramos, US National Institutes of Health (NIH), for editing the information on the US BRAIN (Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies) Initiative.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathinka Evers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evers, K. The contribution of neuroethics to international brain research initiatives. Nat Rev Neurosci 18, 1–2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.143

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing