Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Traits and states in mindfulness meditation

In our Review (The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 213–225 (2015))1, we described recent research into the neural mechanisms and consequences of mindfulness meditation. In their comment on our article (What is being studied as mindfulness meditation? Nat.Rev.Neurosci.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.6)2, Wheeler, Arnkoff and Glass pointed out the importance of differentiating between dispositional mindfulness (also known as trait mindfulness) and deliberate (intentional) mindfulness meditation2. Their suggestion is consistent with our point of view with regard to individual differences in mindfulness meditation1,3. Although we restricted our Review to studies that aimed to investigate mindfulness as an intentional practice1, pre-existing differences in dispositional mindfulness might have affected the findings described.

So far, relatively little is known about how differences in dispositional mindfulness might influence brain processing and the effective practice of mindfulness. However, a number of studies within the past decade have investigated the neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness and have identified some functional and structural brain areas involved4,5,6,7,8,9.

Dispositional mindfulness is usually assessed through self-report questionnaires, such as the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale10, the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills11 or Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire12. The use of these questionnaires comes with specific challenges and limitations, which have been critically discussed13, and a recent review has concluded that the evidence to support the validity of these questionnaires is lacking12. It is therefore important to remember that what is interpreted as 'dispositional mindfulness' is what these questionnaires assess.

It is known that people differ in their attitude towards and practice of mindfulness meditation1,3. Growing evidence has indicated that mindfulness practice induces both state and trait changes: that is, it temporarily changes the condition of the brain and the corresponding pattern of activity or connectivity (state change), and it also alters personality traits following a longer period of practice. It had been traditionally assumed that personality traits are relatively stable entities, but more recent research demonstrates that personality, including disposition towards mindfulness, can change over time as a result of life experiences or through mindfulness practice14,15, suggesting that personality is itself flexible. Although this demonstrates that individuals can change the way that they feel, believe, and act, it also complicates the systematic investigation of the construct of 'dispositional mindfulness', as Wheeler, Arnkoff and Glass suggest2. Nevertheless, this recent evidence suggests that is will be important to assess dispositional mindfulness at different points during studies investigating the effects of mindfulness meditation and distinguish it from intentional mindfulness.

Individual differences in personality are likely to contribute to how people respond to and benefit from mindfulness practice, in the same way that differences in brain function and structure, genetic predisposition, life experiences and environmental factors do. However, more empirical studies are needed to establish a definitive effect of these factors on mindfulness. More longitudinal, randomized, and actively controlled studies with larger sample sizes should deepen our understanding of how people with different personality traits practice effectively.

References

  1. Tang, Y.-Y., Hölzel, B. K. & Posner, M. I. The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 213–225 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wheeler, M. S., Arnkoff, D. B. & Glass, C. R. What is being studied as mindfulness meditation? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.6 (2016).

  3. Tang, Y.-Y. & Posner, M. I. Tools of the trade: theory and method in mindfulness neuroscience. Soc. Cogn. Affect Neurosci. 8, 118–120 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu, H. et al. The brain structure correlates of individual differences in trait mindfulness: a voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroscience 272, 21–28 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kong, F. et al. Brain regions involved in dispositional mindfulness during resting state and their relation with well-being. Soc. Neurosci. Sep. 25, 1–13 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Creswell, J. D., Way, B. M., Eisenberger, N. I. & Lieberman, M. D. Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling. Psychosomat. Med. 69, 560–565 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Modinos, G., Ormel, J. & Aleman, A. Individual differences in dispositional mindfulness and brain activity involved in reappraisal of emotion. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 5, 369–377 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaurya Prakash, R., De leon, A. A., Klatt, M., Malarkey, W. & Patterson, B. Mindfulness disposition and default-mode network connectivity in older adults. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 112–117 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taren, A. A., Creswell, J. D. & Gianaros, P. J. Dispositional mindfulness co-varies with smaller amygdala and caudate volumes in community adults. PLoS One 8, e64574 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, K. W. & Ryan, R. M. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological wellbeing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 822–848 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T. & Allen, K. B. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment 11, 191–206 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, T., Reilly-Spong, M. & Gross, C. R. Mindfulness: A systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient reported outcome (PRO). Qual. Life Res. 22, 2639–2659 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grossman, P. Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology's (re)invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. Psychol. Assess. 23, 1034–1040 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nyklíček, I., van Beugen, S. & Denollet, J. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on distressed (type D) personality traits: a randomized controlled trial. J. Behav. Med. 36, 361–370 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shapiro, S. L., Brown, K. W., Thoresen, C. & Plante, T. G. The moderation of mindfulness-based stress reduction effects by trait mindfulness: results from a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Psychol. 67, 267–277 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the US Office of Naval Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Yuan Tang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, YY., Hölzel, B. & Posner, M. Traits and states in mindfulness meditation. Nat Rev Neurosci 17, 59 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.7

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing