Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Regulated proteolysis in Gram-negative bacteria — how and when?

Nature Reviews Microbiology volume 9, pages 839–848 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Key Points

  • Proteolysis is a fast response to environmental changes. It is used by bacteria to control regulatory networks.

  • Proteolysis is an irreversible process and is therefore tightly controlled. The enzymes that carry out regulated proteolysis can coordinate substrate binding and degradation and are capable of targeting only a subset of proteins.

  • In Gram-negative bacteria, proteolysis regulates a large number of cellular processes such as the synthesis of lipopolysaccharides and the ability to grow at increased temperatures.

  • Proteolysis is crucial in the response to temperature shifts, starvation, stationary phase and envelope stress.

  • Proteolysis is a major factor in controlling regulatory circuits such as the SOS response and bacterial differentiation.

Abstract

Most bacteria live in a dynamic environment where temperature, availability of nutrients and the presence of various chemicals vary, which requires rapid adaptation. Many of the adaptive changes are determined by changes in the transcription of global regulatory networks, but this response is slow because most bacterial proteins are stable and their concentration remains high even after transcription slows down. To respond rapidly, an additional level of regulation has evolved: the degradation of key proteins. However, as proteolysis is an irreversible process, it is subject to tight regulation of substrate binding and degradation. Here we review the roles of the proteolytic enzymes in Gram-negative bacteria and how these enzymes can be regulated to target only a subset of proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Architecture and mechanism of ATP-dependent proteases.
Figure 2: Proteases and protein quality control.
Figure 3: Regulation of cellular processes by proteolysis.
Figure 4: Multifaceted functions of Met.
Figure 5: Proteolysis in the adaptation to temperature increases.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanemori, M., Yanagi, H. & Yura, T. The ATP-dependent HslVU/ClpQY protease participates in turnover of cell division inhibitor SulA in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181, 3674–3680 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Inagawa, T., Kato, J., Niki, H., Karata, K. & Ogura, T. Defective plasmid partition in ftsH mutants of Escherichia coli. Mol. Genet. Genomics 265, 755–762 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Santos, D. & De Almeida, D. F. Isolation and characterization of a new temperature-sensitive cell division mutant of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 124, 1502–1507 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Herman, C. et al. Cell growth and lambda phage development controlled by the same essential Escherichia coli gene, ftsH/hflB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10861–10865 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Markovitz, A. Regulatory mechanisms for synthesis of capsular polysaccharide in mucoid mutants of Escherichia coli K12. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 51, 239–246 (1964).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sassetti, C. M., Boyd, D. H. & Rubin, E. J. Comprehensive identification of conditionally essential genes in mycobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12712–12717 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sousa, M. C. et al. Crystal and solution structures of an HslUV protease-chaperone complex. Cell 103, 633–643 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bochtler, M., Ditzel, L., Groll, M., Hartmann, C. & Huber, R. The proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 28, 295–317 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. AAA+ Proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 587–612 (2011). State of the art review on structure–function relationship and the mechanism of protein degradation by AAA+ proteases.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung, C. H. & Goldberg, A. L. The product of the lon (capR) gene in Escherichia coli is the ATP-dependent protease, protease La. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 4931–4935 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon, L. D., Gottesman, M., Tomczak, K. & Gottesman, S. Hyperdegradation of proteins in Escherichia coli rho mutants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1623–1627 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. ATP-dependent proteases of bacteria: recognition logic and operating principles. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 647–653 (2006). Review on degrons and binding domains of proteases

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gur, E. & Sauer, R. T. Recognition of misfolded proteins by Lon, a AAA+ protease. Genes Dev. 22, 2267–2277 (2008). Characterization of the substrate specificity of the protease Lon.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Akiyama, Y., Kihara, A., Tokuda, H. & Ito, K. FtsH (HflB) is an ATP-dependent protease selectively acting on SecY and some other membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31196–31201 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaltsman, A., Feder, A. & Adam, Z. Developmental and light effects on the accumulation of FtsH protease in Arabidopsis chloroplasts–implications for thylakoid formation and photosystem II maintenance. Plant J. 42, 609–617 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lies, M. & Maurizi, M. R. Turnover of endogenous SsrA-tagged proteins mediated by ATP-dependent proteases in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 22918–22929 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore, S. D. & Sauer, R. T. Ribosome rescue: tmRNA tagging activity and capacity in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 58, 456–466 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gottesman, S., Roche, E., Zhou, Y. & Sauer, R. T. The ClpXP and ClpAP proteases degrade proteins with carboxy-terminal peptide tails added by the SsrA-tagging system. Genes Dev. 12, 1338–1347 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Keiler, K. C., Waller, P. R. & Sauer, R. T. Role of a peptide tagging system in degradation of proteins synthesized from damaged messenger RNA. Science 271, 990–993 (1996). Describes the first identification of a protease-tagging system.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Keiler, K. C. & Sauer, R. T. Sequence determinants of C-terminal substrate recognition by the Tsp protease. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2589–2593 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farrell, C. M., Grossman, A. D. & Sauer, R. T. Cytoplasmic degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 57, 1750–1761 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin, A., Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. Distinct static and dynamic interactions control ATPase-peptidase communication in a AAA+ protease. Mol. Cell 27, 41–52 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Siddiqui, S. M., Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. Role of the processing pore of the ClpX AAA+ ATPase in the recognition and engagement of specific protein substrates. Genes Dev. 18, 369–374 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, J. et al. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure 9, 177–184 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barkow, S. R., Levchenko, I., Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. Polypeptide translocation by the AAA+ ClpXP protease machine. Chem. Biol. 16, 605–612 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Herman, C., Prakash, S., Lu, C. Z., Matouschek, A. & Gross, C. A. Lack of a robust unfoldase activity confers a unique level of substrate specificity to the universal AAA protease FtsH. Mol. Cell 11, 659–669 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koodathingal, P. et al. ATP-dependent proteases differ substantially in their ability to unfold globular proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 18674–18684 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gur, E. & Sauer, R. T. Degrons in protein substrates program the speed and operating efficiency of the AAA+ Lon proteolytic machine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18503–18508 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Levchenko, I., Seidel, M., Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. A specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine. Science 289, 2354–2356 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou, Y., Gottesman, S., Hoskins, J. R., Maurizi, M. R. & Wickner, S. The RssB response regulator directly targets σS for degradation by ClpXP. Genes Dev. 15, 627–637 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dougan, D. A., Reid, B. G., Horwich, A. L. & Bukau, B. ClpS, a substrate modulator of the ClpAP machine. Mol. Cell 9, 673–683 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Erbse, A., et al. ClpS is an essential component of the N-end rule pathway in Escherichia coli. Nature 439, 753–756 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Varshavsky, A. The N-end rule pathway and regulation by proteolysis. Protein Sci. 20, 1298–1345 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, K. H., Roman-Hernandez, G., Grant, R. A., Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. The molecular basis of N-end rule recognition. Mol. Cell 32, 406–414 (2008). Focuses on the adaptor proteins that increase binding of N-end rule substrates to proteases.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Schuenemann, V. J. et al. Structural basis of N-end rule substrate recognition in Escherichia coli by the ClpAP adaptor protein ClpS. EMBO Rep. 10, 508–514 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ninnis, R. L., Spall, S. K., Talbo, G. H., Truscott, K. N. & Dougan, D. A. Modification of PATase by L/F-transferase generates a ClpS-dependent N-end rule substrate in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 28, 1732–1744 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wah, D. A. et al. Flexible linkers leash the substrate binding domain of SspB to a peptide module that stabilizes delivery complexes with the AAA+ ClpXP protease. Mol. Cell 12, 355–363 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Flynn, J. M. et al. Overlapping recognition determinants within the ssrA degradation tag allow modulation of proteolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10584–10589 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosen, R. et al. Protein aggregation in Escherichia coli: role of proteases. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 207, 9–12 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Murata, S., Minami, Y., Minami, M., Chiba, T. & Tanaka, K. CHIP is a chaperone-dependent E3 ligase that ubiquitylates unfolded protein. EMBO Rep. 2, 1133–1138 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tomoyasu, T., Mogk, A., Langen, H., Goloubinoff, P. & Bukau, B. Genetic dissection of the roles of chaperones and proteases in protein folding and degradation in the Escherichia coli cytosol. Mol. Microbiol. 40, 397–413 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lorimer, G. H. & Todd, M. J. GroE structures galore. Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 116–121 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mogk, A. et al. Identification of thermolabile Escherichia coli proteins: prevention and reversion of aggregation by DnaK and ClpB. EMBO J. 18, 6934–6949 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gottesman, S. Proteolysis in bacterial regulatory circuits. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 565–587 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jenal, U. & Hengge-Aronis, R. Regulation by proteolysis in bacterial cells. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 163–172 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Finlay, B. B. et al. Identification and characterization of TnphoA mutants of Salmonella that are unable to pass through a polarized MDCK epithelial cell monolayer. Mol. Microbiol. 2, 757–766 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Krishnapillai, V. Uridinediphosphogalactose-4-epimerase deficiency in Salmonella typhimurium and its correction by plasmoid-borne galactose genes of Escherichia coli K-12: effects on mouse virulence, phagocytosis, and serum sensitivity. Infect. Immun. 4, 177–188 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Munford, R. S. Severe sepsis and septic shock: the role of gram-negative bacteremia. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 1, 467–496 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Raetz, C. R. & Whitfield, C. Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 635–700 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fuhrer, F. et al. Sequence and length recognition of the C-terminal turnover element of LpxC, a soluble substrate of the membrane-bound FtsH protease. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 485–496 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ogura, T. et al. Balanced biosynthesis of major membrane components through regulated degradation of the committed enzyme of lipid A biosynthesis by the AAA protease FtsH (HflB) in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 833–844 (1999). Identifies the role of the FtsH protease in the biosynthesis of outer membrane components, thus explaining the importance of this protein in E. coli.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Belunis, C. J. & Raetz, C. R. Biosynthesis of endotoxins. Purification and catalytic properties of 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic acid transferase from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9988–9997 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Katz, C. & Ron, E. Z. Dual role of FtsH in regulating lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 190, 7117–7122 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Biran, D., Brot, N., Weissbach, H. & Ron, E. Z. Heat shock-dependent transcriptional activation of the metA gene of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 177, 1374–1379 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ron, E. Z. & Davis, B. D. Growth rate of Escherichia coli at elevated temperatures: limitation by methionine. J. Bacteriol. 107, 391–396 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Biran, D., Gur, E., Gollan, L. & Ron, E. Z. Control of methionine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli by proteolysis. Mol. Microbiol. 37, 1436–1443 (2000). Describes the role of proteolysis in regulating the growth rate of E. coli at high temperatures.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ron, E. Z. & Shani, M. Growth rate of Escherichia coli at elevated temperatures: reversible inhibition of homoserine trans-succinylase. J. Bacteriol. 107, 397–400 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ron, E. Z., Alajem, S., Biran, D. & Grossman, N. Adaptation of Escherichia coli to elevated temperatures: the metA gene product is a heat shock protein. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 58, 169–174 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gur, E., Biran, D., Gazit, E. & Ron, E. Z. In vivo aggregation of a single enzyme limits growth of Escherichia coli at elevated temperatures. Mol. Microbiol. 46, 1391–1397 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhou, Y. N., Kusukawa, N., Erickson, J. W., Gross, C. A. & Yura, T. Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli mutants that lack the heat shock sigma factor sigma 32. J. Bacteriol. 170, 3640–3649 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Shenhar, Y., Rasouly, A., Biran, D. & Ron, E. Z. Adaptation of Escherichi coli to elevated temperatures involves a change in stability of heat shock gene transcripts. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 2989–2997 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Herman, C., Thévenet, D., D'Ari, R. & Bouloc, P. Degradation of sigma 32, the heat shock regulator in Escherichia coli, is governed by HflB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3516–3520 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Tomoyasu, T. et al. Escherichia coli FtsH is a membrane-bound, ATP-dependent protease which degrades the heat-shock transcription factor sigma 32. EMBO J. 14, 2551–2560 (1995). References 62 and 63 identify the protease involved in the degradation of σ32, indicating the importance of proteolysis in the heat shock response.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Tatsuta, T., Joob, D. M., Calendar, R., Akiyama, Y. & Ogura, T. Evidence for an active role of the DnaK chaperone system in the degradation of σ32. FEBS Lett. 478, 271–275 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Blaszczak, A., Georgopoulos, C. & Liberek, K. On the mechanism of FtsH-dependent degradation of the σ32 transcriptional regulator of Escherichia coli and the role of the DnaK chaperone machine. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 157–166 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Nakahigashi, K., Ron, E. Z., Yanagi, H. & Yura, T. Differential and independent roles of a σ32 homolog (RpoH) and an HrcA repressor in the heat shock response of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J. Bacteriol. 181, 7509–7515 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Straus, D. B., Walter, W. A. & Gross, C. A. The activity of sigma 32 is reduced under conditions of excess heat shock protein production in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 3, 2003–2010 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Guisbert, E., Herman, C., Lu, C. Z. & Gross, C. A. A chaperone network controls the heat shock response in E. coli. Genes Dev. 18, 2812–2821 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Straus, D., Walter, W. & Gross, C. A. DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE heat shock proteins negatively regulate heat shock gene expression by controlling the synthesis and stability of sigma 32. Genes Dev. 4, 2202–2209 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Tatsuta, T. et al. Heat shock regulation in the ftsH null mutant of Escherichia coli: dissection of stability and activity control mechanisms of σ32in vivo. Mol. Microbiol. 30, 583–593 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Tomoyasu, T., Ogura, T., Tatsuta, T. & Bukau, B. Levels of DnaK and DnaJ provide tight control of heat shock gene expression and protein repair in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 30, 567–581 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Morita, M., Kanemori, M., Yanagi, H. & Yura, T. Heat-induced synthesis of sigma32 in Escherichia coli: structural and functional dissection of rpoH mRNA secondary structure. J. Bacteriol. 181, 401–410 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Nonaka, G., Blankschien, M., Herman, C., Gross, C. A. & Rhodius, V. A. Regulon and promoter analysis of the E. coli heat-shock factor, σ32, reveals a multifaceted cellular response to heat stress. Genes Dev. 20, 1776–1789 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Dartigalongue, C., Missiakas, D. & Raina, S. Characterization of the Escherichia coli σE regulon. J. Biol. Chem. 23, 20866–20875 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Campbell, E. A. et al. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli σE with the cytoplasmic domain of its anti-sigma RseA. Mol. Cell 11, 1067–1078 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. De Las Penas, A., Connolly, L. & Gross, C. A. SigmaE is an essential sigma factor in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179, 6862–6864 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Sohn, J., Grant, R. A. & Sauer, R. T. Allosteric activation of DegS, a stress sensor PDZ protease. Cell 131, 572–583 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Mecsas, J., Rouviere, P. E., Erickson, J. W., Donohue, T. J. & Gross, C. A. The activity of sigma E, an Escherichia coli heat-inducible sigma-factor, is modulated by expression of outer membrane proteins. Genes Dev. 7, 2618–2628 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Wilken, C., Kitzing, K., Kurzbauer, R., Ehrmann, M. & Clausen, T. Crystal structure of the DegS stress sensor: how a PDZ domain recognizes misfolded protein and activates a protease. Cell 117, 483–494 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ades, S. E., Connolly, L. E., Alba, B. M. & Gross, C. A. The Escherichia coli σE -dependent extracytoplasmic stress response is controlled by the regulated proteolysis of an anti-sigma factor. Genes Dev. 13, 2449–2461 (1999). Describes the complex cascade of events resulting from envelope stress and controlled by proteolysis

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Akiyama, Y., Kanehara, K. & Ito, K. RseP (YaeL), an Escherichia coli RIP protease, cleaves transmembrane sequences. EMBO J. 23, 4434–4442 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Flynn, J. M., Levchenko, I., Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. Modulating substrate choice: the SspB adaptor delivers a regulator of the extracytoplasmic-stress response to the AAA+ protease ClpXP for degradation. Genes Dev. 18, 2292–2301 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Cezairliyan, B. O. & Sauer, R. T. Inhibition of regulated proteolysis by RseB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3771–3776 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Chaba, R. et al. Signal integration by DegS and RseB governs the E-mediated envelope stress response in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2106–2111 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Wollmann, P. & Zeth, K. The structure of RseB: a sensor in periplasmic stress response of E. coli. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 927–941 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Hengge, R. Proteolysis of σS (RpoS) and the general stress response in Escherichia coli. Res. Microbiol. 160, 667–676 (2009). An up-to-date review of the role of proteolysis in the general stress response.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Lange, R. & Hengge-Aronis, R. Identification of a central regulator of stationary-phase gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 5, 49–59 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Mika, F. & Hengge, R. A two-component phosphotransfer network involving ArcB, ArcA, and RssB coordinates synthesis and proteolysis of σS (RpoS) in E. coli. Genes Dev. 19, 2770–2781 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Bougdour, A., Wickner, S. & Gottesman, S. Modulating RssB activity: IraP, a novel regulator of σS stability in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 20, 884–897 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Bougdour, A. & Gottesman, S. ppGpp regulation of RpoS degradation via anti-adaptor protein IraP. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12896–12901 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Tu, X., Latifi, T., Bougdour, A., Gottesman, S. & Groisman, E. A. The PhoP/PhoQ two-component system stabilizes the alternative sigma factor RpoS in Salmonella enterica. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13503–13508 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Bougdour, A., Cunning, C., Baptiste, P. J., Elliott, T. & Gottesman, S. Multiple pathways for regulation of σS (RpoS) stability in Escherichia coli via the action of multiple anti-adaptors. Mol. Microbiol. 68, 298–313 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Courcelle, J., Khodursky, A., Peter, B., Brown, P. O. & Hanawalt, P. C. Comparative gene expression profiles following UV exposure in wild-type and SOS-deficient Escherichia coli. Genetics 158, 41–64 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Pruteanu, M. & Baker, T. A. Proteolysis in the SOS response and metal homeostasis in Escherichia coli. Res. Microbiol. 160, 677–683 (2009). Shows that regulation of the SOS response by proteolysis is essential to prevent cellular damage by toxic proteins.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Pruteanu, M. & Baker, T. A. Controlled degradation by ClpXP protease tunes the levels of the excision repair protein UvrA to the extent of DNA damage. Mol. Microbiol. 71, 912–924 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Janion, C. Inducible SOS response system of DNA repair and mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 4, 338–344 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Little, J. W. Autodigestion of lexA and phage lambda repressors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1375–1379 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Neher, S. B., Flynn, J. M., Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. Latent ClpX-recognition signals ensure LexA destruction after DNA damage. Genes Dev. 17, 1084–1089 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Kim, B. & Little, J. W. LexA and lambda Cl repressors as enzymes: specific cleavage in an intermolecular reaction. Cell 73, 1165–1173 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Mizrahi, I., Dagan, M., Biran, D. & Ron, E. Z. Potential use of toxic thermolabile proteins to study protein quality control systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5951–5953 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Wu, W. F., Zhou, Y. & Gottesman, S. Redundant in vivo proteolytic activities of Escherichia coli Lon and the ClpYQ (HslUV) protease. J. Bacteriol. 181, 3681–3687 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Hasegawa, K., Yoshiyama, K. & Maki, H. Spontaneous mutagenesis associated with nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells 13, 459–469 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Frank, E. G., Ennis, D. G., Gonzalez, M., Levine, A. S. & Woodgate, R. Regulation of SOS mutagenesis by proteolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10291–10296 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Al Mamun, A. A. & Humayun, M. Z. Spontaneous mutagenesis is elevated in protease-defective cells. Mol. Microbiol. 71, 629–639 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Schlothauer, T., Mogk, A., Dougan, D. A., Bukau, B. & Turgay, K. MecA, an adaptor protein necessary for ClpC chaperone activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2306–2311 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Wickner, S., Maurizi, M. R. & Gottesman, S. Posttranslational quality control: folding, refolding, and degrading proteins. Science 286, 1888–1893 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Lindner, A. B., Madden, R., Demarez, A., Stewart, E. J. & Taddei, F. Asymmetric segregation of protein aggregates is associated with cellular aging and rejuvenation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3076–3081 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Weibezahn, J. et al. Thermotolerance requires refolding of aggregated proteins by substrate translocation through the central pore of ClpB. Cell 119, 653–665 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Bissonnette, S. A., Rivera-Rivera, I., Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. The IbpA and IbpB small heat-shock proteins are substrates of the AAA+ Lon protease. Mol. Microbiol. 75, 1539–1549 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Curtis, P. D. & Brun, Y. V. Getting in the loop: regulation of development in Caulobacter crescentus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74, 13–41 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Jenal, U. The role of proteolysis in the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle and development. Res. Microbiol. 160, 687–695 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Collier, J., McAdams, H. H. & Shapiro, L. A DNA methylation ratchet governs progression through a bacterial cell cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17111–17116 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Iniesta, A. A. & Shapiro, L. A bacterial control circuit integrates polar localization and proteolysis of key regulatory proteins with a phospho-signaling cascade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16602–16607 (2008). Shows that regulation of differentiation in Caulobacter crescentus results from the localization of a proteolytic complex that controls the initiation of cell division.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Suno, R. et al. Structure of the whole cytosolic region of ATP-dependent protease FtsH. Mol. Cell 22, 575–585 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Glynn, S. E., Martin, A., Nager, A. R., Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. Structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotide-dependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell 139, 744–756 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Wang, T. et al. Structural insights on the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasomal ATPase Mpa. Structure 17, 1377–1385 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Li, D. H. et al. Acyldepsipeptide antibiotics induce the formation of a structured axial channel in ClpP: a model for the ClpX/ClpA-bound state of ClpP. Chem. Biol. 17, 959–969 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Hu, G. et al. Structure of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome and mechanism of inhibition by a peptidyl boronate. Mol. Microbiol. 59, 1417–1428 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful suggestions. Work in the authors' laboratory was supported by a DIP grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to E.Z.R. and D.B.), by a Marie Curie International Reintegration Grant (IRG) and by a German–Israeli Foundation (GIF) Young grant (to E.G.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, 84105, Israel

    Eyal Gur

  2. The National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, 84105, Israel

    Eyal Gur

  3. Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel

    Dvora Biran & Eliora Z. Ron

  4. MIGAL- Galilee Technology Center, Kiryat Shmona, 11016, Israel

    Eliora Z. Ron

Authors
  1. Eyal Gur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dvora Biran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eliora Z. Ron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliora Z. Ron.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

Protein databank

1KYI

2DHR

2FHH

3HWS

3M9B

3MT6

Glossary

N-end rule

The regulation of protein stability by the first amino acid of a protein. For example, the presence of a Lys or Arg severely decreases the half-life of the proteins through regulated proteolysis.

C1 compounds

Compounds that contain one C atom and are more reduced than CO2. Such compounds include methane, methanol and formaldehyde.

Stringent response

The physiological changes that are elicited by amino acid starvation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gur, E., Biran, D. & Ron, E. Regulated proteolysis in Gram-negative bacteria — how and when?. Nat Rev Microbiol 9, 839–848 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2669

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2669

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology