Microorganisms communicate and cooperate to perform a wide range of multicellular behaviours, such as dispersal, foraging, biofilm formation, 'chemical warfare' and quorum sensing.
Cooperative behaviour poses a problem to evolutionary theory, as it can potentially be exploited by cheaters who do not cooperate.
Kin selection theory provides an explanation for cooperation between individuals who share genes ? by helping a close relative to reproduce, an individual is still passing on its own genes to the next generation, albeit indirectly.
Kin selection can often be important in microorganisms because asexual reproduction and dispersal patterns mean that individual cells will often be surrounded by identical clones.
Cooperation between non-relatives, or even between species, can be explained if the cooperative behaviour provides a direct benefit to the individual who performs the behaviour, which outweighs the cost of performing the behaviour (that is, the cooperation is mutually beneficial).
A greater understanding of cooperation in microorganisms will come from combining evolutionary and mechanistic approaches.
Microorganisms communicate and cooperate to perform a wide range of multicellular behaviours, such as dispersal, nutrient acquisition, biofilm formation and quorum sensing. Microbiologists are rapidly gaining a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in these behaviours, and the underlying genetic regulation. Such behaviours are also interesting from the perspective of social evolution ? why do microorganisms engage in these behaviours given that cooperative individuals can be exploited by selfish cheaters, who gain the benefit of cooperation without paying their share of the cost? There is great potential for interdisciplinary research in this fledgling field of sociomicrobiology, but a limiting factor is the lack of effective communication of social evolution theory to microbiologists. Here, we provide a conceptual overview of the different mechanisms through which cooperative behaviours can be stabilized, emphasizing the aspects most relevant to microorganisms, the novel problems that microorganisms pose and the new insights that can be gained from applying evolutionary theory to microorganisms.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Crespi, B. J. The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 178?183 (2001).
Webb, J. S., Givskov, M. & Kjelleberg, S. Bacterial biofilms: prokaryotic adventures in multicellularity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 578?585 (2003).
Lazdunski, A. M., Ventre, I. & Sturgis, J. N. Regulatory circuits and communication in Gram-negative bacteria. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 581?592 (2004).
Kreft, J. -U. Conflicts of interest in biofilms. Biofilms 1, 265?276 (2005).
Parsek, M. R. & Greenberg, E. P. Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13, 27?33 (2005).
Keller, L. & Surett, M. G. Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 4, 249?258 (2006). A clear introduction to the social problems involved in communication between bacteria.
Velicer, G. J. Social strife in the microbial world. Trends Microbiol. 11, 330?337 (2003).
Shapiro, J. A. & Dworkin, M. Bacteria As Multicellular Organisms (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
Shapiro, J. A. Thinking about bacterial populations as multicellular organisms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 52, 81?104 (1998).
Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1?52 (1964).
Maynard Smith, J. Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201, 1145?1147 (1964).
Williams, G. C. Adaptation and Natural Selection (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1966).
Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1976).
Maynard Smith, J. & Szathmary, E. The Major Transitions in Evolution (W. H. Freeman, Oxford, 1995).
Hamilton, W. D. Narrow Roads of Gene Land: I Evolution of Social Behaviour (W. H. Freeman, Oxford, 1996).
Elena, S. F. & Lenski, R. E. Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 457?469 (2003).
Frank, S. A. Foundations of Social Evolution (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998).
Rousset, F. Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004).
Dawkins, R. Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Z. Tierpsychol. 51, 184?200 (1979).
Grafen, A. in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 62?84 (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1984).
Maynard Smith, J. Models of evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 219, 315?325 (1983).
Taylor, P. D. & Frank, S. A. How to make a kin selection model. J. Theor. Biol. 180, 27?37 (1996).
Foster, K. R. & Wenseleers, T. A general model for the evolution of mutualisms. J. Evol. Biol. 25th January 2006 (doi: 10.1111/j.1420?9101.2005.01073.x). An excellent general overview of the mechanisms that can favour cooperation between species.
Lehmann, L. & Keller, L. The evolution of cooperation and altruism. A general framework and classification of models. J. Evol. Biol. (in the press).
Hamilton, W. D. The evolution of altruistic behaviour. Am. Nat. 97, 354?356 (1963).
Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243?1248 (1968). The classic description from a human perspective of why selfish interests erode the possibility of cooperation at the group level.
Griffin, A. S., West, S. A. & Buckling, A. Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature 430, 1024?1027 (2004). Demonstrates the social nature of a public goods trait (siderophores in Pseudomonas aeruginosa ), and shows how relatedness determines the extent to which cheats who do not produce public goods can spread in a population.
West, S. A. & Buckling, A. Cooperation, virulence and siderophore production in bacterial parasites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 37?44 (2003). Theoretical analysis of the tragedy of the commons over the production of public goods in a specific microbial context ? siderophores.
Dinges, M. M., Orwin, P. M. & Schlievert, P. M. Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13, 16?34 (2000).
Greig, D. & Travisano, M. The prisoner's dilemma and polymorphism in yeast SUC genes. Biol. Lett. 271, S25?S26 (2004).
Swift, S. et al. in Advances in Microbial Physiology Vol. 45 (ed. Poole, R.) 199?270 (Elsevier, UK, 2001).
Diggle, S. P., Gardner, A., West, S. A. & Griffin, A. S. Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. (in the press).
Riley, M. A. & Wertz, J. E. Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology and application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 117?137 (2002).
Brown, S. P. Cooperation and conflict in host-manipulating parasites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1899?1904 (1999).
Tateda, K. et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa autoinducer N-3-oxododecanoyl homoserine lactone accelerates apoptosis in macrophages and neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 71, 5785?5793 (2003).
Hooi, D. S. W., Bycroft, B. W., Chhabra, S. R., Williams, P. & Pritchard, D. I. Differential immune modulatory activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing signal molecules. Infect. Immun. 72, 6463?6470 (2004).
Ciofu, O., Beveridge, T. J., Kadurugamuwa, J., Walther-Rasmussen, J. & Hoiby, N. Chromosomal β-lactamase is packaged into membrane vesicles and secreted from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45, 9?13 (2000).
Dugatkin, L. A., Perlin, M., Lucas, J. S. & Atlas, R. Group-beneficial traits, frequency-dependent selection and genotypic diversity: an antibiotic resistance paradigm. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272, 79?83 (2005).
Daniels, R., Vanderleyden, J. & Michiels, J. Quorum sensing and swarming migration in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28, 261?289 (2004).
Velicer, G. J. & Yu, Y. N. Evolution of novel cooperative swarming in the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Nature 425, 75?78 (2003).
Davies, D. G. & Geesey, G. G. Regulation of the alginate biosynthesis gene algC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm development in continuous culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 860?867 (1995).
Rainey, P. B. & Rainey, K. Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations. Nature 425, 72?74 (2003).
Pepper, J. W. Relatedness in trait group models of social evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 206, 355?368 (2000).
Pfeiffer, T., Schuster, S. & Bonhoeffer, S. Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science 292, 504?507 (2001).
Kreft, J. -U. Biofilms promote altruism. Microbiology 150, 2751?2760 (2004).
Bonner, J. T. The Cellular Slime Molds (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967).
Strassmann, J. E., Zhu, Y. & Queller, D. C. Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 408, 965?967 (2000). A demonstration that different lineages of the slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum can come together to form fruiting bodies, and that this can lead to conflict.
Velicer, G. J., Kroos, L. & Lenski, R. E. Developmental cheating in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Nature 404, 598?601 (2000).
Riley, M. A. & Gordon, D. M. The ecological role of bacteriocins in bacterial cooperation. Trends Microbiol. 7, 129?133 (1999).
Queller, D. C. Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour. Nature 318, 366?367 (1985).
Frank, S. A. Repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution 57, 693?705 (2003). An overview of the idea, and history surrounding it, that cooperation can be favoured by repression of competition.
Sachs, J. L., Mueller, U. G., Wilcox, T. P. & Bull, J. J. The evolution of cooperation. Q. Rev. Biol. 79, 135?160 (2004). A comprehensive review of the mechanisms that can explain cooperation both within and between species.
Brown, J. L. & Brown, E. R. in Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory (eds Alexander, R. D. & Tinkle, D. W.) 242?256 (Chiron Press, New York, 1981).
Hamilton, W. D. in Man and Beast: Comparative Social Behavior (eds Eisenberg, J. F. & Dillon, W. S.) 57?91 (Smithsonian Press, Washington, DC, 1971).
Smith, J. The social evolution of bacterial pathogenesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 61?69 (2001).
Griffin, A. S. & West, S. A. Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Science 302, 634?636 (2003).
West, S. A., Reece, S. E. & Read, A. F. The evolution of gametocyte sex ratios in malaria and related apicomplexan (protozoan) parasites. Trends Parasitol. 17, 525?531 (2001).
Meyer, J. -M. et al. Use of siderophores to type pseudomonads: the three Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyoverdine systems. Microbiology 143, 35?43 (1997).
Smith, E. E., Sims, E. H., Spencer, D. H., Kaul, R. & Olson, M. V. Evidence for diversifying selection at the pyoverdine locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 187, 2138?2147 (2005).
Ji, G. Y., Beavis, R. C. & Novick, R. P. Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 12055?12059 (1997).
Novick, R. P. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 1429?1449 (2003).
McDowell, P. et al. Structure, activity and evolution of the group I thiolactone peptide quorum-sensing system of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 41, 503?512 (2001).
Déziel, E. et al. Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinolines (HAQs) reveals a role for 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline in cell to cell communication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1339?1344 (2004).
Diggle, S. P., Cornelis, P., Williams, P. & Camara, M. 4-Quinolone signalling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: old molecules, new perspectives. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296, 83?91 (2006).
Keller, L. Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 99?103 (1997).
Gardner, A. & West, S. A. Spite among siblings. Science 305, 1413?1414 (2004).
Queller, D. C., Ponte, E., Bozzaro, S. & Strassmann, J. E. Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Science 299, 105?106 (2003). Demonstration of a green-beard gene in a microorganism.
Hamilton, W. D. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228, 1218?1220 (1970).
Gardner, A. & West, S. A. Spite and the scale of competition. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 1195?1203 (2004).
Gardner, A., West, S. A. & Buckling, A. Bacteriocins, spite and virulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 1529?1535 (2004).
Kerr, B., Riley, M. A., Feldman, M. W. & Bohannan, B. J. Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors. Nature 418, 171?174 (2002).
Kokko, H., Johnstone, R. A. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 187?196 (2001).
Frank, S. A. Genetics of mutualism: the evolution of altruism between species. J. Theor. Biol. 170, 393?400 (1994).
Kolenbrander, P. E. et al. Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 486?505 (2002).
Egland, P. G., Palmer, R. J. J. & Kolenbrander, P. E. Interspecies communication in Streptococcus gordonii?Veillonella atypica biofilms: signaling in flow conditions requires juxtaposition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16917?16922 (2004).
Palmer, R. J. J., Kazmerzak, K., Hansen, M. C. & Kolenbrander, P. E. Mutualism versus independence: strategies of mixed-species oral biofilms in vitro using saliva as the sole nutrient source. Infect. Immun. 69, 5794?5804 (2001).
Govan, J. R. W. & Deretic, V. Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiol. Rev. 60, 539?574 (1996).
Eberl, L. & Tummler, B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis: genome evolution, interactions and adaptation. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 294, 123?131 (2004).
Frank, S. A. Host-symbiont conflict over the mixing of symbiotic lineages. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 339?344 (1996).
West, S. A., Kiers, E. T., Simms, E. L. & Denison, R. F. Sanctions and mutualism stability: why do rhizobia fix nitrogen? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 685?694 (2002).
Poulsen, M. & Boomsma, J. J. Mutualistic fungi control crop diversity in fungus growing ants. Science 307, 741?744 (2005). A stylish collection of experiments showing how leaf-cutter ants minimize the diversity of their symbiotic fungi, and therefore reduce conflict.
Frank, S. A. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature 377, 520?522 (1995).
Ratnieks, F. L. W. & Visscher, P. K. Worker policing in the honeybee. Nature 342, 796?797 (1989).
Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Parker, G. A. Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373, 209?216 (1995).
Kiers, E. T., Rousseau, R. A., West, S. A. & Denison, R. F. Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism. Nature 425, 78?81 (2003). Experimental evidence from the legume-Rhizobia system that sanctions (punishment) can provide an explanation for cooperation between species.
Ratnieks, F. L. W., Foster, K. R. & Wenseleers, T. Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51, 581?608 (2006).
Visick, K. L., Foster, J., Doino, J., McFall-Ngai, M. & Ruby, E. G. Vibrio fischeri genes play an important role in colonization and development of the host light organ. J. Bacteriol. 182, 4578?4586 (2000).
Foster, K. R., Shaulsky, G., Strassmann, J. E., Queller, D. C. & Thompson, C. R. L. Pleiotropy as a mechanism to stabilize cooperation. Nature 431, 693?696 (2004).
Fiegna, F., Yu, Y. -T. N., Kadam, S. V. & Velicer, G. J. Evolution of an obligate social cheater to a superior cooperator. Nature 441, 310?314 (2006).
Lewis, K. Persister cells and the riddle of biofilm survival. Biochem. (Mosc.) 70, 267?274 (2005).
Brown, S. P. & Johnstone, R. A. Cooperation in the dark: signalling and collective action in quorum-sensing bacteria. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 961?965 (2001). An elegant analysis of quorum sensing from an evolutionary perspective.
Dugatkin, L. A., Perlin, M. & Atlas, R. The evolution of group-beneficial traits in the absence of between-group selection. J. Theor. Biol. 220, 67?74 (2003).
Fortunato, A., Strassmann, J. E. & Queller, D. C. A linear dominance hierarchy among clones in chimeras of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 438?445 (2003).
Fiegna, F. & Velicer, G. J. Exploitative and hierarchical antagonism in a cooperative bacteria. PLoS Biol. 3, e370 (2006).
Foster, K. R., Fortunato, A., Strassmann, J. E. & Queller, D. C. The costs and benefits of being a chimera. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2357?2362 (2002).
Castillo, D., Switz, G., Foster, K. R., Strassman, J. S. & Queller, D. C. A cost to chimerism in Dictyostelium discoideum on natural substrates. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7, 263?271 (2005).
Guiral, S., Mitchell, T. J., Martin, B. & Claverys, J. -P. Competence-programmed predation of noncompetent cells in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae: genetic requirements. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8710?8715 (2005).
Harvey, P. H. & Keymer, A. E. Comparing life histories using phylogenies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 332, 31?39 (1991).
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1990).
Boles, B. R., Thoendel, M. & Singh, P. K. Self-generated diversity produces 'insurance effects' in biofilm communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16630?16635 (2004).
Hughes, W. O. H., Sumner, S., Borm, S. V. & Boomsma, J. J. Worker caste polymorphism has a geneticc basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9394?9397 (2003).
Ratledge, C. & Dover, L. G. Iron metabolism in pathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54, 881?941 (2000).
Queller, D. C. Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evol. Ecol. 8, 70?73 (1994).
West, S. A., Pen, I. & Griffin, A. S. Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296, 72?75 (2002).
Gardner, A. & West, S. A. Demography, altruism, and the benefits of budding. J. Evol. Biol. 27th March 2006 (doi: 10.1111/j.1420?9101.2006.01104.x).
Frank, S. A. Models of parasite virulence. Q. Rev. Biol. 71, 37?78 (1996).
Gandon, S., Mackinnon, M. J., Nee, S. & Read, A. F. Imperfect vaccines and the evolution of pathogen virulence. Nature 414, 751?756 (2002).
André, J. -B. & Godelle, B. Multicellular organization in bacteria as a target for drug therapy? Ecol. Lett. 8, 800?810 (2005).
Redfield, R. J. Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? Trends Microbiol. 10, 365?370 (2002).
Queller, D. C. & Goodnight, K. F. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43, 258?275 (1989).
Griffin, A. S. & West, S. A. Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 15?21 (2002).
Michod, R. E. & Roze, D. Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of multicellularity. Heredity 86, 1?7 (2001).
Lee, B. et al. Heterogeneity of biofilms formed by nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 5247?5255 (2005).
Kjelleberg, S. & Molin, S. Is there a role for quorum sensing signals in bacterial biofilms? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5, 254?258 (2002).
Trivers, R. Social Evolution (Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, 1985).
Tinbergen, N. On aims and methods of ethology. Z. Tierpsychologie 20, 410?433 (1963). A highly influential discussion of the synergistic benefits of studying behaviours from different perspectives.
Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D. Animal Signals (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
Wynne-Edwards, V. C. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1962).
Maynard Smith, J. Group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 51, 277?283 (1976).
Wilson, D. S. A theory of group selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 143?146 (1975).
Reeve, H. K. & Keller, L. in Levels of Selection in Evolution (ed. Keller, L.) 3?14 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999).
Hamilton, W. D. in Biosocial Anthropology (ed. Fox, R.) 133?155 (Wiley, New York, 1975).
Frank, S. A. Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. I. General solutions for structured populations. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 29, 312?342 (1986).
Queller, D. C. Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. Am. Nat. 139, 540?558 (1992).
Clutton-Brock, T. H. Breeding together: kin selection, reciprocity and mutualism in cooperative animal societies. Science 296, 69?72 (2002).
Stevens, J. R. & Hauser, M. D. Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends Cog. Sci. 8, 60?65 (2004).
West, S. A. et al. Cooperation and the scale of competition in humans. Curr. Biol. 16, 1103?1106 (2006)
Turner, P. E. & Chao, L. Prisoner's dilemma in an RNA virus. Nature 398, 441?443 (1999).
Brown, S. P. Collective action in an RNA virus. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 821?828 (2001).
We thank M. Camara, B. Evans, K. Foster, N. Mehdiabadi, S. Molin, A. Ross-Gillespie, J. Strassman and P. Williams for useful discussion and comments on the manuscript, and the Royal Society, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council (UK) for funding.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Entrez Genome Project
The damage caused to the host by a parasite or pathogen, measured as the decrease in host fitness.
An individual who does not cooperate (or cooperates less than their fair share), but can potentially gain the benefit from others cooperating.
A behaviour that benefits another individual (the recipient) and which is maintained (at least partially) because of its beneficial effect on the recipient.
- Tragedy of the commons
A situation when individuals would do better to cooperate, but cooperation is unstable because each individual gains by selfishly pursuing their own short-term interests.
- Public goods
A resource that is costly to produce, and provides a benefit to all the individuals in the local group or population.
Something that alters the behaviour of another individual, which evolved because of that effect, and which is effective because the receiver's response has also evolved.
A focal individual who performs a behaviour.
- Direct fitness
The component of fitness gained through reproduction.
- Repression of competiton
When the selfish advantage of cheats is removed.
A behaviour that increases another individual's fitness at a cost to one's own.
- Kin selection
A process by which traits are favoured because of their beneficial effects on the fitness of relatives.
- Indirect fitness
The component of fitness gained from aiding the reproduction of non-descendant relatives.
- Hamilton's Rule
A condition (rb − c > 0) that predicts when a trait is favoured by kin selection, where c is the cost to the actor of performing the behaviour, b is the benefit to the individual who the behaviour is directed towards, and r is the genetic relatedness between those individuals.
A measure of genetic similarity.
- Kin discrimination
When behaviours are directed towards individuals depending on their relatedness to the actor.
Something that can be used by an individual as a guide for future action.
A behaviour that decreases another individual's fitness at a cost to one's own.
An individual who is affected by the behaviour of the actor.
When one behaviour alters the behaviour of another individual, usually to the benefit of the actor and to the cost of the other individual.
About this article
Cite this article
West, S., Griffin, A., Gardner, A. et al. Social evolution theory for microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 4, 597–607 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1461
Nature Nanotechnology (2021)
Selfishness driving reductive evolution shapes interdependent patterns in spatially structured microbial communities
The ISME Journal (2021)
The ISME Journal (2021)
Evidence for methanobactin “Theft” and novel chalkophore production in methanotrophs: impact on methanotrophic-mediated methylmercury degradation
The ISME Journal (2021)
Quorum sensing provides a molecular mechanism for evolution to tune and maintain investment in cooperation
The ISME Journal (2021)