Various renewable resources, including plant biomass, atmospheric CO2 and methane from landfill gas, can be used through several pathways for sustainable biofuel production.
These metabolic pathways for biofuel production include ethanol pathways, keto acid pathways, isoprenoid pathways, CoA-dependent reverse β-oxidation and fatty acid biosynthesis.
Recent research in this area has included metabolic engineering of microorganisms to improve their production of biofuels.
There are several possible strategies for the optimization of biofuel production, including the redesign of central metabolism for carbon conservation, the balancing of redox cofactors and prolonging the production phase.
Global climate change linked to the accumulation of greenhouse gases has caused concerns regarding the use of fossil fuels as the major energy source. To mitigate climate change while keeping energy supply sustainable, one solution is to rely on the ability of microorganisms to use renewable resources for biofuel synthesis. In this Review, we discuss how microorganisms can be explored for the production of next-generation biofuels, based on the ability of bacteria and fungi to use lignocellulose; through direct CO2 conversion by microalgae; using lithoautotrophs driven by solar electricity; or through the capacity of microorganisms to use methane generated from landfill. Furthermore, we discuss how to direct these substrates to the biosynthetic pathways of various fuel compounds and how to optimize biofuel production by engineering fuel pathways and central metabolism.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Communications Materials Open Access 15 August 2022
Microbial Cell Factories Open Access 28 May 2022
Nature Communications Open Access 07 April 2022
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Stocker, T. F. et al. in Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 13–115 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
O'Neill, B. C. & Oppenheimer, M. Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto Protocol. Science 296, 1971–1972 (2002). A discussion of the potential dangerous anthropogenic effects on the climate system in three areas: severe degradation of coral reef systems, disintegration of the WAIS and shut down of the large-scale, density-driven circulation of the oceans.
Pacala, S. & Socolow, R. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305, 968–972 (2004). A report proposing strategies for reducing carbon emissions by 25 Gt between 2004 and 2054.
Lewis, S. N. & Nocera, G. D. Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15729–15735 (2006).
Bothast, R. J. & Schlicher, M. A. Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 67, 19–25 (2005).
Basso, L. C., Basso, T. O. & Rocha, S. N. in Biofuel Production. Recent Developments and Prospects (ed Bernardes, M. A. d. S.) 85–100 (InTech, 2011).
Goldemberg, J. Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 315 808–810 (2009).
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S. & Hawthorne, P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319, 1235–1238 (2008). A paper suggesting that biofuels made from waste biomass or from biomass grown on degraded and abandoned agricultural lands incur little or no carbon debt and can offer immediate and sustained advantages relating to GHGs.
Searchinger, T. D. et al. Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science 326, 527–528 (2009). An article reporting that using biomass for energy reduces GHG emissions only if the growth and harvesting of the biomass captures carbon above and beyond the amount that would be sequestered by the same biomass.
Sala, O., Sax, D. & Leslie, H. in Biofuels: Environmental Consequences & Interactions with Changing Land Use (eds Howarth, R. W. & Bringezu, S.) 127–137 (Cornell Univ. Press, 2008).
Fiorese, G., Catenacci, M., Verdolini, E. & Bosetti, V. Advanced biofuels: future perspectives from an expert elicitation survey. Energy Policy 56, 293–311 (2013).
Yvon-Durocher, G. et al. Methane fluxes show consistent temperature dependence across microbial to ecosystem scales. Nature 507, 488–491 (2014).
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H. & Pretorius, I. S. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 506–577 (2002). A comprehensive review of cellulases.
Rauch, R., Hrbek, J. & Hofbauer, H. Biomass gasification for synthesis gas production and applications of the syngas. WIREs Energy Environ. 3, 343–362 (2014).
Holtzapple, M. & Granda, C. Carboxylate platform: the MixAlco process part 1: comparison of three biomass conversion platforms. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 156, 95–106 (2009).
Agler, M. T., Wrenn, B. A., Zinder, S. H. & Angenent, L. T. Waste to bioproduct conversion with undefined mixed cultures: the carboxylate platform. Trends Biotechnol. 29, 70–78 (2015).
Liew, L. N., Shi, J. & Li, Y. Methane production from solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 46, 125–132 (2012).
Hu, J., Yu, F. & Lu, Y. Application of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in biomass to liquid conversion. Catalysts 2, 303 (2012).
Henstra, A. M., Sipma, J., Rinzema, A. & Stams, A. J. M. Microbiology of synthesis gas fermentation for biofuel production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18, 200–206 (2007).
Schuchmann, K. & Muller, V. Autotrophy at the thermodynamic limit of life: a model for energy conservation in acetogenic bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 809–821 (2014).
Weimer, P. J., Russell, J. B. & Muck, R. E. Lessons from the cow: what the ruminant animal can teach us about consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 5323–5331 (2009).
Mosier, N. et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 673–686 (2005).
Kumar, P., Barrett, D. M., Delwiche, M. J. & Stroeve, P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 3713–3729 (2009).
Martinez, D. et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 553–560 (2008).
Cherry, J. R. & Fidantsef, A. L. Directed evolution of industrial enzymes: an update. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14, 438–443 (2003).
Van Tilbeurgh, H., Tomme, P., Claeyssens, M., Bhikhabhai, R. & Pettersson, G. Limited proteolysis of the cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei: separation of functional domains. FEBS Lett. 204, 223–227 (1986).
Henrissat, B. Cellulases and their interaction with cellulose. Cellulose 1, 169–196 (1994).
Väljamäe, P., Sild, V., Nutt, A., Pettersson, G. & Johansson, G. Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I. Eur. J. Biochem. 266, 327–334 (1999).
Heinzelman, P. et al. Efficient screening of fungal cellobiohydrolase class I enzymes for thermostabilizing sequence blocks by SCHEMA structure-guided recombination. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 23, 871–880 (2010).
Wu, I. & Arnold, F. H. Engineered thermostable fungal Cel6A and Cel7A cellobiohydrolases hydrolyze cellulose efficiently at elevated temperatures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 110, 1874–1883 (2013).
Liu, G., Zhang, J. & Bao, J. Cost evaluation of cellulase enzyme for industrial-scale cellulosic ethanol production based on rigorous Aspen Plus modeling. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 39, 133–140 (2016).
Klein-Marcuschamer, D., Oleskowicz-Popiel, P., Simmons, B. A. & Blanch, H. W. The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 1083–1087 (2012).
Gusakov, A. V. Alternatives to Trichoderma reesei in biofuel production. Trends Biotechnol. 29, 419–425 (2011).
Bayer, E. A., Kenig, R. & Lamed, R. Adherence of Clostridium thermocellum to cellulose. J. Bacteriol. 156, 818–827 (1983).
Lu, Y., Zhang, Y.-H. P. & Lynd, L. R. Enzyme–microbe synergy during cellulose hydrolysis by Clostridium thermocellum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16165–16169 (2006).
You, C., Zhang, X.-Z., Sathitsuksanoh, N., Lynd, L. R. & Zhang, Y.-H. P. Enhanced microbial utilization of recalcitrant cellulose by an ex vivo cellulosome-microbe complex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 1437–1444 (2012).
Gerngross, U. T., Romaniec, M. P., Kobayashi, T., Huskisson, N. S. & Demain, A. L. Sequencing of a Clostridium thermocellum gene (cipA) encoding the cellulosomal SL-protein reveals an unusual degree of internal homology. Mol. Microbiol. 8, 325–334 (1993).
Schwarz, W. H. The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56, 634–649 (2001).
Zhang, Y.-H. P. & Lynd, L. R. Cellulose utilization by Clostridium thermocellum: bioenergetics and hydrolysis product assimilation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7321–7325 (2005). The demonstration that there is an advantage to the uptake of cellodextrins with 4–5 sugar units in C. thermocellum.
Zhang, Y.-H. P. & Lynd, L. R. Kinetics and relative importance of phosphorolytic and hydrolytic cleavage of cellodextrins and cellobiose in cell extracts of Clostridium thermocellum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1563–1569 (2004).
Resch, M. G. et al. Fungal cellulases and complexed cellulosomal enzymes exhibit synergistic mechanisms in cellulose deconstruction. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1858–1867 (2013).
Resch, M. G. et al. Clean fractionation pretreatment reduces enzyme loadings for biomass saccharification and reveals the mechanism of free and cellulosomal enzyme synergy. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2, 1377–1387 (2014).
Lochner, A. et al. Use of label-free quantitative proteomics to distinguish the secreted cellulolytic systems of Caldicellulosiruptor bescii and Caldicellulosiruptor obsidiansis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4042–4054 (2011).
Brunecky, R. et al. Revealing nature's cellulase diversity: the digestion mechanism of Caldicellulosiruptor bescii CelA. Science 342, 1513–1516 (2013).
Shallom, D. & Shoham, Y. Microbial hemicellulases. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 219–228 (2003).
Demain, A. L. et al. Cellulase, clostridia, and ethanol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69, 124–154 (2005). An overview of the structure and function of the C. thermocellum cellulosome, including a historical perspective of the early research efforts on the subject.
Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Karhumaa, K., Fonseca, C., Spencer-Martins, I. & Gorwa-Grauslund, M. F. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74, 937–953 (2007).
Kuyper, M. et al. Metabolic engineering of a xylose-isomerase-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for rapid anaerobic xylose fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res. 5, 399–409 (2005).
Mohagheghi, A. et al. Improving xylose utilization by recombinant Zymomonas mobilis strain 8b through adaptation using 2-deoxyglucose. Biotechnol. Biofuels 7, 19 (2014).
Farwick, A., Bruder, S., Schadeweg, V., Oreb, M. & Boles, E. Engineering of yeast hexose transporters to transport d-xylose without inhibition by d-glucose. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5159–5164 (2014).
Azadi, P., Inderwildi, O. R., Farnood, R. & King, D. A. Liquid fuels, hydrogen and chemicals from lignin: A critical review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 21, 506–523 (2002).
Ragauskas, A. J. et al. Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science 344, 1246843 (2014). A comprehensive review of lignin characterization and refinement, and the future potential for lignin valorization.
Martínez, Á. T. et al. Biodegradation of lignocellulosics: microbial, chemical, and enzymatic aspects of the fungal attack of lignin. Int. Microbiol. 8, 195–204 (2005).
Haider, K., Trojanowski, J. & Sundman, V. Screening for lignin degrading bacteria by means of 14C-labelled lignins. Methods 119, 103–106 (1978).
Fuchs, G., Boll, M. & Heider, J. Microbial degradation of aromatic compounds — from one strategy to four. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 803–816 (2011).
Johnson, C. W. & Beckham, G. T. Aromatic catabolic pathway selection for optimal production of pyruvate and lactate from lignin. Metab. Eng. 28, 240–247 (2015).
Chisti, Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 25, 294–306 (2007). A summary of the technical and economical feasibility of microalga-derived biodiesel.
Rodolfi, L. et al. Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102, 100–112 (2009).
Boyle, N. R. et al. Three acyltransferases and nitrogen-responsive regulator are implicated in nitrogen starvation-induced triacylglycerol accumulation in Chlamydomonas. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 15811–15825 (2012).
Cerutti, H., Ma, X., Msanne, J. & Repas, T. RNA-mediated silencing in algae: biological roles and tools for analysis of gene function. Eukaryot. Cell 10, 1164–1172 (2011).
Gimpel, J. A., Specht, E. A., Georgianna, D. R. & Mayfield, S. P. Advances in microalgae engineering and synthetic biology applications for biofuel production. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17, 489–495 (2013). A report concerning recent advances in the genetic manipulation of microalgae.
Angermayr, S. A., Gorchs Rovira, A. & Hellingwerf, K. J. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for the synthesis of commodity products. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 352–361 (2015).
Korczynski, P. C., Logan, J. & Faust, J. E. Mapping monthly distribution of daily light integrals across the contiguous United States. HortTechnology 12, 12–16 (2002).
Chen, C. Y., Yeh, K. L., Aisyah, R., Lee, D. J. & Chang, J. S. Cultivation, photobioreactor design and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel production: a critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 71–81 (2011).
Hannon, M., Gimpel, J., Tran, M., Rasala, B. & Mayfield, S. Biofuels from algae: challenges and potential. Biofuels 1, 763–784 (2010).
Zhu, X. G., Long, S. P. & Ort, D. R. What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 153–159 (2008).
Ludwig, M. & Bryant, D. A. Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002 transcriptome: acclimation to temperature, salinity, oxidative stress, and mixotrophic growth conditions. Front. Microbiol. 3, 354 (2012).
Conrado, R., Haynes, C., Haendler, B. & Toone, E. in Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts (ed. Lee, J. W.) 1037–1064 (Springer, 2013).
Blankenship, R. E. et al. Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement. Science 332, 805–809 (2011).
Luo, X., Wang, J., Dooner, M. & Clarke, J. Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Appl. Energy 137, 511–536 (2015).
Li, H. et al. Integrated electromicrobial conversion of CO2 to higher alcohols. Science 335, 1596–1596 (2012). A paper reporting the creation of an integrated electromicrobial process for electricity-driven CO 2 conversion to higher alcohols using genetically engineered C. necator H16.
Torella, J. P. et al. Efficient solar-to-fuels production from a hybrid microbial–water-splitting catalyst system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2337–2342 (2015).
Grousseau, E., Lu, J., Gorret, N., Guillouet, S. E. & Sinskey, A. J. Isopropanol production with engineered Cupriavidus necator as bioproduction platform. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 4277–4290 (2014).
Keller, M. W. et al. Exploiting microbial hyperthermophilicity to produce an industrial chemical, using hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5840–5845 (2013).
Gregory, K. B., Bond, D. R. & Lovley, D. R. Graphite electrodes as electron donors for anaerobic respiration. Environ. Microbiol. 6, 596–604 (2004).
Nevin, K. P., Woodard, T. L. & Franks, A. E. Microbial electrosynthesis: feeding microbes electricity to convert carbon dioxide and water to multicarbon extracellular organic compounds. mBio 1, e00103-10 (2010).
Nevin, K. P. et al. Electrosynthesis of organic compounds from carbon dioxide is catalyzed by a diversity of acetogenic microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2882–2886 (2011).
Cicerone, R. J. & Oremland, R. S. Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2, 299 (1988).
Conrado, R. J. & Gonzalez, R. Envisioning the bioconversion of methane to liquid fuels. Science 343, 621–623 (2014). An article identifying the main challenges in the utilization of methane as a feedstock for bioconversion to liquid biofuels, and discussing how these challenges might be addressed.
Fuerst, J. (ed.) Planctomycetes: Cell Structure, Origins and Biology (Humana Press, 2013).
Banerjee, R., Proshlyakov, Y., Lipscomb, J. D. & Proshlyakov, D. A. Structure of the key species in the enzymatic oxidation of methane to methanol. Nature 518, 431–434 (2015).
Bogorad, I. W. et al. Building carbon–carbon bonds using a biocatalytic methanol condensation cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15928–15933 (2014). A report describing the design and construction of a methanol condensation cycle capable of converting methanol to higher-chain alcohols with complete carbon conservation and ATP independence.
Kalyuzhnaya, M. G., Puri, A. W. & Lidstrom, M. E. Metabolic engineering in methanotrophic bacteria. Metab. Eng. 29, 142–152 (2015).
Lam, F., Ghaderi, A., Fink, G. & Stephanopoulos, G. Engineering alcohol tolerance in yeast. Science 346, 71–75 (2014).
Caspeta, L. et al. Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant. Science 346, 75–78 (2014).
Hasunuma, T. et al. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact. 10, 2 (2011).
Swings, J. & De Ley, J. The biology of Zymomonas. Bacteriol. Rev. 41, 1–46 (1977).
Kremer, T. A., LaSarre, B., Posto, A. L. & McKinlay, J. B. N2 gas is an effective fertilizer for bioethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2222–2226 (2015).
Lynd, L. R., Van Zyl, W. H., McBride, J. E. & Laser, M. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 577–583 (2005).
Zhou, J. et al. Atypical glycolysis in Clostridium thermocellum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 3000–3008 (2013).
Buckel, W. & Thauer, R. K. Energy conservation via electron bifurcating ferredoxin reduction and proton/Na+ translocating ferredoxin oxidation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1827, 94–113 (2013).
Papanek, B., Biswas, R., Rydzak, T. & Guss, A. M. Elimination of metabolic pathways to all traditional fermentation products increases ethanol yields in Clostridium thermocellum. Metab. Eng. 32, 49–54 (2015).
Dam, P. et al. Insights into plant biomass conversion from the genome of the anaerobic thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor bescii DSM 6725. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 3240–3254 (2011).
Chung, D., Cha, M., Guss, A. M. & Westpheling, J. Direct conversion of plant biomass to ethanol by engineered Caldicellulosiruptor bescii. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8931–8936 (2014).
Huang, J. et al. Direct ethanol production from lignocellulosic sugars and sugarcane bagasse by a recombinant Trichoderma reesei strain HJ48. ScientificWorldJournal 2014, 798683 (2014).
Yamada, R. et al. Cocktail δ-integration: a novel method to construct cellulolytic enzyme expression ratio-optimized yeast strains. Microb. Cell Fact. 9, 32 (2010).
Tsai, S. L., Oh, J., Singh, S., Chen, R. & Chen, W. Functional assembly of minicellulosomes on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell surface for cellulose hydrolysis and ethanol production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 6087–6093 (2009).
Atsumi, S., Hanai, T. & Liao, J. C. Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 451, 86–89 (2008). The demonstration that the keto acid pathway can be used to generate C 4 and C 5 alcohols for use as biofuels, and the production of more than 20 g l−1 isobutanol using E. coli.
Hazelwood, L. A., Daran, J. M., van Maris, A. J., Pronk, J. T. & Dickinson, J. R. The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: a century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 2259–2266 (2008).
Bastian, S. et al. Engineered ketol-acid reductoisomerase and alcohol dehydrogenase enable anaerobic 2-methylpropan-1-ol production at theoretical yield in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 13, 345–352 (2011).
Matsuda, F. et al. Increased isobutanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by eliminating competing pathways and resolving cofactor imbalance. Microb. Cell Fact. 12, 119 (2013).
Li, S., Wen, J. & Jia, X. Engineering Bacillus subtilis for isobutanol production by heterologous Ehrlich pathway construction and the biosynthetic 2-ketoisovalerate precursor pathway overexpression. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91, 577–589 (2011).
Lin, P. P. et al. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulose to isobutanol using Clostridium thermocellum. Metab. Eng. 31, 44–52 (2015).
Desai, S. H., Rabinovitch-Deere, C. A., Tashiro, Y. & Atsumi, S. Isobutanol production from cellobiose in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 3727–3736 (2014).
Rodriguez, G. M., Tashiro, Y. & Atsumi, S. Expanding ester biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 259–265 (2014).
Shen, C. R. et al. Driving forces enable high-titer anaerobic 1-butanol synthesis in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2905–2915 (2011).
Dellomonaco, C., Clomburg, J. M., Miller, E. N. & Gonzalez, R. Engineered reversal of the β-oxidation cycle for the synthesis of fuels and chemicals. Nature 476, 355–359 (2011). A study using a functional reversal of the β-oxidation pathway for the synthesis of longer-chain alcohols and carboxylic acids in E. coli.
Inokuma, K., Liao, J. C., Okamoto, M. & Hanai, T. Improvement of isopropanol production by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli using gas stripping. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 110, 696–701 (2010).
Steen, E. J. et al. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of n-butanol. Microb. Cell Fact. 7, 36 (2008).
Nielsen, D. R. et al. Engineering alternative butanol production platforms in heterologous bacteria. Metab. Eng. 11, 262–273 (2009).
Lan, E. I., Ro, S. Y. & Liao, J. C. Oxygen-tolerant coenzyme A-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase facilitates efficient photosynthetic n-butanol biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2672 (2013).
Ingram, L. O., Chevalier, L. S., Gabba, E. J., Ley, K. D. & Winters, K. Propionate-induced synthesis of odd-chain-length fatty acids by Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 131, 1023–1025 (1977).
Tseng, H.-C. & Prather, K. L. J. Controlled biosynthesis of odd-chain fuels and chemicals via engineered modular metabolic pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17925–17930 (2012).
Shen, C. R. & Liao, J. C. Synergy as design principle for metabolic engineering of 1-propanol production in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 17, 12–22 (2013).
Volker, A. R. et al. Fermentative production of short-chain fatty acids in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 160, 1513–1522 (2014).
Cornillot, E., Nair, R. V., Papoutsakis, E. T. & Soucaille, P. The genes for butanol and acetone formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 reside on a large plasmid whose loss leads to degeneration of the strain. J. Bacteriol. 179, 5442–5447 (1997).
Anbarasan, P. et al. Integration of chemical catalysis with extractive fermentation to produce fuels. Nature 491, 235–239 (2012).
Bond-Watts, B. B., Bellerose, R. J. & Chang, M. C. Y. Enzyme mechanism as a kinetic control element for designing synthetic biofuel pathways. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 222–227 (2011).
Saini, M., Wang, Z. W., Chiang, C.-J. & Chao, Y.-P. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for production of butyric acid. J. Agr. Food Chem. 62, 4342–4348 (2014).
Cheon, Y. et al. A biosynthetic pathway for hexanoic acid production in Kluyveromyces marxianus. J. Biotechnol. 182–183, 30–36 (2014).
Black, P. N. & DiRusso, C. C. Yeast acyl-CoA synthetases at the crossroads of fatty acid metabolism and regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1771, 286–298 (2007).
Steen, E. J. et al. Microbial production of fatty-acid-derived fuels and chemicals from plant biomass. Nature 463, 559–562 (2010). A paper detailing the engineering of E. coli to produce fatty esters, fatty alcohols and waxes directly from simple sugars, and engineering of the biodiesel-producing cells to express hemicellulases.
Cho, H. & Cronan, J. E. Defective export of a periplasmic enzyme disrupts regulation of fatty acid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4216–4219 (1995).
Lu, X., Vora, H. & Khosla, C. Overproduction of free fatty acids in E. coli: implications for biodiesel production. Metab. Eng. 10, 333–339 (2008).
Handke, P., Lynch, S. A. & Gill, R. T. Application and engineering of fatty acid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli for advanced fuels and chemicals. Metab. Eng. 13, 28–37 (2011).
Jiang, P. & Cronan, J. E. Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis in Escherichia coli in the absence of phospholipid synthesis and release of inhibition by thioesterase action. J. Bacteriol. 176, 2814–2821 (1994).
Schirmer, A., Rude, M. A., Li, X., Popova, E. & del Cardayre, S. B. Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. Science 329, 559–562 (2010). A report describing the alkane-producing pathway in cyanobacteria, including an acyl-ACP reductase and an aldehyde decarbonylase, which together convert fatty acyl-ACP to alkanes and alkenes. When introduced into E. coli , these two genes enable the cell to produce alkanes and alkenes.
Howard, T. P. et al. Synthesis of customized petroleum-replica fuel molecules by targeted modification of free fatty acid pools in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7636–7641 (2013).
Torella, J. P. et al. Tailored fatty acid synthesis via dynamic control of fatty acid elongation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11290–11295 (2013).
Choi, Y. J. & Lee, S. Y. Microbial production of short-chain alkanes. Nature 502, 571–574 (2013).
Beopoulos, A. et al. Yarrowia lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production. Prog. Lipid Res. 48, 375–387 (2009).
Tai, M. & Stephanopoulos, G. Engineering the push and pull of lipid biosynthesis in oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for biofuel production. Metab. Eng. 15, 1–9 (2013).
Qiao, K. et al. Engineering lipid overproduction in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab. Eng. 29, 56–65 (2015).
Kuzuyama, T. Mevalonate and nonmevalonate pathways for the biosynthesis of isoprene units. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 66, 1619–1627 (2002).
Martin, V. J. J., Pitera, D. J., Withers, S. T., Newman, J. D. & Keasling, J. D. Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 796–802 (2003). An investigation in which E. coli is engineered to express a synthetic amorpha-4,11-diene synthase gene and the mevalonate isoprenoid pathway from S. cerevisiae.
Jakoc̆iūnas, T. et al. Multiplex metabolic pathway engineering using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 28, 213–222 (2015).
Chou, H. H. & Keasling, J. D. Synthetic pathway for production of five-carbon alcohols from isopentenyl diphosphate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 7849–7855 (2012).
George, K. W. et al. Metabolic engineering for the high-yield production of isoprenoid-based C5 alcohols in E. coli. Sci. Rep. 5, 11128 (2015).
Liu, H. et al. MEP pathway-mediated isopentenol production in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Microb. Cell Fact. 13, 135 (2014).
Lindberg, P., Park, S. & Melis, A. Engineering a platform for photosynthetic isoprene production in cyanobacteria, using Synechocystis as the model organism. Metab. Eng. 12, 70–79 (2010).
Xue, J. & Ahring, B. K. Enhancing isoprene production by genetic modification of the 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate pathway in Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2399–2405 (2011).
Sarria, S., Wong, B., Martín, H. G., Keasling, J. D. & Peralta-Yahya, P. Microbial synthesis of pinene. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 466–475 (2014).
Harvey, B. G., Wright, M. E. & Quintana, R. L. High-density renewable fuels based on the selective dimerization of pinenes. Energy Fuels 24, 267–273 (2010).
Alonso-Gutierrez, J. et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for limonene and perillyl alcohol production. Metab. Eng. 19, 33–41 (2013).
Davies, F. K., Work, V. H., Beliaev, A. S. & Posewitz, M. C. Engineering limonene and bisabolene production in wild type and a glycogen-deficient mutant of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2, 21 (2014).
Anthony, J. R. et al. Optimization of the mevalonate-based isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in Escherichia coli for production of the anti-malarial drug precursor amorpha-4,11-diene. Metab. Eng. 11, 13–19 (2009).
Peralta-Yahya, P. P. et al. Identification and microbial production of a terpene-based advanced biofuel. Nat. Commun. 2, 483 (2011).
Chandran, S. S., Kealey, J. T. & Reeves, C. D. Microbial production of isoprenoids. Process Biochem. 46, 1703–1710 (2011). A review of isoprenoid-derived products, their biosynthetic pathways and the means by which their production can be improved.
Phelan, R. M., Sekurova, O. N., Keasling, J. D. & Zotchev, S. B. Engineering terpene biosynthesis in Streptomyces for production of the advanced biofuel precursor bisabolene. ACS Synth. Biol. 4, 393–399 (2014).
Wang, C. et al. Farnesol production from Escherichia coli by harnessing the exogenous mevalonate pathway. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 107, 421–429 (2010).
Asadollahi, M. A., Maury, J., Schalk, M., Clark, A. & Nielsen, J. Enhancement of farnesyl diphosphate pool as direct precursor of sesquiterpenes through metabolic engineering of the mevalonate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 106, 86–96 (2010).
Farmer, W. R. & Liao, J. C. Improving lycopene production in Escherichia coli by engineering metabolic control. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 533–537 (2000).
Zhang, F., Carothers, J. M. & Keasling, J. D. Design of a dynamic sensor-regulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 354–359 (2012).
Alper, H., Moxley, J., Nevoigt, E., Fink, G. R. & Stephanopoulos, G. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science 314, 1565–1568 (2006). A report detailing how the mutation of a global transcription factor, Spt15p, in yeast leads to increased tolerance and more efficient glucose conversion to ethanol.
Lo, J. et al. Deletion of nfnAB in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum and its effect on metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 197, 2920–2929 (2015).
Biswas, R., Wilson, C. M., Zheng, T., Giannone, R. J. & Dawn, M. Elimination of hydrogenase active site assembly blocks H2 production and increases ethanol yield in Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol. Biofuels 8, 20 (2015).
Lan, E. I. & Liao, J. C. ATP drives direct photosynthetic production of 1-butanol in cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6018–6023 (2012).
Royce, L., Liu, P., Stebbins, M., Hanson, B. & Jarboe, L. The damaging effects of short chain fatty acids on Escherichia coli membranes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 8317–8327 (2013).
Bogorad, I. W., Lin, T.-S. & Liao, J. C. Synthetic non-oxidative glycolysis enables complete carbon conservation. Nature 502, 693–697 (2013). Work demonstrating a total carbon conservation from glucose to acetyl-CoA through the redesigning of glycolysis to a NOG pathway. Instead of pyruvate oxidation, acetyl-CoA is produced by acetyl phosphate phosphoketolase as a key pathway enzyme, and sugar phosphates are carbon rearranged to achieve 100% carbon conservation.
Mainguet, S. E., Gronenberg, L. S., Wong, S. S. & Liao, J. C. A reverse glyoxylate shunt to build a non-native route from C4 to C2 in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 19, 116–127 (2013).
Lewis, N. S., Crabtree, G., Nozik, A. J., Wasielewski, M. R. & Alivisatos, P. Basic research needs for solar energy utilization. US Department of Energy [online] (2005).
Tarascon, J. M. & Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414, 359–367 (2001).
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C. & Isaacs, E. D. Electrical energy storage for transportation—approaching the limits of, and going beyond, lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7854 (2012).
Rohan, J. F., Hasan, M., Patil, S., Casey, D. P. & Clancy, T. Energy storage: battery materials and architectures at the nanoscale. ICT - Energy - Concepts Towards Zero - Power Information and Communication Technology [online], (2014).
Ellingsen, L. A.-W. et al. Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 113–124 (2014).
Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).
US Department of Energy. Billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy & bioproducts industry. US Department of Energy [online] (2011).
Salisbury, S. A., Forrest, H. S., Cruse, W. B. T. & Kennard, O. A novel coenzyme from bacterial primary alcohol dehydrogenases. Nature 280, 843–844 (1979).
Arfman, N. et al. Methanol metabolism in thermotolerant methylotrophic Bacillus strains involving a novel catabolic NAD-dependent methanol dehydrogenase as a key enzyme. Arch. Microbiol. 152, 280–288 (1989).
Baratti, J., Couderc, R., Cooney, C. L. & Wang, D. I. C. Preparation and properties of immobilized methanol oxidase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 20, 333–348 (1978).
Anthony, C. How half a century of research was required to understand bacterial growth on C1 and C2 compounds; the story of the serine cycle and the ethylmalonyl-CoA pathway. Sci. Prog. 94, 109 (2011).
Kalyuzhnaya, M. G. et al. Highly efficient methane biocatalysis revealed in a methanotrophic bacterium. Nat. Commun. 4, 2785 (2013).
Culpepper, M. A. & Rosenzweig, A. C. Architecture and active site of particulate methane monooxygenase. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 47, 483–492 (2012).
The authors appreciate support from the US Department of Energy (DOE) BioEnergy Science Center, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)–DOE Institute of Genomics and Proteomics, the DOE (grant DE-SC0012384), the US National Science Foundation (grant MCB-1139318) and the DOE Advanced Research Project Agency-energy REMOTE programme.
The authors are affiliated with the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA). UCLA has filed patents on some of the technologies discussed here.
- Thermohaline circulation
Large-scale ocean currents that result from water density gradients, which are under the control of temperature (thermo) and salinity (haline).
The major component of the plant cell wall, which consists of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin.
- Cellulolytic organisms
Organisms that can digest cellulose.
Capable of using CO2 as the carbon source and inorganic compounds as reducing equivalents.
Capable of utilizing reduced C1 compounds.
Organic molecules with the general formula CnH2n+2.
A long-chain linear polysaccharide of β(1–4)-linked D-glucose; this polysaccharide is a major energy and carbon storage material in plants.
A group of heteropolymers in plant cell walls, commonly consisting of mainly pentoses (such as xylose, arabinose and mannose) and some hexoses (such as glucose).
A group of heterogeneous crosslinked polymers that are rich in phenolic moieties and provide structural support in plant cell walls.
- Synthetic gas
(Syngas). A mixture of CO and H2.
- Fischer–Tropsch reaction
A process that converts a mixture of H2 and CO to liquid fuels using cobalt, iron, or ruthenium as catalysts at 150–350 °C.
- Wood–Ljungdahl pathway
A CO2-fixing pathway that is found in certain bacterial and archaeal species and that synthesizes acetyl-CoA; also known as the reductive acetyl-CoA pathway.
Cell surface-attached multi-enzyme complexes that are produced by several cellulolytic bacteria for lignocellulose degradation.
Fine fibre-like strands formed of multiple cellulose polymers that are aligned in parallel via hydrogen bonding, creating structural crystallinity and mechanical strength.
- Water splitting
A chemical reaction that separates water molecules into O2 and H2.
- 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate CO2 fixation pathway
A cyclic pathway that was discovered in the archaeon Metallosphaera sedula and uses 3-hydroxypropionate and 4-hydroxybutyrate as key intermediates to convert CO2 into acetyl-CoA.
Able to produce acetate as a major metabolite in anaerobic respiration.
An acetyl group linked to CoA by a thioester bond; this molecule acts as the acetyl group donor in cells.
- Keto acid
An organic acid that contains a ketone group.
- Malate shunt
A pathway that converts phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate through oxaloacetate and malate; in this pathway, the reducing equivalent NADH is converted to NADPH.
- Electron-bifurcating enzymes
Multi-enzyme complexes that were recently discovered in anaerobic microorganisms and are capable of coupling a thermodynamically unfavourable redox reaction with a thermodynamically favourable one.
- Acyl carrier protein
A protein molecule that transfers the acyl group during fatty acid biosynthesis.
A class of C15 isoprenoid compounds described by the general chemical formula C15H24.
- Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway
(EMP pathway). The most common native glycolytic pathway for converting glucose to pyruvate and thereby generating reducing equivalents and ATP; the resultant pyruvate is then converted to acetyl-CoA.
- Non-oxidative glycolysis pathway
(NOG pathway). A pathway that can be constructed, through metabolic engineering, to enable the digestion of glucose or other sugars in a redox-neutral manner into acetyl-phosphate or acetyl-CoA without losing carbon to CO2. This is in contrast to native glycolysis, which is oxidative and loses carbon to CO2 when producing acetyl-CoA.
- Reverse glyoxylate shunt
(rGS). A synthetic pathway that is designed to convert malate to acetyl-coA without carbon loss, using glyoxylate as a key pathway intermediate.
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, J., Mi, L., Pontrelli, S. et al. Fuelling the future: microbial engineering for the production of sustainable biofuels. Nat Rev Microbiol 14, 288–304 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.32
This article is cited by
Microbial Cell Factories (2022)
Nature Catalysis (2022)
Nature Communications (2022)
Communications Materials (2022)
Advances in microbial metabolic engineering for the production of butanol isomers (isobutanol and 1-butanol) from a various biomass
BioEnergy Research (2022)