The capability of cells to generate contractile forces originates from the activity of the molecular motor myosin II on its substrate actin filaments.
Although the molecular constituents of contractility are well conserved across cell types, the organization of myosin and actin filaments varies widely from highly organized sarcomeres in striated muscle to non-sarcomeric organizations in smooth and non-muscle cells.
In sarcomeres, actomyosin geometry regulates force transmission and is well understood. The non-sarcomeric organiazations of actomyosin require novel mechanisms of force transmission, from molecular to cellular length scales, and alternative mechanisms of contractility.
Alternativee mechanisms of force transmission invoke nonlinear response of actin filaments and spatial localization of actin filament assembly.
Non-sarcomeric actomyosin assemblies facilitate large shape changes, and mechanochemical feedback exists to coordinate assembly dynamics with contractility.
Actomyosin networks are also used in cell mechanosensing and facilitate a novel mode of intracellular transport.
Actomyosin-mediated contractility is a highly conserved mechanism for generating mechanical stress in animal cells and underlies muscle contraction, cell migration, cell division and tissue morphogenesis. Whereas actomyosin-mediated contractility in striated muscle is well understood, the regulation of such contractility in non-muscle and smooth muscle cells is less certain. Our increased understanding of the mechanics of actomyosin arrays that lack sarcomeric organization has revealed novel modes of regulation and force transmission. This work also provides an example of how diverse mechanical behaviours at cellular scales can arise from common molecular components, underscoring the need for experiments and theories to bridge the molecular to cellular length scales.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 16 November 2022
Nature Communications Open Access 15 July 2022
F-actin bending facilitates net actomyosin contraction By inhibiting expansion with plus-end-located myosin motors
Journal of Mathematical Biology Open Access 04 July 2022
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Munjal, A. & Lecuit, T. Actomyosin networks and tissue morphogenesis. Development 141, 1789–1793 (2014).
Gardel, M. L., Schneider, I. C., Aratyn-Schaus, Y. & Waterman, C. M. Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 315–333 (2010).
Vicente-Manzanares, M., Ma, X., Adelstein, R. S. & Horwitz, A. R. Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 778–790 (2009).
Salbreux, G., Charras, G. & Paluch, E. Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 536–545 (2012).
Green, R. A., Paluch, E. & Oegema, K. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 29–58 (2012).
Pinto, I. M. et al. Actin depolymerization drives actomyosin ring contraction during budding yeast cytokinesis. Dev. Cell 22, 1247–1260 (2012).
Murrell, M. P. et al. Liposome adhesion generates traction stress. Nat. Phys. 10, 163–169 (2014).
Stroka, K. M. et al. Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments. Cell 157, 611–623 (2014).
Levayer, R. & Lecuit, T. Biomechanical regulation of contractility: spatial control and dynamics. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 61–81 (2012).
Lecuit, T., Lenne, P.-F. & Munro, E. Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Bio 27, 157–184 (2011).
Gordon, A. M., Homsher, E. & Regnier, M. Regulation of contraction in striated muscle. Physiol. Rev. 80, 853–924 (2000).
Huxley, H. E. Fifty years of muscle and the sliding filament hypothesis. Eur. J. Biochem. 271, 1403–1415 (2004).
Steinmetz, P. R. H. et al. Independent evolution of striated muscles in cnidarians and bilaterians. Nature 487, 231–234 (2012).
Niederman, R. & Pollard, T. D. Human platelet myosin. II. In vitro assembly and structure of myosin filaments. J. Cell Biol. 67, 72–92 (1975).
Pollard, T. D. Structure and polymerization of Acanthamoeba myosin-II filaments. J. Cell Biol. 95, 816–825 (1982).
Skubiszak, L. & Kowalczyk, L. Myosin molecule packing within the vertebrate skeletal muscle thick filaments. A complete bipolar model. Acta Biochim. Polon. 49, 829–840 (2002).
Sobieszek, A. Cross-bridges on self-assembled smooth muscle myosin filaments. J. Mol. Biol. 70, 741–744 (1972).
Tonino, P., Simon, M. & Craig, R. Mass determination of native smooth muscle myosin filaments by scanning transmission electron microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 318, 999–1007 (2002).
Huxley, H. E. X-ray analysis and the problem of muscle. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 141, 59–62 (1953).
Huxley, H. E. The double array of filaments in cross-striated muscle. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 3, 631–648 (1957).
Huxley, A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 7, 255–318 (1957).
Huxley, A. F. & Niedergerke, R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction: interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature 173, 971–973 (1954).
Littlefield, R., Almenar-Queralt, A. & Fowler, V. M. Actin dynamics at pointed ends regulates thin filament length in striated muscle. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 544–551 (2001).
Lavoie, T. L. et al. Disrupting actin–myosin–actin connectivity in airway smooth muscle as a treatment for asthma? Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 6, 295–300 (2009).
Gunst, S. J. & Zhang, W. Actin cytoskeletal dynamics in smooth muscle: a new paradigm for the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 295, C576–587 (2008).
Verkhovsky, A. B. & Borisy, G. G. Non-sarcomeric mode of myosin II organization in the fibroblast lamellum. J. Cell Biol. 123, 637–652 (1993).
Svitkina, T. M., Verkhovsky, A. B., McQuade, K. M. & Borisy, G. G. Analysis of the actin–myosin II system in fish epidermal keratocytes: mechanism of cell body translocation. J. Cell Biol. 139, 397–415 (1997).
Aratyn-Schaus, Y., Oakes, P. W. & Gardel, M. L. Dynamic and structural signatures of lamellar actomyosin force generation. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 1330–1339 (2011).
Hotulainen, P. & Lappalainen, P. Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells. J. Cell Biol. 173, 383–394 (2006).
Svitkina, T. M. & Borisy, G. G. Correlative light and electron microscopy of the cytoskeleton of cultured cells. Methods Enzymol. 298, 570–592 (1998).
Stricker, J., Beckham, Y., Davidson, M. W. & Gardel, M. L. Myosin II-mediated focal adhesion maturation is tension insensitive. PLoS ONE 8, e70652 (2013).
Oakes, P. W., Beckham, Y., Stricker, J. & Gardel, M. L. Tension is required but not sufficient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress fiber template. J. Cell Bio. 196, 363–374 (2012).
Martin, A. C. et al. Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination. J. Cell Biol. 188, 735–749 (2010).
Martin, A. C., Kaschube, M. & Wieschaus, E. F. Pulsed contractions of an actin–myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 457, 495–499 (2009).
He, L., Wang, X., Tang, H. L. & Montell, D. J. Tissue elongation requires oscillating contractions of a basal actomyosin network. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1133–1142 (2010).
Levayer, R. & Lecuit, T. Oscillation and polarity of E-cadherin asymmetries control actomyosin flow patterns during morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 26, 162–175 (2013).
Kim, T., Gardel, M. L. & Munro, E. Determinants of fluidlike behavior and effective viscosity in cross-linked actin networks. Biophys. J. 106, 526–534 (2014).
Courtemanche, N., Lee, J. Y., Pollard, T. D. & Greene, E. C. Tension modulates actin filament polymerization mediated by formin and profilin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9752–9757 (2013).
Ferrer, J. M. et al. Measuring molecular rupture forces between single actin filaments and actin-binding proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9221–9226 (2008).
Jégou, A., Carlier, M.-F. & Romet-Lemonne, G. Formin mDia1 senses and generates mechanical forces on actin filaments. Nat. Commun. 4, 1883 (2013).
Wilson, C. A. et al. Myosin II contributes to cell-scale actin network treadmilling through network disassembly. Nature 465, 373–377 (2010).
Fritzsche, M. et al. Analysis of turnover dynamics of the submembranous actin cortex. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 757–767 (2013).
Carvalho, A., Desai, A. & Oegema, K. Structural memory in the contractile ring makes the duration of cytokinesis independent of cell size. Cell 137, 926–937 (2009).
Luo, W. et al. Analysis of the local organization and dynamics of cellular actin networks. J. Cell Biol. 202, 1057–1073 (2013).
Lenz, M., Gardel, M. L. & Dinner, A. R. Requirements for contractility in disordered cytoskeletal bundles. New J. Phys. 14, 033037 (2012).
Vavylonis, D. et al. Assembly mechanism of the contractile ring for cytokinesis by fission yeast. Science 319, 97–100 (2008).
Kruse, K. & Julicher, F. Actively contracting bundles of polar filaments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1778–1781 (2000).
Liverpool, T. B. & Marchetti, M. C. Bridging the microscopic and the hydrodynamic in active filament solutions. Europhys. Lett. 69, 846 (2005).
Tsuda, Y., Yasutake, H., Ishijima, A. & Yanagida, T. Torsional rigidity of single actin filaments and actin–actin bond breaking force under torsion measured directly by in vitro micromanipulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12937–12942 (1996).
McCullough, B. R. et al. Cofilin-linked changes in actin filament flexibility promote severing. Biophys. J. 101, 151–159 (2011).
Arai, Y. et al. Tying a molecular knot with optical tweezers. Nature 399, 446–448 (1999).
Lenz, M., Thoresen, T., Gardel, M. L. & Dinner, A. R. Contractile units in disordered actomyosin bundles arise from F-actin buckling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 238107 (2012).
Murrell, M. P. & Gardel, M. L. F-actin buckling coordinates contractility and severing in a biomimetic actomyosin cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 51, 20820–20825 (2012).
Hayakawa, K., Tatsumi, H. & Sokabe, M. Actin filaments function as a tension sensor by tension-dependent binding of cofilin to the filament. J. Cell Biol. 195, 721–727 (2011).
Vogel, S. K., Petrasek, Z., Heinemann, F. & Schwille, P. Myosin motors fragment and compact membrane-bound actin filaments. eLife 2, e00116 (2013).
Lenz, M. Geometrical origins of contractility in disordered actomyosin networks. Phys. Rev. X 4, 041002 (2014).
Thoresen, T., Lenz, M. & Gardel, M. L. Thick filament length and isoform composition determine self-organized contractile units in actomyosin bundles. Biophys. J. 104, 655–665 (2013).
Haviv, L., Gillo, D., Backouche, F. & Bernheim-Groswasser, A. A cytoskeletal demolition worker: myosin II acts as an actin depolymerization agent. J. Mol. Biol. 375, 325–330 (2008).
Pelham, R. J. & Chang, F. Actin dynamics in the contractile ring during cytokinesis in fission yeast. Nature 419, 82–86 (2002).
Costa, K. D., Hucker, W. J. & Yin, F. C. Buckling of actin stress fibers: a new wrinkle in the cytoskeletal tapestry. Cell. Motil. Cytoskeleton 52, 266–274 (2002).
Heissler, S. M. & Manstein, D. J. Nonmuscle myosin-2: mix and match. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70, 1–21 (2013).
Parsons, J. T., Horwitz, A. R. & Schwartz, M. A. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 633–643 (2010).
Jordan, S. N. & Canman, J. C. Rho GTPases in animal cell cytokinesis: an occupation by the one percent. Cytoskeleton 69, 919–930 (2012).
Machacek, M. et al. Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion. Nature 461, 99–103 (2009).
Munro, E. & Bowerman, B. Cellular symmetry breaking during Caenorhabditis elegans development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, a003400 (2009).
Janson, L. W., Kolega, J. & Taylor, D. L. Modulation of contraction by gelation/solation in a reconstituted motile model. J. Cell Biol. 114, 1005–1015 (1991).
Bendix, P. M. et al. A quantitative analysis of contractility in active cytoskeletal protein networks. Biophys. J. 94, 3126–3136 (2008).
Thoresen, T., Lenz, M. & Gardel, M. L. Reconstitution of contractile actomyosin bundles. Biophys. J. 100, 2698–2705 (2011).
Alvarado, J. et al. Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state. Nat. Phys. 9, 591–597 (2013).
Gardel, M. L. et al. Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. Science 304, 1301–1305 (2004).
Kasza, K. E. et al. Nonlinear elasticity of stiff biopolymers connected by flexible linkers. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 79, 041928 (2009).
Kohler, S., Schaller, V. & Bausch, A. R. Structure formation in active networks. Nat. Mater. 10, 462–468 (2011).
Reymann, A.-C. et al. Nucleation geometry governs ordered actin networks structures. Nat. Mater. 9, 827–832 (2010).
Alexandrova, A. Y. et al. Comparative dynamics of retrograde actin flow and focal adhesions: formation of nascent adhesions triggers transition from fast to slow flow. PLoS ONE 3, e3234 (2008).
Koenderink, G. H. et al. An active biopolymer network controlled by molecular motors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15192–15197 (2009).
Gardel, M. L. et al. Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1762–1767 (2006).
Smith, M. A. et al. A zyxin-mediated mechanism for actin stress fiber maintenance and repair. Dev. Cell 19, 365–376 (2010).
Halder, G., Dupont, S. & Piccolo, S. Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 591–600 (2012).
Cowan, C. R. & Hyman, A. A. Acto-myosin reorganization and PAR polarity in C. elegans. Development 134, 1035–1043 (2007).
Liu, C. et al. Actin-mediated feedback loops in B-cell receptor signaling. Immunol. Rev. 256, 177–189 (2013).
Storm, C. et al. Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature 435, 191–194 (2005).
Gardel, M. L. et al. Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 088102 (2006).
Kasza, K. E. et al. Filamin A is essential for active cell stiffening but not passive stiffening under external force. Biophys. J. 96, 4326–4335 (2009).
Mizuno, D., Tardin, C., Schmidt, C. F. & Mackintosh, F. C. Nonequilibrium mechanics of active cytoskeletal networks. Science 315, 370–373 (2007).
Pasternak, C., Spudich, J. A. & Elson, E. L. Capping of surface receptors and concomitant cortical tension are generated by conventional myosin. Nature 341, 549–551 (1989).
Wang, N. et al. Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282, C606–616 (2002).
Stamenovic, D., Liang, Z., Chen, J. & Wang, N. Effect of the cytoskeletal prestress on the mechanical impedance of cultured airway smooth muscle cells. J. Appl. Physiol. 92, 1443–1450 (2002).
Balland, M., Richert, A. & Gallet, F. The dissipative contribution of myosin II in the cytoskeleton dynamics of myoblasts. Eur. Biophys. J. 34, 255–261 (2005).
Martens, J. C. & Radmacher, M. Softening of the actin cytoskeleton by inhibition of myosin II. Pflugers Arch. 456, 95–100 (2008).
Lau, A. W. et al. Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 198101 (2003).
Brangwynne, C. P. et al. Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement. J. Cell Biol. 173, 733–741 (2006).
Fakhri, N. et al. High-resolution mapping of intracellular fluctuations using carbon nanotubes. Science 344, 1031–1035 (2014).
Manneville, J. B., Bassereau, P., Levy, D. & Prost, J. Activity of transmembrane proteins induces magnification of shape fluctuations of lipid membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4356–4359 (1999).
Betz, T., Lenz, M., Joanny, J. F. & Sykes, C. ATP-dependent mechanics of red blood cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15320–15325 (2009).
le Duc, Q. et al. Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II-dependent manner. J. Cell Biol. 189, 1107–1115 (2010).
Heisenberg, C.-P. & Bellaïche, Y. Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell 153, 948–962 (2013).
Sonnemann, K. J. & Bement, W. M. Wound repair: toward understanding and integration of single-cell and multicellular wound responses. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 237–263 (2011).
Friedl, P. & Gilmour, D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 445–457 (2009).
Sedzinski, J. et al. Polar actomyosin contractility destabilizes the position of the cytokinetic furrow. Nature 476, 462–466 (2011).
Tinevez, J.-Y. et al. Role of cortical tension in bleb growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 18581–18586 (2009).
Rubinstein, B. et al. Actin–myosin viscoelastic flow in the keratocyte lamellipod. Biophys. J. 97, 1853–1863 (2009).
Kruse, K., Joanny, J. F., Julicher, F. & Prost, J. Contractility and retrograde flow in lamellipodium motion. Phys. Biol. 3, 130–137 (2006).
Mertz, A. F. et al. Cadherin-based intercellular adhesions organize epithelial cell–matrix traction forces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 842–847 (2012).
Goehring, N. W. et al. Polarization of PAR proteins by advective triggering of a pattern-forming system. Science 334, 1137–1141 (2011).
Oakes, P. W., Banerjee, S., Marchetti, M. C. & Gardel, M. L. Geometry regulates traction stresses in adherent cells. Biophys. J. 107, 825–833 (2014).
Guthardt Torres, P., Bischofs, I. B. & Schwarz, U. S. Contractile network models for adherent cells. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 85, 011913 (2012).
Howard, J. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton (Sinauer Associates, 2001).
Yao, Norman, Y. et al. Stress-enhanced gelation: A dynamic nonlinearity of elasticity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 018103 (2013).
Verkhovsky, A. B., Svitkina, T. M. & Borisy, G. G. Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 9, 11–20 (1999).
Sun, S. X., Walcott, S. & Wolgemuth, C. W. Cytoskeletal cross-linking and bundling in motor-independent contraction. Curr. Biol. 20, R649–R654 (2010).
Ramaswamy, S. The mechanics and statistics of active matter. Annu. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 1, 323–345 (2010).
Bartles, J. R. Parallel actin bundles and their multiple actin-bundling proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 72–78 (2000).
Kohler, S. & Bausch, A. R. Contraction mechanisms in composite active actin networks. PLoS ONE 7, e39869 (2012).
Kane, R. E. Interconversion of structural and contractile actin gels by insertion of myosin during assembly. J. Cell Biol. 97, 1745–1752 (1983).
Backouche, F., Haviv, L., Groswasser, D. & Bernheim-Groswasser, A. Active gels: dynamics of patterning and self-organization. Phys. Biol. 3, 264–273 (2006).
Aratyn, Y. S., Schaus, T. E., Taylor, E. W. & Borisy, G. G. Intrinsic dynamic behavior of fascin in filopodia. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3928–3940 (2007).
Wang, K., Ash, J. F. & Singer, S. J. Filamin, a new high-molecular-weight protein found in smooth muscle and non-muscle cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 4483–4486 (1975).
Biro, Maté et al. Cell cortex composition and homeostasis resolved by integrating proteomics and quantitative imaging. Cytoskeleton 70, 741–754 (2013).
Schmoller, K. M., Lieleg, O. & Bausch, A. R. Structural and viscoelastic properties of actin/filamin networks: cross-linked versus bundled networks. Biophys. J. 97, 83–89 (2009).
Kasza, K. E. et al. Actin filament length tunes elasticity of flexibly cross-linked actin networks. Biophys. J. 99, 1091–1100 (2010).
Kohler, S., Schmoller, K. M., Crevenna, A. H. & Bausch, A. R. Regulating contractility of the actomyosin cytoskeleton by pH. Cell Rep. 2, 433–439 (2012).
Goldmann, W. H. & Isenberg, G. Analysis of filamin and α-actinin binding to actin by the stopped flow method. FEBS Lett. 336, 408–410 (1993).
Ebashi, S. & Ebashi, F. α-actinin, a new structural protein from striated muscle. I. Preparation and action on actomyosin-ATP interaction. J. Biochem. 58, 7–12 (1965).
Edlund, M., Lotano, M. A. & Otey, C. A. Dynamics of α-actinin in focal adhesions and stress fibers visualized with α-actinin–green fluorescent protein. Cell. Motil. Cytoskeleton 48, 190–200 (2001).
Sanger, J. M., Mittal, B., Pochapin, M. B. & Sanger, J. W. Stress fiber and cleavage furrow formation in living cells microinjected with fluorescently labeled α-actinin. Cell. Motil. Cytoskeleton 7, 209–220 (1987).
Falzone, T. T., Lenz, M., Kovar, D. R. & Gardel, M. L. Assembly kinetics determine the architecture of α-actinin crosslinked F-actin networks. Nat. Commun. 3, 861 (2012).
Field, C. M. & Alberts, B. M. Anillin, a contractile ring protein that cycles from the nucleus to the cell cortex. J. Cell Biol. 131, 165–178 (1995).
Schaller, V. et al. Crosslinking proteins modulate the self-organization of driven systems. Soft Matter 9, 7229–7233 (2013).
Kinoshita, M. et al. Self- and actin-templated assembly of Mammalian septins. Dev. Cell 3, 791–802 (2002).
Reichl, E. M. et al. Interactions between myosin and actin crosslinkers control cytokinesis contractility dynamics and mechanics. Curr. Biol. 18, 471–480 (2008).
Weber, I. et al. Two-step positioning of a cleavage furrow by cortexillin and myosin II. Curr. Biol. 10, 501–506 (2000).
Yin, H. L. & Stossel, T. P. Control of cytoplasmic actin gel–sol transformation by gelsolin, a calcium-dependent regulatory protein. Nature 281, 583–586 (1979).
Murrell, M. et al. Spreading dynamics of biomimetic actin cortices. Biophys. J. 100, 1400–1409 (2011).
Murrell, M. & Gardel, M. L. Actomyosin sliding is attenuated in contractile biomimetic cortices. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 1845–1853 (2014).
Carvalho, K. et al. Cell-sized liposomes reveal how actomyosin cortical tension drives shape change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16456–16461 (2013).
The authors thank Y. Beckham and B. Hissa for contributing images for Figure 1. M.L.G. is supported by the Packard Foundation, an American Asthma Foundation grant and NSF-MCB 1344203. M.M. is supported by NSF-CMMI 1434095. M.L.'s group belongs to the CNRS consortium CellTiss. M.L. was supported by grants from Université Paris-Sud and CNRS, Marie Curie Integration Grant PCIG12-GA-2012-334053 and “Investissements d'Avenir” LabEx PALM (ANR-10-LABX-0039-PALM). M.L. and M.L.G. were supported by the University of Chicago FACCTS programme. This work was supported by the University of Chicago MRSEC (NSF-DMR 1420709).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Isotropic contraction
Shortening that is uniform in all directions.
- Anisotropic stresses
Shortening that is not uniform in all directions.
A region at the boundaries of muscle sarcomeres in which the actin filaments are anchored. It appears as a dark transverse line in electron micrographs.
- Force–velocity curve
The relationship between the force applied to a motor and the speed at which it moves relative to its substrate.
The structural unit of striated muscle fibres, which is formed from longitudinally joined sarcomeres. Several myofibrils form each fibre.
- Unloaded velocity
The speed at which a motor moves under no applied load. Typical unloaded velocities for myosin II motors range from 50–1,000 nm s−1.
- Stall force
The applied force that stops the motion of the motor. Typical stall forces for individual molecular motors are 1–10 pN.
RHOA-dependent actomyosin organelles in adherent cells. Actomyosin is organized into a variety of contractile bundles and networks and tethered to the matrix by mature focal adhesions.
- Transverse arcs
Actomyosin bundles in the lamella that are parallel to the cell periphery and undergo myosin II-dependent retrograde flow towards the cell centre.
- Radial stress fibres
Actin bundles tethered at one end to focal adhesions and integrated into transverse arcs along their length and, thus, oriented in a radial fashion with respect to the cell centre on the dorsal surface. Radial stress fibres do not contain myosin II and assemble in a DIA1- and INF2-dependent manner. They are also known as dorsal stress fibres.
- Peripheral bundles
Actomyosin bundles found at non-adherent edges of cells that are responsible for cell shape maintenance.
- Ventral stress fibres
Actomyosin bundles formed at the ventral surface that are attached to focal adhesions at each end.
- Contractile strain
Deformation of a structure that results in shortening of length, area or volume.
- Steady-state flow
Movements that occur at a constant rate, or velocity, over time.
- Stress relaxation
The decrease of force that occurs in structures owing to viscous, or fluid, effects.
- Compressive forces
Force that results in pushing, or compression, on a structure.
- Tensile force
Force that results in pulling, or tension, on a structure
The tendency of a material to deform in response to an external force. A more compliant material will deform to a greater extent than a less compliant one.
- Focal adhesions
Cellular structures that link the extracellular matrix on the outside of the cell, through integrin receptors, to the actin cytoskeleton inside the cell.
- Adherens junctions
Protein complexes that contain cadherin and catenin proteins. They are formed between neighbouring cells in the tissue and serve not only to maintain cell–cell adhesion but also to regulate intracellular signalling and cytoskeletal organization.
- Elastic response
The tendency of structures to store mechanical energy. The initial shape is preserved upon release of external forces.
- Traction force microscopy
A technique to calculate stresses generated by cells by measuring the deformation of the matrix to which they are attached.
About this article
Cite this article
Murrell, M., Oakes, P., Lenz, M. et al. Forcing cells into shape: the mechanics of actomyosin contractility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16, 486–498 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm4012
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2022)
Inhibition of negative feedback for persistent epithelial cell–cell junction contraction by p21-activated kinase 3
Nature Communications (2022)
Nature Communications (2022)
Nature Reviews Genetics (2022)
Nature Chemistry (2022)