Review Article | Published:

Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology volume 12, pages 815826 (2011) | Download Citation

Abstract

The discovery of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) celebrated its golden anniversary this year. Originally offered as an explanation for the establishment of genetic equality between males and females, 50 years on, XCI presents more than a curious gender-based phenomenon that causes silencing of sex chromosomes. How have the mysteries of XCI unfolded? And what general lessons can be extracted? Several of the cell biological mechanisms that are used to establish the inactive X chromosome, including regulatory networks of non-coding RNAs and unusual nuclear dynamics, are now suspected to hold true for processes occurring on a genome-wide scale.

Key points

  • X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), a process that was discovered by Mary Lyon 50 years ago, has become a model system for the cell biological mechanisms that regulate non-coding RNAs and chromatin during gene expression.

  • XCI occurs as a continual biological cycle that begins during both oogenesis and spermiogenesis, allowing 'imprinted' XCI upon zygote formation, and must then be re-established in a 'random' manner at the epiblast stage of development.

  • The mechanisms that drive XCI revolve around the nucleation of an inactive state at the X-inactivation centre (Xic), and require regulatory networks of non-coding sense and antisense RNAs that drive expression of the X-inactivation specific transcript (Xist) transcript on the future inactive X chromosome through RNA–RNA and RNA–protein interactions. Less is known about how Xist RNA spreads from the 'nucleation centre' to induce heterochromatin elsewhere on the inactive X chromosome.

  • XCI has also provided key insights into nuclear structure and function, in terms both of how chromosome territory organization controls gene expression and of the means by which certain genes on the X chromosome escape from inactivation. The transient X–X pairing that occurs before XCI also provides an unusual example of somatic chromosome pairing in mammals, and this may be important for generating epigenetic asymmetry between the two X chromosomes.

  • The characterization of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that reside at the Xic has provided a model for the unique properties of lncRNAs, which enable locus-specific control during gene expression. The regulatory principles that have emerged here are likely to be relevant for lncRNA functions throughout the genome.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190, 372–373 (1961).

  2. 2.

    & X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 733–772 (2008).

  3. 3.

    , & Chromatin remodeling in dosage compensation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 615–651 (2005).

  4. 4.

    & Vive la difference: males vs females in flies vs worms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 637–702 (1996).

  5. 5.

    & A new model for random X chromosome inactivation. Development 136, 1–10 (2009).

  6. 6.

    Gene silencing in X-chromosome inactivation: advances in understanding facultative heterochromatin formation. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 542–553 (2011).

  7. 7.

    & Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 17, 155–190 (1983).

  8. 8.

    & Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome. Genes Dev. 20, 1848–1867 (2006).

  9. 9.

    in Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation (ed. Ohlsson, R.) 73–90 (Springer, Heidelberg, 1999).

  10. 10.

    & Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation in development in mice and humans. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 362–378 (1998).

  11. 11.

    On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection. (John Murray, London, 1859).

  12. 12.

    Experiments in plant hybridization (English translation). J. R. Hort. Soc. 26, 1–32 (1866).

  13. 13.

    Theodor Boveri. Science 144, 809–815 (1964).

  14. 14.

    Nettie Stevens and the discovery of sex chromosomes. Isis 69, 163–172 (1978).

  15. 15.

    , , & The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. (Henry Holt and Co., New York, 1915).

  16. 16.

    Some genetic aspects of sex. Am. Nat. 66, 118–138 (1932).

  17. 17.

    & The genetic control of biochemical reactions in Neurospora. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 27, 499–506 (1941).

  18. 18.

    & A morphological distinction between neurones of the male and female, and the behaviour of the nucleolar satellite during accelerated nucleoprotein synthesis. Nature 163, 676 (1949).

  19. 19.

    , & Formation of the sex chromatin by a single X-chromosome in liver cells of Rattus norvegicus. Exp. Cell Res. 18, 415–418 (1959).

  20. 20.

    X-chromosome inactivation and developmental patterns in mammals. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 47, 1–35 (1972).

  21. 21.

    Possible mechanisms of X chromosome inactivation. Nature New Biol. 232, 229–232 (1971).

  22. 22.

    & Variegated-type position effects in the mouse. Genetics 46, 509–525 (1961).

  23. 23.

    & Sex chromatin and the sex chromosomes: on the origin of sex chromatin from a single X chromosome. Acta Cytol. 6, 46–60 (1962).

  24. 24.

    , & The normal human female as a mosaic of X-chromosome activity: studies using the gene for C-6-PD-deficiency as a marker. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 48, 9–16 (1962).

  25. 25.

    & Mammalian X chromosome inactivation: testing the hypothesis of transcriptional control. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 12, 275–280 (1986).

  26. 26.

    Mary Lyon: quiet battler. Curr. Biol. 7, R269–R270 (1997).

  27. 27.

    & X inactivation in females with X-linked disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 338, 325–328 (1998).

  28. 28.

    & Biology of the X chromosome. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 13, 340–345 (2001).

  29. 29.

    & Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase mosaicism: utilization as a cell marker in the study of leiomyomas. Science 150, 67–69 (1965).

  30. 30.

    , & X-inactivation and X-reactivation: epigenetic hallmarks of mammalian reproduction and pluripotent stem cells. Hum. Genet. 130, 265–280 (2011).

  31. 31.

    & Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse. Nature 256, 640–642 (1975).

  32. 32.

    Late DNA replication in the paternally derived X chromosome of female kangaroos. Nature 230, 231–232 (1971).

  33. 33.

    , & Parental imprinting of the mouse H19 gene. Nature 351, 153–155 (1991).

  34. 34.

    , , , & Genetic imprinting suggested by maternal heterodisomy in nondeletion Prader–Willi syndrome. Nature 342, 281–285 (1989).

  35. 35.

    & Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37, 179–183 (1984).

  36. 36.

    , & Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 308, 548–550 (1984).

  37. 37.

    & The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 69, 182–186 (1972).

  38. 38.

    , , , & The X and Y chromosomes assemble into H2A.Z-containing facultative heterochromatin following meiosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 5394–405 (2006).

  39. 39.

    , , , & Pachytene asynapsis drives meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and leads to substantial postmeiotic repression in spermatids. Dev. Cell 10, 521–529 (2006).

  40. 40.

    et al. Postmeiotic sex chromatin in the male germline of mice. Curr. Biol. 16, 660–667 (2006).

  41. 41.

    & Imprinted X inactivation in eutherians: a model of gametic execution and zygotic relaxation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 690–697 (2001).

  42. 42.

    & Inheritance of a pre-inactivated paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Nature 426, 857–862 (2003).

  43. 43.

    in Gene Families: Studies of DNA, RNA, Enzymes, and Proteins (eds Xue, G. et al.) 59–72 (World Scientific, Teaneck, New Jersey, 2001).

  44. 44.

    Directed genetic change model for X chromosome inactivation in eutherian mammals. Nature 230, 292–294 (1971).

  45. 45.

    & HGPRT activity changes in preimplantation mouse embryos. Nature 274, 503–504 (1978).

  46. 46.

    Phosphoribosyltransferase activity during early mammalian development. J. Biol. Chem. 245, 3289–3294 (1970).

  47. 47.

    , & Expression of α-galactosidase in preimplantation mouse embryos. Nature 267, 838–839 (1977).

  48. 48.

    & Dosage compensation for an X-linked gene in pre-implantation mouse embryos. Nature 270, 599–601 (1977).

  49. 49.

    , , , & Two-step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 3187–3205 (2010).

  50. 50.

    , , , & Evidence of Xist RNA-independent initiation of mouse imprinted X-chromosome inactivation. Nature 460, 647–651 (2009).

  51. 51.

    , , , & Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 303, 644–649 (2004).

  52. 52.

    et al. Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Science 303, 666–669 (2004).

  53. 53.

    & Sequential X chromosome inactivation coupled with cellular differentiation in early mouse embryos. Nature 281, 311–313 (1979).

  54. 54.

    , & X-chromosome inactivation mosaicism in the three germ layers and the germ line of the mouse embryo. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 74, 207–220 (1983).

  55. 55.

    et al. X-chromosome inactivation during differentiation of female teratocarcinoma stem cells in vitro. Nature 271, 329–333 (1978).

  56. 56.

    & X-chromosome deletions in embryo-derived (EK) cell lines associated with lack of X-chromosome inactivation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 90, 379–388 (1985).

  57. 57.

    & Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–156 (1981).

  58. 58.

    Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science 244, 1288–1292 (1989).

  59. 59.

    , & Random X-chromosome inactivation in female primordial germ cells in the mouse. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 64, 251–258 (1981).

  60. 60.

    & X-chromosome activity in foetal germ cells of the mouse. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 63, 75–84 (1981).

  61. 61.

    , , , & Evidence for two functional X chromosomes in human oocytes. Cell Differ. 1, 215–218 (1972).

  62. 62.

    & X chromosome reactivation initiates in nascent primordial germ cells in mice. PLoS Genet. 3, e116 (2007).

  63. 63.

    , & Early loss of Xist RNA expression and inactive X chromosome associated chromatin modification in developing primordial germ cells. PLoS ONE 2, e860 (2007).

  64. 64.

    et al. X chromosome activity in mouse XX primordial germ cells. PLoS Genet. 4, e30 (2008).

  65. 65.

    , , & Cell cycle-specific reactivation of an inactive X-chromosome locus by 5-azadeoxycytidine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 1215–1219 (1982).

  66. 66.

    X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 14, 9–25 (1975).

  67. 67.

    5-azacytidine-induced re-expression of alleles on the inactive X chromosome in a hybrid mouse cell line. Exp. Cell Res. 141, 99–105 (1982).

  68. 68.

    et al. Imprint switching for non-random X-chromosome inactivation during mouse oocyte growth. Development 127, 3101–3105 (2000).

  69. 69.

    , , & Imprinting and X chromosome counting mechanisms determine Xist expression in early mouse development. Cell 77, 639–650 (1994).

  70. 70.

    & Controlling elements in the mouse X chromosome. Genetics 57, 331–346 (1967).

  71. 71.

    & Evidence of non-random X chromosome activity in the mouse. Genet. Res. 19, 229–240 (1972).

  72. 72.

    Evolution of sex chromosomes in mammals. Annu. Rev. Genet. 3, 495–524 (1969).

  73. 73.

    Regulation of X-chromosome counting by Tsix and Xite sequences. Science 309, 768–771 (2005).

  74. 74.

    & Targeted mutagenesis of Tsix leads to nonrandom X inactivation. Cell 99, 47–57 (1999).

  75. 75.

    et al. Localization of the X inactivation centre on the human X chromosome in Xq13. Nature 349, 82–84 (1991).

  76. 76.

    et al. Human X inactivation center induces random X chromosome inactivation in male transgenic mice. Genomics 59, 113–121 (1999).

  77. 77.

    , , & Xist yeast artificial chromosome transgenes function as X-inactivation centers only in multicopy arrays and not as single copies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3156–3166 (1999).

  78. 78.

    , , & A 450 kb transgene displays properties of the mammalian X-inactivation center. Cell 86, 83–94 (1996).

  79. 79.

    , & Genetic analysis of the mouse X inactivation center defines an 80-kb multifunction domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3836–3841 (1999).

  80. 80.

    et al. Molecular correlates of the murine Xce locus. Genet. Res. 72, 217–224 (1998).

  81. 81.

    et al. A gene from the region of the human X inactivation centre is expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 349, 38–44 (1991).

  82. 82.

    et al. Characterization of a murine gene expressed from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 351, 325–329 (1991).

  83. 83.

    et al. Conservation of position and exclusive expression of mouse Xist from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 351, 329–331 (1991).

  84. 84.

    et al. The human XIST gene: analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus. Cell 71, 527–542 (1992).

  85. 85.

    et al. The product of the mouse Xist gene is a 15 kb inactive X-specific transcript containing no conserved ORF and located in the nucleus. Cell 71, 515–526 (1992).

  86. 86.

    , , & XIST RNA paints the inactive X chromosome at interphase: evidence for a novel RNA involved in nuclear/chromosome structure. J. Cell Biol. 132, 259–275 (1996).

  87. 87.

    , , , & Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis. Genes Dev. 11, 156–166 (1997).

  88. 88.

    , , , & Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996).

  89. 89.

    , & Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA. Nature Genet. 30, 167–174 (2002).

  90. 90.

    , , & The product of the H19 gene may function as an RNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 28–36 (1990).

  91. 91.

    , & Igf2 imprinting does not require its own DNA methylation or H19 RNA. Genes Dev. 12, 2200–2207 (1998).

  92. 92.

    et al. Establishment of histone h3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed–Enx1 polycomb group complexes. Dev. Cell 4, 481–495 (2003).

  93. 93.

    et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 300, 131–135 (2003).

  94. 94.

    et al. A chromosomal memory triggered by Xist regulates histone methylation in X inactivation. PLoS Biol. 2, E171 (2004).

  95. 95.

    et al. Mitotically stable association of polycomb group proteins eed and enx1 with the inactive X chromosome in trophoblast stem cells. Curr. Biol. 12, 1016–1020 (2002).

  96. 96.

    et al. Imprinted X inactivation maintained by a mouse Polycomb group gene. Nature Genet. 28, 371–375 (2001).

  97. 97.

    , , , & Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science 322, 750–756 (2008).

  98. 98.

    et al. 2D structure of the A region of Xist RNA and its implication for PRC2 association. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000276 (2010).

  99. 99.

    et al. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell 129, 1311–1323 (2007).

  100. 100.

    & Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the Polycomb and Trithorax group proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 413–443 (2004).

  101. 101.

    & YY1 tethers Xist RNA to the inactive X nucleation center. Cell 146, 119–133 (2011).

  102. 102.

    , & Tsix, a gene antisense to Xist at the X-inactivation centre. Nature Genet. 21, 400–404 (1999).

  103. 103.

    Disruption of imprinted X inactivation by parent-of-origin effects at Tsix. Cell 103, 17–27 (2000).

  104. 104.

    et al. The DXPas34 repeat regulates random and imprinted X inactivation. Dev. Cell 12, 57–71 (2007).

  105. 105.

    , & Intersection of the RNA interference and X-inactivation pathways. Science 320, 1336–1341 (2008).

  106. 106.

    & Tsix transcription- versus RNA-based mechanisms in Xist repression and epigenetic choice. Curr. Biol. 14, 1747–1754 (2004).

  107. 107.

    , & A functional role for Tsix transcription in blocking Xist RNA accumulation but not in X-chromosome choice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10232–10237 (2001).

  108. 108.

    , & Antisense transcription through the Xist locus mediates Tsix function in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 8512–8520 (2001).

  109. 109.

    & Role of the region 3′ to Xist exon 6 in the counting process of X-chromosome inactivation. Nature Genet. 19, 249–253 (1998).

  110. 110.

    et al. The region 3′ to Xist mediates X chromosome counting and H3 Lys-4 dimethylation within the Xist gene. EMBO J. 23, 594–604 (2004).

  111. 111.

    , , , & An essential role for the DXPas34 tandem repeat and Tsix transcription in the counting process of X chromosome inactivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7390–7395 (2006).

  112. 112.

    , , & Tsix-deficient X chromosome does not undergo inactivation in the embryonic lineage in males: implications for Tsix-independent silencing of Xist. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 113, 345–349 (2006).

  113. 113.

    , , & Crucial role of antisense transcription across the Xist promoter in Tsix-mediated Xist chromatin modification. Development 135, 227–235 (2008).

  114. 114.

    , & Tsix silences Xist through modification of chromatin structure. Dev. Cell 9, 159–165 (2005).

  115. 115.

    , & Tsix defective in splicing is competent to establish Xist silencing. Development 133, 4925–4931 (2006).

  116. 116.

    , & Effect of TSIX disruption on XIST expression in male ES cells. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 99, 115–118 (2002).

  117. 117.

    , , & Regulation of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice by Tsix. Development 128, 1275–1286 (2001).

  118. 118.

    , , & Evidence that homologous X-chromosome pairing requires transcription and Ctcf protein. Nature Genet. 39, 1390–1396 (2007).

  119. 119.

    , & Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. Science 311, 1149–1152 (2006).

  120. 120.

    , & A transient heterochromatic state in Xist preempts X inactivation choice without RNA stabilization. Mol. Cell 21, 617–628 (2006).

  121. 121.

    , , , & Tsix transcription across the Xist gene alters chromatin conformation without affecting Xist transcription: implications for X-chromosome inactivation. Genes Dev. 19, 1474–1484 (2005).

  122. 122.

    et al. Dicer regulates Xist promoter methylation in ES cells indirectly through transcriptional control of Dnmt3a. Epigenetics Chromatin 1, 2 (2008).

  123. 123.

    et al. X chromosome inactivation in the absence of Dicer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1122–1127 (2009).

  124. 124.

    , , & Identification of TSIX, encoding an RNA antisense to human XIST, reveals differences from its murine counterpart: implications for X inactivation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69, 951–960 (2001).

  125. 125.

    Reply to “Is Tsix repression of Xist specific to mouse?”. Nature Genetics 33, 337–338 (2003).

  126. 126.

    Is Tsix repression of Xist specific to mouse? Nature Genet. 33, 337 (2003).

  127. 127.

    , & Identification of developmentally specific enhancers for Tsix in the regulation of X chromosome inactivation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 2757–2769 (2005).

  128. 128.

    & Xite, X-inactivation intergenic transcription elements that regulate the probability of choice. Mol. Cell 11, 731–743 (2003).

  129. 129.

    et al. A proximal conserved repeat in the Xist gene is essential as a genomic element for X-inactivation in mouse. Development 136, 139–146 (2009).

  130. 130.

    , , , & Characterization of expression at the human XIST locus in somatic, embryonal carcinoma, and transgenic cell lines. Genomics 82, 309–322 (2003).

  131. 131.

    , , & Enox, a novel gene that maps 10 kb upstream of Xist and partially escapes X inactivation. Genomics 80, 236–244 (2002).

  132. 132.

    et al. Comparative sequence analysis of the X-inactivation center region in mouse, human, and bovine. Genome Res. 12, 894–908 (2002).

  133. 133.

    , & The long noncoding RNA, Jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation. Cell 143, 390–403 (2010).

  134. 134.

    et al. RNF12 is an X-encoded dose-dependent activator of X chromosome inactivation. Cell 139, 999–1011 (2009).

  135. 135.

    et al. RNF12 activates Xist and is essential for X chromosome inactivation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002001 (2011).

  136. 136.

    et al. Maternal Rnf12/RLIM is required for imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice. Nature 467, 977–981 (2010).

  137. 137.

    et al. A 94 kb genomic sequence 3′ to the murine Xist gene reveals an AT rich region containing a new testis specific gene Tsx. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 1713–1726 (1996).

  138. 138.

    , , , & The mouse Tsx gene is expressed in Sertoli cells of the adult testis and transiently in premeiotic germ cells during puberty. Dev. Biol. 204, 345–360 (1998).

  139. 139.

    et al. Tsx produces a long noncoding RNA and has general functions in the germline, stem cells, and brain. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002248 (2011).

  140. 140.

    et al. Ftx is a non-coding RNA which affects Xist expression and chromatin structure within the X-inactivation center region. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 705–718 (2010).

  141. 141.

    , & Xce haplotypes show modified methylation in a region of the active X chromosome lying 3′ to Xist. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3531–3535 (1995).

  142. 142.

    , , , & The pluripotency factor Oct4 interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting. Nature 460, 128–132 (2009).

  143. 143.

    et al. Molecular coupling of Tsix regulation and pluripotency. Nature 468, 457–460 (2010).

  144. 144.

    et al. Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science 321, 1693–1695 (2008).

  145. 145.

    , & Chromatin structure of active and inactive human X chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 1829–1845 (1984).

  146. 146.

    & Comparison of transformation efficiency of human active and inactive X-chromosomal DNA. Nature 302, 82–83 (1983).

  147. 147.

    , , , & The X chromosome is organized into a gene-rich outer rim and an internal core containing silenced nongenic sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7688–7693 (2006).

  148. 148.

    , , & A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. Genes Dev. 20, 2223–2237 (2006).

  149. 149.

    & Multiple spatially distinct types of facultative heterochromatin on the human inactive X chromosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17450–17455 (2004).

  150. 150.

    et al. The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev. 25, 1371–1383 (2011).

  151. 151.

    The Lyon and the LINE hypothesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 313–318 (2003).

  152. 152.

    , , & Molecular evidence for a relationship between LINE-1 elements and X chromosome inactivation: the Lyon repeat hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6634–6639 (2000).

  153. 153.

    , , & Evidence of influence of genomic DNA sequence on human X chromosome inactivation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e113 (2006).

  154. 154.

    et al. LINE-1 activity in facultative heterochromatin formation during X chromosome inactivation. Cell 141, 956–969 (2010).

  155. 155.

    , & X chromosome inactivation and Xist evolution in a rodent lacking LINE-1 activity. PLoS ONE 4, e6252 (2009).

  156. 156.

    , , & Silencing of the mammalian X chromosome. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 6, 69–92 (2005).

  157. 157.

    et al. The Trithorax group protein Ash2l and Saf-A are recruited to the inactive X chromosome at the onset of stable X inactivation. Development 137, 935–943 (2010).

  158. 158.

    , , , & The matrix protein hnRNP U is required for chromosomal localization of Xist RNA. Dev. Cell 19, 469–476 (2010).

  159. 159.

    & Scaffold attachment factor A (SAF-A) is concentrated in inactive X chromosome territories through its RGG domain. Chromosoma 112, 173–182 (2003).

  160. 160.

    et al. SATB1 defines the developmental context for gene silencing by Xist in lymphoma and embryonic cells. Dev. Cell 16, 507–516 (2009).

  161. 161.

    , & Perinucleolar targeting of the inactive X during S phase: evidence for a role in the maintenance of silencing. Cell 129, 693–706 (2007).

  162. 162.

    , & Escape from X inactivation in mice and humans. Genome Biol. 11, 213 (2010).

  163. 163.

    , , & A first-generation X-inactivation profile of the human X chromosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14440–14444 (1999).

  164. 164.

    & X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature 434, 400–404 (2005).

  165. 165.

    , , , & Genes that escape from X inactivation. Hum. Genet. 130, 237–245 (2011).

  166. 166.

    et al. Boundaries between chromosomal domains of X inactivation and escape bind CTCF and lack CpG methylation during early development. Dev. Cell 8, 31–42 (2005).

  167. 167.

    & Escape from X chromosome inactivation is an intrinsic property of the Jarid1c locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17055–17060 (2008).

  168. 168.

    et al. Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 293–299 (2006).

  169. 169.

    & Homologous association of oppositely imprinted chromosomal domains. Science 272, 725–728 (1996).

  170. 170.

    et al. RAG-1 and ATM coordinate monoallelic recombination and nuclear positioning of immunoglobulin loci. Nature Immunol. 10, 655–664 (2009).

  171. 171.

    et al. Sensing X chromosome pairs before X inactivation via a novel X-pairing region of the Xic. Science 318, 1632–1636 (2007).

  172. 172.

    , , , & Characterization of Xpr (Xpct) reveals instability but no effects on X-chromosome pairing or Xist expression. Transcr. 1, 46–56 (2010).

  173. 173.

    et al. Live-cell chromosome dynamics and outcome of X chromosome pairing events during ES cell differentiation. Cell 145, 447–458 (2011).

  174. 174.

    & Symmetry-breaking model for X-chromosome inactivation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 108104 (2007).

  175. 175.

    , & Genome-wide transcription and the implications for genomic organization. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 413–423 (2007).

  176. 176.

    , & Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell 136, 629–641 (2009).

  177. 177.

    et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309, 1559–1563 (2005).

  178. 178.

    , , , & The Xist RNA gene evolved in eutherians by pseudogenization of a protein-coding gene. Science 312, 1653–1655 (2006).

  179. 179.

    Lessons from X-chromosome inactivation: long ncRNA as guides and tethers to the epigenome. Genes Dev. 23, 1831–1842 (2009).

  180. 180.

    The X as model for RNA's niche in epigenomic regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a003749 (2010).

  181. 181.

    et al. Genome-wide identification of polycomb-associated RNAs by RIP-seq. Mol. Cell 40, 939–953 (2010).

  182. 182.

    et al. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2009).

  183. 183.

    et al. Short RNAs are transcribed from repressed Polycomb target genes and interact with Polycomb repressive complex-2. Mol. Cell 38, 675–688 (2010).

  184. 184.

    & No-nonsense functions for long noncoding RNAs. Cell 145, 178–181 (2011).

  185. 185.

    & Long noncoding RNA in genome regulation: prospects and mechanisms. RNA Biol. 7, 582–585 (2010).

  186. 186.

    et al. Long noncoding RNAs with enhancer-like function in human cells. Cell 143, 46–58 (2010).

  187. 187.

    et al. A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature 472, 120–124 (2011).

  188. 188.

    , , & X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic fluidity in human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2008).

  189. 189.

    et al. X-inactivation in female human embryonic stem cells is in a nonrandom pattern and prone to epigenetic alterations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4709–4714 (2008).

  190. 190.

    et al. X-inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected. J. Cell. Physiol. 216, 445–452 (2008).

  191. 191.

    et al. In the platypus a meiotic chain of ten sex chromosomes shares genes with the bird Z and mammal X chromosomes. Nature 432, 913–917 (2004).

  192. 192.

    et al. Eutherian mammals use diverse strategies to initiate X-chromosome inactivation during development. Nature 472, 370–374 (2011).

  193. 193.

    , , , & Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation at an epigenetically sensitive allele in mice. PLoS Genet. 2, e49 (2006).

  194. 194.

    et al. SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation. Nature Genet. 40, 663–669 (2008).

  195. 195.

    The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr. Biol. 6, 149–162 (1996).

  196. 196.

    Sex chromosome specialization and degeneration in mammals. Cell 124, 901–914 (2006).

  197. 197.

    More about the mammalian X chromosome. Lancet 2, 152–153 (1962).

  198. 198.

    et al. Dosage compensation in the mouse balances up-regulation and silencing of X-linked genes. PLoS Biol. 5, e326 (2007).

  199. 199.

    & Dosage compensation of the active X chromosome in mammals. Nature Genet. 38, 47–53 (2006).

  200. 200.

    et al. RNA sequencing shows no dosage compensation of the active X-chromosome. Nature Genet. 42, 1043–1047 (2010).

  201. 201.

    , , & X-chromosome kiss and tell: how the Xs go their separate ways. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 71, 429–437 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am greatly indebted to members of the laboratory, past and present, for their valuable intellectual and experimental contributions. I also thank A. Riggs, B. Payer and Y. Jeon for critical reading of the manuscript, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute for providing ongoing support.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

    • Jeannie T. Lee

Authors

  1. Search for Jeannie T. Lee in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeannie T. Lee.

Glossary

Dosage compensation

A process by which the expression of sex-linked genes is equalized in species in which males and females differ in the number of sex chromosomes.

One gene–one enzyme hypothesis

The view that an enzyme or protein is encoded by information in a single corresponding gene.

Nucleolar

Of the nucleolus, which is a conserved organelle that assembles around ribosomal DNA genes and is the site of ribosomal RNA transcription and the assembly of ribosome subunits (the translation machinery).

Aneuploidies

Instances in which an abnormal number of chromosomes are generated during cell division because the chromosomes do not separate properly between the two daughter cells. This is a characteristic of cancer cells.

Epiblast

The inner layer of the developing vertebrate embryo that gives rise to the fetus.

Imprinting

A genetic mechanism by which genes are selectively expressed from the maternal or paternal chromosomes.

Blastocyst

The embryo form before implantation that contains at least two distinct cell types: the trophectoderm and the inner cell mass.

Endoderm

The innermost germ layer of the developing embryo. Prominent examples of endodermal tissues include the epithelia of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, thyroid, liver and pancreas, as well as of the auditory and urinary systems.

Trophectoderm

(TE). An extra-embryonic lineage that is derived from the outer layer of cells within the blastocyst.

Embryonic stem cells

(ES cells). Pluripotent cells that can be derived from the inner cell mass of the blastocyst-stage embryo.

Primordial germ cells

(PGCs). Cells that have the ability to self-renew and to generate differentiated cells that are restricted to the germ cell lineage.

Genital ridges

Mesodermal precursors to the somatic gonads in vertebrate embryos (also known as gonadal ridges).

Facultative heterochromatin

A dynamic subtype of heterochromatin that is inducible and is formed from a euchromatic environment, where heterochromatin proteins are used to stably repress the activity of certain target genes.

LINEs

(Long interspersed nuclear elements). Long interspersed sequences that contain a promoter region, an untranslated region and one or more open reading frames and are generated by retrotransposition.

SINEs

(Short interspersed nuclear elements). Short interspersed sequences that are generated by RNA polymerase III transcripts.

Chromosome territory

A domain of the nucleus that is occupied by a pair of homologous chromosomes.

Chromatin insulators

Complexes, formed from chromatin elements and their associated proteins, that act as barriers against the influence of positive (enhancers) or negative (silencers) signals.

RIP–seq

A technique in which transcripts are immunoprecipitated through their association with a chromatin modifier or other protein, reverse transcribed and then identified by high-throughput sequencing.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3231

Further reading