Key Points
-
The processing and degradation of RNA sequences is ubiquitous, and these activities can be separated into different classes on the basis of their mechanism and function. The clearest functional differences exist between RNA maturation that will generate a usable RNA from its precursor and RNA degradation that will destroy the RNA completely.
-
There is mounting evidence that all RNA-maturation pathways in eukaryotes are continuously monitored by surveillance systems. A key component of the RNA-surveillance machinery is the exosome complex of 3′→5′ exonucleases. On different substrates this complex is responsible for either total RNA degradation or accurate RNA processing, implying a precise distinction between different classes of substrate.
-
Despite the presence of multiple catalytic sites, the purified yeast exosome is almost entirely inactive. However, several activating cofactors have recently been identified.
-
The role of polyadenylation in eukaryotic cells seems different on either side of the nuclear envelope. The long poly(A) tails on cytoplasmic mRNAs promote stability and translation. By contrast, defective nuclear RNAs are identified and 'tagged' with short oligo(A) tails by the TRAMP polyadenylation complex prior to degradation by the exosome. Such tagging of RNAs by polyadenylation could be conceptually similar to the role of polyubiquitylation in targeting proteins for degradation by the proteasome complex.
-
Key features of RNA degradation have been conserved throughout evolution. Recent structural analyses indicate that the eukaryotic exosome resembles a complex between bacterial PNPase and RNase II, the most active degradative exonucleases in Escherichia coli lysates. Moreover, the role of eukaryotic poly(A) polymerases in targeting nuclear RNAs for degradation is strikingly similar to the role of oligoadenylation in stimulating RNA degradation in bacteria.
Abstract
The exosome complex of 3′→5′ exonucleases is an important component of the RNA-processing machinery in eukaryotes. This complex functions in the accurate processing of nuclear RNA precursors and in the degradation of RNAs in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm. However, it has been unclear how different classes of substrate are distinguished from one another. Recent studies now provide insights into the regulation and structure of the exosome, and they reveal striking similarities between the process of RNA degradation in bacteria and eukaryotes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay inhibition synergizes with MDM2 inhibition to suppress TP53 wild-type cancer cells in p53 isoform-dependent manner
Cell Death Discovery Open Access 30 September 2022
-
CDE-1 suppresses the production of risiRNA by coupling polyuridylation and degradation of rRNA
BMC Biology Open Access 04 September 2020
-
EXOSC9 depletion attenuates P-body formation, stress resistance, and tumorigenicity of cancer cells
Scientific Reports Open Access 09 June 2020
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



References
Warner, J. R. The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 437?440 (1999).
Parker, R. & Song, H. The enzymes and control of eukaryotic mRNA turnover. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 121?127 (2004).
Mitchell, P., Petfalski, E., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M. & Tollervey, D. The exosome; a conserved eukaryotic RNA processing complex containing multiple 3′→5′ exoribonuclease activities. Cell 91, 457?466 (1997).
Allmang, C. et al. The yeast exosome and human PM-Scl are related complexes of 3′→5′ exonucleases. Genes Dev. 13, 2148?2158 (1999).
Peng, W. T. et al. A panoramic view of yeast noncoding RNA processing. Cell 113, 919?933 (2003).
Burkard, K. T. & Butler, J. S. A nuclear 3′?5′ exonuclease involved in mRNA degradation interacts with Poly(A) polymerase and the hnRNA protein Npl3p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 604?616 (2000).
Araki, Y. et al. Ski7p G protein interacts with the exosome and the Ski complex for 3′-to-5′ mRNA decay in yeast. EMBO J. 20, 4684?4693 (2001).
van Hoof, A., Staples, R. R., Baker, R. E. & Parker, R. Function of the ski4p (Csl4p) and Ski7p proteins in 3′-to-5′ degradation of mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8230?8243 (2000).
Mitchell, P. et al. Rrp47p is an exosome-associated protein required for the 3′ processing of stable RNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 6982?6992 (2003).
Yavuzer, U., Smith, G. C., Bliss, T., Werner, D. & Jackson, S. P. DNA end-independent activation of DNA-PK mediated via association with the DNA-binding protein C1D. Genes Dev. 12, 2188?2199 (1998).
van Hoof, A., Lennertz, P. & Parker, R. Yeast exosome mutants accumulate 3′-extended polyadenylated forms of U4 small nuclear RNA and small nucleolar RNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 441?452 (2000).
Zanchin, N. I. & Goldfarb, D. S. The exosome subunit Rrp43p is required for the efficient maturation of 5.8S, 18S and 25S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 1283?1288 (1999).
Allmang, C. et al. Functions of the exosome in rRNA, snoRNA and snRNA synthesis. EMBO J. 18, 5399?5410 (1999).
de la Cruz, J., Kressler, D., Tollervey, D. & Linder, P. Dob1p (Mtr4p) is a putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase required for the 3′ end formation of 5.8S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 17, 1128?1140 (1998).
Grosshans, H., Deinert, K., Hurt, E. & Simos, G. Biogenesis of the signal recognition particle (SRP) involves import of SRP proteins into the nucleolus, assembly with the SRP-RNA, and Xpo1p-mediated export. J. Cell Biol. 153, 745?762 (2001).
Allmang, C., Mitchell, P., Petfalski, E. & Tollervey, D. Degradation of ribosomal RNA precursors by the exosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1684?1691 (2000).
Wyers, F. et al. Cryptic Pol II transcripts are degraded by a nuclear quality control pathway involving a new poly(A) polymerase. Cell 121, 725?737 (2005). Shows that the TRAMP complex and the exosome rapidly degrade transcripts that are produced from intergenic regions. These transcripts are very common, being produced from up to 10% of intergenic regions under normal conditions.
LaCava, J. et al. RNA degradation by the exosome is promoted by a nuclear polyadenylation complex. Cell 21, 713?724 (2005).
Vanacova, S. et al. A new yeast poly(A) polymerase complex involved in RNA quality control. PLoS Biol. 3, e189 (2005). A biochemical analysis of the activity of the TRAMP complex, showing that it can recruit the exosome to degrade an aberrant tRNA in vitro.
Kadaba, S. et al. Nuclear surveillance and degradation of hypomodified initiator tRNAMet in S. cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 18, 1227?1240 (2004). First report that polyadenylation by Trf4 is linked to RNA degradation by the exosome.
Torchet, C. et al. Processing of 3′ extended read-through transcripts by the exosome can generate functional mRNAs. Mol. Cell 9, 1285?1296 (2002).
Hilleren, P., McCarthy, T., Rosbash, M., Parker, R. & Jensen, T. H. Quality control of mRNA 3′-end processing is linked to the nuclear exosome. Nature 413, 538?542 (2001).
Bousquet-Antonelli, C., Presutti, C. & Tollervey, D. Identification of a regulated pathway for nuclear pre-mRNA turnover. Cell 102, 765?775 (2000).
Lee, A., Henras, A. K. & Chanfreau, G. Multiple RNA surveillance pathways limit aberrant expression of iron uptake mRNAs and prevent iron toxicity in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 19, 39?51 (2005). Reports that mRNA-encoding proteins that are involved in iron metabolism are subject to various different nuclear RNA-surveillance pathways.
Kuai, L., Das, B. & Sherman, F. A nuclear degradation pathway controls the abundance of normal mRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13962?13967 (2005).
Roth, K. M., Wolf, M. K., Rossi, M. & Butler, J. S. The nuclear exosome contributes to autogenous control of NAB2 mRNA levels. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 1577?1585 (2005).
Houalla, R. et al. Microarray detection of novel nuclear RNA substrates for the exosome. Yeast 23, 439?454 (2006).
Anderson, J. S. J. & Parker, R. P. The 3′ to 5′ degradation of yeast mRNAs is a general mechanism for mRNA turnover that requires the SKI2 DEVH box protein and 3′ to 5′ exonucleases of the exosome complex. EMBO J. 17, 1497?1506 (1998).
Takahashi, S., Araki, Y., Sakuno, T. & Katada, T. Interaction between Ski7p and Upf1p is required for nonsense-mediated 3′-to-5′ mRNA decay in yeast. EMBO J. 22, 3951?3959 (2003).
Mitchell, P. & Tollervey, D. An NMD pathway in yeast involving accelerated deadenylation and exosome-mediated 3′→5′ degradation. Mol. Cell 11, 1405?1413 (2003).
Lejeune, F., Li, X. & Maquat, L. E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in mammalian cells involves decapping, deadenylating, and exonucleolytic activities. Mol. Cell 12, 675?687 (2003).
Frischmeyer, P. A. et al. An mRNA surveillance mechanism that eliminates transcripts lacking termination codons. Science 295, 2258?2261 (2002).
van Hoof, A., Frischmeyer, P. A., Dietz, H. C. & Parker, R. Exosome-mediated recognition and degradation of mRNAs lacking a termination codon. Science 295, 2262?2264 (2002).
Tran, H., Schilling, M., Wirbelauer, C., Hess, D. & Nagamine, Y. Facilitation of mRNA deadenylation and decay by the exosome-bound, DExH protein RHAU. Mol. Cell 13, 101?111 (2004).
Chen, C. Y. et al. AU binding proteins recruit the exosome to degrade ARE-containing mRNAs. Cell 107, 451?464 (2001).
Mukherjee, D. et al. The mammalian exosome mediates the efficient degradation of mRNAs that contain AU-rich elements. EMBO J. 21, 165?174 (2002).
Gherzi, R. et al. A KH domain RNA binding protein, KSRP, promotes ARE-directed mRNA turnover by recruiting the degradation machinery. Mol. Cell 14, 571?583 (2004).
Doma, M. K. & Parker, R. Endonucleolytic cleavage of eukaryotic mRNAs with stalls in translation elongation. Nature 440, 561?564 (2006). First report of a yeast mRNA-surveillance pathway that is initiated by RNA cleavage.
Tollervey, D. RNA lost in translation. Nature 440, 425?426 (2006).
Orban, T. I. & Izaurralde, E. Decay of mRNAs targeted by RISC requires XRN1, the Ski complex, and the exosome. RNA 11, 459?469 (2005).
Symmons, M. F., Jones, G. H. & Luisi, B. F. A duplicated fold is the structural basis for polynucleotide phosphorylase catalytic activity, processivity, and regulation. Struct. Fold. Des. 8, 1215?1226 (2000).
Stickney, L. M., Hankins, J. S., Miao, X. & Mackie, G. A. Function of the conserved S1 and KH domains in polynucleotide phosphorylase. J. Bacteriol. 187, 7214?7121 (2005).
Valentine, R. C., Thang, M. N. & Grunberg-Manago, M. Electron microscopy of Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase molecules and polyribonucleotide formation. J. Mol. Biol. 39, 389?391 (1969).
Spickler, C. & Mackie, G. A. Action of RNase II and polynucleotide phosphorylase against RNAs containing stem-loops of defined structure. J. Bacteriol. 182, 2422?2427 (2000).
Lorentzen, E. et al. The archaeal exosome core is a hexameric ring structure with three catalytic subunits. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 575?581 (2005). The first structure of the archaeal exosome, which showed that only one of the archaeal RNase PH-like exosome subunits is an active ribonuclease, although both are required for activity.
Lorentzen, E. & Conti, E. Structural basis of 3′ end RNA recognition and exoribonucleolytic cleavage by an exosome RNase PH core. Mol. Cell 20, 473?481 (2005). Following from the previous analysis, the authors show here how the exosome binds and degrades substrate RNAs.
Buttner, K., Wenig, K. & Hopfner, K. P. Structural framework for the mechanism of archaeal exosomes in RNA processing. Mol. Cell 20, 461?471 (2005). This work characterizes the structure of the complete archaeal exosome.
Symmons, M. F., Williams, M. G., Luisi, B. F., Jones, G. H. & Carpousis, A. J. Running rings around RNA: a superfamily of phosphate-dependent RNases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 11?18 (2002).
Aloy, P. et al. A complex prediction: three-dimensional model of the yeast exosome. EMBO Rep. 3, 628?635 (2002).
van Hoof, A. & Parker, R. The exosome: a proteasome for RNA? Cell 99, 347?350 (1999).
Andrulis, E. D. et al. The RNA processing exosome is linked to elongating RNA polymerase II in Drosophila. Nature 420, 837?841 (2002).
Brouwer, R., Pruijn, G. J. & van Venrooij, W. J. The human exosome: an autoantigenic complex of exoribonucleases in myositis and scleroderma. Arthritis Res. 3, 102?106 (2001).
Brouwer, R. et al. Three novel components of the human exosome. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 6177?6184 (2001).
Estevez, A. M., Kempf, T. & Clayton, C. The exosome of Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J. 20, 3831?3839 (2001).
Chekanova, J. A., Dutko, J. A., Mian, I. S. & Belostotsky, D. A. Arabidopsis thaliana exosome subunit AtRrp4p is a hydrolytic 3′→5′ exonuclease containing S1 and KH RNA-binding domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 695?700 (2002).
Briggs, M. W., Burkard, K. T. & Butler, J. S. Rrp6p, the yeast homologue of the human PM-Scl 100-kDa autoantigen, is essential for efficient 5.8 S rRNA 3′ end formation. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13255?13263 (1998).
Phillips, S. & Butler, J. S. Contribution of domain structure to the RNA 3′ end processing and degradation functions of the nuclear exosome subunit Rrp6p. RNA 9, 1098?1107 (2003).
Raijmakers, R., Egberts, W. V., van Venrooij, W. J. & Pruijn, G. J. Protein?protein interactions between human exosome components support the assembly of RNase PH-type subunits into a six-membered PNPase-like ring. J. Mol. Biol. 323, 653?663 (2002).
Estevez, A. M., Lehner, B., Sanderson, C. M., Ruppert, T. & Clayton, C. The roles of intersubunit interactions in exosome stability. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 34943?34951 (2003).
Lehner, B. & Sanderson, C. M. A protein interaction framework for human mRNA degradation. Genome Res. 14, 1315?1323 (2004).
Milligan, L., Torchet, C., Allmang, C., Shipman, T. & Tollervey, D. A nuclear surveillance pathway for mRNAs with defective polyadenylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 9996?10004 (2005). Describes how the exosome responds to mRNA molecules with defective poly(A) tails.
Wang, L., Lewis, M. S. & Johnson, A. W. Domain interactions within the Ski2?3?8 complex and between the Ski complex and Ski7p. RNA 11, 1291?1302 (2005).
Arigo, J. T., Carroll, K. L., Ames, J. M. & Corden, J. L. Regulation of yeast NRD1 expression by premature transcription termination. Mol. Cell 21, 641?651 (2006). Reports that autoregulation of Nrd1 expression involves the RNA-binding proteins Nrd1 and Nab3 as well as the exosome.
Vasiljeva, L. & Buratowski, S. Nrd1 Interacts with the nuclear exosome for 3′ processing of RNA polymerase II transcripts. Mol. Cell 21, 239?248 (2006). Reports a second exosome-stimulating complex. The Nrd1 protein binds to a specific target-RNA sequence and recruits the exosome to facilitate degradation.
Morlando, M. et al. Coupling between snoRNP assembly and 3′ processing controls box C/D snoRNA biosynthesis in yeast. EMBO J. 23, 2392?2401 (2004).
Steinmetz, E. J., Conrad, N. K., Brow, D. A. & Corden, J. L. RNA-binding protein Nrd1 directs poly(A)-independent 3′-end formation of RNA polymerase II transcripts. Nature 413, 327?331 (2001).
Puig, S., Askeland, E. & Thiele, D. J. Coordinated remodeling of cellular metabolism during iron deficiency through targeted mRNA degradation. Cell 120, 99?110 (2005). Reports that an ARE-mediated mRNA-degradation system functions in yeast and involves the yeast homologue of the well characterized human ARE-binding protein TTP.
Houseley, J. & Tollervey, D. Yeast Trf5p is a nuclear poly(A) polymerase. EMBO Rep. 7, 205?211 (2005).
Egecioglu, D. E., Henras, A. K. & Chanfreau, G. F. Contributions of Trf4p- and Trf5p-dependent polyadenylation to the processing and degradative functions of the yeast nuclear exosome. RNA 12, 26?32 (2006). References 68 and 69 describe a second TRAMP complex, and show that the two TRAMP complexes have different substrate affinities.
Kadaba, S., Wang, X. & Anderson, J. T. Nuclear RNA surveillance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Trf4p-dependent polyadenylation of nascent hypomethylated tRNA and an aberrant form of 5S rRNA. RNA 12, 508?521 (2006). Extends the range of TRAMP substrates and shows that the complex acts on newly transcribed pre-tRNA.
Gavin, A. C. et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141?147 (2002).
Gavin, A. C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631?636 (2006).
Schilders, G., Raijmakers, R., Raats, J. M. & Pruijn, G. J. MPP6 is an exosome-associated RNA-binding protein involved in 5.8S rRNA maturation. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 6795?6804 (2005).
Thomson, E. & Tollervey, D. Nop53p is required for late 60S ribosome subunit maturation and nuclear export in yeast. RNA 11, 1215?1224 (2005).
Granato, D. C. et al. Nop53p, an essential nucleolar protein that interacts with Nop17p and Nip7p, is required for pre-rRNA processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS J. 272, 4450?4463 (2005).
Brown, J. T., Bai, X. & Johnson, A. W. The yeast antiviral proteins Ski2p, Ski3p, and Ski8p exist as a complex in vivo. RNA 6, 449?457 (2000).
Inada, T. & Aiba, H. Translation of aberrant mRNAs lacking a termination codon or with a shortened 3′-UTR is repressed after initiation in yeast. EMBO J. 24, 1584?1595 (2005).
Cao, D. & Parker, R. Computational modeling and experimental analysis of nonsense-mediated decay in yeast. Cell 113, 533?45 (2003).
Wickner, R. B. Double-stranded and single-stranded RNA viruses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 46, 347?375 (1992).
Benard, L., Carroll, K., Valle, R. C., Masison, D. C. & Wickner, R. B. The ski7 antiviral protein is an EF1-α homolog that blocks expression of non-Poly(A) mRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Virol. 73, 2893?2900 (1999).
Ridley, S. P., Sommer, S. S. & Wickner, R. B. Superkiller mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae suppress exclusion of M2 double-stranded RNA by L-A-HN and confer cold sensitivity in the presence of M and L-A-HN. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 761?770 (1984).
Folichon, M. et al. Fate of mRNA extremities generated by intrinsic termination: detailed analysis of reactions catalyzed by ribonuclease II and poly(A) polymerase. Biochimie 87, 819?826 (2005).
Khemici, V. & Carpousis, A. J. The RNA degradosome and poly(A) polymerase of Escherichia coli are required in vivo for the degradation of small mRNA decay intermediates containing REP-stabilizers. Mol. Microbiol. 51, 777?790 (2004).
Kuai, L., Fang, F., Butler, J. S. & Sherman, F. Polyadenylation of rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8581?8586 (2004).
Haracska, L., Johnson, R. E., Prakash, L. & Prakash, S. Trf4 and Trf5 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibit poly(A) RNA polymerase activity but no DNA polymerase activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10183?10189 (2005). Reports that both Trf4 and Trf5 are poly(A) polymerases.
West, S., Gromak, N., Norbury, C. J. & Proudfoot, N. J. Adenylation and exosome-mediated degradation of co-transcriptionally cleaved pre-messenger RNA in human cells Mol. Cell 21, 437?443 (2006). Evidence is presented that human mRNA molecules that fail to be correctly cleaved and polyadenylated are rapidly targeted by the exosome for degradation.
Teixeira, A. et al. Autocatalytic RNA cleavage in the human β-globin pre-mRNA promotes transcription termination. Nature 432, 526?530 (2004).
West, S., Gromak, N. & Proudfoot, N. J. Human 5′→3′ exonuclease Xrn2 promotes transcription termination at co-transcriptional cleavage sites. Nature 432, 522?525 (2004). Resolving a long-standing argument, West et al . show that cleavage occurs prior to transcriptional termination, the continuing RNA polymerase is then chased down by a 5′→3′ exonuclease that triggers its release.
Portnoy, V. et al. RNA polyadenylation in Archaea: not observed in Haloferax while the exosome polynucleotidylates RNA in Sulfolobus. EMBO Rep. 6, 1188?1193 (2005).
Yehudai-Resheff, S., Hirsh, M. & Schuster, G. Polynucleotide phosphorylase functions as both an exonuclease and a poly(A) polymerase in spinach chloroplasts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5408?5416 (2001).
Mohanty, B. K. & Kushner, S. R. Polynucleotide phosphorylase functions both as a 3′→5′ exonuclease and a poly(A) polymerase in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11966?11971 (2000).
Bollenbach, T. J., Schuster, G. & Stern, D. B. Cooperation of endo- and exoribonucleases in chloroplast mRNA turnover. Prog. Nucleic Acid. Res. Mol. Biol. 78, 305?337 (2004).
Zhu, B. et al. The human PAF complex coordinates transcription with events downstream of RNA synthesis. Genes Dev. 19, 1668?1673 (2005).
Graham, A. C., Kiss, D. L. & Andrulis, E. D. Differential distribution of exosome subunits at the nuclear lamina and in cytoplasmic foci. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 1399?1409 (2006). Reports that some exosome components show differential enrichments at distinct locations, which indicates that all human exosome components might not obligatorily function as a complex.
Rouhana, L. et al. Vertebrate GLD2 poly(A) polymerases in the germline and the brain. RNA 11, 1117?1130 (2005).
Kwak, J. E., Wang, L., Ballantyne, S., Kimble, J. & Wickens, M. Mammalian GLD-2 homologs are poly(A) polymerases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4407?4412 (2004).
Dez, C., Houseley, J. & Tollervey, D. Surveillance of nuclear-restricted pre-ribosomes within a subnucleolar region of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 25, 1534?1546 (2006). The authors show that defective pre-ribosomes are rapidly and completely degraded by the TRAMP and exosome in nucleolar 'No-bodies'.
Kadowaki, T. et al. Isolation and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA transport-defective (mtr) mutants. J. Cell Biol. 126, 649?659 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related links
Glossary
- Small nucleolar RNA
-
(snoRNA). A small RNA molecule that functions in ribosome biogenesis in the nucleolus. Most snoRNAs direct site-specific base modification in the pre-ribosomal RNAs, whereas a small number are required for pre-ribosomal RNA cleavage.
- Small nuclear RNAs
-
Five small RNA species (U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6) that form the core of the pre-mRNA-splicing system in the nucleus.
- Ribonucleoprotein particle
-
A complex of proteins and RNA. In many cases, the proteins can recognize their cognate mRNA molecules (selective binding) and mediate their delivery to specific regions within the cell.
- Nonsense-mediated decay
-
The process by which the cell destroys mRNAs in which translation has been prematurely terminated owing to the presence of a nonsense codon within the coding region.
- Non-stop decay
-
An RNA-degradation pathway for mRNAs that do not contain a translation-termination codon and in which the translating ribosomes stall at the end of the transcript.
- No-go decay
-
An RNA-degradation pathway that is induced by the stalling of a translating ribosome. The RNA is cleaved in the vicinity of the stalled ribosome, and this is followed by exonuclease degradation of the cleaved fragments. The 5′ fragment is degraded by the exosome, whereas the 3′ fragment is degraded by the 5′ exonuclease Xrn1.
- S1 domain
-
A putative RNA-binding domain that was initially identified in ribosomal protein S1, and that is present in a large number of RNA-associated proteins.
- KH domain
-
An evolutionarily conserved single-stranded-RNA-binding domain that was originally identified in the human heterogeneous nuclear (hn)RNP K protein.
- Proteasome
-
A large multisubunit protease complex that selectively degrades multi-ubiquitylated proteins. It contains a 20S particle that has catalytic activity and two regulatory 19S particles.
- DExH-box RNA helicases
-
RNA helicases that are related to DEAD-box proteins, and that contain an Asp-Glu-x-His (DExH) conserved motif.
- ARE-mediated mRNA degradation
-
A process of rapid degradation of mRNAs that is mediated by the recruitment of the exosome by factors that bind to A+U-rich sequence elements (AREs) that are generally located in the 3′ untranslated region of the mRNAs.
- Zinc-knuckle domain
-
This CX2CX4HX4C motif binds two zinc atoms and has been implicated in interactions between proteins and with single-stranded nucleic acids.
- 5′ cap structure
-
A structure that is located at the 5′ end of eukaryotic mRNAs and that consists of m7GpppN (where m7G represents 7-methylguanosine, p represents a phosphate group and N represents any base).
- P-body
-
(Processing body). The cytoplasmic site of mRNA degradation. mRNAs on which translation has ceased are released from the polysome pool and recruited to P-bodies, where they accumulate together with the mRNA decapping and 5′-degradation machinery.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houseley, J., LaCava, J. & Tollervey, D. RNA-quality control by the exosome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7, 529–539 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1964
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1964
This article is cited by
-
Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay inhibition synergizes with MDM2 inhibition to suppress TP53 wild-type cancer cells in p53 isoform-dependent manner
Cell Death Discovery (2022)
-
Identification and application of piwi-interacting RNAs from seminal plasma exosomes in Cynoglossus semilaevis
BMC Genomics (2020)
-
CDE-1 suppresses the production of risiRNA by coupling polyuridylation and degradation of rRNA
BMC Biology (2020)
-
MTR4 drives liver tumorigenesis by promoting cancer metabolic switch through alternative splicing
Nature Communications (2020)
-
EXOSC9 depletion attenuates P-body formation, stress resistance, and tumorigenicity of cancer cells
Scientific Reports (2020)