Abstract
What are the main characteristics of scientific conferences and what distinguishes the successful meetings from the less successful? Here, semi-seriously, I present a set of observations and suggestions that are organized into categories (such as big versus little conferences and long versus short conferences) and, for each category, I award the new meeting Oscars — the Georges.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petsko, G. The highs and lows of scientific conferences. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7, 231–234 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1832
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1832
