Comment

A user's guide to the ambiguous word 'epigenetics'

The term 'epigenetics' is currently ambiguous, over-encompassing and uncoupled from its historical roots. This reflects interests and insights that have developed over time. In this Comment, I propose that we stop using the word in isolation, and be explicit about which definition we are using to avoid ambiguity in its scientific and public use.

  • Subscribe to Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology for full access:

    $265

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    The (dual) origin of epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 69, 67–70 (2004).

  2. 2.

    Epigenetics: The origins and evolution of a fashionable topic. Dev. Biol. 416, 249–254 (2016).

  3. 3.

    & Associating cellular epigenetic models with human phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 441–451 (2017).

  4. 4.

    & Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 157, 95–109 (2014).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Epigenomics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.

    • John M. Greally

Authors

  1. Search for John M. Greally in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Greally.