Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Innovation
  • Published:

Democratizing systems immunology with modular transcriptional repertoire analyses

Abstract

Individual elements that constitute the immune system have been characterized over the few past decades, mostly through reductionist approaches. The introduction of large-scale profiling platforms has more recently facilitated the assessment of these elements on a global scale. However, the analysis and the interpretation of such large-scale datasets remains a challenge and a barrier for the wider adoption of systems approaches in immunological and clinical studies. In this Innovation article, we describe an analytical strategy that relies on the a priori determination of co-dependent gene sets for a given biological system. Such modular transcriptional repertoires can in turn be used to simplify the analysis and the interpretation of large-scale datasets, and to design targeted immune fingerprinting assays and web applications that will further facilitate the dissemination of systems approaches in immunology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Modular repertoire identification.
Figure 2: Mapping perturbations of the modular repertoire.
Figure 3: Mapping perturbations of the modular repertoire across individual samples.
Figure 4: Mapping perturbations of the modular repertoire across studies.
Figure 5: Transcriptome fingerprinting assays.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schuh, W., Meister, S., Herrmann, K., Bradl, H. & Jack, H. M. Transcriptome analysis in primary B lymphoid precursors following induction of the pre-B cell receptor. Mol. Immunol. 45, 362–375 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaussabel, D., Pascual, V. & Banchereau, J. Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics. BMC Biol. 8, 84 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pascual, V., Chaussabel, D. & Banchereau, J. A genomic approach to human autoimmune diseases. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 535–571 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, S., Nakaya, H. I., Kazmin, D. A., Oh, J. Z. & Pulendran, B. Systems biological approaches to measure and understand vaccine immunity in humans. Semin. Immunol. 25, 209–218 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ravindran, R. et al. Vaccine activation of the nutrient sensor GCN2 in dendritic cells enhances antigen presentation. Science 343, 313–317 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Germain, R. N., Meier-Schellersheim, M., Nita-Lazar, A. & Fraser, I. D. Systems biology in immunology: a computational modeling perspective. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29, 527–585 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Amit, I., Regev, A. & Hacohen, N. Strategies to discover regulatory circuits of the mammalian immune system. Nature Rev. Immunol. 11, 873–880 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chevrier, N. et al. Systematic discovery of TLR signaling components delineates viral-sensing circuits. Cell 147, 853–867 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Litvak, V. et al. A FOXO3–IRF7 gene regulatory circuit limits inflammatory sequelae of antiviral responses. Nature 490, 421–425 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapira, S. D. & Hacohen, N. Systems biology approaches to dissect mammalian innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23, 71–77 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Diercks, A. & Aderem, A. Systems approaches to dissecting immunity. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 363, 1–19 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ergun, A. et al. Differential splicing across immune system lineages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14324–14329 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schutte, J., Moignard, V. & Gottgens, B. Establishing the stem cell state: insights from regulatory network analysis of blood stem cell development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 4, 285–295 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller, M. A. et al. Transcriptional regulatory network analysis of developing human erythroid progenitors reveals patterns of coregulation and potential transcriptional regulators. Physiol. Genom. 28, 114–128 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Novershtern, N. et al. Densely interconnected transcriptional circuits control cell states in human hematopoiesis. Cell 144, 296–309 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jojic, V. et al. Identification of transcriptional regulators in the mouse immune system. Nature Immunol. 14, 633–643 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Allantaz, F. et al. Expression profiling of human immune cell subsets identifies miRNA–mRNA regulatory relationships correlated with cell type specific expression. PLoS ONE 7, e29979 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nutt, S. L., Taubenheim, N., Hasbold, J., Corcoran, L. M. & Hodgkin, P. D. The genetic network controlling plasma cell differentiation. Semin. Immunol. 23, 341–349 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murn, J. et al. A Myc-regulated transcriptional network controls B-cell fate in response to BCR triggering. BMC Genom. 10, 323 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmes, M. L., Pridans, C. & Nutt, S. L. The regulation of the B-cell gene expression programme by Pax5. Immunol. Cell Biol. 86, 47–53 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarkar, S. et al. Functional and genomic profiling of effector CD8 T cell subsets with distinct memory fates. J. Exp. Med. 205, 625–640 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Haining, W. N. et al. Identification of an evolutionarily conserved transcriptional signature of CD8 memory differentiation that is shared by T and B cells. J. Immunol. 181, 1859–1868 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Luckey, C. J. et al. Memory T and memory B cells share a transcriptional program of self-renewal with long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3304–3309 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. He, F. et al. PLAU inferred from a correlation network is critical for suppressor function of regulatory T cells. Mol. Systems Biol. 8, 624 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Doering, T. A. et al. Network analysis reveals centrally connected genes and pathways involved in CD8+ T cell exhaustion versus memory. Immunity 37, 1130–1144 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Quigley, M. et al. Transcriptional analysis of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells shows that PD-1 inhibits T cell function by upregulating BATF. Nature Med. 16, 1147–1151 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yosef, N. et al. Dynamic regulatory network controlling TH17 cell differentiation. Nature 496, 461–468 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Angelosanto, J. M. & Wherry, E. J. Transcription factor regulation of CD8+ T-cell memory and exhaustion. Immunol. Rev. 236, 167–175 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, Article17 (2005).

  30. Stuart, J. M., Segal, E., Koller, D. & Kim, S. K. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 302, 249–255 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Novershtern, N., Regev, A. & Friedman, N. Physical Module Networks: an integrative approach for reconstructing transcription regulation. Bioinformatcs 27, i177–i185 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shmulevich, I., Dougherty, E. R., Kim, S. & Zhang, W. Probabilistic Boolean Networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks. Bioinformatics 18, 261–274 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Berry, M. P. et al. An interferon-inducible neutrophil-driven blood transcriptional signature in human tuberculosis. Nature 466, 973–977 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pascual, V. et al. How the study of children with rheumatic diseases identified interferon-α and interleukin-1 as novel therapeutic targets. Immunol. Rev. 223, 39–59 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gaucher, D. et al. Yellow fever vaccine induces integrated multilineage and polyfunctional immune responses. J. Exp. Med. 205, 3119–3131 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Obermoser, G. et al. Systems scale interactive exploration reveals quantitative and qualitative differences in response to influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Immunity 38, 831–844 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nakaya, H. I. et al. Systems biology of vaccination for seasonal influenza in humans. Nature Immunol. 12, 786–795 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Franco, L. M. et al. Integrative genomic analysis of the human immune response to influenza vaccination. eLife 2, e00299 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Querec, T. D. et al. Systems biology approach predicts immunogenicity of the yellow fever vaccine in humans. Nature Immunol. 10, 116–125 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Klechevsky, E. et al. Functional specializations of human epidermal Langerhans cells and CD14+ dermal dendritic cells. Immunity 29, 497–510 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Banchereau, R. et al. Host immune transcriptional profiles reflect the variability in clinical disease manifestations in patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections. PloS ONE 7, e34390 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shen-Orr, S. S. et al. Cell type-specific gene expression differences in complex tissues. Nature Methods 7, 287–289 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Chaussabel, D. et al. A modular analysis framework for blood genomics studies: application to systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity 29, 150–164 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ardura, M. I. et al. Enhanced monocyte response and decreased central memory T cells in children with invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections. PLoS ONE 4, e5446 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mejias, A. et al. Whole blood gene expression profiles to assess pathogenesis and disease severity in infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. PLoS Med. 10, e1001549 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pankla, R. et al. Genomic transcriptional profiling identifies a candidate blood biomarker signature for the diagnosis of septicemic melioidosis. Genome Biol. 10, R127 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Caskey, M. et al. Synthetic double-stranded RNA induces innate immune responses similar to a live viral vaccine in humans. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2357–2366 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Li, S. et al. Molecular signatures of antibody responses derived from a systems biology study of five human vaccines. Nature Immunol. 15, 185–205 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schadt, E. E. Molecular networks as sensors and drivers of common human diseases. Nature 461, 218–223 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Krzywinski, M., Birol, I., Jones, S. J. & Marra, M. A. Hive plots — rational approach to visualizing networks. Brief. Bioinformat. 13, 627–644 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Aloy, P. & Russell, R. B. Taking the mystery out of biological networks. EMBO Rep. 5, 349–350 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Albert, R., Jeong, H. & Barabasi, A. L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406, 378–382 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank S. Presnell, M. C. Altman and E. Whalen for input and comments, B. Norris for editorial help, and C. Quinn, S. Presnell, K. Domico, E. Whalen, A. Bjork and B. Zeitner for the development of web tools. N.B. and D.C. are supported by US National Institutes of Health grants U01AI082110, U19-AI089987, U19-AI08998 and U19-AI057234. The authors apologize to those in the field whose important work was not cited here because of space limitations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damien Chaussabel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors are listed as inventors on patent applications and they receive funding from grants to support their research from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, USA.

Related links

PowerPoint slides

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Online Supplementary Material: Interactive web applications for exploration of modular repertoire analysis results (PDF 85 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaussabel, D., Baldwin, N. Democratizing systems immunology with modular transcriptional repertoire analyses. Nat Rev Immunol 14, 271–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3642

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3642

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing