The plasticity and stability of regulatory T cells

Abstract

Regulatory T (TReg) cells are crucial for the prevention of fatal autoimmunity in mice and humans. Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ TReg cells are produced in the thymus and are also generated from conventional CD4+ T cells in peripheral sites. It has been suggested that FOXP3+ TReg cells might become unstable under certain inflammatory conditions and might adopt a phenotype that is more characteristic of effector CD4+ T cells. These suggestions have caused considerable debate in the field and have important implications for the therapeutic use of TReg cells. In this article, Nature Reviews Immunology asks several experts for their views on the plasticity and stability of TReg cells.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Sakaguchi, S., Yamaguchi, T., Nomura, T. & Ono, M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 133, 775–787 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Duarte, J. H., Zelenay, S., Bergman, M. L., Martins, A. C. & Demengeot, J. Natural Treg cells spontaneously differentiate into pathogenic helper cells in lymphopenic conditions. Eur. J. Immunol. 39, 948–955 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Miyao, T. et al. Plasticity of Foxp3+ T cells reflects promiscuous Foxp3 expression in conventional T cells but not reprogramming of regulatory T cells. Immunity. 36, 262–275 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Vignali, D. A. A., Collison, L. W. & Workman, C. J. How regulatory T cells work. Nature Rev. Immunol. 8, 523–532 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Benoist, C. & Mathis, D. Treg cells, life history, and diversity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a007021 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Rudensky, A. Y. Regulatory T cells and Foxp3. Immunol. Rev. 241, 260–268 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Fu, W. et al. A multiply redundant genetic switch 'locks in' the transcriptional signature of regulatory T cells. Nature Immunol. 13, 972–980 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Ohkura, N. et al. T cell receptor stimulation-induced epigenetic changes and Foxp3 expression are independent and complementary events required for Treg cell development. Immunity 37, 785–799 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Sakaguchi, S. Regulatory T cells: history and perspective. Methods Mol. Biol. 707, 3–17 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Workman, C. J., Szymczak-Workman, A. L., Collison, L. W., Pillai, M. R. & Vignali, D. A. The development and function of regulatory T cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66, 2603–2622 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Collison, L. W., Pillai, M. R., Chaturvedi, V. & Vignali, D. A. Regulatory T cell suppression is potentiated by target T cells in a cell contact, IL-35- and IL-10-dependent manner. J. Immunol. 182, 6121–6128 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Abbas, A. K. et al. Regulatory T cells: recommendations to simplify the nomenclature. Nature Immunol. 14, 307–308 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Rubtsov, Y. P. et al. Stability of the regulatory T cell lineage in vivo. Science 329, 1667–1671 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Zhou, X. et al. Instability of the transcription factor Foxp3 leads to the generation of pathogenic memory T cells in vivo. Nature Immunol. 10, 1000–1007 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Hori, S., Nomura, T. & Sakaguchi, S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 299, 1057–1061 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Fontenot, J. D. et al. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity 22, 329–341 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Williams, L. M. & Rudensky, A. Y. Maintenance of the Foxp3-dependent developmental program in mature regulatory T cells requires continued expression of Foxp3. Nature Immunol. 8, 277–284 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Samstein, R. M. et al. Foxp3 exploits a pre-existent enhancer landscape for regulatory T cell lineage specification. Cell 151, 153–166 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Hori, S. Stability of regulatory T-cell lineage. Adv. Immunol. 112, 1–24 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Sakaguchi, S., Miyara, M., Costantino, C. M. & Hafler, D. A. FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nature Rev. Immunol. 10, 490–500 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Tian, L., Humblet-Baron, S. & Liston, A. Immune tolerance: are regulatory T cell subsets needed to explain suppression of autoimmunity? BioEssays 34, 569–575 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Nie, H. et al. Phosphorylation of FOXP3 controls regulatory T cell function and is inhibited by TNF-α in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Med. 19, 322–328 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Zhou, X., Bailey-Bucktrout, S., Jeker, L. T. & Bluestone, J. A. Plasticity of CD4+ FoxP3+ T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 21, 281–285 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lal, G. et al. Distinct inflammatory signals have physiologically divergent effects on epigenetic regulation of Foxp3 expression and Treg function. Am. J. Transplant. 11, 203–214 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Yurchenko, E. et al. Inflammation-driven reprogramming of CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells into pathogenic Th1/Th17 T effectors is abrogated by mTOR inhibition in vivo. PLoS ONE 7, e35572 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    d'Hennezel, E., Yurchenko, E., Sgouroudis, E., Hay, V. & Piccirillo, C. A. Single-cell analysis of the human T regulatory population uncovers functional heterogeneity and instability within FOXP3+ cells. J. Immunol. 186, 6788–6797 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Pasare, C. & Medzhitov, R. Toll pathway-dependent blockade of CD4+CD25+ T cell-mediated suppression by dendritic cells. Science 299, 1033–1036 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Koch, M. A. et al. The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation. Nature Immunol. 10, 595–602 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Chaudhry, A. et al. CD4+ regulatory T cells control TH17 responses in a Stat3-dependent manner. Science 326, 986–991 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Zheng, Y. et al. Regulatory T-cell suppressor program co-opts transcription factor IRF4 to control TH2 responses. Nature 458, 351–356 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Polansky, J. K. et al. DNA methylation controls Foxp3 gene expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 1654–1663 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Zheng, Y. et al. Role of conserved non-coding DNA elements in the Foxp3 gene in regulatory T-cell fate. Nature 463, 808–812 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Josefowicz, S. Z. et al. Extrathymically generated regulatory T cells control mucosal TH2 inflammation. Nature 482, 395–399 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Josefowicz, S. Z., Lu, L.-F. & Rudensky, A. Y. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 531–564 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Oldenhove, G. et al. Decrease of Foxp3+ Treg cell number and acquisition of effector cell phenotype during lethal infection. Immunity 31, 772–786 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Floess, S. et al. Epigenetic control of the foxp3 locus in regulatory T cells. PLoS Biol. 5, e38 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Wei, G. et al. Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+ T cells. Immunity 30, 155–167 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Takahashi, T. et al. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells: induction of autoimmune disease by breaking their anergic/suppressive state. Int. Immunol. 10, 1969–1980 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Thornton, A. M. & Shevach, E. M. CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells suppress polyclonal T cell activation in vitro by inhibiting interleukin 2 production. J. Exp. Med. 188, 287–296 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Daniel, C., Wennhold, K., Kim, H. J. & von Boehmer, H. Enhancement of antigen-specific Treg vaccination in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16246–16251 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Cobbold, S. P., Adams, E., Marshall, S. E., Davies, J. D. & Waldmann, H. Mechanisms of peripheral tolerance and suppression induced by monoclonal antibodies to CD4 and CD8. Immunol. Rev. 149, 5–33 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Chang, J. T. et al. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science 315, 1687–1691 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Miyara, M. et al. Functional delineation and differentiation dynamics of human CD4+ T cells expressing the FoxP3 transcription factor. Immunity 30, 899–911 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Kendal, A. R. et al. Sustained suppression by Foxp3+ regulatory T cells is vital for infectious transplantation tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2043–2053 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Beier, U. H. et al. Histone deacetylases 6 and 9 and sirtuin-1 control Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function through shared and isoform-specific mechanisms. Sci. Signal. 5, ra45 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Zhang, H., Xiao, Y., Zhu, Z., Li, B. & Greene, M. I. Immune regulation by histone deacetylases: a focus on the alteration of FOXP3 activity. Immunol. Cell Biol. 90, 95–100 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Wing, J. B. & Sakaguchi, S. Multiple Treg suppressive modules and their adaptability. Front. Immunol. 3, 178 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Wang, H. Y. & Wang, R. F. Regulatory T cells and cancer. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 19, 217–223 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.S. acknowledges the daily discussions he had with his colleagues that helped him to write his comments for this article.

D.A.A.V. apologises to those investigators who contributed important observations related to the questions he covered that he could not discuss or quote owing to space limitations. D.A.A.V. is supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grants AI091977, AI039480, AI052199, DK089125), American Asthma Foundation (grant10-0128), National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center grant (CA21765) and ALSAC.

A.Y.R. is supported by an NIH grant (R37 AI034206) and is an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Center. R.E.N. is supported by an NIH Medical Scientist Training Program grant (GM07739) and a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grant (1F31NS073203-01).

H.W. wishes to acknowledge the help of his colleagues D. Howie, R. Hilbrands and S. Cobbold in writing his comments for this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shimon Sakaguchi or Dario A. A. Vignali or Alexander Y. Rudensky or Herman Waldmann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.A.A.V. declares competing financial interests. He has submitted patents that are pending or granted, and is entitled to a share in net income generated from licensing of these patent rights for commercial development. He also consults for several biopharmaceutical companies.

S.S., R.E.N., A.R. and H.W. declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Glossary

Asymmetric T cell division

A process by which two daughter cells can inherit different amounts of immune receptors and signalling components from a parent cell during T cell division. It has been suggested that this process occurs because of the polarity of the dividing cell that is associated with immunological synapse formation and that it could specify different fates to the progeny of an individual T cell.

Conserved non-coding sequence 2

(CNS2). The element engaged in the positive auto-feedback loop that confers heritable maintenance of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) expression once demethylated. Also known as the TSDR (TReg cell-specific demethylated region).

CpG island

A sequence of 0.5–2 kilobases that is rich in CpG dinucleotides. CpG islands are mostly located upstream of housekeeping genes and also upstream of some tissue-specific genes. They are constitutively non-methylated in all animal cell types.

Infectious tolerance

The ability of a tolerized population of T cells to induce tolerance in a new, naive population of T cells. Tolerance might be to the same antigens or to new antigens that are encountered in the same context (linked suppression). Newly tolerized T cells can, in turn, induce tolerance in other T cells.

NOD mice

Non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice spontaneously develop a form of autoimmunity that closely resembles human type 1 diabetes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakaguchi, S., Vignali, D., Rudensky, A. et al. The plasticity and stability of regulatory T cells. Nat Rev Immunol 13, 461–467 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3464

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing