Review Article | Published:

Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity

Nature Reviews Immunology volume 18, pages 3545 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have allowed for comprehensive analysis of the immune system. In this Review, we briefly describe the available scRNA-seq technologies together with their corresponding strengths and weaknesses. We discuss in depth how scRNA-seq can be used to deconvolve immune system heterogeneity by identifying novel distinct immune cell subsets in health and disease, characterizing stochastic heterogeneity within a cell population and building developmental 'trajectories' for immune cells. Finally, we discuss future directions of the field and present integrated approaches to complement molecular information from a single cell with studies of the environment, epigenetic state and cell lineage.

Key points

  • Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) can be used to identify and characterize distinct immune cell subsets in health and disease. The transcriptional signatures of these immune cells enable the identification of novel pathogenic drivers and biomarkers.

  • scRNA-seq can be used to identify stochastic variations in gene expression within a single population, which might drive complex immunological responses.

  • scRNA-seq can be used for the reconstruction of developmental 'trajectories' to reveal cell fate decisions of distinct cell subpopulations. Branching points at these trajectories bridge transitional cellular states to distinct fate-specific progenitor populations.

  • Combining single-cell technologies will allow for more complete profiling of a cell. With emerging technologies, it will become possible to identify the transcriptional state of a cell together with its chromatin accessibility, epigenetic modifications and cellular ancestry.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from $8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Maintaining system homeostasis: the third law of Newtonian immunology. Nat. Immunol. 13, 902–906 (2012).

  2. 2.

    & Th17 and regulatory T cells in mediating and restraining inflammation. Cell 140, 845–858 (2010).

  3. 3.

    & Regulatory T cells exert checks and balances on self tolerance and autoimmunity. Nat. Immunol. 11, 7–13 (2010).

  4. 4.

    , , & FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 490–500 (2010).

  5. 5.

    & Single cell technologies are revolutionizing the approach to rare cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 94, 225–229 (2015).

  6. 6.

    , & Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 648–655 (2004).

  7. 7.

    & Mass cytometry: single cells, many features. Cell 165, 780–791 (2016).

  8. 8.

    , , & A deep profiler's guide to cytometry. Trends Immunol. 33, 323–332 (2012).

  9. 9.

    et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 332, 687–696 (2011). This manuscript introduces CyTOF technology, which enables profiling of up to 17 markers across millions of cells. Here, CyTOF is used to study immune signalling in healthy human haematopoiesis.

  10. 10.

    , , & Single-cell technologies for monitoring immune systems. Nat. Immunol. 15, 128–135 (2014).

  11. 11.

    , & Single-cell gene-expression profiling and its potential diagnostic applications. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 11, 735–740 (2011).

  12. 12.

    , , & Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 6, 986–994 (1996).

  13. 13.

    , , & Quantification of mRNA in single cells and modelling of RT-qPCR induced noise. BMC Mol. Biol. 9, 63 (2008).

  14. 14.

    et al. Characterization of transcriptional networks in blood stem and progenitor cells using high-throughput single-cell gene expression analysis. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 363–372 (2013).

  15. 15.

    et al. Decoding the regulatory network of early blood development from single-cell gene expression measurements. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 269–276 (2015).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 5, 621–628 (2008).

  17. 17.

    & Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).

  18. 18.

    et al. RNA-Seq analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of a single cell. Nat. Protoc. 5, 516–535 (2010). The first paper to carry out scRNA-seq.

  19. 19.

    & RNA-Seq-quantitative measurement of expression through massively parallel RNA-sequencing. Methods 48, 249–257 (2009).

  20. 20.

    et al. Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing data from blood leukocytes derived from Parkinson's disease patients prior to and following deep brain stimulation treatment. Genom. Data 3, 57–60 (2014).

  21. 21.

    et al. RNA-seq transcriptional profiling of peripheral blood leukocytes from cattle infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Front. Immunol. 5, 396 (2014).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Quantitative transcriptomics using designed primer-based amplification. Sci. Rep. 3, 1740 (2013).

  23. 23.

    et al. Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 777–782 (2012).

  24. 24.

    et al. Gene Expression Atlas update — a value-added database of microarray and sequencing-based functional genomics experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1077–D1081 (2012).

  25. 25.

    et al. Densely interconnected transcriptional circuits control cell states in human hematopoiesis. Cell 144, 296–309 (2011).

  26. 26.

    et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).

  27. 27.

    et al. Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. Genome Res. 21, 1160–1167 (2011).

  28. 28.

    et al. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods 10, 1096–1098 (2013).

  29. 29.

    , , & CEL-Seq: single-cell RNA-Seq by multiplexed linear amplification. Cell Rep. 2, 666–673 (2012).

  30. 30.

    et al. Massively parallel single-cell RNA-Seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science 343, 776–779 (2014).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Characterization of directed differentiation by high-throughput single-cell RNA-Seq. Preprint at bioRxiv (2014).

  32. 32.

    et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-Seq. Genome Biol. 17, 77 (2016).

  33. 33.

    et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).

  34. 34.

    et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015). References 33 and 34 introduce the concept of droplet-based barcoding for massively parallel single-cell transcriptomics.

  35. 35.

    et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Preprint at bioRxiv (2016).

  36. 36.

    The $1,000 genome. Nature 507, 295 (2014).

  37. 37.

    , , , & Genomewide characterization of non-polyadenylated RNAs. Genome Biol. 12, R16 (2011).

  38. 38.

    et al. Transcript amplification from single bacterium for transcriptome analysis. Genome Res. 21, 925–935 (2011).

  39. 39.

    , , & Single-cell RNA-seq: advances and future challenges. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 8845–8860 (2014).

  40. 40.

    et al. The heterogeneity of human CD127+ innate lymphoid cells revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Immunol. 17, 451–460 (2016).

  41. 41.

    et al. The spectrum and regulatory landscape of intestinal innate lymphoid cells are shaped by the microbiome. Cell 166, 1231–1246.e13 (2016). References 40 and 41 report heterogeneity in tonsil and intestine-derived CD127+ ILCs; they describe distinct ILC subpopulations and previously unknown ILC types.

  42. 42.

    et al. Single-cell genomics unveils critical regulators of Th17 cell pathogenicity. Cell 163, 1400–1412 (2015). This study identifies highly pathogenic subsets of TH17 cells that are characterized by increased expression of Gpr65, Plzp, Toso and Cd5l.

  43. 43.

    , , , a & Stochastic regulation in early immune response. Biophys. J. 90, 725–742 (2006).

  44. 44.

    , , & Stochastic effects and bistability in T cell receptor signaling. J. Theor. Biol. 254, 110–122 (2008).

  45. 45.

    et al. Single-cell quantification of IL-2 response by effector and regulatory T cells reveals critical plasticity in immune response. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 437 (2010).

  46. 46.

    & Heterogeneity in immune responses: from populations to single cells. Trends Immunol. 35, 219–229 (2014).

  47. 47.

    et al. T cell fate and clonality inference from single-cell transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 13, 329–332 (2016).

  48. 48.

    et al. Single-cell RNA-seq and computational analysis using temporal mixture modeling resolves TH1/TFH fate bifurcation in malaria. Sci. Immunol. 2, eaal2192 (2017).

  49. 49.

    , & Single-cell TCRseq: paired recovery of entire T-cell alpha and beta chain transcripts in T-cell receptors from single-cell RNAseq. Genome Med. 8, 80 (2016).

  50. 50.

    et al. Targeted reconstruction of T cell receptor sequence from single cell RNA-sequencing links CDR3 length to T cell differentiation state. Preprint at bioRxiv (2016). References 47–50 introduce computational approaches for TCR repertoire reconstruction from full-length scRNA-seq data.

  51. 51.

    et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature 498, 236–240 (2013).

  52. 52.

    et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic paracrine control of cellular variation. Nature 510, 363–369 (2014).

  53. 53.

    et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals coordinated ectopic gene-expression patterns in medullary thymic epithelial cells. Nat. Immunol. 16, 933–941 (2015).

  54. 54.

    , , & Aire controls gene expression in the thymic epithelium with ordered stochasticity. Nat. Immunol. 16, 942–949 (2015). References 53 and 54 show how single-cell methods can be used to discover both coordinated and stochastic sources of heterogeneity in medullary thymic epithelial cells.

  55. 55.

    et al. Single-cell trajectory detection uncovers progression and regulatory coordination in human b cell development. Cell 157, 714–725 (2014).

  56. 56.

    et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014). References 55 and 56 show how single-cell profiling can be used to reconstruct developmental processes and identify regulators of cell fate decisions.

  57. 57.

    et al. Identification of cDC1- and cDC2-committed DC progenitors reveals early lineage priming at the common DC progenitor stage in the bone marrow. Nat. Immunol. 16, 718–728 (2015).

  58. 58.

    et al. Distinct myeloid progenitor–differentiation pathways identified through single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Immunol. 17, 666–676 (2016).

  59. 59.

    et al. Single-cell transcriptomic reconstruction reveals cell cycle and multi-lineage differentiation defects in Bcl11a-deficient hematopoietic stem cells. Genome Biol. 16, 178 (2015).

  60. 60.

    et al. Single-cell profiling of human megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors identifies distinct megakaryocyte and erythroid differentiation pathways. Genome Biol. 17, 83 (2016).

  61. 61.

    et al. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352, 189–196 (2016).

  62. 62.

    et al. Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors. Cell 163, 1663–1677 (2015).

  63. 63.

    et al. A single cell resolution map of mouse haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation running title: single cell map of HSPC differentiation. Blood 128, 20–32 (2016). References 58, 62 and 63 report unbiased profiling of the mouse HSC compartment, which reveals unexpected levels of progenitor cell heterogeneity, particularly in myeloid cells.

  64. 64.

    et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals molecular and functional platelet bias of aged haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 11075 (2016).

  65. 65.

    et al. Osteoclasts degrade endosteal components and promote mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Nat. Med. 12, 657–664 (2006).

  66. 66.

    et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature 425, 841–846 (2003).

  67. 67.

    et al. Bone marrow macrophages maintain hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niches and their depletion mobilizes HSCs. Blood 116, 4815–4828 (2010).

  68. 68.

    et al. Angiocrine factors from Akt-activated endothelial cells balance self-renewal and differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1046–1056 (2010).

  69. 69.

    , , , & Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495–502 (2015).

  70. 70.

    et al. High-throughput spatial mapping of single-cell RNA-seq data to tissue of origin. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 503–509 (2015).

  71. 71.

    et al. Fluorescent in situ sequencing (FISSEQ) of RNA for gene expression profiling in intact cells and tissues. Nat. Protoc. 10, 442–458 (2015).

  72. 72.

    et al. Clonal tracking of rhesus macaque hematopoiesis highlights a distinct lineage origin for natural killer cells. Cell Stem Cell 14, 486–499 (2014).

  73. 73.

    et al. Determining lineage pathways from cellular barcoding experiments. Cell Rep. 6, 617–624 (2014).

  74. 74.

    et al. Single-cell whole-genome analyses by Linear Amplification via Transposon Insertion (LIANTI). Science 356, 189–194 (2017).

  75. 75.

    et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature 523, 486–490 (2015).

  76. 76.

    et al. Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science 348, 910–914 (2015).

  77. 77.

    et al. Single-cell DNA methylome sequencing and bioinformatic inference of epigenomic cell-state dynamics. Cell Rep. 10, 1386–1397 (2015).

  78. 78.

    , & Single-cell, locus-specific bisulfite sequencing (SLBS) for direct detection of epimutations in DNA methylation patterns. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e93 (2015).

  79. 79.

    et al. Single-cell methylome landscapes of mouse embryonic stem cells and early embryos analyzed using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Genome Res. 23, 2126–2135 (2013).

  80. 80.

    et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 11, 817–820 (2014).

  81. 81.

    et al. Multiplexed, targeted profiling of single-cell proteomes and transcriptomes in a single reaction. Genome Biol. 17, 188 (2016).

  82. 82.

    , , , & Integrated genome and transcriptome sequencing of the same cell. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 285–289 (2015).

  83. 83.

    et al. G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 12, 519–522 (2015).

  84. 84.

    et al. Large-scale simultaneous measurement of epitopes and transcriptomes in single cells. Preprint at bioRxiv (2017).

  85. 85.

    et al. Human bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells are increased in frequency and myeloid-biased with age. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20012–20017 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank members of the Satija and Littman laboratories for helpful discussions and the anonymous referees for insightful critiques. R.S. is supported by a National Institutes of Health Director's New Innovator Award Program (DP2-HG-009623).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003–6688, USA.

    • Efthymia Papalexi
    •  & Rahul Satija
  2. New York Genome Center, New York, New York 10013, USA.

    • Efthymia Papalexi
    •  & Rahul Satija

Authors

  1. Search for Efthymia Papalexi in:

  2. Search for Rahul Satija in:

Contributions

E.P. and R.S. wrote the article and reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Satija.

Glossary

Flow cytometry

Laser-based technology that allows for simultaneous quantification of the abundance of up to 17 cell surface proteins using fluorescently labelled antibodies.

Mass cytometry

(commercial name CyTOF). Mass spectrometry technique used as an alternative to flow cytometry that allows for the quantification of cellular protein levels by using isotopes that overcome problems associated with the spectral overlap of fluorophores.

Quantitative PCR

(qPCR). Polymerase chain reaction used to quantify gene expression levels using fluorescently labelled nucleotides and by tracking fluorescence levels during amplification cycles.

Microfluidic approaches

Single-cell RNA-sequencing techniques that use microfluidic devices for single-cell isolation.

Microarrays

Technique used to detect gene expression levels of many genes simultaneously. Microarrays use gene-specific probes that can be hybridized to complementary fluorescently labelled cDNA molecules. The fluorescence intensity is used to quantify gene expression.

Reverse transcription

Conversion of a mRNA molecule to complementary DNA (cDNA) using reverse transcriptase enzymes isolated from RNA viruses.

Barcode

A 12–20 nucleotide sequence that is uniquely assigned to a cell during reverse transcription and is used to trace mRNA transcripts back to their cellular origins.

Reverse emulsions devices

Devices that create oil-in-water emulsions, producing droplets that can encapsulate single cells.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing

(CHIP-seq). A technique that uses crosslinking of protein–DNA interactions and sequencing to identify protein-binding patterns and motifs on DNA.

cDC1 or cDC2 lineage

Functionally distinct conventional dendritic cell subgroups characterized by high levels of expression of the surface markers CD8α and CD103 (cDC1) or CD4 and CD11b (cDC2).

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.76