Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Are histones real pathogenic agents in sepsis?

Subjects

We read with interest the recent Review article by van der Poll et al.1 (The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 407–420 (2017)).This Review article describes various immunopathological aspects of sepsis and relevant targets as potential therapeutics. Unfortunately, we feel the authors failed to acknowledge highly relevant published data related to the possible pathogenic role of histones in sepsis.

In 2009, a paper by Xu et al.2, published in Nature Medicine, claimed that the main cause of death in sepsis is the release of highly toxic histones from neutrophils, possibly from those activated to make neutrophil extracellular traps3. Xu and co-workers also showed that the toxicity of histones could be abolished by either heparin, activated protein C or antibodies to histones. However, despite being an important new insight, this study was not cited in the Review by van der Poll and colleagues. Since this study, several other papers have been published showing high levels of circulating histones in many clinical disorders unrelated to sepsis3,4,5,6,7. This has led to the suggestion that histones are not unique inflammation-inducing alarmins (also known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs)) but are actually markers of cell damage8,9. Notably, in the context of sepsis, highly toxic cationic histones may function not alone but in synergy with oxidants and a range of pro-inflammatory agonists that are also released from activated neutrophils10,11,12,13. Again, none of these publications was acknowledged in the Review by van der Poll and colleagues.

We believe this important information on the possible role of histones in sepsis should have been acknowledged in this Review to encourage unbiased reporting and scholarly debate14.

References

  1. van der Poll, T. et al. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 407–420 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, J. et al. Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat. Med. 15, 1318–1321 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams, S. T. et al. Circulating histones are mediators of trauma-associated lung injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 187, 160–169 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alhamdi, Y. & Toh, C. H. The role of extracellular histones in haematological disorders. Br. J. Haematol. 173, 805–811 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, H. et al. Endogenous histones function as alarmins in sterile inflammatory liver injury through Toll-like receptor 9 in mice. Hepatology 54, 999–1008 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward, P. A. & Grailer, J. J. Acute lung injury and the role of histones. Transl Respir. Med. 2, 1 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, H., Villar, J. & Slutsky, A. S. Circulating histones: a novel target in acute respiratory distress syndrome? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 187, 118–120 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginsburg, I. et al. Is histone a solitary vile sepsis-inducing agent or just “a member of the gang”? J. Infect. Dis. Ther. 5, 1000329 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ginsburg, I. et al. Nuclear histones: major virulence factors or just additional early sepsis markers? A comment. Inflammopharma 24, 287–289 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ginsburg, I. et al. Vascular endothelial cell killing by combinations of membrane-active agents and hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 7, 369–376 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ginsburg, I. & Kohen, R. Cell damage in inflammatory and infectious sites might involve a coordinated “cross-talk” among oxidants, microbial haemolysins and ampiphiles, cationic proteins, phospholipases, fatty acids, proteinases and cytokines (an overview). Free Radic. Res. 22, 489–517 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ginsburg, I. et al. Killing of endothelial cells and release of arachidonic acid. Synergistic effects among hydrogen peroxide, membrane-damaging agents, cationic substances, and proteinases and their modulation by inhibitors. Inflammation 17, 295–319 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koren, E. & Ginsburg, I. Synergistic aspects to explain the pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock-an opinion. J. Infect. Dis. Ther. 3, 254 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ginsburg, I. The disregard syndrome: a menace to honest science? Scientist 15, 51–52 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Isaac Ginsburg or Erez Koren.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ginsburg, I., Koren, E. Are histones real pathogenic agents in sepsis?. Nat Rev Immunol 18, 148 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.156

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.156

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing