Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Transplantation

Allocation of liver transplants—a road to consensus

Rationing of livers for transplantation is a difficult problem especially when creation of national policies is needed. Italy recently convened a national consensus conference to decide who should be first in line.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Ideogram of donor resource distribution among the main liver allocation principles in Italy.

References

  1. Alexander, S. Medical miracle and a moral burden of a small committee. They decide who lives, who dies. Life magazine (Time Inc.) (9 November 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cillo, U. et al. A multistep, consensus-based approach to organ allocation in liver transplantation: toward a “blended principle model”. Am. J. Transplant. 15, 2552–2561 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: National Data [online], (2015).

  4. Schaubel, D. E. et al. Survival benefit-based deceased-donor liver allocation. Am. J. Transplant. 9, 970–981 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiesner, R. et al. United Network for Organ Sharing Liver Disease Severity Score Committee. Gastroenterology 124, 91–96 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, W. R. et al. Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 1018–1026 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heimbach, J. K. et al. Delayed hepatocellular carcinoma model for end-stage liver disease exception score improves disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States. Hepatology 61, 1643–1650 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Roberts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberts, J. Allocation of liver transplants—a road to consensus. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12, 615–616 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.181

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.181

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing