Functional dyspepsia—symptoms, definitions and validity of the Rome III criteria


Dyspepsia refers to a heterogeneous group of symptoms that are localized in the epigastric region. Typical dyspeptic symptoms include postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain and epigastric burning, but other upper gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, belching or abdominal bloating often occur. Functional dyspepsia is defined as the presence of dyspeptic symptoms in the absence of an organic cause that readily explains them. The Rome III consensus proposed the subdivision of functional dyspepsia into postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), characterized by postprandial fullness and early satiation, and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), characterized by epigastric pain or burning. Epidemiological studies in the USA and Europe confirmed the presence of both subgroups, with good separation between EPS and PDS. By contrast, other studies have found major overlap between EPS and PDS in patients with functional dyspepsia in specialist care centres in Europe and Asia. Preliminary pathophysiological studies suggest that PDS might be characterized by a higher prevalence of impaired gastric accommodation than EPS and raised duodenal eosinophil counts. Whether different treatment approaches are needed for EPS and PDS is currently unclear; only acotiamide, a new drug for the treatment of functional dyspepsia, has been found to be efficacious in PDS but not in EPS. Further randomized controlled trials testing treatment response by subgroup are urgently needed.

Key Points

  • Functional dyspepsia refers to dyspeptic symptoms that cannot currently be explained by an organic cause

  • The Rome III criteria has divided functional dyspepsia into two subgroups; postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS)

  • Patients with PDS typically report postprandial fullness and early satiation, whereas those with EPS are more likely to experience epigastric pain and burning

  • Currently, it is unknown whether patients with PDS and EPS need to be treated differently; randomized controlled trials are required to test treatment response by subgroup

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Graphical representations of the functional dyspepsia symptom profile that could be used to help patients identify their symptom descriptions.
Figure 2: Prevalence of FD, PDS, EPS and their overlap in three studies in the general population.29,30,31
Figure 3: Prevalence of PDS, EPS and their overlap in three studies in gastroenterology clinic patient samples.34,35,36


  1. 1

    Tack, J. in Sleisenger and Fordtran, Handbook of Gastroenterology 9th edn, Vol. 1, Ch. 13 (eds Feldman, M., Friedman, L. S. & Brandt, L. J.) 183–196 (Saunders, Philadelphia, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Drossman, D. A. et al. Identification of subgroups of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterol. Int. 3, 159–172 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Talley, N. J. et al. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gut 45 (Suppl. 2), 37–42 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Tack, J. et al. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology 130, 1466–1479 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Nesland, A. & Berstad, A. Erosive prepyloric changes in persons with and without dyspepsia. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 20, 222–228 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Talley, N. J. et al. Non-ulcer dyspepsia and duodenal eosinophilia: an adult endoscopic population-based case-control study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 1175–1183 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Mazzoleni, L. E. et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication in functional dyspepsia: HEROES trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 171, 1929–1936 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Vanheel, H. & Farré, R. Changes in gastrointestinal tract function and structure in functional dyspepsia. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.

  9. 9

    El-Serag, H. B. & Talley, N. J. Systematic review: the prevalence and clinical course of functional dyspepsia. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 19, 643–654 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Piessevaux, H. et al. Dyspeptic symptoms in the general population: a factor and cluster analysis of symptom groupings. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 21, 378–388 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Agreus, L. Natural history of dyspepsia. Gut 50 (Suppl. 4), iv2–iv9 (2002).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Camilleri, M. et al. Prevalence and socioeconomic impact of upper gastrointestinal disorders in the United States: results of the US Upper Gastrointestinal Study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3, 543–552 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Enck, P., Dubois, D. & Marquis, P. Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms: results from the Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST). Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. 231, 48–54 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Moayyedi, P. & Mason, J. Clinical and economic consequences of dyspepsia in the community. Gut 50 (Suppl. 4), iv10–iv12 (2002).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Koloski, N. A., Talley, N. J. & Boyce, P. M. Predictors of health care seeking for irritable bowel syndrome and nonulcer dyspepsia: a critical review of the literature on symptom and psychosocial factors. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 96, 1340–1349 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Tack, J., Bisschops, R. & Sarnelli, G. Pathophysiology and treatment of functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 127, 1239–1255 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Jones, M. P., Talley, N. J., Eslick, G. D., Dubois, D. & Tack, J. Community subgroups in dyspepsia and their association with weight loss. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 103, 2051–2060 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Colin-Jones, D. G. et al. Management of dyspepsia. Report of a working party. Lancet 1, 576–579 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Locke, G. R. 3rd, Zinsmeister, A. R., Fett, S. L., Melton, L. J. 3rd & Talley, N. J. Overlap of gastrointestinal symptom complexes in a US community. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 17, 29–34 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Carlsson, R. et al. The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 33, 1023–1029 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Johnsson, F., Roth, Y., Damgaard Pedersen, N. E. & Joelsson, B. Cimetidine improves GERD symptoms in patients selected by a validated GERD questionnaire. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 7, 81–86 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Tack, J. et al. Prevalence of acid reflux in functional dyspepsia and its association with symptom profile. Gut 54, 1370–1376 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Corsetti, M., Caenepeel, P., Fischler, B., Janssens, J. & Tack, J. Impact of coexisting irritable bowel syndrome on symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 99, 1152–1159 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Laheij, R. J. et al. Predominant symptom behavior in patients with persistent dyspepsia during treatment. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 38, 490–495 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Talley, N. J. et al. Predictors of the placebo response in functional dyspepsia. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 23, 923–936 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Karamanolis, G., Caenepeel, P., Arts, J. & Tack, J. Association of the predominant symptom with clinical characteristics and pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 130, 296–303 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Castillo, E. J. et al. A community-based, controlled study of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of dyspepsia. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2, 985–996 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Bisschops, R. et al. Relationship between symptoms and ingestion of a meal in functional dyspepsia. Gut 57, 1495–1503 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Choung, R. S., Locke, G. R., Schleck, C. D., Zinsmeister, A. R. & Talley, N. J. Do distinct dyspepsia subgroups exist in the community? A population-based study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102, 1983–1989 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Aro, P. et al. Anxiety is associated with uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia (ROME III criteria) in a Swedish population based study. Gastroenterology 137, 94–100 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Zagari, R. M. et al. Epidemiology of functional dyspepsia and subgroups in the Italian general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology 138, 1302–1311 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Matsuzaki, J. et al. Classification of functional dyspepsia based on concomitant bowel symptoms. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 24, 325–e164 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Matsuzaki, J. et al. High frequency of overlap between functional dyspepsia and overactive bladder. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 24, 821–827 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    van Kerkhoven, L. A. et al. Functional dyspepsia: not all roads seem to lead to Rome. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 43, 118–122 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Wang, A. J. et al. The clinical overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome based on Rome III criteria. BMC Gastroenterol. 8, 43 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Arts, J. et al. Discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups according to the Rome III consensus in dyspeptic patients referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy [abstract]. Gastroenterology 134 (Suppl. 1), A-627 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Abid, S., Siddiqui, S. & Jafri, W. Discriminant value of Rome III questionnaire in dyspeptic patients. Saudi J. Gastroenterol. 17, 129–133 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Haag, S. et al. Is there any association between disturbed gastrointestinal visceromotor and sensory function and impaired quality of life in functional dyspepsia? Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 22, 262–e79 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Shindo, T. et al. Comparison of gastric emptying and plasma ghrelin levels in patients with functional dyspepsia and non-erosive reflux disease. Digestion 79, 65–72 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Kindt, S. et al. Impaired accommodation is a feature of functional dyspepsia patients with postprandial distress syndrome, not with epigastric pain syndrome [abstract]. Gastroenterology 136 (Suppl. 1), A-140–A-141 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Ahmed, A. B., Matre, K., Hausken, T., Gregersen, H. & Gilja, O. H. ROME III Subgroups of functional dyspepsia exhibit different characteristics of antral strain measured by strain rate imaging [abstract]. Gastroenterology 134 (Suppl. 1), A-531 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Kusano, M. et al. Rapid gastric emptying, rather than delayed gastric emptying, might provoke functional dyspepsia. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 26 (Suppl. 3), 75–78 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Vilaichone, R. K., Mahacahai, V., Tumwasorn, S. & Kachintorn, U. CagA genotype and metronidazole resistant strain of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia in Thailand. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 26 (Suppl. 3), 46–48 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Noh, Y. W., Jung, H. K., Kim, S. E. & Jung, S. A. Overlap of erosive and non-erosive reflux diseases with functional gastrointestinal disorders according to Rome III criteria. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 16, 148–156 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Santonicola, A. et al. Prevalence of functional dyspepsia and its subgroups in patients with eating disorders. World J. Gastroenterol. 18, 4379–4385 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Futagami, S. et al. Migration of eosinophils and CCR2-/CD68-double positive cells into the duodenal mucosa of patients with postinfectious functional dyspepsia. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 1835–1842 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Talley, N. J. et al. Non-ulcer dyspepsia and duodenal eosinophilia: an adult endoscopic population-based case-control study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 1175–1183 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Walker, M. M. et al. Duodenal mastocytosis, eosinophilia and intraepithelial lymphocytosis as possible disease markers in the irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 29, 765–773 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Aggarwal, K. R. et al. Duodenal eosinophilia and early satiety in functional dyspepsia (FD): confirmation of a positive biomarker association for FD in an Australian cohort [abstract]. Gastroenterology 142, S170–S171 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Bafutto, M. et al. Duodenal eosinophilia: a link between functional dyspepsia and post-infective functional dyspepsia [abstract]? Gastroenterology 142, S171 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Oshima, T. et al. The G-protein β3 subunit 825 TT genotype is associated with epigastric pain syndrome-like dyspepsia. BMC Med. Genet. 11, 13 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Shimpuku, M. et al. G-protein β3 subunit 825CC genotype is associated with postprandial distress syndrome with impaired gastric emptying and with the feeling of hunger in Japanese. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 23, 1073–1080 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Toyoshima, F. et al. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism may be associated with functional dyspepsia in a Japanese population. BMC Med. Genet. 12, 88 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Arisawa, T. et al. Genetic polymorphisms of SCN10A are associated with functional dyspepsia in Japanese subjects. J. Gastroenterol. 48, 73–80 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Hsu, Y. C. et al. Proton pump inhibitor versus prokinetic therapy in patients with functional dyspepsia: is therapeutic response predicted by Rome III subgroups? J. Gastroenterol. 46, 183–190 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Xiao, Y. L. et al. Prevalence and symptom pattern of pathologic esophageal acid reflux in patients with functional dyspepsia based on the Rome III criteria. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 2626–2631 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Futagami, S. et al. Nizatidine improves clinical symptoms and gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia accompanied by impaired gastric emptying. Digestion 86, 114–121 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Tack, J. & Janssen, P. Acotiamide (Z-338, YM-443), a new drug for the treatment of functional dyspepsia. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 20, 701–712 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Tack, J. et al. A dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of acotiamide in patients with functional dyspepsia. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 21, 272–280 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Matsueda, K. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of novel agent (Z-338) in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 128, A467 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Tack, J. F. et al. Efficacy and safety study of acotiamide (Z-338) in European patients with functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 140, S805–S805 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Matsueda, K. et al. Clinical trial: dose-dependent therapeutic efficacy of acotiamide hydrochloride (Z-338) in patients with functional dyspepsia—100 mg t.i.d. is an optimal dosage. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 22, 618–e173 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Matsueda, K., Hongo, M., Tack, J., Saito Y. & Kato, H. A placebo-controlled trial of acotiamide for meal-related symptoms of functional dyspepsia. Gut 61, 821–828 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Van Oudenhove, L. et al. Determinants of symptoms in functional dyspepsia: gastric sensorimotor function, psychosocial factors or somatisation? Gut 57, 1666–1673 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


J. Tack would like to acknowledge the support of a Methusalem grant from Leuven University.

Author information




Both authors contributed equally to all aspects of this article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Tack.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tack, J., Talley, N. Functional dyspepsia—symptoms, definitions and validity of the Rome III criteria. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10, 134–141 (2013).

Download citation

Further reading


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing