Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Endoscopy

Risk assessment in upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Endoscopy is the mainstay for diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Early risk assessment is crucial for effective timing of endoscopy and determination of the need for other measures to be taken—scoring systems should be used for this purpose. A new prospective study suggests that the Blatchford score can identify patients who do not need endoscopic intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. van Leerdam, M. E. et al. Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 98, 1494–1499 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barkun, A. N. et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann. Intern. Med. 152, 101–113 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pang, S. H. et al. Comparing the Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in predicting the need for endoscopic therapy in patients with upper GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest. Endosc. 71, 1134–1140 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sung, J. J. et al. Intravenous esomeprazole for prevention of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 150, 455–464 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanley, A. J. et al. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. Lancet 373, 42–47 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, I. C., Hung, M. S., Chiu, T. F., Chen, J. C. & Hsiao, C. T. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 25, 774–779 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Masaoka, T., Suzuki, H., Hori, S., Aikawa, N. & Hibi, T. Blatchford scoring system is a useful scoring system for detecting patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who do not need endoscopic intervention. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 22, 1404–1408 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gralnek, I. M. & Dulai, G. S. Incremental value of upper endoscopy for triage of patients with acute non-variceal upper-GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest. Endosc. 60, 9–14 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hearnshaw, S. A. et al. Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit. Gut 59, 1022–1029 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuipers, E. Risk assessment in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7, 480–482 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2010.119

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2010.119

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing