Review Article | Published:

Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans

Nature Reviews Genetics volume 16, pages 359371 (2015) | Download Citation

Abstract

As modern and ancient DNA sequence data from diverse human populations accumulate, evidence is increasing in support of the existence of beneficial variants acquired from archaic humans that may have accelerated adaptation and improved survival in new environments — a process known as adaptive introgression. Within the past few years, a series of studies have identified genomic regions that show strong evidence for archaic adaptive introgression. Here, we provide an overview of the statistical methods developed to identify archaic introgressed fragments in the genome sequences of modern humans and to determine whether positive selection has acted on these fragments. We review recently reported examples of adaptive introgression, grouped by selection pressure, and consider the level of supporting evidence for each. Finally, we discuss challenges and recommendations for inferring selection on introgressed regions.

Key points

  • Recent genomic analyses of sequence data from archaic humans have detected evidence of gene flow from the genomes of archaic humans to modern humans. Several studies have identified DNA segments within the genomes of modern humans that show strong signatures of both introgression and positive selection.

  • Statistical analysis methods have been developed to detect surviving archaic human DNA segments and to ascertain that these introgressed segments show signatures of positive selection.

  • There are reported examples of adaptive introgression by putative selective pressures, including pathogens, temperatures, altitude and diet. Candidate genes showing evidence for adaptive introgression have functional annotations that suggest roles in immune function, pigmentation, response to high altitude, and metabolism.

  • Although recent studies have identified several well-supported examples of adaptive introgression in humans, we still lack a framework that jointly models the effects of introgression and positive selection. Studies of the synergistic effect of these two forces will lead to a better characterization of adaptive introgression and of its relative importance in human adaptation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & in The Origins of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence (eds Smith, F. H. & Spencer, F.) 411–483 (Liss, 1984).

  2. 2.

    & Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans. Science 239, 1263–1268 (1988).

  3. 3.

    The Afro-European sapiens hypothesis and hominid evolution in East Asia during the late Middle and Upper Pleistocene. Cour. Forschungsinst. Senckenb. 69, 145–165 (1984).

  4. 4.

    , & The assimilation model, modern human origins in Europe, and the extinction of Neandertals. Quaternary Int. 137, 7–19 (2005).

  5. 5.

    & Possible ancestral structure in human populations. PLoS Genet. 2, e105 (2006). This study develops a novel statistic algorithm, S*, to find candidate linked SNPs within haplotypes that may have been introduced by admixture with archaic humans.

  6. 6.

    , & Detecting ancient admixture and estimating demographic parameters in multiple human populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1823–1827 (2009).

  7. 7.

    et al. The timing and spatiotemporal patterning of Neanderthal disappearance. Nature 512, 306–309 (2014).

  8. 8.

    et al. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328, 710–722 (2010). This paper reports the draft sequence of a Neanderthal genome. Analysis of this sequence provided the first estimates of the proportion of archaic admixture in present-day human genomes.

  9. 9.

    et al. The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature 505, 43–49 (2014). This paper reports the first high-coverage sequence of a Neanderthal genome. Analysis of this sequence allowed the identification of Neanderthal segments in present-day humans.

  10. 10.

    et al. Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia. Nature 468, 1053–1060 (2010).

  11. 11.

    et al. A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science 338, 222–226 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Patterns of coding variation in the complete exomes of three Neandertals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6666–6671 (2014).

  13. 13.

    & Adaptation by introgression. J. Biol. 8, 82 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Evolution: replacing genes and traits through hybridization. Curr. Biol. 19, R119–R122 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation. Mol. Ecol. 22, 4606–4618 (2013). This is an introductory review of adaptive introgression in non-human species, providing a comparison with other types of selection and a list of many specific examples.

  16. 16.

    , , & A genetic legacy from archaic Homo. Trends Genet. 24, 19–23 (2008).

  17. 17.

    & Dynamics of adaptive introgression from archaic to modern humans. PaleoAnthropology 2006, 101–115 (2006). This is a visionary review that proposed adaptive introgression as a mode of adaptation in humans before the availability of archaic genome sequences.

  18. 18.

    et al. Higher levels of Neanderthal ancestry in East Asians than in Europeans. Genetics 194, 199–209 (2013).

  19. 19.

    & Resurrecting surviving Neandertal lineages from modern human genomes. Science 343, 1017–1021 (2014). This key paper estimates the sum total of Neanderthal segments in a large sample of present-day human genomes using an LD-based statistic, S*, and identifies segments that may be targets of positive selection.

  20. 20.

    et al. Denisova admixture and the first modern human dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 516–528 (2011).

  21. 21.

    & Archaic human ancestry in East Asia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18301–18306 (2011).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15123–15128 (2011).

  23. 23.

    et al. Evolutionary history and adaptation from high-coverage whole-genome sequences of diverse African hunter-gatherers. Cell 150, 457–469 (2012).

  24. 24.

    & The impact of whole-genome sequencing on the reconstruction of human population history. Nature Rev. Genet. 15, 149–162 (2014).

  25. 25.

    & Strong reproductive isolation between humans and Neanderthals inferred from observed patterns of introgression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15129–15134 (2011).

  26. 26.

    & Effect of ancient population structure on the degree of polymorphism shared between modern human populations and ancient hominins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13956–13960 (2012).

  27. 27.

    & The lengths of admixture tracts. Genetics 197, 953–967 (2014). This paper presents important theoretical results on the expected length of admixture tracts and how they can be used to identify particular models of admixture.

  28. 28.

    & Inference of historical changes in migration rate from the lengths of migrant tracts. Genetics 181, 711–719 (2009).

  29. 29.

    Population genetics models of local ancestry. Genetics 191, 607–619 (2012).

  30. 30.

    et al. Genome sequence of a 45,000-year-old modern human from Western Siberia. Nature 514, 445–449 (2014).

  31. 31.

    et al. Genomic structure in Europeans dating back at least 36,200 years. Science 346, 1113–1118 (2014).

  32. 32.

    , , , & The date of interbreeding between Neandertals and modern humans. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002947 (2012).

  33. 33.

    , , , & Bayesian inference of ancient human demography from individual genome sequences. Nature Genet. 43, 1031–1034 (2011).

  34. 34.

    et al. Demographic history and rare allele sharing among human populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11983–11988 (2011).

  35. 35.

    & Inferring demographic history from a spectrum of shared haplotype lengths. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003521 (2013).

  36. 36.

    , , & Ancient structure in Africa unlikely to explain Neanderthal and non-African genetic similarity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 2987–2995 (2012).

  37. 37.

    & Neandertal admixture in Eurasia confirmed by maximum-likelihood analysis of three genomes. Genetics 196, 1241–1251 (2014).

  38. 38.

    et al. Ancient admixture in human history. Genetics 192, 1065–1093 (2012).

  39. 39.

    , , & Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2239–2252 (2011). This is a detailed analysis of Patterson's D statistic to test for admixture with archaic humans.

  40. 40.

    , & Evaluating the use of ABBA–BABA statistics to locate introgressed loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 244–257 (2014).

  41. 41.

    , & A haplotype at STAT2 introgressed from Neanderthals and serves as a candidate of positive selection in Papua New Guinea. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 91, 265–274 (2012).

  42. 42.

    Detecting ancient admixture in humans using sequence polymorphism data. Genetics 154, 1271–1279 (2000).

  43. 43.

    Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 13, 260–269 (1967).

  44. 44.

    et al. The genomic landscape of Neanderthal ancestry in present-day humans. Nature 507, 354–357 (2014). This paper presents a framework that combines different DNA sequence features to identify Neanderthal segments in present-day humans and determine which of these segments may have been positively selected.

  45. 45.

    et al. The history of African gene flow into Southern Europeans, Levantines, and Jews. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001373 (2011).

  46. 46.

    , , & A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 4, e72 (2006).

  47. 47.

    et al. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419, 832–837 (2002).

  48. 48.

    et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature 449, 913–918 (2007).

  49. 49.

    Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989).

  50. 50.

    & Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155, 1405–1413 (2000).

  51. 51.

    et al. A composite of multiple signals distinguishes causal variants in regions of positive selection. Science 327, 883–886 (2010).

  52. 52.

    , , , & Natural selection has driven population differentiation in modern humans. Nature Genet. 40, 340–345 (2008).

  53. 53.

    & Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics 74, 175–195 (1973).

  54. 54.

    et al. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum. Genom. 1, 274–286 (2004).

  55. 55.

    et al. Sequencing of 50 human exomes reveals adaptation to high altitude. Science 329, 75–78 (2010).

  56. 56.

    Gene admixture in human populations: models and predictions. Am. J.Phys. Anthropol. 29, 1–43 (1986).

  57. 57.

    et al. Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature 512, 194–197 (2014).

  58. 58.

    et al. The shaping of modern human immune systems by multiregional admixture with archaic humans. Science 334, 89–94 (2011).

  59. 59.

    et al. Natural selection on EPAS1 (HIF2α) associated with low hemoglobin concentration in Tibetan highlanders. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11459–11464 (2010).

  60. 60.

    , , , & Neanderthal introgression at chromosome 3p21.31 was under positive natural selection in East Asians. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 683–695 (2014).

  61. 61.

    & The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. 205, 581–598 (1979).

  62. 62.

    et al. Evidence suggesting that Homo neanderthalensis contributed the H2 MAPT haplotype to Homo sapiens. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33, 582–585 (2005).

  63. 63.

    , , , & Evidence that the adaptive allele of the brain size gene microcephalin introgressed into Homo sapiens from an archaic Homo lineage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18178–18183 (2006).

  64. 64.

    et al. Using the neanderthal and denisova genetic data to understand the common MAPT 17q21 inversion in modern humans. Hum. Biol. 84, 633–640 (2012).

  65. 65.

    , & Determinants of mutation rate variation in the human germline. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 15, 47–70 (2014).

  66. 66.

    et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491, 56–65 (2012).

  67. 67.

    et al. Neanderthal ancestry drives evolution of lipid catabolism in contemporary Europeans. Nature Commun. 5, 3584 (2014).

  68. 68.

    & Novel anticancer targets: revisiting ERBB2 and discovering ERBB3. Nature Rev. Cancer 9, 463–475 (2009).

  69. 69.

    et al. The atypical kinase Cdk5 is activated by insulin, regulates the association between GLUT4 and E-Syt1, and modulates glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4249–4253 (2009).

  70. 70.

    , & E-Syts, a family of membranous Ca2+-sensor proteins with multiple C2 domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3823–3828 (2007).

  71. 71.

    , & A model-based approach for identifying signatures of ancient balancing selection in genetic data. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004561 (2014).

  72. 72.

    et al. A novel family of human leukocyte antigen class II receptors may have its origin in archaic human species. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 639–653 (2014).

  73. 73.

    , & Non-Neanderthal origin of the HLA-DPB1*0401. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 10252 (2014).

  74. 74.

    , & Neandertal origin of genetic variation at the cluster of OAS immunity genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 798–801 (2013).

  75. 75.

    , & Global genetic variation at OAS1 provides evidence of archaic admixture in Melanesian populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1513–1520 (2012).

  76. 76.

    et al. Comprehensive candidate gene study highlights UGT1A and BNC2 as new genes determining continuous skin color variation in Europeans. Hum. Genet. 132, 147–158 (2013).

  77. 77.

    et al. Web-based, participant-driven studies yield novel genetic associations for common traits. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000993 (2010).

  78. 78.

    et al. Neanderthal origin of the haplotypes carrying the functional variant Val92Met in the MC1R in modern humans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1994–2003 (2014).

  79. 79.

    , & The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5268–5273 (2003).

  80. 80.

    et al. The Asp84Glu variant of the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) is associated with melanoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 1663–1666 (1996).

  81. 81.

    , , , & Variants of the melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor gene are associated with red hair and fair skin in humans. Nature Genet. 11, 328–330 (1995).

  82. 82.

    & Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133, 693–709 (1993).

  83. 83.

    et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 467, 52–58 (2010).

  84. 84.

    et al. Identifying signatures of natural selection in Tibetan and Andean populations using dense genome scan data. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001116 (2010).

  85. 85.

    et al. Genetic evidence for high-altitude adaptation in Tibet. Science 329, 72–75 (2010).

  86. 86.

    et al. Genetic variations in Tibetan populations and high-altitude adaptation at the Himalayas. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1075–1081 (2011).

  87. 87.

    et al. A genome-wide search for signals of high-altitude adaptation in Tibetans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1003–1011 (2011).

  88. 88.

    et al. On the origin of Tibetans and their genetic basis in adapting high-altitude environments. PLoS ONE 6, e17002 (2011).

  89. 89.

    et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467, 1061–1073 (2010).

  90. 90.

    et al. Sequence variants in SLC16A11 are a common risk factor for type 2 diabetes in Mexico. Nature 506, 97–101 (2014).

  91. 91.

    et al. Haplotypes in the dystrophin DNA segment point to a mosaic origin of modern human diversity. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 994–1015 (2003).

  92. 92.

    et al. An X-linked haplotype of Neandertal origin is present among all non-African populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1957–1962 (2011).

  93. 93.

    et al. Genetic evidence for recent population mixture in India. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 422–438 (2013).

  94. 94.

    et al. A genetic atlas of human admixture history. Science 343, 747–751 (2014).

  95. 95.

    et al. Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Nature 513, 409–413 (2014).

  96. 96.

    et al. Genetic signatures reveal high-altitude adaptation in a set of Ethiopian populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1877–1888 (2013).

  97. 97.

    et al. Admixture facilitates genetic adaptations to high altitude in Tibet. Nature Commun. 5, 3281 (2014).

  98. 98.

    et al. Genome-wide scan of 29,141 African Americans finds no evidence of directional selection since admixture. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 95, 437–444 (2014).

  99. 99.

    Happy New Year Homo erectus? More evidence for interbreeding with archaics predating the modern human/Neanderthal split. arXiv , (2013).

  100. 100.

    & New g%AIC, g%AICc, g%BIC, and power divergence fit statistics expose mating between modern humans, Neanderthals and other archaics. arXiv , (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

E.H.-S. is supported by start-up funds from the University of California, Merced, USA. R.N and S.S are supported by the US National Institutes of Health (grants R01HG003229-09 and K99 GM111744). F.R. is supported by the US National Institutes of Health grant to M. Slatkin (R01-GM40282). The authors thank F. Casey for discussions and help with Box 2, as well as E. Durand for help with Supplementary information S1 (box).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 97420, USA.

    • Fernando Racimo
    •  & Rasmus Nielsen
  2. Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

    • Sriram Sankararaman
  3. Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 97420, USA.

    • Rasmus Nielsen
  4. Molecular and Cell Biology Unit, School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, California 95343, USA.

    • Emilia Huerta-Sánchez

Authors

  1. Search for Fernando Racimo in:

  2. Search for Sriram Sankararaman in:

  3. Search for Rasmus Nielsen in:

  4. Search for Emilia Huerta-Sánchez in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilia Huerta-Sánchez.

Supplementary information

Glossary

Modern humans

Present-day humans and their recent ancestors, up to the time at which they diverged from their most closely related archaic human groups, the Neanderthals and Denisovans.

Out-of-Africa model

A model of recent human evolution positing that all present-day humans had a recent origin in Africa and then expanded across the world, replacing other archaic groups.

Admixture

Genetic exchange between individuals from two populations that were isolated in the past.

Archaic humans

A broad category of human populations that diverged from present-day humans 550–765 thousand years ago (kya) (assuming a mutation rate of 0.5 × 10−9 per base pair per year) before present-day human populations started diverging from each other 86–130 kya (assuming the same mutation rate) and that are now extinct. This includes the Neanderthal and Denisovan populations.

Ancestral population structure

A demographic scenario in which an ancestral population is not homogenously mixing. For example, some subpopulations might exchange more migrants with certain other subpopulations than with the rest because of geography or mate choice.

Haplotypes

Sequences of contiguous alleles that are closely linked and that tend to be inherited together as a single unit.

Human mutation rate

The rate (per base pair) at which mutations appear in the genome sequence of an individual at each generation or year. Currently, the exact value of this rate in humans is a topic of debate, with most estimates ranging from a value of 0.5 × 10−9 per base pair per year to a value of 10−9 per base pair per year.

D statistic

A summary statistic based on differential sharing of derived alleles among different pairs of populations. When applied on a genome-wide scale, they can be used to detect significant deviations from a strict population tree with no admixture or migration.

Incomplete lineage sorting

(ILS). A phenomenon whereby two or more lineages from different populations or species share a common ancestor more recently than their respective most recent common ancestor within populations, causing discordance between the population tree and a gene tree.

Time of the MRCA

(TMRCA). Time in generations back into the past until two copies of an allele or two haplotypes shared a most recent common ancestor (MRCA). This is often an unknown parameter that can be estimated from genetic data.

Linkage disequilibrium

(LD). A nonrandom association of alleles in different loci along the same chromosome due to low recombination rate, population structure and/or selection.

S* statistic

A summary statistic based on patterns of linkage disequilibrium that can be used to detect introgressed haplotypes.

Hidden Markov model

(HMM). A statistical modelling method used to infer hidden states from observed data along an ordered sequence, in which each hidden variable is independent of all other hidden variables, conditional on knowing the state of the immediately previous hidden variable.

Archaic introgression

The introduction of genetic material into the ancestors of an extant population (for example, East Asians) from an archaic population that is currently extinct (for example, Neanderthals) via admixture.

Conditional random field

(CRF). A statistical modelling method that is similar to a hidden Markov model but that also allows contextual data (regional data not directly contiguous to a site in a sequence) to provide information about the state of a hidden variable.

Emission functions

Functions that relate the hidden variables to the observed data in the conditional random field framework.

Positive selection

Selection that favours a specific allele over others. The allele may consequently rise to high frequency or become fixed. Hitchhiking of neutral alleles tightly linked to the favoured allele leaves a known genetic footprint in the genome, sometimes allowing detection of positive selection at a particular locus.

Balancing selection

Selection that favours the maintenance of variability in a population, which can prevent any single allele from reaching fixation. Examples include frequency-dependent selection and heterozygous advantage (that is, overdominance).

Negative selection

Selection that acts to prune away deleterious variants from the genome.

Coalescent

Pertaining to coalescence: an event in the past at which two genetic lineages sampled in the present shared their most recent common ancestor at a specific locus in the genome.

Ancestral polymorphism

A present-day polymorphism that exists at a site or haplotype because more than one allele existed in the ancestor of the two populations before they diverged from each other.

Hybrid sterility

Reduced viability or fertility of offspring from a mating between individuals from populations or species that diverged a long time ago; it is often due to incompatible mutations that occurred in each daughter population after they separated from each other.

Uniquely shared sites

Sites containing high-frequency derived alleles in a particular population that are also present in a distantly related population but that are absent or at low frequencies in other populations more closely related to the first population. Such sites serve as necessary, but insufficient, evidence for adaptive introgression from the distantly related population.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3936

Further reading