Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have rapidly improved sequencing fidelity and substantially decreased sequencing error rates. However, given that there are billions of nucleotides in a human genome, even low experimental error rates yield many errors in variant calls. Erroneous variants can mimic true somatic and rare variants, thus requiring costly confirmatory experiments to minimize the number of false positives. Here, we discuss sources of experimental errors in NGS and how replicates can be used to abate such errors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Genome Biology Open Access 03 January 2022
Identification of genes related to tipburn resistance in Chinese cabbage and preliminary exploration of its molecular mechanism
BMC Plant Biology Open Access 03 December 2021
BioData Mining Open Access 23 April 2021
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $6.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
O'Rawe, J. et al. Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing. Genome Med. 5, 28 (2013).
Kircher, M., Heyn, P. & Kelso, J. Addressing challenges in the production and analysis of Illumina sequencing data. BMC Genomics 12, 382 (2011).
Metzker, M. L. Sequencing technologies — the next generation. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 31–46 (2010).
Sboner, A., Mu, X. J., Greenbaum, D., Auerbach, R. K. & Gerstein, M. B. The real cost of sequencing: higher than you think! Genome Biol. 12, 125 (2011).
Ratan, A. et al. Comparison of sequencing platforms for single nucleotide variant calls in a human sample. PLoS ONE 8, e55089 (2013).
Peters, B. A. et al. Accurate whole-genome sequencing and haplotyping from 10 to 20 human cells. Nature 487, 190–195 (2012).
Williams, C. et al. A high frequency of sequence alterations is due to formalin fixation of archival specimens. Am. J. Pathol. 155, 1467–1471 (1999).
Yost, S. E. et al. Identification of high-confidence somatic mutations in whole genome sequence of formalin-fixed breast cancer specimens. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e107 (2012).
Akbari, M., Hansen, M. D., Halgunset, J., Skorpen, F. & Krokan, H. E. Low copy number DNA template can render polymerase chain reaction error prone in a sequence-dependent manner. J. Mol. Diagn. 7, 36–39 (2005).
Lawrence, M. S. et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 499, 214–218 (2013).
Leal, S. M. Detection of genotyping errors and pseudo-SNPs via deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Genet. Epidemiol. 29, 204–214 (2005).
Walsh, P. S., Erlich, H. A. & Higuchi, R. Preferential PCR amplification of alleles: mechanisms and solutions. PCR Methods Appl. 1, 241–250 (1992).
Hutchison, C. A. 3rd, Smith, H. O., Pfannkoch, C. & Venter, J. C. Cell-free cloning using phi29 DNA polymerase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17332–17336 (2005).
Hodges, E. et al. Genome-wide in situ exon capture for selective resequencing. Nature Genet. 39, 1522–1527 (2007).
Aird, D. et al. Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries. Genome Biol. 12, R18 (2011).
Bystrykh, L. V. Generalized DNA barcode design based on Hamming codes. PLoS ONE 7, e36852 (2012).
Koboldt, D. C., Ding, L., Mardis, E. R. & Wilson, R. K. Challenges of sequencing human genomes. Brief Bioinform. 11, 484–498 (2010).
Xuan, J., Yu, Y., Qing, T., Guo, L. & Shi, L. Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: promises and challenges. Cancer Lett. 340, 284–295 (2012).
Nakamura, K. et al. Sequence-specific error profile of Illumina sequencers. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e90 (2011).
Fuller, C. W. et al. The challenges of sequencing by synthesis. Nature Biotech. 27, 1013–1023 (2009).
Roberts, R. J., Carneiro, M. O. & Schatz, M. C. The advantages of SMRT sequencing. Genome Biol. 14, 405 (2013).
Yang, X., Chockalingam, S. P. & Aluru, S. A survey of error-correction methods for next-generation sequencing. Brief Bioinform. 14, 56–66 (2013).
Lynch, M. Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 961–968 (2010).
Laurie, C. C. et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer. Nature Genet. 44, 642–650 (2012).
Schmitt, M. W. et al. Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14508–14513 (2012).
Luo, C., Tsementzi, D., Kyrpides, N., Read, T. & Konstantinidis, K. T. Direct comparisons of Illumina versus Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample. PLoS ONE 7, e30087 (2012).
DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).
Ajay, S. S., Parker, S. C., Abaan, H. O., Fajardo, K. V. & Margulies, E. H. Accurate and comprehensive sequencing of personal genomes. Genome Res. 21, 1498–1505 (2011).
Meynert, A. M., Bicknell, L. S., Hurles, M. E., Jackson, A. P. & Taylor, M. S. Quantifying single nucleotide variant detection sensitivity in exome sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 195 (2013).
Leek, J. T. et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 733–739 (2010).
Baranzini, S. E. et al. Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis. Nature 464, 1351–1356 (2010).
Reumers, J. et al. Optimized filtering reduces the error rate in detecting genomic variants by short-read sequencing. Nature Biotech. 30, 61–68 (2012).
Lam, H. Y. et al. Performance comparison of whole-genome sequencing platforms. Nature Biotech. 30, 78–82 (2012).
Jung, H., Bleazard, T., Lee, J. & Hong, D. Systematic investigation of cancer-associated somatic point mutations in SNP databases. Nature Biotech. 31, 787–789 (2013).
Drmanac, R. et al. Human genome sequencing using unchained base reads on self-assembling DNA nanoarrays. Science 327, 78–81 (2010).
Pelak, K. et al. The characterization of twenty sequenced human genomes. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001111 (2010).
Li, H., Ruan, J. & Durbin, R. Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores. Genome Res. 18, 1851–1858 (2008).
Lee, W. et al. The mutation spectrum revealed by paired genome sequences from a lung cancer patient. Nature 465, 473–477 (2010).
Ball, M. P. et al. A public resource facilitating clinical use of genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11920–11927 (2012).
Laurie, C. C. et al. Quality control and quality assurance in genotypic data for genome-wide association studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 34, 591–602 (2010).
Ye, K., Schulz, M. H., Long, Q., Apweiler, R. & Ning, Z. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics 25, 2865–2871 (2009).
Jurka, J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462–467 (2005).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
Lindgreen, S. AdapterRemoval: easy cleaning of next-generation sequencing reads. BMC Res. Notes 5, 337 (2012).
Degner, J. F. et al. Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data. Bioinformatics 25, 3207–3212 (2009).
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
Genovese, G. et al. Using population admixture to help complete maps of the human genome. Nature Genet. 45, 406–414 (2013).
Church, D. M. et al. Modernizing reference genome assemblies. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001091 (2011).
Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T. & Maglott, D. R. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D61–D65 (2007).
Rusk, N. One genome, two haplotypes. Nature Methods 8, 107 (2011).
Fan, H. C., Wang, J., Potanina, A. & Quake, S. R. Whole-genome molecular haplotyping of single cells. Nature Biotech. 29, 51–57 (2011).
Kitzman, J. O. et al. Haplotype-resolved genome sequencing of a Gujarati Indian individual. Nature Biotech. 29, 59–63 (2011).
Browning, S. R. & Browning, B. L. Haplotype phasing: existing methods and new developments. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 703–714 (2011).
Bansal, V. & Bafna, V. HapCUT: an efficient and accurate algorithm for the haplotype assembly problem. Bioinformatics 24, i153–i159 (2008).
Chen, R. et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 148, 1293–1307 (2012).
Roach, J. C. et al. Analysis of genetic inheritance in a family quartet by whole-genome sequencing. Science 328, 636–639 (2010).
Lupski, J. R. et al. Whole-genome sequencing in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1181–1191 (2010).
Chapman, S. J. & Hill, A. V. Human genetic susceptibility to infectious disease. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 175–188 (2012).
Ott, J., Kamatani, Y. & Lathrop, M. Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 465–474 (2011).
Gibson, G. Rare and common variants: twenty arguments. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 135–145 (2011).
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. Analysing biological pathways in genome-wide association studies. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 843–854 (2010).
Schloissnig, S. et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493, 45–50 (2013).
Robins, W. P., Faruque, S. M. & Mekalanos, J. J. Coupling mutagenesis and parallel deep sequencing to probe essential residues in a genome or gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E848–857 (2013).
Conrad, T. M., Lewis, N. E. & Palsson, B. O. Microbial laboratory evolution in the era of genome-scale science. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 509 (2011).
Shendure, J. et al. Accurate multiplex polony sequencing of an evolved bacterial genome. Science 309, 1728–1732 (2005).
Barrick, J. E. & Lenski, R. E. Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nature Rev. Genet. 14, 827–839 (2013).
Xu, X. et al. The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line. Nature Biotech. 29, 735–741 (2011).
Lewis, N. E. et al. Genomic landscapes of Chinese hamster ovary cell lines as revealed by the Cricetulus griseus draft genome. Nature Biotech. 31, 759–765 (2013).
Brinkrolf, K. et al. Chinese hamster genome sequenced from sorted chromosomes. Nature Biotech. 31, 694–695 (2013).
Becker, J. et al. Unraveling the Chinese hamster ovary cell line transcriptome by next-generation sequencing. J. Biotechnol. 156, 227–235 (2011).
Kildegaard, H. F., Baycin-Hizal, D., Lewis, N. E. & Betenbaugh, M. J. The emerging CHO systems biology era: harnessing the 'omics revolution for biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 1102–1107 (2013).
Furey, T. S. ChIP-seq and beyond: new and improved methodologies to detect and characterize protein–DNA interactions. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 840–852 (2012).
Meaburn, E. & Schulz, R. Next generation sequencing in epigenetics: insights and challenges. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 192–199 (2012).
Ley, T. J. et al. DNA sequencing of a cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia genome. Nature 456, 66–72 (2008).
Rios, J., Stein, E., Shendure, J., Hobbs, H. H. & Cohen, J. C. Identification by whole-genome resequencing of gene defect responsible for severe hypercholesterolemia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 4313–4318 (2010).
Schneeberger, K. et al. SHOREmap: simultaneous mapping and mutation identification by deep sequencing. Nature Methods 6, 550–551 (2009).
Cooper, G. M. & Shendure, J. Needles in stacks of needles: finding disease-causal variants in a wealth of genomic data. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 628–640 (2011).
Gonzalez-Perez, A. et al. Computational approaches to identify functional genetic variants in cancer genomes. Nature Methods 10, 723–729 (2013).
Reva, B., Antipin, Y. & Sander, C. Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e118 (2011).
Lewis, N. E. & Abdel-Haleem, A. M. The evolution of genome-scale models of cancer metabolism. Front. Physiol. 4, 237 (2013).
Ala-Korpela, M., Kangas, A. J. & Inouye, M. Genome-wide association studies and systems biology: together at last. Trends Genet. 27, 493–498 (2011).
Moreau, Y. & Tranchevent, L. C. Computational tools for prioritizing candidate genes: boosting disease gene discovery. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 523–536 (2012).
Zamft, B. M. et al. Measuring cation dependent DNA polymerase fidelity landscapes by deep sequencing. PLoS ONE 7, e43876 (2012).
Drukier, A. et al. New dark matter detectors using DNA for nanometer tracking. arXiv 1206.6809 (2012).
Hubisz, M. J., Lin, M. F., Kellis, M. & Siepel, A. Error and error mitigation in low-coverage genome assemblies. PLoS ONE 6, e17034 (2011).
Macabeo-Ong, M. et al. Effect of duration of fixation on quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses. Mod. Pathol. 15, 979–987 (2002).
Kerick, M. et al. Targeted high throughput sequencing in clinical cancer settings: formaldehyde fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, input amount and tumor heterogeneity. BMC Med. Genom. 4, 68 (2011).
Lin, M. T. et al. Quantifying the relative amount of mouse and human DNA in cancer xenografts using species-specific variation in gene length. Biotechniques 48, 211–218 (2010).
Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J. & White, T. J. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications (Academic press, 1990).
Wojdacz, T. K., Hansen, L. L. & Dobrovic, A. A new approach to primer design for the control of PCR bias in methylation studies. BMC Res. Notes 1, 54 (2008).
Kanagawa, T. Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR). J. Biosci. Bioeng. 96, 317–323 (2003).
Nagalakshmi, U. et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 320, 1344–1349 (2008).
Pont-Kingdon, G. et al. Design and analytical validation of clinical DNA sequencing assays. Arch. Pathol. Lab Med. 136, 41–46 (2012).
Gogol-Doring, A. & Chen, W. An overview of the analysis of next generation sequencing data. Methods Mol. Biol. 802, 249–257 (2012).
Whiteford, N. et al. Swift: primary data analysis for the Illumina Solexa sequencing platform. Bioinformatics 25, 2194–2199 (2009).
Loman, N. J. et al. Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nature Biotech. 30, 434–439 (2012).
Huse, S. M., Huber, J. A., Morrison, H. G., Sogin, M. L. & Welch, D. M. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biol. 8, R143 (2007).
The authors thank T. Gianoulis for her feedback and inspiration, and J. Dupuis, Professor of Biostatistics at Boston University, Massachusetts, USA, for her encouragement and feedback during the nascent stages of replicate analysis. They also thank W. Jones, Global Head of Genomic Bioinformatics, Quintiles, and E. Aronesty, author of the ea-utils FASTQ processing package, for critical review of the manuscript. Some of this work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health grant P50HG005550.
K.R. is currently under employment by Expression Analysis, a Quintiles company. G.M.C. has advisory roles in and research sponsorships from several companies that are involved in genome sequencing technology and personal genomics. For a list of G.M.C's tech transfer, advisory roles and funding sources, see http://arep.med.harvard.edu/gmc/tech.html.
Known DNA sequences that are appended to the ends of DNA fragments before sequencing for the purpose of pooling samples together to reduce cost.
- Base call
Identification of the nitrogenous base (A, G, C or T) that is added to the short read during sequencing.
- Batch effect
The statistical bias of indeterminate cause observed in samples that are processed together with the same sample preparation, the same library preparation and the same sequencing experiment.
A sequence of multiple consecutive identical nucleotides.
- Insertions and deletions
(Indels). Variants that are created by either the insertion or the deletion of nucleotides with respect to a matching reference.
The alignment of a sequencing read to an incorrect location on a reference genome. This can occur when reads align equally well to multiple genomic locations owing to indels, repeats and low-complexity regions of the genome.
- Multiple displacement amplification
(MDA). A technique that is used for amplifying DNA sequences by synthesizing DNA from random hexamer primers.
- Read clipping
Removal of adaptor and barcode sequences or of low-quality bases near read ends following sequencing.
- Sequencing errors
Errors that are seen in the base call of short reads from next-generation sequencing technology.
- Sequencing read depth
The number of reads that contributes to the variant call at a single location; also known as read depth, fold coverage and depth of coverage. It can also refer to the average read depth across the entire targeted sequence area.
- Short reads
Short sequences of nucleotide bases and their respective quality scores that are obtained through next-generation sequencing from longer target sequences.
- Somatic mosaicism
Genetic diversity among cells of a single organism.
- Substitution errors
Errors that occur when one base is substituted for another during sequencing.
- Variant call errors
An accumulation of misaligned reads or of reads with base call errors over a particular locus, which results in that locus being called a variant when it truly matches the reference, and vice versa.
About this article
Cite this article
Robasky, K., Lewis, N. & Church, G. The role of replicates for error mitigation in next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 15, 56–62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3655
This article is cited by
Journal of Biosciences (2022)
DNA High-Throughput Sequencing for Arthropod Gut Content Analysis to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Biological Control Agents
Neotropical Entomology (2022)
Genome Biology (2022)
BioData Mining (2021)
Identification of genes related to tipburn resistance in Chinese cabbage and preliminary exploration of its molecular mechanism
BMC Plant Biology (2021)