Key Points
-
The emergence and evolutionary fate of an adaptive allele depends on three broad theoretical principles: the initial frequency of the allele when it becomes favoured by selection; the strength of selection on the adaptive allele; and the effective size and demography of the population in which it arises.
-
Adaptive alleles may originate from de novo mutations at high risk of elimination by genetic drift or from previously neutral or nearly neutral alleles segregating at intermediate frequency when they become advantageous. Alternatively, adaptation may occur through subtle frequency changes in many loci controlling a trait.
-
The strength of selection on an allele depends on its cumulative effects on the target trait and on unrelated beneficial or deleterious traits. These effect sizes are determined by the trait's genetic architecture, the allele's position in its regulatory or biochemical network, environmental influences and genetic background.
-
Larger populations sample more potentially adaptive mutations and are less likely to lose adaptive alleles to genetic drift, even when selection is weak. Migration between populations in contrasting environments introduces new genetic variation that may either encourage or prevent local adaptation.
-
Recent empirical work integrating functional genetics and genomics with evolutionary biology has both conformed to and conflicted with expectations from first principles. Resolution of these discrepancies will require a deeper, more nuanced understanding of molecular and population genetic processes.
-
More poorly understood factors, such as agents and mechanisms of selection, phenotypic plasticity, gene-by-environment interactions and environmental variability, are major challenges for evolutionary biologists.
Abstract
Adaptive evolution is shaped by the interaction of population genetics, natural selection and underlying network and biochemical constraints. Variation created by mutation, the raw material for evolutionary change, is translated into phenotypes by flux through metabolic pathways and by the topography and dynamics of molecular networks. Finally, the retention of genetic variation and the efficacy of selection depend on population genetics and demographic history. Emergent high-throughput experimental methods and sequencing technologies allow us to gather more evidence and to move beyond the theory in different systems and populations. Here we review the extent to which recent evidence supports long-established theoretical principles of adaptation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duret, L. & Galtier, N. Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 10, 285–311 (2009).
Lynch, M. The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8597–8604 (2007).
Barrett, R. D. H. & Hoekstra, H. E. Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 767–780 (2011). This Review emphasizes that genetic architecture and pleiotropy can confound inferences of adaptive evolution, hence conclusive evidence that a locus is adaptive must demonstrate functional connections between genotype, phenotype and fitness.
Kawecki, T. J. et al. Experimental evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 547–560 (2012).
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory (Burgess, 1970).
Charlesworth, B. Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 195–205 (2009).
Nelson, M. R. et al. An abundance of rare functional variants in 202 drug target genes sequenced in 14,002 people. Science 337, 100–104 (2012).
Tennessen, J. A. & Akey, J. M. Parallel adaptive divergence among geographically diverse human populations. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002127 (2011).
Keinan, A. & Clark, A. G. Recent explosive human population growth has resulted in an excess of rare genetic variants. Science 336, 740–743 (2012). This theoretical analysis of expanding human populations predicts an excess of young, rare alleles that may contribute to human disease. Detection of such alleles requires very large population samples, such as the recent empirical studies reported in references 7 and 8, which correspond well to these models.
Yu, N., Jensen-Seaman, M. I., Chemnick, L., Ryder, O. & Li, W.-H. Nucleotide diversity in gorillas. Genetics 166, 1375–1383 (2004).
Pritchard, J. K., Pickrell, J. K. & Coop, G. The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr. Biol. 20, R208–R215 (2010).
Tennessen, J. A. et al. Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes. Science 337, 64–69 (2012).
Eyre-Walker, A., Keightley, P. D., Smith, N. G. C. & Gaffney, D. Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 2142–2149 (2002).
Cao, J. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nature Genet. 43, 956–963 (2011).
Karasov, T., Messer, P. W. & Petrov, D. A. Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000924 (2010).
Phifer-Rixey, M. et al. Adaptive evolution and effective population size in wild house mice. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 2949–2955 (2012).
Carneiro, M. et al. Evidence for widespread positive and purifying selection across the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1837–1849 (2012).
Andolfatto, P., Wong, K. M. & Bachtrog, D. Effective population size and the efficacy of selection on the X chromosomes of two closely related Drosophila species. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 114–128 (2011).
Maynard Smith, J. & Haigh, J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. 23, 23–35 (1974).
Haldane, J. B. S. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part II the influence of paritial self-fertilisation, inbreeding, assortative mating, and selective fertilisation on the composition of Mendelian populations, and on natural selection. Biol. Rev. 1, 158–163 (1924).
Charlesworth, B. Evolutionary rates in partially self-fertilizing species. Am. Nat. 140, 126–148 (1992).
Halligan, D. L. & Keightley, P. D. Spontaneous mutation accumulation studies in evolutionary genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 151–172 (2009).
Teshima, K. M. & Przeworski, M. Directional positive selection on an allele of arbitrary dominance. Genetics 172, 713–718 (2006).
Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer Press, 1998).
Hermisson, J. & Pennings, P. S. Soft sweeps molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169, 2335–2352 (2005).
Sella, G., Petrov, D. A., Przeworski, M. & Andolfatto, P. Pervasive natural selection in the Drosophila genome? PLoS Genet. 5, e1000495 (2009).
Ralph, P. Parallel adaptation: one or many waves of advance of an advantageous allele? Genetics 186, 647–668 (2010).
Sattath, S., Elyashiv, E., Kolodny, O., Rinott, Y. & Sella, G. Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001302 (2011).
Steiner, C. C., Weber, J. N. & Hoekstra, H. E. Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes. PLoS Biol. 5, e219 (2007).
Colosimo, P. F. et al. Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles. Science 307, 1928–1933 (2005).
Jones, F. C. et al. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484, 55–61 (2012).
Domingues, V. S., Poh, Y. P. & Peterson, B. K. Evidence of adaptation from ancestral variation in young populations of beach mice. Evolution 66, 3209–3223 (2012).
Barrett, R. D. H. & Schluter, D. Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 38–44 (2008).
Burke, M. K. et al. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature 467, 587–590 (2010).
Teotónio, H., Chelo, I. M., Bradic, M., Rose, M. R. & Long, A. D. Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation. Nature Genet. 41, 251–257 (2009).
Tennessen, J. & Akey, J. Parallel adaptive divergence among geographically diverse human populations. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002127 (2011).
Hancock, A. et al. Adaptations to climate-mediated selective pressures in humans. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001375 (2011).
Turchin, M. C. et al. Evidence of widespread selection on standing variation in Europe at height-associated SNPs. Nature Genet. 44, 1015–1019 (2012). This landmark paper reports the development of methods to test for soft selective sweeps at many loci and shows substantial natural selection on standing variation at hundreds of genes influencing human height.
Hernandez, R. D. et al. Classic selective sweeps were rare in recent human evolution. Science 331, 920–924 (2011).
Anderson, T. M. et al. Molecular and evolutionary history of melanism in North American grey wolves. Science 323, 1339–1343 (2009).
Dasmahapatra, K. K. et al. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487, 94–98 (2012).
Abi-Rached, L. et al. The shaping of modern human immune systems by multiregional admixture with archaic humans. Science 334, 89–94 (2011).
Orr, H. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52, 935–949 (1998).
Fisher, R. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford Univ. Press, 1930).
Kimura, M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713–719 (1962).
Rockman, M. V. The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution 66, 1–17 (2012).
Lanktree, M. B. et al. Meta-analysis of dense genecentric association studies reveals common and uncommon variants associated with height. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 6–18 (2011).
Loeschcke, V., Kristensen, T. N. & Norry, F. M. Consistent effects of a major QTL for thermal resistance in field-released Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect. Physiol. 57, 1227–1231 (2011).
Chan, Y. et al. Common variants show predicted polygenic effects on height in the tails of the distribution, except in extremely short individuals. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002439 (2011).
Xu, K. et al. Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature 442, 705–708 (2006).
Jin, W., Qin, P., Lou, H., Jin, L. & Xu, S. A systematic characterization of genes underlying both complex and Mendelian diseases. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 1611–1624 (2012). This analysis finds an important overlap between Mendelian and complex disease genes and shows that genes contributing to both disease categories show substantial functional differences from other loci.
Kacser, H. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97, 639–666 (1981).
Wright, K. M. & Rausher, M. D. The evolution of control and distribution of adaptive mutations in a metabolic pathway. Genetics 184, 483–502 (2010).
Tarutani, Y. et al. Trans-acting small RNA determines dominance relationships in Brassica self-incompatibility. Nature 466, 983–986 (2010).
Jenkins, D. J. & Stekel, D. J. De novo evolution of complex, global and hierarchical gene regulatory mechanisms. J. Mol. Evol. 71, 128–140 (2010).
Yu, H., Kim, P. M., Sprecher, E., Trifonov, V. & Gerstein, M. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comp. Biol. 3, e59 (2007).
Yamada, T. & Bork, P. Evolution of biomolecular networks — lessons from metabolic and protein interactions. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 791–803 (2009).
Ohta, T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246, 96–98 (1973).
Stoltzfus, A. On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 169–181 (1999).
Casals, F. et al. Genetic adaptation of the antibacterial human innate immunity network. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 202 (2011).
van Dam, T. J., Zwartkruis, F. J., Bos, J. L. & Snel, B. Evolution of the TOR pathway. J. Mol. Evol. 73, 209–220 (2011).
Luisi, P. et al. Network-level and population genetics analysis of the insulin/TOR signal transduction pathway across human populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1379–1392 (2012).
Jovelin, R. & Phillips, P. C. Expression level drives the pattern of selective constraints along the insulin/TOR signal transduction pathway in Caenorhabditis. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 715–722 (2011).
Alvarez-Ponce, D., Aguadé, M. & Rozas, J. Comparative genomics of the vertebrate insulin/TOR signal transduction pathway: a network-level analysis of selective pressures. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 87–101 (2011).
Alvarez-Ponce, D., Aguadé, M. & Rozas, J. Network-level molecular evolutionary analysis of the insulin/TOR signal transduction pathway across 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Res. 19, 234–242 (2009).
Olson-Manning, C. F., Lee, C.-R., Rausher, M. D. & Mitchell-Olds, T. Evolution of flux control in the glucosinolate pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25 Aug 2012 (doi:10.1093/molbev/mss204).
Flowers, J. M. et al. Adaptive evolution of metabolic pathways in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1347–1354 (2007).
Prasad, K. V.S. K. et al. A gain-of-function polymorphism controlling complex traits and fitness in nature. Science 337, 1081–1084 (2012).
Gilad, Y., Bustamante, C. D., Lancet, D. & Pääbo, S. Natural selection on the olfactory receptor gene family in humans and chimpanzees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 489–501 (2003).
Spady, T. C. et al. Adaptive molecular evolution in the opsin genes of rapidly speciating cichlid species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1412–1422 (2005).
Wray, G. A. The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 206–216 (2007).
Feldman, C. R., Brodie, E. D. & Pfrender, M. E. Genetic architecture of a feeding adaptation: garter snake (Thamnophis) resistance to tetrodotoxin bearing prey. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277, 3317–3325 (2010).
Albre, J. et al. Sex pheromone evolution is associated with differential regulation of the same desaturase gene in two genera of leafroller moths. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002489 (2012).
Andersen, K. et al. Genome-wide scans provide evidence for positive selection of genes implicated in Lassa fever. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 868–877 (2012).
Arnaud, N., Lawrenson, T. & Ostergaard, L. The same regulatory point mutation changed seed-dispersal structures in evolution and domestication. Curr. Biol. 21, 1215–1219 (2011).
Chan, Y. F. et al. Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327, 302–305 (2010). This study demonstrated that the parallel adaptive evolution of pelvis loss in stickleback fish occurred via repeated mutations in a tissue-specific regulatory element, which eliminated protein function in pelvic tissue while avoiding lethal pleiotropic effects of protein knockout in other tissues.
Wright, S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, cross-breeding and selection in evolution. Proc. 6th Int. Congress Genet. 1, 356–366 (1932).
Povolotskaya, I. S. & Kondrashov, F. A. Sequence space and the ongoing expansion of the protein universe. Nature 465, 922–926 (2010).
Weinreich, D. M., Watson, R. A. & Chao, L. Perspective: sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 59, 1165–1174 (2005).
Taylor, C. F. & Higgs, P. G. A population genetics model for multiple quantitative traits exhibiting pleiotropy and epistasis. J. Theor. Biol. 203, 419–437 (2000).
Lenski, R. E., Rose, M. R., Simpson, S. C. & Tadler, S. C. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli 1. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 138, 1315–1341 (1991).
Chou, H.-H., Chiu, H.-C., Delaney, N. F., Segre, D. & Marx, C. J. Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 332, 1190–1192 (2011).
Khan, A. I., Dinh, D. M., Schneider, D., Lenski, R. E. & Cooper, T. F. Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science 332, 1193–1196 (2011).
Weinreich, D. M., Delaney, N. F., DePristo, M. A. & Hartl, D. L. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312, 111–114 (2006).
Lunzer, M., Golding, G. B. & Dean, A. M. Pervasive cryptic epistasis in molecular evolution. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001162 (2010).
Ortlund, E. A., Bridgham, J. T., Redinbo, M. R. & Thornton, J. W. Crystal structure of an ancient protein: evolution by conformational epistasis. Science 317, 1544–1548 (2007).
Kryazhimskiy, S., Dushoff, J., Bazykin, G. A. & Plotkin, J. B. Prevalence of epistasis in the evolution of influenza A surface proteins. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001301 (2011).
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8, 269–294 (1966).
Charlesworth, B. The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites. Genetics 190, 5–22 (2012).
Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173, 419–434 (2006).
Dobzhansky, T. G. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process (Columbia Univ. Press, 1970).
Presgraves, D. C. Recombination enhances protein adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 15, 1651–1656 (2005).
Cutter, A. D. & Choi, J. Y. Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae. Genome Res. 20, 1103–1111 (2010).
Cutter, A. D. & Moses, A. M. Polymorphism, divergence, and the role of recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1745–1754 (2011).
Keinan, A. & Reich, D. Human population differentiation is strongly correlated with local recombination rate. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000886 (2010).
Hoffmann, A. A. & Rieseberg, L. H. Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 21–42 (2008).
Joron, M. et al. Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry. Nature 477, 203–206 (2011).
Lowry, D. B. & Willis, J. H. A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000500 (2010).
Spichtig, M. & Kawecki, T. The maintenance (or not) of polygenic variation by soft selection in heterogeneous environments. Am. Nat. 164, 70–84 (2004).
Yeaman, S. & Whitlock, M. The genetic architecture of adaptation under migration-selection balance. Evolution 65, 1897–1911 (2011).
Kawecki, T. Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 321–342 (2008).
Yanchukov, A. & Proulx, S. Invasion of gene duplication through masking for maladaptive gene flow. Evolution 66, 1543–1555 (2012).
Zhou, J., Lemos, B., Dopman, E. B. & Hartl, D. L. Copy-number variation: the balance between gene dosage and expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 1014–1024 (2011).
Yeaman, S. & Jarvis, A. Regional heterogeneity and gene flow maintain variance in a quantitative trait within populations of lodgepole pine. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1587–1593 (2006).
Yeaman, S., Chen, Y. & Whitlock, M. C. No effect of environmental heterogeneity on the maintenance of genetic variation in wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 64, 3398–3408 (2010).
Anderson, J. T. & Geber, M. A. Demographic source-sink dynamics restrict local adaptation in Elliott's blueberry (Vaccinium elliottii). Evolution 64, 370–384 (2010).
Paul, J., Sheth, S. & Angert, A. Quantifying the impact of gene flow on phenotype-environment mismatch: a demonstration with the scarlet monkeyflower Mimulus cardinalis. Am. Nat. 178, S62–S79 (2011).
Gan, X. et al. Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 477, 419–423 (2011).
Louthan, A. M. & Kay, K. M. Comparing the adaptive landscape across trait types: larger QTL effect size in traits under biotic selection. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 60 (2011).
Califano, A., Butte, A. J., Friend, S., Ideker, T. & Schadt, E. Leveraging models of cell regulation & GWAS data in integrative network-based association studies. Nature Genet. 44, 841–847 (2012).
Nielsen, R. et al. A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 3, 976–985 (2005).
Wall, J. D., Andolfatto, P. & Przeworski, M. Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 162, 203–216 (2002).
Pennings, P. S. & Hermisson, J. Soft sweeps II-Molecular population genetics of adaptation from recurrent mutation or migration. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1076–1084 (2006).
McDonald, J. H. & Kreitman, M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351, 652–654 (1991).
Fay, J. C. Weighing the evidence for adaptation at the molecular level. Trends Genet. 27, 343–349 (2011).
Segal, E. & Widom, J. From DNA sequence to transcriptional behaviour: a quantitative approach. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 443–456 (2009).
Cutter, A. D. Nucleotide polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium in wild populations of the partial selfer Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 172, 171–184 (2005).
Shapiro, J. A. et al. Adaptive genic evolution in the Drosophila genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2271–2276 (2007).
Charlesworth, J. & Eyre-Walker, A. The rate of adaptive evolution in enteric bacteria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1348–1356 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We thank J. T. Anderson, D. Lowry, P. Magwene, A. Schmid and three anonymous reviewers for helpful discussion and comments. We also acknowledge the authors of the many excellent studies that could not be included in this Review owing to space limitations. This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (award R01 GM086496 to T.M.-O.; training grant 5T32GM007754-32 to the Duke University Program in Genetics and Genomics) and the US National Science Foundation (award EF-0723447 to T.M.-O.; dissertation grant 1110445 to C.F.O.-M.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related links
Glossary
- Effective population size
-
(Ne). The size of an ideal population that would experience genetic drift at the same rate as the actual population.
- Selection coefficient
-
The proportional change in fitness owing to a mutation.
- Genetic architecture
-
Also called trait architecture, this is a summary of the allelic effects and frequencies of the genes underlying a given phenotypic trait and their emergent properties, such as epistasis, pleiotropy and modularity.
- Introgression
-
The introduction of a gene into a population or species by crossing with a different population or species.
- Major genes
-
Phenotypic differences between alleles at a locus can range from large phenotypic effects (major genes) to small effects (minor genes). A major gene at intermediate frequency will control a fairly large proportion of trait variation but would have little effect on variation when rare.
- Connectivity
-
A gene's degree of connectivity is the number of direct links to or from other genes in its network.
- Centrality
-
Sometimes referred to as 'between-ness', a gene's degree of centrality is the number of shortest paths between pairs of other genes that must pass through it.
- Pleiotropy
-
The control of multiple traits by a single locus.
- Adaptive landscape
-
A conceptual surface that describes the fitness of all possible genotypic combinations of an organism.
- Epistasis
-
Interaction between genes. The dependence of the effect of a mutation on other sites in the same gene or in other loci, resulting in non-additive effects on phenotype.
- Sign epistasis
-
Epistatic interactions for which the phenotypic effect of a mutation has a different sign in different genetic backgrounds.
- Negative epistasis
-
Epistatic interactions that lessen the magnitude of trait changes, such that combined effects of beneficial mutations are less than their individual effects.
- Background selection
-
The purging of non-deleterious alleles that are closely linked to deleterious sites.
- Mullerian mimicry
-
When two or more poisonous species mimic each other's warning signals for shared predators.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olson-Manning, C., Wagner, M. & Mitchell-Olds, T. Adaptive evolution: evaluating empirical support for theoretical predictions. Nat Rev Genet 13, 867–877 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3322
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3322
This article is cited by
-
Convergent TP53 loss and evolvability in cancer
BMC Ecology and Evolution (2023)
-
Local adaptation and future climate vulnerability in a wild rodent
Nature Communications (2023)
-
A review on microalgal growth stress parameters for sustainable biofuel production
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy (2023)
-
A second locus contributing to the differential expression of the blue sensitive opsin SWS2A in Lake Malawi cichlids
Hydrobiologia (2023)
-
Adaptation insights from comparative transcriptome analysis of two Opisthopappus species in the Taihang mountains
BMC Genomics (2022)