Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

DNA methylation profiling in the clinic: applications and challenges

Key Points

  • Alterations in epigenetic marks — specifically DNA methylation — are an emerging biomarker that may be used in the decision-making process for disease diagnosis, prognosis and treatment, most notably in cancer, but there are examples in other diseases, such as type 1 diabetes.

  • Alterations in epigenetic marks that are chosen as biomarkers must be carefully selected owing to the dynamic nature of these marks. These alterations may be detected in non-invasive tissues, such as serum, in addition to primary tissues and so may have advantages over genetic biomarkers.

  • Glutathione S-transferase pi 1 (GSTP1) is the best-studied example of an epigenetic biomarker for cancer diagnosis. However, additional candidates show a high potential for future clinical applications, although specificity of diagnosis is an issue, and combinatorial approaches analysing DNA methylation alterations at several genes may improve this.

  • Single-gene approaches have identified epigenetic biomarkers that predict cancer recurrence and survival. Recently, high-resolution genome-wide technologies have shown the potential to improve this strategy with DNA methylation signatures of cancers showing high predictive capacity of disease prognosis.

  • DNA methylation alterations may be used as biomarkers to predict response to chemotherapy strategies. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) are examples of hypermethylated genes that predict a response to chemotherapy in cancer. Additional prognostic gene markers have already been identified and suggest DNA methylation profiling as a potent strategy to predict drug response.

  • Recent advances in sequencing and array technologies, which are capable of screening DNA methylomes genome-wide at high-resolution, gave unexpected novel insights in cancer biology. They will be crucial for DNA methylation profiling and the identification of epigenetic biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of drug response.

Abstract

Knowledge of epigenetic alterations in disease is rapidly increasing owing to the development of genome-wide techniques for their identification. The ever-growing number of genes that show epigenetic alterations in disease emphasizes the crucial role of these epigenetic alterations — particularly DNA methylation — for future diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of response to therapies. This Review focuses on epigenetic profiling, which has started to be of clinical value in cancer and may in the future be extended to other diseases, such as neurological and autoimmune disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: GSTP1 and MGMT: case examples for epigenetic profiling in diagnosis and prognosis.
Figure 2: High-resolution screening of patient samples in disease diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of drug response and tumour-type identification.

References

  1. Sandoval, J. et al. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics 6, 692–702 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bibikova, M. et al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics 98, 288–295 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris, R. A. et al. Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications. Nature Biotech. 28, 1097–1105 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baylin, S. B. & Jones, P. A. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome — biological and translational implications. Nature Rev. Cancer 11, 726–734 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Esteller, M. et al. Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 1350–1354 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Esteller, M. et al. Inactivation of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene by promoter hypermethylation in human neoplasia. Cancer Res. 58, 4515–4518 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hon, G. C. et al. Global DNA hypomethylation coupled to repressive chromatin domain formation and gene silencing in breast cancer. Genome Res. 22, 246–258 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berman, B. P. et al. Regions of focal DNA hypermethylation and long-range hypomethylation in colorectal cancer coincide with nuclear lamina-associated domains. Nature Genet. 44, 40–46 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen, K. D. Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types. Nature Genet. 43, 768–775 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, P. A. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 484–492 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodríguez-Paredes, M. & Esteller, M. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nature Med. 17, 330–339 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawson, M. A. & Kouzarides, T. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell 150, 12–27 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adams, D. et al. BLUEPRINT to decode the epigenetic signature written in blood. Nature Biotech. 30, 224–226 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernstein, B. E. The NIH roadmap epigenomics mapping consortium. Nature Biotech. 28, 1045–1048 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Esteller, M. Epigenetics in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 1148–1159 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Esteller, M. Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer: the DNA hypermethylome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, R50–R59 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Esteller, M., Corn, P. G., Baylin, S. B. & Herman, J. G. A gene hypermethylation profile of human cancer. Cancer Res. 61, 3225–3229 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Javierre, B. M. et al. Changes in the pattern of DNA methylation associate with twin discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Genome Res. 20, 170–179 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Volkmar, M. et al. DNA methylation profiling identifies epigenetic dysregulation in pancreatic islets from type 2 diabetic patients. EMBO J. 31, 1405–1426 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernandez, A. F. et al. A DNA methylation fingerprint of 1628 human samples. Genome Res. 22, 407–419 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahlquist, D. A. et al. Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas. Gastroenterology 142, 248–256; quiz e25–e26 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawakami, K. et al. Long interspersed nuclear element-1 hypomethylation is a potential biomarker for the prediction of response to oral fluoropyrimidines in microsatellite stable and CpG island methylator phenotype-negative colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 102, 166–174 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cui, H. et al. Loss of imprinting in colorectal cancer linked to hypomethylation of H19 and IGF2. Cancer Res. 62, 6442–6446 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ito, Y. et al. Somatically acquired hypomethylation of IGF2 in breast and colorectal cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 2633–2643 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Maxwell, A., McCudden, C. R., Wians, F. & Willis, M. S. Recent advances in the detection of prostate cancer using epigenetic markers in commonly collected laboratory samples. Lab. Med. 40, 171–178 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Feinberg, A. P. Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease. Nature 447, 433–440 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berdasco, M. & Esteller, M. Aberrant epigenetic landscape in cancer: how cellular identity goes awry. Dev. Cell 19, 698–711 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, W. H. et al. Cytidine methylation of regulatory sequences near the pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene accompanies human prostatic carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 11733–11737 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yegnasubramanian, S. et al. Hypermethylation of CpG islands in primary and metastatic human prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 64, 1975–1986 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jerónimo, C. et al. Quantitation of GSTP1 methylation in non-neoplastic prostatic tissue and organ-confined prostate adenocarcinoma. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 93, 1747–1752 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bastian, P. J. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic information in prostate cancer with the help of a small set of hypermethylated gene loci. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 4097–4106 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Padar, A. et al. Inactivation of cyclin D2 gene in prostate cancers by aberrant promoter methylation. Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 4730–4734 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Neste, L. et al. The epigenetic promise for prostate cancer diagnosis. Prostate 72, 1248–1261 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nakayama, M. et al. Hypermethylation of the human glutathione S-transferase-π gene (GSTP1) CpG island is present in a subset of proliferative inflammatory atrophy lesions but not in normal or hyperplastic epithelium of the prostate: a detailed study using laser-capture microdissection. Am. J. Pathol. 163, 923–933 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Goessl, C. et al. Fluorescent methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA-based detection of prostate cancer in bodily fluids. Cancer Res. 60, 5941–5945 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Reibenwein, J. et al. Promoter hypermethylation of GSTP1, AR, and 14-3-3σ in serum of prostate cancer patients and its clinical relevance. Prostate 67, 427–432 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ellinger, J. et al. CpG island hypermethylation in cell-free serum DNA identifies patients with localized prostate cancer. Prostate 68, 42–49 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sunami, E. et al. Multimarker circulating DNA assay for assessing blood of prostate cancer patients. Clin. Chem. 55, 559–567 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gonzalgo, M. L., Pavlovich, C. P., Lee, S. M. & Nelson, W. G. Prostate cancer detection by GSTP1 methylation analysis of postbiopsy urine specimens. Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 2673–2677 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cairns, P. et al. Molecular detection of prostate cancer in urine by GSTP1 hypermethylation. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 2727–2730 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goessl, C. et al. DNA-based detection of prostate cancer in urine after prostatic massage. Urology 58, 335–338 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoque, M. O. et al. Quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction gene patterns in urine sediment distinguish prostate cancer patients from control subjects. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 6569–6575 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rogers, C. G. et al. High concordance of gene methylation in post-digital rectal examination and post-biopsy urine samples for prostate cancer detection. J. Urol. 176, 2280–2284 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu, T. et al. Measurement of GSTP1 promoter methylation in body fluids may complement PSA screening: a meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 105, 65–73 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ellinger, J. et al. CpG island hypermethylation at multiple gene sites in diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Urology 71, 161–167 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee, B. B. et al. Aberrant methylation of APC, MGMT, RASSF2A, and Wif-1 genes in plasma as a biomarker for early detection of colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 6185–6191 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lofton-Day, C. DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin. Chem. 54, 414–423 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Warren, J. D. et al. Septin 9 methylated DNA is a sensitive and specific blood test for colorectal cancer. BMC Med. 9, 133 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Glockner, S. C. Methylation of TFPI2 in stool DNA: a potential novel biomarker for the detection of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 69, 4691–4699 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Balan´a, C. et al. Tumour and serum MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression in glioblastoma patients. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 13, 677–685 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Esteller, M. et al. Detection of aberrant promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in serum DNA from non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Res. 59, 67–70 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rosas, S. L. et al. Promoter hypermethylation patterns of p16, O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase, and death-associated protein kinase in tumors and saliva of head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Res. 61, 939–942 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Guerrero-Preston, R. et al. NID2 and HOXA9 promoter hypermethylation as biomarkers for prevention and early detection in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma tissues and saliva. Cancer Prev. Res. 4, 1061–1072 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Portela, A. & Esteller, M. Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nature Biotech. 28, 1057–1068 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Fraga, M. F. et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10604–10609 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Rakyan, V. K. et al. Identification of type 1 diabetes-associated DNA methylation variable positions that precede disease diagnosis. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002300 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Goate, A. & Hardy, J. Twenty years of Alzheimer's disease-causing mutations. J. Neurochem. 120 (Suppl. 1), 3–8 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mastroeni, D., McKee, A., Grover, A., Rogers, J. & Coleman, P. D. Epigenetic differences in cortical neurons from a pair of monozygotic twins discordant for Alzheimer's disease. PLoS ONE 4, e6617 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Heyn, H. et al. Distinct DNA methylomes of newborns and centenarians. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10522–10527 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Brock, M. V. DNA methylation markers and early recurrence in stage I lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 1118–1128 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Graff, J. R., Gabrielson, E., Fujii, H., Baylin, S. B. & Herman, J. G. Methylation patterns of the E-cadherin 5′ CpG island are unstable and reflect the dynamic, heterogeneous loss of E-cadherin expression during metastatic progression. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2727–2732 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Carmona, F. J. et al. Epigenetic disruption of cadherin-11 in human cancer metastasis. J. Pathol. 26 Jul 2012 (doi:10.1002/path.4011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lujambio, A. et al. A microRNA DNA methylation signature for human cancer metastasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13556–13561 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Milani, L. et al. DNA methylation for subtype classification and prediction of treatment outcome in patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 115, 1214–1225 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hinoue, T. et al. Genome-scale analysis of aberrant DNA methylation in colorectal cancer. Genome Res. 22, 271–281 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhuang, J. et al. The dynamics and prognostic potential of DNA methylation changes at stem cell gene loci in women's cancer. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002517 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Dedeurwaerder, S. et al. DNA methylation profiling reveals a predominant immune component in breast cancers. EMBO Mol. Med. 3, 726–741 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Fang, F. et al. Breast cancer methylomes establish an epigenomic foundation for metastasis. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 75ra25 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Noushmehr, H. et al. Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 17, 510–522 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Turcan, S. et al. IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype. Nature 483, 479–483 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hegi, M. E. et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 997–1003 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Esteller, M., Hamilton, S. R., Burger, P. C., Baylin, S. B. & Herman, J. G. Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Res. 59, 793–797 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Stupp, R. et al. Phase I/IIa study of cilengitide and temozolomide with concomitant radiotherapy followed by cilengitide and temozolomide maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 2712–2718 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Esteller, M. et al. Hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 94, 26–32 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Chakravarti, A. et al. Temozolomide-mediated radiation enhancement in glioblastoma: a report on underlying mechanisms. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 4738–4746 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. King, M.-C., Marks, J. H. & Mandell, J. B. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302, 643–646 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Esteller, M. et al. Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 92, 564–569 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Stefansson, O. A. et al. CpG island hypermethylation of BRCA1 and loss of pRb as co-occurring events in basal/triple-negative breast cancer. Epigenetics 6, 638–649 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Silver, D. P. et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant cisplatin in triple-negative breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 1145–1153 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Fong, P. C. et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 123–134 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Veeck, J. et al. BRCA1 CpG island hypermethylation predicts sensitivity to poly(adenosine diphosphate)-ribose polymerase inhibitors. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, e563–e564; author reply e565–e566 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Frommer, M. et al. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1827–1831 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Lister, R. et al. Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell 133, 523–536 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Lister, R. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 462, 315–322 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Laurent, L. et al. Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. Genome Res. 20, 320–331 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Lister, R. et al. Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471, 68–73 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Li, Y. et al. The DNA methylome of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000533 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Meissner, A. et al. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 5868–5877 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Bernstein, B. E. et al. The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium. Nature Biotech. 28, 1045–1048 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Bock, C. et al. Reference maps of human ES and iPS cell variation enable high-throughput characterization of pluripotent cell lines. Cell 144, 439–452 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Irizarry, R. A. et al. Comprehensive high-throughput arrays for relative methylation (CHARM). Genome Res. 18, 780–790 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Irizarry, R. A. et al. The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nature Genet. 41, 178–186 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Kim, K. et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 467, 285–290 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Kim, K. et al. Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotech. 29, 1117–1119 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Doi, A. Differential methylation of tissue- and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts. Nature Genet. 41, 1350–1353 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. McDonald, O. G., Wu, H., Timp, W., Doi, A. & Feinberg, A. P. Genome-scale epigenetic reprogramming during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 867–874 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Serre, D., Lee, B. H. & Ting, A. H. MBD-isolated genome sequencing provides a high-throughput and comprehensive survey of DNA methylation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 391–399 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Taylor, B. S. et al. Frequent alterations and epigenetic silencing of differentiation pathway genes in structurally rearranged liposarcomas. Cancer Disc. 1, 587–597 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Down, T. A. et al. A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nature Biotech. 26, 779–785 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Jacinto, F. V., Ballestar, E. & Esteller, M. Methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP): hunting down the DNA methylome. BioTechniques 44, 35–43 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Feber, A. et al. Comparative methylome analysis of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Genome Res. 21, 515–524 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Ball, M. P. et al. Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nature Biotech. 27, 361–368 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Maunakea, A. K. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 466, 253–257 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Dedeurwaerder, S. et al. Evaluation of the Infinium Methylation 450K technology. Epigenomics 3, 771–784 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Tost, J., Schatz, P., Schuster, M., Berlin, K. & Gut, I. G. Analysis and accurate quantification of CpG methylation by MALDI mass spectrometry. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e50 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Cocklin, R. R. & Wang, M. Identification of methylation and acetylation sites on mouse histone H3 using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight and nanoelectrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Protein Chem. 22, 327–334 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Ehrich, M. et al. Quantitative high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation patterns by base-specific cleavage and mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15785–15790 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Schatz, P., Dietrich, D. & Schuster, M. Rapid analysis of CpG methylation patterns using RNase T1 cleavage and MALDI-TOF. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e167 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Kelly, T. K., De Carvalho, D. D. & Jones, P. A. Epigenetic modifications as therapeutic targets. Nature Biotech. 28, 1069–1078 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Yoo, C. B. et al. Delivery of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine to cells using oligodeoxynucleotides. Cancer Res. 67, 6400–6408 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Kelly, W. K. et al. Phase I study of an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, in patients with advanced cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 3923–3931 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Duvic, M. et al. Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Blood 109, 31–39 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Garcia-Manero, G. et al. Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 111, 1060–1066 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Whittaker, S. J. et al. Final results from a multicenter, international, pivotal study of romidepsin in refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 4485–4491 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Filippakopoulos, P. et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature 468, 1067–1073 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Dawson, M. A. et al. Inhibition of BET recruitment to chromatin as an effective treatment for MLL-fusion leukaemia. Nature 478, 529–533 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Bernt, K. M. et al. MLL-rearranged leukemia is dependent on aberrant H3K79 methylation by DOT1L. Cancer Cell 20, 66–78 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Krivtsov, A. V. et al. H3K79 methylation profiles define murine and human MLL-AF4 leukemias. Cancer Cell 14, 355–368 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Daigle, S. R. Selective killing of mixed lineage leukemia cells by a potent small-molecule DOT1L inhibitor. Cancer Cell 20, 53–65 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Chekhun, V. F. et al. Role of DNA hypomethylation in the development of the resistance to doxorubicin in human MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 231, 87–93 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Soengas, M. S. et al. Inactivation of the apoptosis effector Apaf-1 in malignant melanoma. Nature 409, 207–211 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Iorns, E. et al. Identification of CDK10 as an important determinant of resistance to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Cancer Cell 13, 91–104 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Toyota, M. et al. Epigenetic inactivation of CHFR in human tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7818–7823 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Fan, M. et al. Diverse gene expression and DNA methylation profiles correlate with differential adaptation of breast cancer cells to the antiestrogens tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Cancer Res. 66, 11954–11966 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Taniguchi, T. et al. Disruption of the Fanconi anemia-BRCA pathway in cisplatin-sensitive ovarian tumors. Nature Med. 9, 568–574 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Dejeux, E. et al. DNA methylation profiling in doxorubicin treated primary locally advanced breast tumours identifies novel genes associated with survival and treatment response. Mol. Cancer 9, 68 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Ibanez de Caceres, I. et al. IGFBP-3 hypermethylation-derived deficiency mediates cisplatin resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene 29, 1681–1690 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Strathdee, G., MacKean, M. J., Illand, M. & Brown, R. A role for methylation of the hMLH1 promoter in loss of hMLH1 expression and drug resistance in ovarian cancer. Oncogene 18, 2335–2341 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Faller, W. J. et al. Metallothionein 1E is methylated in malignant melanoma and increases sensitivity to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Melanoma Res. 20, 392–400 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Maier, S. et al. DNA-methylation of the homeodomain transcription factor PITX2 reliably predicts risk of distant disease recurrence in tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer patients—technical and clinical validation in a multi-centre setting in collaboration with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PathoBiology group. Eur. J. Cancer 43, 1679–1686 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Syed, N. et al. Polo-like kinase Plk2 is an epigenetic determinant of chemosensitivity and clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 71, 3317–3327 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Lee, J.-H. et al. Epigenetic alteration of PRKCDBP in colorectal cancers and its implication in tumor cell resistance to TNFα-induced apoptosis. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 7551–7562 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Ramirez, J. L. et al. 14-3-3σ methylation in pretreatment serum circulating DNA of cisplatin-plus-gemcitabine-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients predicts survival: the Spanish Lung Cancer Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 9105–9112 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Ferreri, A. J. M. et al. Aberrant methylation in the promoter region of the reduced folate carrier gene is a potential mechanism of resistance to methotrexate in primary central nervous system lymphomas. Br. J. Haematol. 126, 657–664 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Tessema, M. et al. SULF2 methylation is prognostic for lung cancer survival and increases sensitivity to topoisomerase-I inhibitors via induction of ISG15. Oncogene 12 Dec 2011 (doi:10.1038/onc.2011.577).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Ebert, M. P. A. et al. TFAP2E-DKK4 and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 44–53 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Ai, L. et al. The transglutaminase 2 gene (TGM2), a potential molecular marker for chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity, is epigenetically silenced in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 29, 510–518 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Shen, L. et al. Drug sensitivity prediction by CpG island methylation profile in the NCI-60 cancer cell line panel. Cancer Res. 67, 11335–11343 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Agrelo, R. et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the premature aging Werner syndrome gene in human cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8822–8827 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Sabatino, M. A. et al. Down-regulation of the nucleotide excision repair gene XPG as a new mechanism of drug resistance in human and murine cancer cells. Mol. Cancer 9, 259 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are supported by the European Research Council Advanced Grant EPINORC under the agreement no. 268626, the MICINN Project–SAF2011-22803, the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) by the grant HEALTH-F5-2011-282510- BLUEPRINT, Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias Grant PI08-1345, the Dr. Josef Steiner Cancer Research Foundation Award, Botin Foundation, Cellex Foundation and the Health Department of the Catalan Government (Generalitat de Catalunya). M.E. is an Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA) Research Professor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manel Esteller.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

Group's homepage

BLUEPRINT project

Computational Epigenetics

CURELUNG project

Epigenomics at UCL

International Human Epigenome Consortium

Roadmap Epigenomics Project

Glossary

CpG islands

CpG-rich regions of DNA that are often associated with the transcription start sites of genes and that are also found in gene bodies and intergenic regions.

Personalized medicine

Therapeutic decisions based on genetic and epigenetic information of individual patients

Prostate-specific antigen

(PSA). A serine protease of the kallikrein gene family that is secreted into seminal fluid by prostatic epithelial cells and is found in the serum. As it is almost exclusively a product of prostate cells, measurement in blood has proved to be useful as a tumour marker for diagnosis of prostate cancer and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyn, H., Esteller, M. DNA methylation profiling in the clinic: applications and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 13, 679–692 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3270

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3270

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing