The integration of transcriptomic, genetic, genomic, epigenetic and network interaction data is crucial for a unified view of biological processes and to advance our understanding of human disease and biology.
The genome sequence is a scaffold on which known annotations and experimental data can be assembled. It is useful to view these different levels of information together on a genome browser.
Data integration can be used to identify functional elements in the genome, explore the function of genetic variation and improve understanding of gene regulation.
Given large multidimensional data sets with minimal parameters, unsupervised learning techniques can be used to identify frequently occurring patterns in the data and therefore to suggest hypotheses.
Carefully designed computational experiments for supervised integration can be used to test hypotheses on a global scale. Other supervised approaches, such as Bayesian networks, can also generate hypotheses of function.
There are a range of online and stand-alone tools available to bench scientists for tackling large-scale data sets.
Several analytical hurdles remain, which are being addressed by bioinformaticians.
Integrating results from diverse experiments is an essential process in our effort to understand the logic of complex systems, such as development, homeostasis and responses to the environment. With the advent of high-throughput methods — including genome-wide association (GWA) studies, chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP–seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA–seq) — acquisition of genome-scale data has never been easier. Epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and genomics each provide an insightful, and yet one-dimensional, view of genome function; integrative analysis promises a unified, global view. However, the large amount of information and diverse technology platforms pose multiple challenges for data access and processing. This Review discusses emerging issues and strategies related to data integration in the era of next-generation genomics.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
Journal of Gastroenterology Open Access 25 June 2022
Scientific Reports Open Access 10 June 2022
SPEAQeasy: a scalable pipeline for expression analysis and quantification for R/bioconductor-powered RNA-seq analyses
BMC Bioinformatics Open Access 01 May 2021
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Licatalosi, D. D. & Darnell, R. B. RNA processing and its regulation: global insights into biological networks. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 75–87 (2010).
Wang, Z., Gerstein, M. & Snyder, M. RNA–Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 57–63 (2009).
Farnham, P. J. Insights from genomic profiling of transcription factors. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 605–616 (2009).
Park, P. J. ChIP–seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 669–680 (2009).
Metzker, M. L. Sequencing technologies — the next generation. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 31–46 (2010).
Laird, P. W. Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 191–203 (2010).
Beyer, A., Bandyopadhyay, S. & Ideker, T. Integrating physical and genetic maps: from genomes to interaction networks. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 699–710 (2007).
Frazer, K. A. et al. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449, 851–861 (2007).
Ng, S. B. et al. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature 461, 272–276 (2009).
Turner, E. H., Lee, C., Ng, S. B., Nickerson, D. A. & Shendure, J. Massively parallel exon capture and library-free resequencing across 16 genomes. Nature Methods 6, 315–316 (2009).
Chiang, D. Y. et al. High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing. Nature Methods 6, 99–103 (2009).
Alkan, C. et al. Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nature Genet. 41, 1061–1067 (2009).
Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L. & Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA–Seq. Nature Methods 5, 621–628 (2008).
Maher, C. A. et al. Transcriptome sequencing to detect gene fusions in cancer. Nature 458, 97–101 (2009).
Gingeras, T. R. Post-transcriptional processing generates a diversity of 5′-modified long and short RNAs. Nature 457, 1028–1032 (2009).
Guttman, M. et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458, 223–227 (2009). This study demonstrates the integration of epigenetic data with the human genome to annotate novel RNAs.
Core, L. J., Waterfall, J. J. & Lis, J. T. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 322, 1845–1848 (2008).
Bernstein, B. E., Meissner, A. & Lander, E. S. The mammalian epigenome. Cell 128, 669–681 (2007).
Goldberg, A. D., Allis, C. D. & Bernstein, E. Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell 128, 635–638 (2007).
Jones, P. A. & Baylin, S. B. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell 128, 683–692 (2007).
Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128, 693–705 (2007).
Li, E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 662–673 (2002).
Ren, B. et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290, 2306–2309 (2000).
Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein–DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).
Lister, R. et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 462, 315–322 (2009). In addition to providing the first human methylomes, this study conducts an integrative analysis of DNA methylation, histone modifications and RNA–seq.
Cokus, S. J. et al. Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452, 215–219 (2008).
Lister, R. et al. Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell 133, 523–536 (2008).
Meissner, A. et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454, 766–770 (2008).
Pomraning, K. R., Smith, K. M. & Freitag, M. Genome-wide high throughput analysis of DNA methylation in eukaryotes. Methods 47, 142–150 (2009).
Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823–837 (2007).
Wang, Z. et al. Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nature Genet. 40, 897–903 (2008).
Crawford, G. E. et al. DNase-chip: a high-resolution method to identify DNase I hypersensitive sites using tiled microarrays. Nature Methods 3, 503–509 (2006).
Boyle, A. P. et al. High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132, 311–322 (2008).
Sabo, P. J. et al. Genome-scale mapping of DNase I sensitivity in vivo using tiling DNA microarrays. Nature Methods 3, 511–518 (2006).
Dorschner, M. O. et al. High-throughput localization of functional elements by quantitative chromatin profiling. Nature Methods 1, 219–225 (2004).
Hesselberth, J. R. et al. Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nature Methods 6, 283–289 (2009).
Chi, S. W., Zang, J. B., Mele, A. & Darnell, R. B. Argonaute HITS-CLIP decodes microRNA–mRNA interaction maps. Nature 460, 479–486 (2009).
Walhout, A. J. & Vidal, M. Protein interaction maps for model organisms. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 55–62 (2001).
Hutchins, J. R. et al. Systematic analysis of human protein complexes identifies chromosome segregation proteins. Science 328, 593–599 (2010).
Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nature Genet. 38, 1348–1354 (2006).
Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299–1309 (2006).
Fullwood, M. J. & Ruan, Y. ChIP-based methods for the identification of long-range chromatin interactions. J. Cell. Biochem. 107, 30–39 (2009).
Vassetzky, Y. et al. Chromosome conformation capture (from 3C to 5C) and its ChIP-based modification. Methods Mol. Biol. 567, 171–188 (2009).
Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
Fullwood, M. J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-α-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462, 58–64 (2009).
Duan, Z. et al. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature 465, 363–367 (2010).
Gobeil, S., Zhu, X., Doillon, C. J. & Green, M. R. A genome-wide shRNA screen identifies GAS1 as a novel melanoma metastasis suppressor gene. Genes Dev. 22, 2932–2940 (2008).
Gazin, C., Wajapeyee, N., Gobeil, S., Virbasius, C. M. & Green, M. R. An elaborate pathway required for Ras-mediated epigenetic silencing. Nature 449, 1073–1077 (2007).
Bric, A. et al. Functional identification of tumor-suppressor genes through an in vivo RNA interference screen in a mouse lymphoma model. Cancer Cell 16, 324–335 (2009).
Meacham, C. E., Ho, E. E., Dubrovsky, E., Gertler, F. B. & Hemann, M. T. In vivo RNAi screening identifies regulators of actin dynamics as key determinants of lymphoma progression. Nature Genet. 41, 1133–1137 (2009).
Luo, J. et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies multiple synthetic lethal interactions with the Ras oncogene. Cell 137, 835–848 (2009).
Zender, L. et al. An oncogenomics-based in vivo RNAi screen identifies tumor suppressors in liver cancer. Cell 135, 852–864 (2008).
Schuldiner, M. et al. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123, 507–519 (2005).
Roguev, A., Wiren, M., Weissman, J. S. & Krogan, N. J. High-throughput genetic interaction mapping in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature Methods 4, 861–866 (2007).
Hannum, G. et al. Genome-wide association data reveal a global map of genetic interactions among protein complexes. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000782 (2009).
Heintzman, N. D. et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nature Genet. 39, 311–318 (2007).
Heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108–112 (2009).
Kim, T. H. et al. A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. Nature 436, 876–880 (2005).
Kim, T. H. et al. Analysis of the vertebrate insulator protein CTCF-binding sites in the human genome. Cell 128, 1231–1245 (2007).
Hartman, S. E. et al. Global changes in STAT target selection and transcription regulation upon interferon treatments. Genes Dev. 19, 2953–2968 (2005).
Robertson, G. et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nature Methods 4, 651–657 (2007).
Visel, A. et al. ChIP–seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854–858 (2009).
O'Geen, H. et al. Genome-wide analysis of KAP1 binding suggests autoregulation of KRAB-ZNFs. PLoS Genet. 3, e89 (2007).
Lee, T. I. et al. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 301–313 (2006).
McCarthy, M. I. et al. Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 356–369 (2008).
Marks, H. et al. High-resolution analysis of epigenetic changes associated with X inactivation. Genome Res. 19, 1361–1373 (2009).
Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553–560 (2007).
Pomerantz, M. M. et al. The 8q24 cancer risk variant rs6983267 shows long-range interaction with MYC in colorectal cancer. Nature Genet. 41, 882–884 (2009).
Wright, J. B., Brown, S. J. & Cole, M. D. Upregulation of c-MYC in cis through a large chromatin loop linked to a cancer risk-associated single-nucleotide polymorphism in colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 1411–1420 (2010).
Tuupanen, S. et al. The common colorectal cancer predisposition SNP rs6983267 at chromosome 8q24 confers potential to enhanced Wnt signaling. Nature Genet. 41, 885–890 (2009).
Kasowski, M. et al. Variation in transcription factor binding among humans. Science 328, 232–235 (2010). This study shows that individual binding variability for RNAPII and NF-κB is linked to SNPs and structural variants that alter individual gene expression levels. The binding data enables functional annotation of regulatory SNPs.
Gaulton, K. J. et al. A map of open chromatin in human pancreatic islets. Nature Genet. 42, 255–259 (2010). These authors used open chromatin maps to recover a type 2 diabetes-associated SNP in the intron of transcription factor 7-like 2 ( TCF7L2 ). Functional assays confirmed its role in enhancer activity.
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based Analysis of ChIP–Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Degner, J. F. et al. Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data. Bioinformatics 25, 3207–3212 (2009).
Maynard, N. D., Chen, J., Stuart, R. K., Fan, J. B. & Ren, B. Genome-wide mapping of allele-specific protein–DNA interactions in human cells. Nature Methods 5, 307–309 (2008).
McDaniell, R. et al. Heritable individual-specific and allele-specific chromatin signatures in humans. Science 328, 235–239 (2010). This study shows that nucleotide sequences in human regulatory elements are variable, which suggests that these elements may contain regulatory SNPs.
Hellman, A. & Chess, A. Gene body-specific methylation on the active X chromosome. Science 315, 1141–1143 (2007).
Edwards, C. A. & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. Mechanisms regulating imprinted genes in clusters. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 281–289 (2007).
Marson, A. et al. Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 134, 521–533 (2008).
Pandey, R. R. et al. Kcnq1ot1 antisense noncoding RNA mediates lineage-specific transcriptional silencing through chromatin-level regulation. Mol. Cell 32, 232–246 (2008).
Nagano, T. et al. The Air noncoding RNA epigenetically silences transcription by targeting G9a to chromatin. Science 322, 1717–1720 (2008).
Khalil, A. M. et al. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11667–11672 (2009).
Kolasinska-Zwierz, P. et al. Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3. Nature Genet. 41, 376–381 (2009).
Andersson, R., Enroth, S., Rada-Iglesias, A., Wadelius, C. & Komorowski, J. Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications. Genome Res. 19, 1732–1741 (2009).
Schwartz, S., Meshorer, E. & Ast, G. Chromatin organization marks exon–intron structure. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 990–995 (2009).
Luco, R. F. et al. Regulation of alternative splicing by histone modifications. Science 327, 996–1000 (2010).
Spies, N., Nielsen, C. B., Padgett, R. A. & Burge, C. B. Biased chromatin signatures around polyadenylation sites and exons. Mol. Cell 36, 245–254 (2009).
Hon, G., Wang, W. & Ren, B. Discovery and annotation of functional chromatin signatures in the human genome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000566 (2009).
Schubeler, D. et al. The histone modification pattern of active genes revealed through genome-wide chromatin analysis of a higher eukaryote. Genes Dev. 18, 1263–1271 (2004).
Licatalosi, D. D. et al. HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing. Nature 456, 464–469 (2008).
Shiraki, T. et al. Cap analysis gene expression for high-throughput analysis of transcriptional starting point and identification of promoter usage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15776–15781 (2003).
Shumaker, D. K. et al. Mutant nuclear lamin A leads to progressive alterations of epigenetic control in premature aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8703–8708 (2006).
Zeng, W. et al. Specific loss of histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation and HP1γ/cohesin binding at D4Z4 repeats is associated with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). PLoS Genet. 5, e1000559 (2009).
Chen, X. et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106–1117 (2008).
Kharchenko, P. V., Tolstorukov, M. Y. & Park, P. J. Design and analysis of ChIP–seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins. Nature Biotech. 26, 1351–1359 (2008).
Schones, D. E. et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132, 887–898 (2008).
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O. & Botstein, D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14863–14868 (1998).
Hon, G., Ren, B. & Wang, W. ChromaSig: a probabilistic approach to finding common chromatin signatures in the human genome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000201 (2008).
Spirin, V. & Mirny, L. A. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12123–12128 (2003).
Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454, 49–55 (2008).
Hawkins, R. D. et al. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 479–491 (2010).
Rosenbloom, K. R. et al. ENCODE whole-genome data in the UCSC Genome Browser. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D620–D625 (2010).
Kent, W. J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996–1006 (2002).
Ashburner, M. et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Oberdoerffer, S. et al. Regulation of CD45 alternative splicing by heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein, hnRNPLL. Science 321, 686–691 (2008).
Needham, C. J., Bradford, J. R., Bulpitt, A. J. & Westhead, D. R. Inference in Bayesian networks. Nature Biotech. 24, 51–53 (2006).
van Steensel, B. et al. Bayesian network analysis of targeting interactions in chromatin. Genome Res. 20, 190–200 (2010). This is an excellent example of using supervised integration with a Bayesian network to predict interactions among chromatin-associated proteins, then validating the findings experimentally.
Yu, H., Zhu, S., Zhou, B., Xue, H. & Han, J. D. Inferring causal relationships among different histone modifications and gene expression. Genome Res. 18, 1314–1324 (2008).
Jansen, R. et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein–protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302, 449–453 (2003).
Taylor, J., Schenck, I., Blankenberg, D. & Nekrutenko, A. Using Galaxy to perform large-scale interactive data analyses. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics Chapter 10, Unit 10.5 (2007).
Blankenberg, D. et al. A framework for collaborative analysis of ENCODE data: making large-scale analyses biologist-friendly. Genome Res. 17, 960–964 (2007).
Ji, H. et al. An integrated software system for analyzing ChIP–chip and ChIP–seq data. Nature Biotech. 26, 1293–1300 (2008).
Taslim, C. et al. Comparative study on ChIP–seq data: normalization and binding pattern characterization. Bioinformatics 25, 2334–2340 (2009).
Celniker, S. E. et al. Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 459, 927–930 (2009).
Collins, S. R. et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446, 806–810 (2007).
Jaschek, R. & Tanay, A. Spatial clustering of multivariate genomic and epigenomic information. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 5541, 170–183 (2009).
Dennis, G. Jr et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 4, P3 (2003).
Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
Lupien, M. et al. FoxA1 translates epigenetic signatures into enhancer-driven lineage-specific transcription. Cell 132, 958–970 (2008).
Roh, T. Y., Cuddapah, S. & Zhao, K. Active chromatin domains are defined by acetylation islands revealed by genome-wide mapping. Genes Dev. 19, 542–552 (2005).
Roh, T. Y., Wei, G., Farrell, C. M. & Zhao, K. Genome-wide prediction of conserved and nonconserved enhancers by histone acetylation patterns. Genome Res. 17, 74–81 (2007).
We apologize to those authors whose work we were unable to reference owing to limitations of space. R.D.H is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the American Cancer Society. We acknowledge generous funding from the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, the US National Institutes of Health, the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this Review.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Next-generation sequencing
Here, we define this as the use of established sequencing platforms, including the Illumina/Solexa Genome Analyzer, Roche/454 Genome Sequencer and Applied Biosystems SOLiD platforms, as well as newer platforms, such as the Helicos and Pacific Biosciences platforms.
- Reduced representation bisulphite sequencing
This technique cuts genomic DNA with restriction enzymes to enrich for CG-rich regions, which are then converted through bisulphite treatment and sequenced with next-generation sequencing. Bisulphite treatment converts unmethylated C to uracil — which appears as T in sequencing reads — while leaving methylated C intact.
Methylated DNA is immunoprecipitated with an antibody against methylated cytosine and then sequenced by next-generation sequencing.
(Also known as bisulphite conversion followed by sequencing (BS–seq).) Methylated DNA is identified by shotgun sequencing of bisulphite-converted DNA.
- Sequence capture
This uses oligonucleotide microarrays or oligonucleotide-coupled beads to select for regions of the genome, such as all exons (exome sequencing) for targeted sequencing.
- RNA sequencing
(RNA–seq.) RNA isolated from cells are sequenced by next-generation sequencing after conversion to cDNA.
- Nuclear run-on
An assay that directly measures the transcriptional activity of a gene by incorporation of labelled UTP into its mRNA.
Small, highly conserved basic proteins, found in the chromatin of all eukaryotic cells, which associate with DNA to form a nucleosome. The amino-terminal tails of histones are subject to various post-translational modifications.
- Chromatin immunoprecipitation
A technique used to identify potential regulatory sequences by isolating soluble DNA chromatin extracts (complexes of DNA and protein) using antibodies that recognize specific DNA-binding proteins.
- DNase I hypersensitivity site footprinting
An assay that identifies regions of the genome that lack nucleosome structure and are therefore readily degraded by the enzyme DNase I. Such regions tend to be associated with transcriptional activity. When coupled with sequencing, the ends of DNA fragments generated by treatment of chromatin with DNase I are sequenced.
A technique similar to ChIP–seq in which proteins bound to RNA — such as splicing factors — are immunoprecipitated and the RNA fragments are sequenced.
An assay system in which one protein is fused to an activation domain and the other to a DNA-binding domain, and both fusion proteins are expressed in cells. Expression of a reporter gene indicates that the two proteins physically interact.
- Epistatic miniarray profiles
These are created by screening the fitness of double mutants in a high-throughput manner. The results, when analysed as a whole, can reveal both positive and negative genetic interactions between genes and provide insights into biological pathways and protein–protein complexes in the cell.
- Single-nucleotide variant
Sequence variations that include insertions and deletions in addition to base substitutions (which are known as SNPs).
- Genomic imprinting
The epigenetic marking of a gene on the basis of parental origin, which results in monoallelic expression.
- Cap analysis of gene expression
(CAGE.) The high-throughput sequencing of concatamers of DNA tags that are derived from the initial nucleotides of 5′ mRNA.
- Formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements followed by sequencing
(FAIRE–seq.) This technique isolates nucleosome-free regions of DNA from chromatin during phenol:chloroform extraction.
The conversion of a continuous signal to a discrete signal.
About this article
Cite this article
Hawkins, R., Hon, G. & Ren, B. Next-generation genomics: an integrative approach. Nat Rev Genet 11, 476–486 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2795
Scientific Reports (2022)
Journal of Gastroenterology (2022)
SPEAQeasy: a scalable pipeline for expression analysis and quantification for R/bioconductor-powered RNA-seq analyses
BMC Bioinformatics (2021)
BMC Bioinformatics (2020)
Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics (2020)