Key Points
-
Raises questions about the widespread belief that the structures of genetic networks are driven entirely by adaptive processes.
-
Provides an overview of the empirical evidence for the evolution of novel regulatory mechanisms by neutral processes with little or no alteration at the phenotypic level.
-
Provides a simple explanation, on the basis of amounts of intergenic DNA, of why multicellular species are more prone to the evolution of complex regulatory mechanisms than are unicellular species.
-
Demonstrates that the effective size of a population alone can dictate the potential pathways of network evolution.
-
Demonstrates that recombinational activation, and not mutational masking, is a powerful force for promoting redundant genetic pathways.
-
Argues that models of network evolution that ignore intermediate states of population-level variation are incapable of providing meaningful insight into issues of pathway evolution.
Abstract
Although numerous investigators assume that the global features of genetic networks are moulded by natural selection, there has been no formal demonstration of the adaptive origin of any genetic network. This Analysis shows that many of the qualitative features of known transcriptional networks can arise readily through the non-adaptive processes of genetic drift, mutation and recombination, raising questions about whether natural selection is necessary or even sufficient for the origin of many aspects of gene-network topologies. The widespread reliance on computational procedures that are devoid of population-genetic details to generate hypotheses for the evolution of network configurations seems to be unjustified.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gerhart, J. & Kirschner, M. Cells, Embryos and Evolution (Blackwell Science, Malden, 1997).
Barab'asi, A. L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 101–113 (2004).
Babu, M. M., Teichmann, S. A. & Aravind, L. Evolutionary dynamics of prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory networks. Mol. Biol. 358, 614–633 (2006).
Balaji, S., Iyer, L. M., Aravind, L. & Babu, M. M. Uncovering a hidden distributed architecture behind scale-free transcriptional regulatory networks. J. Mol. Biol. 360, 204–212 (2006).
Davidson, E. H. The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks in Development and Evolution (Academic, New York, 2006).
Alon, U. Biological networks: the tinkerer as an engineer. Science 301, 1866–1867 (2003).
Adami, C. Digital genetics: unravelling the genetic basis of evolution. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 109–118 (2006).
Wagner, A. Does selection mold molecular networks? Science STKE 202, pe41 (2003). One of the first papers to raise questions about the adaptive paradigm for the architecture of genetic networks.
Sole, R. V. & Valverde, S. Are network motifs the spandrels of cellular complexity? Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 419–422 (2006).
Keller, E. F. Revisiting 'scale-free' networks. Bioessays 27, 1060–1068 (2005).
Lynch, M. The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, S8597–S8604 (2007). This paper raises questions about the rationale and objectivity of numerous arguments that nearly all aspects of molecular, cellular and developmental complexity have arisen by adaptive mechanisms.
Wilkins, A. S. The Evolution of Developmental Pathways (Sinauer, Sunderland, 2002). An excellent overview of our knowledge (or lack thereof) of the evolutionary forces that mould developmental pathways.
Lynch, M. The Origins of Genome Architecture (Sinauer, Sunderland, 2007).
Davidson, E. H. & Erwin, D. H. Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science 311, 796–800 (2006).
Thieffry, D., Huerta, A. M., Perez-Rueda, E. & Collado-Vides, J. From specific gene regulation to genomic networks: a global analysis of transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli. Bioessays 20, 433–440 (1998).
Lee, T. I. et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 298, 799–804 (2002).
Wuchty, S. & Almaas, E. Evolutionary cores of domain co-occurrence networks. BMC Evol. Biol. 5, 24 (2005).
Johnson, N. A. & Porter, A. H. Rapid speciation via parallel, directional selection on regulatory genetic pathways. J. Theor. Biol. 205, 527–542 (2000).
Force, A. et al. The origin of subfunctions and modular gene regulation. Genetics 170, 433–446 (2005).
Haag, E. S. & Molla, M. N. Compensatory evolution of interacting gene products through multifunctional intermediates. Evolution 59, 1620–1632 (2005).
Wagner, A. Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2005). A broad and relatively balanced view of the evolutionary mechanisms that can lead to the robustness of living systems to external and internal perturbations.
Conant, G. C. & Wagner, A. Convergent evolution of gene circuits. Nature Genet. 34, 264–266 (2003).
Artzy-Randrup, Y., Fleishman, S. J., Ben-Tal, N. & Stone, L. Comment on 'Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks' and 'Superfamilies of evolved and designed networks'. Science 305, 1107 (2004).
van Noort, V., Snel, B. & Huynen, M. A. The yeast coexpression network has a small-world, scale-free architecture and can be explained by a simple model. EMBO Rep. 5, 280–284 (2004).
de Silva, E. & Stumpf, M. P. Complex networks and simple models in biology. J. R. Soc. Interface 2, 419–430 (2005).
Wilkins, A. S. Recasting developmental evolution in terms of genetic pathway and network evolution and the implications for comparative biology. Brain Res. Bull. 66, 495–509 (2005).
Sommer, R. J. Evolution and development — the nematode vulva as a case study. Bioessays 19, 225–231 (1997).
Ludwig, M. Z., Bergman, C., Patel, N. H. & Kreitman, M. Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature 403, 564–567 (2000).
Ruvinsky, I. & Ruvkun, G. Functional tests of enhancer conservation between distantly related species. Development 130, 5133–5142 (2003).
Coulson, R. M. & Ouzounis, C. A. The phylogenetic diversity of eukaryotic transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 653–660 (2003).
Goltsev, Y., Hsiong, W., Lanzaro, G. & Levine, M. Different combinations of gap repressors for common stripes in Anopheles and Drosophila embryos. Dev. Biol. 275, 435–446 (2004).
Coulson, R. M., Touboul, N. & Ouzounis, C. A. Lineage-specific partitions in archaeal transcription. Archaea 2, 117–125 (2006).
Hill, R. C. et al. Genetic flexibility in the convergent evolution of hermaphroditism in Caenorhabditis nematodes. Dev. Cell 10, 531–538 (2006).
Mazurie, A., Bottani, S. & Vergassola, M. An evolutionary and functional assessment of regulatory network motifs. Genome Biol. 6, R35 (2005).
Moses, A. M. et al. Large-scale turnover of functional transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila. PLoS Comput.Biol. 2, 1219–1231 (2006).
Tsong, A. E., Tuch, B. B., Li, H. & Johnson, A. D. Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic. Nature 443, 415–420 (2006). An elegant demonstration of how dramatic changes in regulatory mechanisms can be brought about by intermediate, neutral steps involving functional redundancy.
Marino-Ramirez, L., Jordan, I. K. & Landsman, D. Multiple independent evolutionary solutions to core histone gene regulation. Genome Biol. 7, R122 (2006).
Tanay, A., Regev, A. & Shamir, R. Conservation and evolvability in regulatory networks: the evolution of ribosomal regulation in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7203–7208 (2005).
Lozada-Chavez, I., Janga, S. C. & Collado-Vides, J. Bacterial regulatory networks are extremely flexible in evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 3434–3445 (2006).
Perez-Rueda, E., Collado-Vides, J. & Segovia, L. Phylogenetic distribution of DNA-binding transcription factors in bacteria and archaea. Comput. Biol. Chem. 28, 341–350 (2004).
Riechmann, J. L. et al. Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science 290, 2105–2110 (2000).
Messina, D. N., Glasscock, J., Gish, W. & Lovett, M. An ORFeome-based analysis of human transcription factor genes and the construction of a microarray to interrogate their expression. Genome Res. 14, 2041–2047 (2004).
Harbison, C. T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99–104 (2004).
Stone, J. R. & Wray, G. A. Rapid evolution of cis-regulatory sequences via local point mutations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 1764–1770 (2001).
Hahn, M. W., Stajich, J. E. & Wray, G. A. The effects of selection against spurious transcription factor binding sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 901–906 (2003). This work shows that even non-functional DNA can be under selection for the avoidance of spurious regulatory sites
Shen-Orr, S. S., Milo, R., Mangan, S. & Alon, U. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nature Genet. 31, 64–68 (2002).
Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N. & Barabasi, A. L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 651–654 (2000).
Rodriguez-Caso, C., Medina, M. A. & Sole, R. V. Topology, tinkering and evolution of the human transcription factor network. FEBS J. 272, 6423–6434 (2005).
Chung, F., Lu, L., Dewey, T. G. & Galas, D. J. Duplication models for biological networks. J. Comput. Biol. 10, 677–687 (2003).
Yuh, C. H., Bolouri, H. & Davidson, E. H. Genomic cis-regulatory logic: experimental and computational analysis of a sea urchin gene. Science 279, 1896–1902 (1998).
Balhoff, J. P. & Wray, G. A. Evolutionary analysis of the well characterized endo16 promoter reveals substantial variation within functional sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8591–8596 (2005).
Romano, L. A. & Wray, G. A. Conservation of Endo16 expression in sea urchins despite evolutionary divergence in both cis and trans-acting components of transcriptional regulation. Development 130, 4187–4199. References 51 and 52 provide dramatic evidence that typological descriptions of the regulatory structure of genes on the basis of narrow model systems ignore important aspects of variation that are found within and among natural populations.
True, J. R. & Haag, E. S. Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories. Evol. Dev. 3, 109–119 (2001). A thoughtful account of how major modifications of developmental processes can come about by neutral processes.
Soyer, O. S. & Bonhoeffer, S. Evolution of complexity in signaling pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16337–16342 (2006).
van Nimwegen, E. Scaling laws in the functional content of genomes. Trends Genet. 19, 479–484 (2003).
Clark, A. G. Invasion and maintenance of a gene duplication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2950–2954 (1994).
Lynch, M., O'Hely, M., Walsh, B. & Force, A. The probability of fixation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. Genetics 159, 1789–1804 (2001).
Proulx, S. R. & Phillips, P. C. The opportunity for canalization and the evolution of genetic networks. Am. Nat. 165, 147–162 (2005). References 56 – 58 formally demonstrate the difficulties of evolving genetic redundancy by natural selection.
Lynch, M. & Conery, J. S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151–1154 (2000).
Wagner, A. The role of population size, pleiotropy and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of overlapping gene functions. Genetics 154, 1389–1401 (2000).
Wagner, A. Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast. Nature Genet. 24, 355–361 (2000).
Bhan, A., Galas, D. J. & Dewey, T. G. A duplication growth model of gene expression networks. Bioinformatics 18, 1486–1493 (2002).
Cordero, O. X. & Hogeweg, P. Feed-forward loop circuits as a side effect of genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1931–1936 (2006).
Foster, D. V., Kauffman, S. A., & Socolar, J. E. Network growth models and genetic regulatory networks. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 73, 031912 (2006).
Ciliberti, S., Martin, O. C. & Wagner, A. Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e15 (2007).
Pagel, M., Meade, A. & Scott, D. Assembly rules for protein networks derived from phylogenetic-statistical analysis of whole genomes. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, S16 (2007).
Milo, R. et al. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 824–827 (2002).
Yeger-Lotem, E. et al. Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein–protein interaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5934–5939 (2004).
Carroll, S. B. Evolution at two levels: on genes and form. PLoS Biol. 3, e245 (2005). The author argues that most interesting aspects of evolution are associated with changes at the level of gene regulation, rather than with changes in coding DNA.
Hoekstra, H. E. & Coyne, J. A. The locus of evolution: evo–devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61, 995–1016 (2007). This paper presents a counterview to reference 69.
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory (Harper & Row, New York, 1970).
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to E. Haag, M. Hahn and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. This work has been supported by US National Science Foundation and US National Institutes of Healthe grants to the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Related links
Glossary
- Effective population size
-
A scaled measure of the size of a natural population that is relevant to population genetics. This value is equivalent to the size of the idealized, random-mating population that gives equivalent allele-frequency dynamics, and is generally one or more orders of magnitude smaller than the actual population size.
- Power-law distribution
-
A distribution for a variable x that follows the form axb.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lynch, M. The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes. Nat Rev Genet 8, 803–813 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2192
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2192
This article is cited by
-
Mitochondrially mediated RNA interference, a retrograde signaling system affecting nuclear gene expression
Heredity (2023)
-
Gene loss and compensatory evolution promotes the emergence of morphological novelties in budding yeast
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2022)
-
Finding gene network topologies for given biological function with recurrent neural network
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Hidden paths to endless forms most wonderful: Complexity of bacterial motility shapes diversification of latent phenotypes
BMC Evolutionary Biology (2020)
-
Computational intractability law molds the topology of biological networks
Applied Network Science (2020)