Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Genetic equity


This paper proposes, elaborates and defends a principle of genetic equity. In doing so it articulates, explains and justifies what might be meant by the concept of 'human dignity' in a way that is clear, defensible and consistent with, but by no means the same as, the plethora of appeals to human dignity found in contemporary bioethics, and more particularly in international instruments on bioethics. We propose the following principle of genetic equity: humans are born equal; they are entitled to freedom from discrimination and equality of opportunity to flourish; genetic information may not be used to limit that equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Giordano, S. Do elderly people have human rights? Respect for equality and the treatment of the older person: declarations of human rights and age-based rationing. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics (in the press).

  2. Rousseau, J. J. Du Contract Social, ou Principes du Droit Politique (Chez Rey MM, Amsterdam, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Plato The Republic Book V, 451–457 (Stephanus edn, 1578).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously 227 (Duckworth, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mill, J. S. in Utilitarianism (ed. Mary Warnock) 319 (Collins/Fontana, London, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, J. Does justice require that we be ageist? Bioethics 8, 74–84 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, J. Could we hold people responsible for their own adverse health? J. Contemp. Health Law Policy 1, 100–106 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, J. What is the good of health care? Bioethics 10, 269–292 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daniels, N. Just Health Care (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. McKie, J. et al. The Allocation of Health Care Resources (Ashgate, UK, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. The World Medical Association. The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, [Online ], (adopted by the 52nd General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000).

  12. United Nations. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Articles 1 and 2, [Online ], (General Assembly resolution 217A (III), 10 December 1948).

  13. Council of Europe. The European Convention on Human Rights Articles 2 and 14, [Online ], (Rome, 4 November 1950).

  14. Hobbes, T. Leviathan (ed. Oakshott, M.) (Blackwell, Oxford, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dworkin, R. Sovereign Virtue 1 (Harvard Univ. Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. UNESCO. Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights [Online ], (adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO on 11 November 1997).

  17. Kahn, A. Clone mammals...clone man? Nature 386, 119 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McLaren, A. Opinion of the group of advisers on the ethical implications of biotechnology to the European Commission No 9. [Online], (28 May 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kahn, A. Cloning, dignity and ethical revisionism. Nature 388, 320 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris, J. Is cloning an attack on human dignity? Nature 387, 754 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. The European Court of Human Rights. Case of Vo v. France (application no. 53924/00) [Online], (Strasbourg, 8 July 2004).

  22. Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously Ch. 9 (Duckworth, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge the support of a project grant from the European Commission for the project EUREKA under its Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources Programme, 2002. An important part of the impetus for this paper has come from the membership of both authors of the UK Human Genetics Commission (HGC). We thank all our colleagues on the commission for many helpful comments and suggestions but emphasize that the responsibility for this paper and for the ideas it contains is that of the authors and this paper does not necessarily represent the views nor the policy of HGC nor those of any other of its members. A version of the principle of genetic equity was originally proposed in an informal working paper by J.S., J.H. and Simona Giordano, called 'Genetic Equality' and submitted to the HGC. We thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links


The World Medical Association Declaration of Human Rights



The practice of counting features such as gender or skin colour affirmatively as a qualification for educational or employment opportunities to mitigate or help to eradicate the effects of discrimination.


The rights that arise in common-law jurisdictions such as England and the United States, which are usually rights that are traditionally recognized by the courts (case law), as opposed, for example, to rights established by a parliament (statute law).


A person who adheres broadly to the philosophical idea of consequentialism, which holds that actions are to be ethically evaluated in terms of their consequences, rather than in terms of the agent's intentions or some absolute standard.


Features that are not necessary or logically entailed.


The singling out of genetic criteria for special attention, often with the implication that it is inappropriate to do so.


The introduction of an active gene into a patient to supply a missing function or to offset susceptibility to a disease.


In broad terms, the name given to a trend in ethics that follows the ethical approach of Immanuel Kant. In this context, it refers to the idea that people should be treated always as ends in themselves and never only as a means to the ends of others.


Claims that people make on each other or society, the justification of which is ethical rather than legal or customary.


Pharmaceutical treatment that is tailored to the individual, with regard to genetic criteria — for example, by choice of drug or dosage.


Cloning, either by nuclear substitution or by embryo splitting, resulting in a live birth. It occurs naturally in the case of identical twins.


The rights established by statute or other acts of the legislature.


A declaration of principles and standards for human-subject research that is widely accepted in the research community.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, J., Sulston, J. Genetic equity. Nat Rev Genet 5, 796–800 (2004).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing