The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has become an important model for evolutionary genomics owing to the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies.
Comparative genomics analysis of S. cerevisiae and closely related species has contributed to our understanding of how new species emerge and has shed light on the various mechanisms that contribute to reproductive isolation.
Population genomics and comparative genomics of Saccharomyces yeasts have revealed that hybridization occurred frequently throughout, and has had substantial effects on, yeast evolution. Hybridization could itself be a mechanism of adaptation and speciation.
Genomic analysis of Saccharomyces yeasts has provided a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying large-scale genomic changes, such as polyploidy, and their consequences for genome evolution and cell physiology.
Genomic analysis of yeast strains associated with humans has revealed the history of yeast domestication and the mechanisms that have contributed to its adaptation to anthropogenic environments.
Genomic approaches are increasingly contributing to our understanding of how budding yeasts adapt to natural environments by identifying the genes that are involved in adaptation within natural substrates.
The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a highly advanced model system for studying genetics, cell biology and systems biology. Over the past decade, the application of high-throughput sequencing technologies to this species has contributed to this yeast also becoming an important model for evolutionary genomics. Indeed, comparative genomic analyses of laboratory, wild and domesticated yeast populations are providing unprecedented detail about many of the processes that govern evolution, including long-term processes, such as reproductive isolation and speciation, and short-term processes, such as adaptation to natural and domestication-related environments.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Mortimer, R. K. & Johnston, J. R. Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. Genetics 113, 35–43 (1986).
Haase, S. B. & Wittenberg, C. Topology and control of the cell-cycle-regulated transcriptional circuitry. Genetics 196, 65–90 (2014).
Teixeira, M. T. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model to study replicative senescence triggered by telomere shortening. Front. Oncol. 3, 101 (2013).
Reggiori, F. & Klionsky, D. J. Autophagic processes in yeast: mechanism, machinery and regulation. Genetics 194, 341–361 (2013).
Goffeau, A. et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274, 563–567 (1996).
Kavscek, M., Strazar, M., Curk, T., Natter, K. & Petrovic, U. Yeast as a cell factory: current state and perspectives. Microb. Cell Fact. 14, 94 (2015).
Richardson, S. M. et al. Design of a synthetic yeast genome. Science 355, 1040–1044 (2017).
Botstein, D. & Fink, G. R. Yeast: an experimental organism for 21 st century biology. Genetics 189, 695–704 (2011).
Duina, A. A., Miller, M. E. & Keeney, J. B. Budding yeast for budding geneticists: a primer on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system. Genetics 197, 33–48 (2014).
Liu, L., Redden, H. & Alper, H. S. Frontiers of yeast metabolic engineering: diversifying beyond ethanol and Saccharomyces. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 1023–1030 (2013).
Dequin, S. & Casaregola, S. The genomes of fermentative Saccharomyces. C. R. Biol. 334, 687–693 (2011).
Sicard, D. & Legras, J. L. Bread, beer and wine: yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. C. R. Biol. 334, 229–236 (2011).
Mortimer, R. K. Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. Genome Res. 10, 403–409 (2000).
Liti, G. et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458, 337–341 (2009).
Stefanini, I. et al. Social wasps are a Saccharomyces mating nest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2247–2251 (2016).
Boynton, P. J. & Greig, D. The ecology and evolution of non-domesticated Saccharomyces species. Yeast 31, 449–462 (2014).
Borneman, A. R. & Pretorius, I. S. Genomic insights into the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Genetics 199, 281–291 (2015).
Scannell, D. R. et al. The awesome power of yeast evolutionary genetics: new genome sequences and strain resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto genus. G3 (Bethesda) 1, 11–25 (2011).
Leducq, J. B. et al. Speciation driven by hybridization and chromosomal plasticity in a wild yeast. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 15003 (2016). This study provides genomic evidence of incipient speciation by hybridization in natural S. paradoxus populations and shows the role of chromosomal translocations in initiating reproductive barriers.
Dujon, B. Yeast evolutionary genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 512–524 (2010).
Galeote, V., Bigey, F., Devillers, H., Neuveglise, C. & Dequin, S. Genome sequence of the food spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii CLIB 213T. Genome Announc. 1, e00606–13 (2013).
Genolevures, C. et al. Comparative genomics of protoploid Saccharomycetaceae. Genome Res. 19, 1696–1709 (2009).
Friedrich, A., Jung, P., Reisser, C., Fischer, G. & Schacherer, J. Population genomics reveals chromosome-scale heterogeneous evolution in a protoploid yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 184–192 (2015).
Gabaldon, T. et al. Comparative genomics of emerging pathogens in the Candida glabrata clade. BMC Genomics 14, 623 (2013).
Seehausen, O. et al. Genomics and the origin of species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 176–192 (2014).
Shapiro, B. J., Leducq, J. B. & Mallet, J. What Is speciation? PLoS Genet. 12, e1005860 (2016).
Maclean, C. J. & Greig, D. Prezygotic reproductive isolation between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 1 (2008).
Liti, G., Barton, D. B. & Louis, E. J. Sequence diversity, reproductive isolation and species concepts in Saccharomyces. Genetics 174, 839–850 (2006).
Rayssiguier, C., Thaler, D. S. & Radman, M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature 342, 396–401 (1989).
Chambers, S. R., Hunter, N., Louis, E. J. & Borts, R. H. The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6110–6120 (1996).
Greig, D., Travisano, M., Louis, E. J. & Borts, R. H. A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 429–437 (2003).
Cutter, A. D. The polymorphic prelude to Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 209–218 (2012).
Paliwal, S., Fiumera, A. C. & Fiumera, H. L. Mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis contributes to phenotypic variation and coadaptation in natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 198, 1251–1265 (2014).
Hou, J., Friedrich, A., Gounot, J. S. & Schacherer, J. Comprehensive survey of condition-specific reproductive isolation reveals genetic incompatibility in yeast. Nat. Commun. 6, 7214 (2015). This study provides experimental and genomic evidence that BDMIs are widespread within S. cerevisiae and may help to initiate reproductive barriers in fluctuating environments.
Chou, J. Y., Hung, Y. S., Lin, K. H., Lee, H. Y. & Leu, J. Y. Multiple molecular mechanisms cause reproductive isolation between three yeast species. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000432 (2010).
Jhuang, H. Y., Lee, H. Y. & Leu, J. Y. Mitochondrial-nuclear co-evolution leads to hybrid incompatibility through pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. EMBO Rep. 18, 87–101 (2017).
Lee, H. Y. et al. Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 135, 1065–1073 (2008).
Anderson, J. B. et al. Determinants of divergent adaptation and Dobzhansky-Muller interaction in experimental yeast populations. Curr. Biol. 20, 1383–1388 (2010).
Delneri, D. et al. Engineering evolution to study speciation in yeasts. Nature 422, 68–72 (2003).
Fischer, G., James, S. A., Roberts, I. N., Oliver, S. G. & Louis, E. J. Chromosomal evolution in Saccharomyces. Nature 405, 451–454 (2000).
Charron, G., Leducq, J. B. & Landry, C. R. Chromosomal variation segregates within incipient species and correlates with reproductive isolation. Mol. Ecol. 23, 4362–4372 (2014).
Livingstone, K. & Rieseberg, L. Chromosomal evolution and speciation: a recombination-based approach. New Phytol. 161, 107–112 (2004).
Ayala, F. J. & Coluzzi, M. Chromosome speciation: humans, Drosophila, and mosquitoes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (Suppl. 1), 6535–6542 (2005).
Greig, D., Louis, E. J., Borts, R. H. & Travisano, M. Hybrid speciation in experimental populations of yeast. Science 298, 1773–1775 (2002).
Schumer, M., Rosenthal, G. G. & Andolfatto, P. How common is homoploid hybrid speciation? Evolution 68, 1553–1560 (2014).
Barbosa, R. et al. Evidence of natural hybridization in Brazilian wild lineages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 317–329 (2016). This study reports that introgression from S. paradoxus to S. cerevisiae in natural populations could be a rapid mode of adaptation to new environments.
Peris, D. et al. Complex ancestries of lager-brewing hybrids were shaped by standing variation in the wild yeast Saccharomyces eubayanus. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006155 (2016).
Leducq, J. B. et al. Mitochondrial recombination and introgression during speciation by hybridization. Mol. Biol. Evol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx139 (2017).
Morales, L. & Dujon, B. Evolutionary role of interspecies hybridization and genetic exchanges in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 721–739 (2012).
Antunovics, Z., Nguyen, H. V., Gaillardin, C. & Sipiczki, M. Gradual genome stabilisation by progressive reduction of the Saccharomyces uvarum genome in an interspecific hybrid with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 5, 1141–1150 (2005).
Dunn, B., Levine, R. P. & Sherlock, G. Microarray karyotyping of commercial wine yeast strains reveals shared, as well as unique, genomic signatures. BMC Genomics 6, 53 (2005).
Querol, A. & Bond, U. The complex and dynamic genomes of industrial yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 293, 1–10 (2009).
Mertens, S. et al. A large set of newly created interspecific Saccharomyces hybrids increases aromatic diversity in lager beers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 8202–8214 (2015).
Laureau, R. et al. Extensive recombination of a yeast diploid hybrid through meiotic reversion. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005781 (2016).
Heil, C. S. D. et al. Loss of heterozygosity drives adaptation in hybrid yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx098 (2017).
Bui, D. T., Dine, E., Anderson, J. B., Aquadro, C. F. & Alani, E. E. A. Genetic incompatibility accelerates adaptation in yeast. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005407 (2015).
Bui, D. T. et al. Mismatch repair incompatibilities in diverse yeast populations. Genetics 205, 1459–1471 (2017).
Kunicka-Styczynska, A. & Rajkowska, K. Physiological and genetic stability of hybrids of industrial wine yeasts Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. J. Appl. Microbiol. 110, 1538–1549 (2011).
Bellon, J. R., Schmid, F., Capone, D. L., Dunn, B. L. & Chambers, P. J. Introducing a new breed of wine yeast: interspecific hybridisation between a commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast and Saccharomyces mikatae. PLoS ONE 8, e62053 (2013).
Clowers, K. J., Will, J. L. & Gasch, A. P. A unique ecological niche fosters hybridization of oak-tree and vineyard isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Ecol. 24, 5886–5898 (2015).
Dunn, B. et al. Recurrent rearrangement during adaptive evolution in an interspecific yeast hybrid suggests a model for rapid introgression. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003366 (2013).
Otto, S. P. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131, 452–462 (2007).
Albertin, W. & Marullo, P. Polyploidy in fungi: evolution after whole-genome duplication. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 2497–2509 (2012).
Lynch, M. et al. A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9272–9277 (2008).
Zhu, Y. O., Siegal, M. L., Hall, D. W. & Petrov, D. A. Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2310–E2318 (2014). This study provides a direct estimation of the molecular mutation rates in S. cerevisiae from many mutation accumulation lines and different mutation classes.
Hong, J. & Gresham, D. Molecular specificity, convergence and constraint shape adaptive evolution in nutrient-poor environments. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004041 (2014).
Mayer, V. W. & Aguilera, A. High levels of chromosome instability in polyploids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 231, 177–186 (1990).
Gerstein, A. C., Chun, H. J., Grant, A. & Otto, S. P. Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2, e145 (2006).
Gerstein, A. C., McBride, R. M. & Otto, S. P. Ploidy reduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biol. Lett. 4, 91–94 (2008).
Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008).
Zorgo, E. et al. Ancient evolutionary trade-offs between yeast ploidy states. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003388 (2013).
Ezov, T. K. et al. Molecular-genetic biodiversity in a natural population of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae from “Evolution Canyon”: microsatellite polymorphism, ploidy and controversial sexual status. Genetics 174, 1455–1468 (2006).
Selmecki, A. M. et al. Polyploidy can drive rapid adaptation in yeast. Nature 519, 349–352 (2015).
Madlung, A. Polyploidy and its effect on evolutionary success: old questions revisited with new tools. Heredity (Edinb.) 110, 99–104 (2013).
Anderson, C. A. et al. Ploidy variation in multinucleate cells changes under stress. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 1129–1140 (2015).
Giam, M. & Rancati, G. Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability in cancer: a jackpot to chaos. Cell Div. 10, 3 (2015).
Van de Peer, Y., Mizrachi, E. & Marchal, K. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.26 (2017).
Kellis, M., Birren, B. W. & Lander, E. S. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428, 617–624 (2004).
Gordon, J. L., Byrne, K. P. & Wolfe, K. H. Additions, losses, and rearrangements on the evolutionary route from a reconstructed ancestor to the modern Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000485 (2009).
Wolfe, K. H. & Shields, D. C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708–713 (1997).
Marcet-Houben, M. & Gabaldon, T. Beyond the whole-genome duplication: phylogenetic evidence for an ancient interspecies hybridization in the baker's yeast lineage. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002220 (2015). This paper reports that the Saccharomyces WGD event results from the mating of two different ancestral species rather than from the doubling of DNA from only one ancestor species.
Guan, Y., Dunham, M. J. & Troyanskaya, O. G. Functional analysis of gene duplications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 175, 933–943 (2007).
Byrne, K. P. & Wolfe, K. H. The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res. 15, 1456–1461 (2005).
Kondrashov, F. A., Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2002-3-2-research0008 (2002).
Kondrashov, F. A. Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 5048–5057 (2012).
Brown, C. J., Todd, K. M. & Rosenzweig, R. F. Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 931–942 (1998).
Payen, C. et al. The dynamics of diverse segmental amplifications in populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae adapting to strong selection. G3 (Bethesda) 4, 399–409 (2014).
Kito, K. et al. Yeast interspecies comparative proteomics reveals divergence in expression profiles and provides insights into proteome resource allocation and evolutionary roles of gene duplication. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15, 218–235 (2016).
Gout, J. F. & Lynch, M. Maintenance and loss of duplicated genes by dosage subfunctionalization. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2141–2148 (2015).
Papp, B., Pal, C. & Hurst, L. D. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424, 194–197 (2003).
Kondrashov, F. A. & Kondrashov, A. S. Role of selection in fixation of gene duplications. J. Theor. Biol. 239, 141–151 (2006).
Bleuven, C. & Landry, C. R. Molecular and cellular bases of adaptation to a changing environment in microorganisms. Proc. Biol. Sci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1458 (2016).
Lynch, M. & Katju, V. The altered evolutionary trajectories of gene duplicates. Trends Genet. 20, 544–549 (2004).
Qian, W. & Zhang, J. Genomic evidence for adaptation by gene duplication. Genome Res. 24, 1356–1362 (2014).
He, X. & Zhang, J. Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 169, 1157–1164 (2005).
Force, A. et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531–1545 (1999).
Landry, C. R., Oh, J., Hartl, D. L. & Cavalieri, D. Genome-wide scan reveals that genetic variation for transcriptional plasticity in yeast is biased towards multi-copy and dispensable genes. Gene 366, 343–351 (2006).
Freschi, L., Courcelles, M., Thibault, P., Michnick, S. W. & Landry, C. R. Phosphorylation network rewiring by gene duplication. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 504 (2011).
Wapinski, I. et al. Gene duplication and the evolution of ribosomal protein gene regulation in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5505–5510 (2010).
Parenteau, J. et al. Preservation of gene duplication increases the regulatory spectrum of ribosomal protein genes and enhances growth under stress. Cell Rep. 13, 2516–2526 (2015).
Mattenberger, F., Sabater-Munoz, B., Toft, C. & Fares, M. A. The phenotypic plasticity of duplicated genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the origin of adaptations. G3 (Bethesda) 7, 63–75 (2017). This study demonstrates that duplicate genes respond more specifically to stress than singletons, a transcriptional plasticity that is potentially involved in adaptation.
Diss, G. et al. Gene duplication can impart fragility, not robustness, in the yeast protein interaction network. Science 355, 630–634 (2017).
Johnston, M. A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 51, 458–476 (1987).
Kuang, M. C., Hutchins, P. D., Russell, J. D., Coon, J. J. & Hittinger, C. T. Ongoing resolution of duplicate gene functions shapes the diversification of a metabolic network. eLife 5, e19027 (2016). This paper illustrates the important involvement of duplication in the evolution of transcriptional and metabolic networks by investigating differences in the galactose utilization network among Saccharomyces species.
Warringer, J. et al. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002111 (2011).
Eberlein, C. et al. The rapid evolution of an ohnolog contributes to the ecological specialization of incipient yeast species. Mol. Biol. Evol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx153 (2017).
Almeida, P. et al. A population genomics insight into the Mediterranean origins of wine yeast domestication. Mol. Ecol. 24, 5412–5427 (2015).
Strope, P. K. et al. The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res. 25, 762–774 (2015).
Gallone, B. et al. Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell 166, 1397–1410.e16 (2016). The most recent paper using genomic and phenotypic analyses to study the origins, evolutionary history and domestication of industrial yeasts.
Borneman, A. R., Forgan, A. H., Kolouchova, R., Fraser, J. A. & Schmidt, S. A. Whole genome comparison reveals high levels of inbreeding and strain redundancy across the spectrum of commercial wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 6, 957–971 (2016).
Goncalves, M. et al. Distinct domestication trajectories in top-fermenting beer yeasts and wine yeasts. Curr. Biol. 26, 2750–2761 (2016). The most recent leading paper that presents a comprehensive comparison of domestication hallmarks between beer and wine yeasts, using genome sequence analysis.
Ludlow, C. L. et al. Independent origins of yeast associated with coffee and cacao fermentation. Curr. Biol. 26, 965–971 (2016).
Fay, J. C. & Benavides, J. A. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1, 66–71 (2005).
Legras, J. L., Merdinoglu, D., Cornuet, J. M. & Karst, F. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2091–2102 (2007).
Schacherer, J., Shapiro, J. A., Ruderfer, D. M. & Kruglyak, L. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458, 342–345 (2009).
Cromie, G. A. et al. Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 (Bethesda) 3, 2163–2171 (2013).
Marsit, S. & Dequin, S. Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review. FEMS Yeast Res. 15, fov067 (2015).
Eberlein, C., Leducq, J. B. & Landry, C. R. The genomics of wild yeast populations sheds light on the domestication of man's best (micro) friend. Mol. Ecol. 24, 5309–5311 (2015).
Alexandre, H. Flor yeasts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae their ecology, genetics and metabolism. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 167, 269–275 (2013).
Coi, A. L. et al. Genomic signatures of adaptation to wine biological ageing conditions in biofilm-forming flor yeasts. Mol. Ecol. 26, 2150–2166 (2017).
Randez-Gil, F., Corcoles-Saez, I. & Prieto, J. A. Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of baker's yeast: relevance to baking. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 4, 191–214 (2013).
Bokulich, N. A., Thorngate, J. H., Richardson, P. M. & Mills, D. A. Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E139–E148 (2014).
Christiaens, J. F. et al. The fungal aroma gene ATF1 promotes dispersal of yeast cells through insect vectors. Cell Rep. 9, 425–432 (2014).
Baker, E. et al. The genome sequence of Saccharomyces eubayanus and the domestication of lager-brewing yeasts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2818–2831 (2015).
Marsit, S. et al. Evolutionary advantage conferred by an eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer event in wine yeasts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1695–1707 (2015). This study demonstrates the adaptive advantage of a large gene cluster that was recently acquired by HGT from more distant species in wine yeasts.
Marsit, S., Sanchez, I., Galeote, V. & Dequin, S. Horizontally acquired oligopeptide transporters favour adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast to oenological environment. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1148–1161 (2016).
Novo, M. et al. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16333–16338 (2009).
Yue, J. X. et al. Contrasting evolutionary genome dynamics between domesticated and wild yeasts. Nat. Genet. 49, 913–924 (2017). The most recent leading paper that presents a comprehensive comparison of evolutionary genome dynamics between domesticated and wild yeasts, using long-read sequencing.
Zimmer, A. et al. QTL dissection of Lag phase in wine fermentation reveals a new translocation responsible for Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to sulfite. PLoS ONE 9, e86298 (2014).
Perez-Ortin, J. E., Querol, A., Puig, S. & Barrio, E. Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Res. 12, 1533–1539 (2002).
Fay, J. C., McCullough, H. L., Sniegowski, P. D. & Eisen, M. B. Population genetic variation in gene expression is associated with phenotypic variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 5, R26 (2004).
Chang, S. L., Lai, H. Y., Tung, S. Y. & Leu, J. Y. Dynamic large-scale chromosomal rearrangements fuel rapid adaptation in yeast populations. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003232 (2013).
Gerstein, A. C. et al. Too much of a good thing: the unique and repeated paths toward copper adaptation. Genetics 199, 555–571 (2015).
Zhao, Y. et al. Structures of naturally evolved CUP1 tandem arrays in yeast indicate that these arrays are generated by unequal nonhomologous recombination. G3 (Bethesda) 4, 2259–2269 (2014).
Fidalgo, M., Barrales, R. R., Ibeas, J. I. & Jimenez, J. Adaptive evolution by mutations in the FLO11 gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11228–11233 (2006).
Legras, J. L. et al. Flor yeast: new perspectives beyond wine aging. Front. Microbiol. 7, 503 (2016).
Borneman, A. R., Forgan, A. H., Pretorius, I. S. & Chambers, P. J. Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 8, 1185–1195 (2008).
Borneman, A. R. et al. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001287 (2011).
Galeote, V. et al. FSY1, a horizontally transferred gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 wine yeast strain, encodes a high-affinity fructose/H+ symporter. Microbiology 156, 3754–3761 (2010).
Wu, H., Ito, K. & Shimoi, H. Identification and characterization of a novel biotin biosynthesis gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 6845–6855 (2005).
Hall, C. & Dietrich, F. S. The reacquisition of biotin prototrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved horizontal gene transfer, gene duplication and gene clustering. Genetics 177, 2293–2307 (2007).
Cheeseman, K. et al. Multiple recent horizontal transfers of a large genomic region in cheese making fungi. Nat. Commun. 5, 2876 (2014).
Ropars, J. et al. Adaptive horizontal gene transfers between multiple cheese-associated fungi. Curr. Biol. 25, 2562–2569 (2015).
Gonzalez, S. S., Gallo, L., Climent, M. A., Barrio, E. & Querol, A. Enological characterization of natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 116, 11–18 (2007).
Arroyo-Lopez, F. N., Orlic, S., Querol, A. & Barrio, E. Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 131, 120–127 (2009).
Gangl, H. et al. Exceptional fermentation characteristics of natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii. N. Biotechnol. 25, 244–251 (2009).
Libkind, D. et al. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14539–14544 (2011).
Bing, J., Han, P. J., Liu, W. Q., Wang, Q. M. & Bai, F. Y. Evidence for a Far East Asian origin of lager beer yeast. Curr. Biol. 24, R380–R381 (2014).
Okuno, M. et al. Next-generation sequencing analysis of lager brewing yeast strains reveals the evolutionary history of interspecies hybridization. DNA Res. 23, 67–80 (2016).
Sipiczki, M. Interspecies hybridization and recombination in Saccharomyces wine yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 8, 996–1007 (2008).
Borneman, A. R. et al. The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. FEMS Yeast Res. 12, 88–96 (2012).
Erny, C. et al. Ecological success of a group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae/Saccharomyces kudriavzevii hybrids in the northern European wine-making environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 3256–3265 (2012).
Le Jeune, C. et al. Characterization of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum. FEMS Yeast Res. 7, 540–549 (2007).
Stelkens, R. B., Brockhurst, M. A., Hurst, G. D., Miller, E. L. & Greig, D. The effect of hybrid transgression on environmental tolerance in experimental yeast crosses. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 2507–2519 (2014).
Bernardes, J., Stelkens, R. B. & Greig, D. Heterosis in hybrids within and between yeast species. J. Evol. Biol. 30, 538–548 (2017).
Lopandic, K. et al. Genetically different wine yeasts isolated from Austrian vine-growing regions influence wine aroma differently and contain putative hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. FEMS Yeast Res. 7, 953–965 (2007).
Replansky, T., Koufopanou, V., Greig, D. & Bell, G. Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 494–501 (2008).
Dunn, B., Richter, C., Kvitek, D. J., Pugh, T. & Sherlock, G. Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments. Genome Res. 22, 908–924 (2012).
Brown, S. L. et al. Reducing haziness in white wine by overexpression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes YOL155c and YDR055w. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73, 1363–1376 (2007).
Almeida, P. et al. A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum. Nat. Commun. 5, 4044 (2014).
Goddard, M. R. & Greig, D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a nomadic yeast with no niche? FEMS Yeast Res. 15, fov009 (2015).
Xia, W. et al. Population genomics reveals structure at the individual, host-tree scale and persistence of genotypic variants of the undomesticated yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus in a natural woodland. Mol. Ecol. 26, 995–1007 (2017).
Leducq, J. B. et al. Local climatic adaptation in a widespread microorganism. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281, 20132472 (2014).
Sylvester, K. et al. Temperature and host preferences drive the diversification of Saccharomyces and other yeasts: a survey and the discovery of eight new yeast species. FEMS Yeast Res. 15, fov002 (2015).
Kowallik, V., Miller, E. & Greig, D. The interaction of Saccharomyces paradoxus with its natural competitors on oak bark. Mol. Ecol. 24, 1596–1610 (2015).
Naranjo, S. et al. Dissecting the genetic basis of a complex cis-regulatory adaptation. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005751 (2015).
Pena-Castillo, L. & Hughes, T. R. Why are there still over 1000 uncharacterized yeast genes? Genetics 176, 7–14 (2007).
Filteau, M., Charron, G. & Landry, C. R. Identification of the fitness determinants of budding yeast on a natural substrate. ISME J. 11, 959–971 (2017). This study investigates the genetic determinants and conditions that are required for optimal growth in maple sap, using a functional genomic screen.
Ibstedt, S. et al. Concerted evolution of life stage performances signals recent selection on yeast nitrogen use. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 153–161 (2015).
Treu, L. et al. The impact of genomic variability on gene expression in environmental Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 1378–1397 (2014).
Clowers, K. J., Heilberger, J., Piotrowski, J. S., Will, J. L. & Gasch, A. P. Ecological and genetic barriers differentiate natural populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2317–2327 (2015). This study investigates genetic and phenotypic differences between vineyard and oak yeast populations, using genomic tools and high-throughput sequencing technologies.
Reuter, M., Bell, G. & Greig, D. Increased outbreeding in yeast in response to dispersal by an insect vector. Curr. Biol. 17, R81–R83 (2007).
Lang, G. I. et al. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature 500, 571–574 (2013).
Levy, S. F. et al. Quantitative evolutionary dynamics using high-resolution lineage tracking. Nature 519, 181–186 (2015). This paper shows how the fitness effect of each de novo mutation occurring during the evolution of experimental populations can be tracked to measure their contribution to the population fitness with extremely high precision.
Charron, G., Leducq, J. B., Bertin, C., Dube, A. K. & Landry, C. R. Exploring the northern limit of the distribution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus in North America. FEMS Yeast Res. 14, 281–288 (2014).
Mortimer, R. K., Romano, P., Suzzi, G. & Polsinelli, M. Genome renewal: a new phenomenon revealed from a genetic study of 43 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from natural fermentation of grape musts. Yeast 10, 1543–1552 (1994).
Filteau, M. et al. Evolutionary rescue by compensatory mutations is constrained by genomic and environmental backgrounds. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 832 (2015).
Lynch, M. et al. Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 704–714 (2016).
Rolland, T. & Dujon, B. Yeasty clocks: dating genomic changes in yeasts. C. R. Biol. 334, 620–628 (2011).
Martens, K., Hallin, J., Warringer, J., Liti, G. & Parts, L. Predicting quantitative traits from genome and phenome with near perfect accuracy. Nat. Commun. 7, 11512 (2016).
Nishant, K. T. et al. The baker's yeast diploid genome is remarkably stable in vegetative growth and meiosis. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001109 (2010).
Gerstein, A. C., Cleathero, L. A., Mandegar, M. A. & Otto, S. P. Haploids adapt faster than diploids across a range of environments. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 531–540 (2011).
Lang, G. I. & Murray, A. W. Mutation rates across budding yeast chromosome VI are correlated with replication timing. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 799–811 (2011).
Lang, G. I. & Murray, A. W. Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 178, 67–82 (2008).
Park, C., Qian, W. & Zhang, J. Genomic evidence for elevated mutation rates in highly expressed genes. EMBO Rep. 13, 1123–1129 (2012).
Chen, X. & Zhang, J. Yeast mutation accumulation experiment supports elevated mutation rates at highly transcribed sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E4062 (2014).
Bensasson, D. Evidence for a high mutation rate at rapidly evolving yeast centromeres. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 211 (2011).
Serero, A., Jubin, C., Loeillet, S., Legoix-Ne, P. & Nicolas, A. G. Mutational landscape of yeast mutator strains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1897–1902 (2014).
Hittinger, C. T. et al. Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi-locus gene network. Nature 464, 54–58 (2010).
McGovern, P. E. et al. Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17593–17598 (2004).
Michel, R. H., McGovern, P. E. & Badler, V. R. Chemical evidence for ancient beer. Nature 360, 24 (1992).
McGovern, P. E., Glusker, D. L., Exner, L. J. & Voigt, M. M. Neolithic resinated wine. Nature 381, 480–481 (1996).
The authors thank the members of the Landry laboratory, N. Aubin-Horth and the three anonymous reviewers for useful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). C.R.L. holds the Canada Research Chair in Evolutionary Cell and Systems Biology.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Conditions related to human activities.
- Whole-genome duplication
(WGD). Process by which the number of chromosomes is doubled.
A group of species that diverged from the group of interest before its most recent common ancestor.
- Reproductive isolation
A mechanism that prevents the production of viable or fertile offspring between species.
Crosses between species or divergent populations.
The number of sets of homologous chromosomes in a cell for a given species, in which haploid cells have one set, diploid cells have two sets and polyploid cells have multiple (more than two) sets.
- Postzygotic isolation
A mechanism that limits the reproductive success or survival of offspring.
- Prezygotic isolation
A mechanism that prevents the fertilization of eggs or, in the case of yeast, the formation of zygotes.
The presence in a cell of an abnormal number of chromosomes that deviates from a multiple of the normal number.
- Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities
(BDMIs). Interactions between genetic elements that reduce the viability or the fertility of hybrids between populations or species. Mito-nuclear BDMIs involve components encoded by the mitochondrial genome and the nuclear genome.
The integration of genomic regions of one species or population into the genome of another species or population.
- Loss of heterozygosity
(LOH). The loss of one allele at a heterozygous locus. This loss can occur by mutation, deletion or gene conversion, using the other allele as a template. LOH in yeast genomes often corresponds to large-scale chromosomal regions encompassing multiple neighbouring genes.
Interaction between alleles of genes leading to a lower (negative epitasis) or increased (positive epistasis) phenotypic value than expected from their single contributions.
Polyploidization event in which the chromosome sets derive from a single species.
Polyploidization event as a result of hybridization between distinct species.
The physical colocalization of orthologous genes on the same chromosomes between individuals or species.
Duplicated genes originating from a whole-genome duplication event.
Genes related by duplication within a species.
- Single-nucleotide variation
(SNV). A single-nucleotide change observed by comparing genomes within or between populations.
- Horizontal gene transfer
(HGT). A process by which an organism incorporates genetic material from another organism that does not belong to its line of ancestry.
- Balanced rearrangements
Changes in chromosomal gene order that do not remove or duplicate any of the DNA of the chromosomes. For example, inversions, reciprocal translocations and transpositions.
- Chromosomal cores
Internal parts of chromosomes that exclude subtelomeres and terminal chromosome ends.
- Convergent evolution
Evolution that leads populations to the same phenotypic or genotypic outcomes from distinct initial genotypes or phenotypes.
Fitness advantage of hybrids over parental species or individuals.
A mechanism by which certain mutations increase in frequency because they are linked to advantageous mutations.
- Clonal interference
Competition among cells of a population that acquire advantageous mutations. This competition may prevent the fixation of one allele or the other.
- Standing genetic variation
Genetic variation that exists at a given point in time in a population.
About this article
Cite this article
Marsit, S., Leducq, JB., Durand, É. et al. Evolutionary biology through the lens of budding yeast comparative genomics. Nat Rev Genet 18, 581–598 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.49
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2021)
Population Size, Sex and Purifying Selection: Comparative Genomics of Two Sister Taxa of the Wild Yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus
Genome Biology and Evolution (2020)
Revisiting the Taxonomic Synonyms and Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae—Phylogeny, Phenotypes, Ecology and Domestication
The Genome Sequence of the Jean-Talon Strain, an Archeological Beer Yeast from Québec, Reveals Traces of Adaptation to Specific Brewing Conditions
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics (2020)