Lyon, M. F. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190, 372–373 (1961).
Starmer, J. & Magnuson, T. A new model for random X chromosome inactivation. Development 136, 1–10 (2009).
Disteche, C. M. Dosage compensation of the sex chromosomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 537–560 (2012).
Lee, J. T. Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 815–826 (2011).
Wutz, A. Gene silencing in X-chromosome inactivation: advances in understanding facultative heterochromatin formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 542–553 (2011).
Costanzi, C. & Pehrson, J. R. Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female mammals. Nature 393, 599–601 (1998).
Heard, E. et al. Methylation of histone H3 at Lys-9 is an early mark on the X chromosome during X inactivation. Cell 107, 727–738 (2001).
Plath, K. et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 300, 131–135 (2003).
Zhao, J., Sun, B. K., Erwin, J. A., Song, J. J. & Lee, J. T. Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science 322, 750–756 (2008).
Mira-Bontenbal, H. & Gribnau, J. New Xist-interacting proteins in X-chromosome inactivation. Curr. Biol. 26, R338–R342 (2016).
Lee, J. T., Strauss, W. M., Dausman, J. A. & Jaenisch, R. A. 450 kb transgene displays properties of the mammalian X-inactivation center. Cell 86, 83–94 (1996).
Lee, J. T., Lu, N. & Han, Y. Genetic analysis of the mouse X inactivation center defines an 80-kb multifunction domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3836–3841 (1999).
Simmler, M. C. et al. A 94 kb genomic sequence 3′ to the murine Xist gene reveals an AT rich region containing a new testis specific gene Tsx. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 1713–1726 (1996).
Chureau, C. et al. Ftx is a non-coding RNA which affects Xist expression and chromatin structure within the X-inactivation center region. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 705–718 (2011).
Jonkers, I. et al. RNF12 is an X-encoded dose-dependent activator of X chromosome inactivation. Cell 139, 999–1011 (2009).
Chureau, C. et al. Comparative sequence analysis of the X-inactivation center region in mouse, human, and bovine. Genome Res. 12, 894–908 (2002).
Sun, S. et al. Jpx RNA activates Xist by evicting CTCF. Cell 153, 1537–1551 (2013).
Sun et al. show that Jpx allows Xist expression by alleviating the repressive action of CTCF on its promoter.
Lee, J. T. & Lu, N. Targeted mutagenesis of Tsix leads to nonrandom X inactivation. Cell 99, 47–57 (1999).
Lee, J. T. Regulation of X-chromosome counting by Tsix and Xite sequences. Science 309, 768–771 (2005).
Ogawa, Y. & Lee, J. T. Xite, X-inactivation intergenic transcription elements that regulate the probability of choice. Mol. Cell 11, 731–743 (2003).
Tian, D., Sun, S. & Lee, J. T. The long noncoding RNA, Jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation. Cell 143, 390–403 (2010).
Jeon, Y. & Lee, J. T. YY1 tethers Xist RNA to the inactive X nucleation center. Cell 146, 119–133 (2011).
Clemson, C. M., McNeil, J. A., Willard, H. F. & Lawrence, J. B. XIST RNA paints the inactive X chromosome at interphase: evidence for a novel RNA involved in nuclear/chromosome structure. J. Cell Biol. 132, 259–275 (1996).
Simon, M. D. et al. High-resolution Xist binding maps reveal two-step spreading during X-chromosome inactivation. Nature 504, 465–469 (2013).
Engreitz, J. M. et al. The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome. Science 341, 1237973 (2013).
Minajigi, A. et al. Chromosomes. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation. Science 349, aab2276 (2015).
This work shows that in mice, the Xi has two megadomains that are separated by the Dxz4 boundary, and that Xist lncRNA shapes the 3D organization of the Xi. The authors also suggest that Xist interacts directly with cohesins and evicts them from the Xi.
McHugh, C. A. et al. The Xist lncRNA interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3. Nature 521, 232–236 (2015).
Chu, C. et al. Systematic discovery of Xist RNA binding proteins. Cell 161, 404–416 (2015).
Zhang, L. F., Huynh, K. D. & Lee, J. T. Perinucleolar targeting of the inactive X during S phase: evidence for a role in the maintenance of silencing. Cell 129, 693–706 (2007).
This paper describes the perinucleolar targeting of the Xi during S phase and shows that is dependent on Xist.
Giorgetti, L. et al. Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse. Nature 535, 575–579 (2016).
These authors find that Dxz4 deletion on the Xi in mouse cells induces a disruption in the formation of the two megadomains.
Splinter, E. et al. The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev. 25, 1371–1383 (2011).
Hall, L. L. et al. An ectopic human XIST gene can induce chromosome inactivation in postdifferentiation human HT-1080 cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8677–8682 (2002).
Kelsey, A. D. et al. Impact of flanking chromosomal sequences on localization and silencing by the human non-coding RNA XIST. Genome Biol. 16, 208 (2015).
Gartler, S. M. & Riggs, A. D. Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 17, 155–190 (1983).
Lyon, M. F. X-Chromosome inactivation and developmental patterns in mammals. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 47, 1–35 (1972).
Lyon, M. F. Possible mechanisms of X chromosome inactivation. Nat. New Biol. 232, 229–232 (1971).
Riggs, A. D. X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 14, 9–25 (1975).
Chao, W., Huynh, K. D., Spencer, R. J., Davidow, L. S. & Lee, J. T. CTCF, a candidate trans-acting factor for X-inactivation choice. Science 295, 345–347 (2002).
Monkhorst, K., Jonkers, I., Rentmeester, E., Grosveld, F. & Gribnau, J. X inactivation counting and choice is a stochastic process: evidence for involvement of an X-linked activator. Cell 132, 410–421 (2008).
Sado, T., Wang, Z., Sasaki, H. & Li, E. Regulation of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice by Tsix. Development 128, 1275–1286 (2001).
Navarro, P. et al. Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science 321, 1693–1695 (2008).
Gontan, C. et al. RNF12 initiates X-chromosome inactivation by targeting REX1 for degradation. Nature 485, 386–390 (2012).
Shin, J. et al. Maternal Rnf12/RLIM is required for imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice. Nature 467, 977–981 (2010).
Shin, J. et al. RLIM is dispensable for X-chromosome inactivation in the mouse embryonic epiblast. Nature 511, 86–89 (2014).
Barakat, T. S. et al. The trans-activator RNF12 and cis-acting elements effectuate X chromosome inactivation independent of X-pairing. Mol. Cell 53, 965–978 (2014).
Chow, J. C., Hall, L. L., Clemson, C. M., Lawrence, J. B. & Brown, C. J. Characterization of expression at the human XIST locus in somatic, embryonal carcinoma, and transgenic cell lines. Genomics 82, 309–322 (2003).
Johnston, C. M., Newall, A. E., Brockdorff, N. & Nesterova, T. B. Enox, a novel gene that maps 10 kb upstream of Xist and partially escapes X inactivation. Genomics 80, 236–244 (2002).
Ostendorff, H. P. et al. Ubiquitination-dependent cofactor exchange on LIM homeodomain transcription factors. Nature 416, 99–103 (2002).
Wang, F. et al. Regulation of X-linked gene expression during early mouse development by Rlim. eLife 5, e19127 (2016).
Donohoe, M. E., Silva, S. S., Pinter, S. F., Xu, N. & Lee, J. T. The pluripotency factor Oct4 interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting. Nature 460, 128–132 (2009).
Xu, N., Tsai, C.-l. & Lee, J. T. Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. Science 311, 1149–1152 (2006).
This paper describes the importance of X–X pairing for XCI initiation.
Bacher, C. P. et al. Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 293–299 (2006).
In this publication, the authors observed that X–X pairing occurs at the initiation of XCI.
Xu, N., Donohoe, M. E., Silva, S. S. & Lee, J. T. Evidence that homologous X-chromosome pairing requires transcription and Ctcf protein. Nat. Genet. 39, 1390–1396 (2007).
Masui, O. et al. Live-cell chromosome dynamics and outcome of X chromosome pairing events during ES cell differentiation. Cell 145, 447–458 (2011).
Lee, J. T. Homozygous Tsix mutant mice reveal a sex-ratio distortion and revert to random X-inactivation. Nat. Genet. 32, 195–200 (2002).
Kung, J. T. et al. Locus-specific targeting to the X chromosome revealed by the RNA interactome of CTCF. Mol. Cell 57, 361–375 (2015).
In this publication, CTCF is shown to interact with Tsix RNA and to be a key player in X–X pairing.
Augui, S. et al. Sensing X chromosome pairs before X inactivation via a novel X-pairing region of the Xic. Science 318, 1632–1636 (2007).
Sun, S., Fukue, Y., Nolen, L., Sadreyev, R. & Lee, J. T. Characterization of Xpr (Xpct) reveals instability but no effects on X-chromosome pairing or Xist expression. Transcription 1, 46–56 (2010).
Thatcher, K. N., Peddada, S., Yasui, D. H. & Lasalle, J. M. Homologous pairing of 15q11–13 imprinted domains in brain is developmentally regulated but deficient in Rett and autism samples. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 785–797 (2005).
Hewitt, S. L. et al. RAG-1 and ATM coordinate monoallelic recombination and nuclear positioning of immunoglobulin loci. Nat. Immunol. 10, 655–664 (2009).
Hogan, M. S., Parfitt, D. E., Zepeda-Mendoza, C. J., Shen, M. M. & Spector, D. L. Transient pairing of homologous Oct4 alleles accompanies the onset of embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 16, 275–288 (2015).
Zorca, C. E. et al. Myosin VI regulates gene pairing and transcriptional pause release in T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1587–E1593 (2015).
Okamoto, I. et al. Eutherian mammals use diverse strategies to initiate X-chromosome inactivation during development. Nature 472, 370–374 (2011).
Petropoulos, S. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals lineage and X chromosome dynamics in human preimplantation embryos. Cell 165, 1012–1026 (2016).
Theunissen, T. W. et al. Molecular criteria for defining the naive human pluripotent state. Cell Stem Cell 19, 502–515 (2016).
Vallot, C. et al. XACT, a long noncoding transcript coating the active X chromosome in human pluripotent cells. Nat. Genet. 45, 239–241 (2013).
Vallot, C. et al. XACT noncoding RNA competes with XIST in the control of X chromosome activity during human early development. Cell Stem Cell 20, 102–111 (2017).
Makhlouf, M. et al. A prominent and conserved role for YY1 in Xist transcriptional activation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4878 (2014).
Chapman, A. G., Cotton, A. M., Kelsey, A. D. & Brown, C. J. Differentially methylated CpG island within human XIST mediates alternative P2 transcription and YY1 binding. BMC Genet. 15, 89 (2014).
Jonkers, I. et al. Xist RNA is confined to the nuclear territory of the silenced X chromosome throughout the cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 5583–5594 (2008).
Bischoff, A. et al. Differences of size and shape of active and inactive X-chromosome domains in human amniotic fluid cell nuclei. Microsc. Res. Tech. 25, 68–77 (1993).
Eils, R. et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of painted human interphase chromosomes: active and inactive X chromosome territories have similar volumes but differ in shape and surface structure. J. Cell Biol. 135, 1427–1440 (1996).
This paper shows that the Xi territory is characterized by a spherical shape and smooth surface.
Teller, K. et al. A top-down analysis of Xa- and Xi-territories reveals differences of higher order structure at ≥20 Mb genomic length scales. Nucleus 2, 465–477 (2011).
Naughton, C., Sproul, D., Hamilton, C. & Gilbert, N. Analysis of active and inactive X chromosome architecture reveals the independent organization of 30 nm and large-scale chromatin structures. Mol. Cell 40, 397–409 (2010).
These authors find that the compaction of the Xi is only 1.2-fold higher than that of the Xa. This paper also argues for a non-monotonous compaction of the Xi.
Rego, A., Sinclair, P. B., Tao, W., Kireev, I. & Belmont, A. S. The facultative heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome has a distinctive condensed ultrastructure. J. Cell Sci. 121, 1119–1127 (2008).
Smeets, D. et al. Three-dimensional super-resolution microscopy of the inactive X chromosome territory reveals a collapse of its active nuclear compartment harboring distinct Xist RNA foci. Epigenetics Chromatin 7, 8 (2014).
In this work, the authors show that the Xi displays a sponge-like structure, in which escapee genes are distributed throughout the Xi territory.
Cremer, T. et al. The 4D nucleome: evidence for a dynamic nuclear landscape based on co-aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments. FEBS Lett. 589, 2931–2943 (2015).
Nagano, T. et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502, 59–64 (2013).
Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
Deng, X. et al. Bipartite structure of the inactive mouse X chromosome. Genome Biol. 16, 152 (2015).
Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).
In this paper, the authors show that in human cells, the Xi is folded into two megadomains separated by the DXZ4 boundary. This work also finds that Xi exhibits superloops, among which DXZ4 and FIRRE interact.
Wang, S. et al. Spatial organization of chromatin domains and compartments in single chromosomes. Science 353, 598–602 (2016).
Darrow, E. M. et al. Deletion of DXZ4 on the human inactive X chromosome alters higher-order genome architecture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E45504–E45512 (2016).
This paper shows that deletion of DXZ4 in human cells leads to the disappearance of the two megadomains of the Xi.
Horakova, A. H., Moseley, S. C., Mclaughlin, C. R., Tremblay, D. C. & Chadwick, B. P. The macrosatellite DXZ4 mediates CTCF-dependent long-range intrachromosomal interactions on the human inactive X chromosome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 4367–4377 (2012).
Chen, C. Y. et al. YY1 binding association with sex-biased transcription revealed through X-linked transcript levels and allelic binding analyses. Sci. Rep. 6, 37324 (2016).
Tang, Z. et al. CTCF-mediated human 3D genome architecture reveals chromatin topology for transcription. Cell 163, 1611–1627 (2015).
Yang, F. et al. The lncRNA Firre anchors the inactive X chromosome to the nucleolus by binding CTCF and maintains H3K27me3 methylation. Genome Biol. 16, 52 (2015).
Ding, Z. et al. Quantitative genetics of CTCF binding reveal local sequence effects and different modes of X-chromosome association. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004798 (2014).
Berletch, J. B. et al. Escape from X inactivation varies in mouse tissues. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005079 (2015).
Yao, H. et al. Mediation of CTCF transcriptional insulation by DEAD-box RNA-binding protein p68 and steroid receptor RNA activator SRA. Genes Dev. 24, 2543–2555 (2010).
Li, W. et al. Functional roles of enhancer RNAs for oestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. Nature 498, 516–520 (2013).
Zhao, X. et al. CTCF cooperates with noncoding RNA MYCNOS to promote neuroblastoma progression through facilitating MYCN expression. Oncogene 35, 3565–3576 (2016).
Saldaña-Meyer, R. et al. CTCF regulates the human p53 gene through direct interaction with its natural antisense transcript, Wrap53. Genes Dev. 28, 723–734 (2014).
Balaton, B. P. & Brown, C. J. Escape artists of the X chromosome. Trends Genet. 32, 348–359 (2016).
Berletch, J. B., Yang, F. & Disteche, C. M. Escape from X inactivation in mice and humans. Genome Biol. 11, 213 (2010).
Yang, F., Babak, T., Shendure, J. & Disteche, C. M. Global survey of escape from X inactivation by RNA-sequencing in mouse. Genome Res. 20, 614–622 (2010).
Li, S. M. et al. Transcriptome-wide survey of mouse CNS-derived cells reveals monoallelic expression within novel gene families. PLoS ONE 7, e31751 (2012).
Calabrese, J. M. et al. Site-specific silencing of regulatory elements as a mechanism of X inactivation. Cell 151, 951–963 (2012).
These authors find that Xi-silencing genes can be located and maintained outside the Xi territory and that transcription can occur inside the Xi.
Marks, H. et al. Dynamics of gene silencing during X inactivation using allele-specific RNA-seq. Genome Biol. 16, 149 (2015).
Dietzel, S. et al. The 3D positioning of ANT2 and ANT3 genes within female X chromosome territories correlates with gene activity. Exp. Cell Res. 252, 363–375 (1999).
Namekawa, S. H., Payer, B., Huynh, K. D., Jaenisch, R. & Lee, J. T. Two-step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 3187–3205 (2010).
Chaumeil, J., Le Baccon, P., Wutz, A. & Heard, E. A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. Genes Dev. 20, 2223–2237 (2006).
Chow, J. C. et al. LINE-1 activity in facultative heterochromatin formation during X chromosome inactivation. Cell 141, 956–969 (2010).
These authors show that the Xi is formed by a transcriptionally silent core, marked by Xist, and that escapees are located exterior to this core.
Clemson, C. M., Hall, L. L., Byron, M., McNeil, J. & Lawrence, J. B. The X chromosome is organized into a gene-rich outer rim and an internal core containing silenced nongenic sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7688–7693 (2006).
These authors show that the internal core of the Xi is composed of non-genic sequences and that the outer rim is formed by gene-rich regions regardless of their transcriptional activity.
Filippova, G. N. et al. Boundaries between chromosomal domains of X inactivation and escape bind CTCF and lack CpG methylation during early development. Dev. Cell 8, 31–42 (2005).
Goto, Y. & Kimura, H. Inactive X chromosome-specific histone H3 modifications and CpG hypomethylation flank a chromatin boundary between an X-inactivated and an escape gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 7416–7428 (2009).
Horakova, A. H. et al. The mouse DXZ4 homolog retains Ctcf binding and proximity to Pls3 despite substantial organizational differences compared to the primate macrosatellite. Genome Biol. 13, R70 (2012).
In this work, the authors show that the structure and organization of Dxz4 in mice and DXZ4 in humans are different.
Chadwick, B. P. DXZ4 chromatin adopts an opposing conformation to that of the surrounding chromosome and acquires a novel inactive X-specific role involving CTCF and antisense transcripts. Genome Res. 18, 1259–1269 (2008).
Chadwick, B. P. & Willard, H. F. Multiple spatially distinct types of facultative heterochromatin on the human inactive X chromosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17450–17455 (2004).
Hacisuleyman, E. et al. Topological organization of multichromosomal regions by the long intergenic noncoding RNA Firre. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 198–206 (2014).
Tsai, C. L., Rowntree, R. K., Cohen, D. E. & Lee, J. T. Higher order chromatin structure at the X-inactivation center via looping DNA. Dev. Biol. 319, 416–425 (2008).
This paper describes that the Xic is partitioned into two distinct TADs.
Giorgetti, L. et al. Predictive polymer modeling reveals coupled fluctuations in chromosome conformation and transcription. Cell 157, 950–963 (2014).
Spencer, R. J. et al. A boundary element between Tsix and Xist binds the chromatin insulator Ctcf and contributes to initiation of X-chromosome inactivation. Genetics 189, 441–454 (2011).
Barr, M. L. & Bertram, E. G. A morphological distinction between neurones of the male and female, and the behaviour of the nucleolar satellite during accelerated nucleoprotein synthesis. Nature 163, 676 (1949).
Bourgeois, C. A., Laquerriere, F., Hemon, D., Hubert, J. & Bouteille, M. New data on the in situ position of the inactive X chromosome in the interphase nucleus of human fibroblasts. Hum. Genet. 69, 122–129 (1985).
Dyer, K. A., Canfield, T. K. & Gartler, S. M. Molecular cytological differentiation of active from inactive X domains in interphase: implications for X chromosome inactivation. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 50, 116–120 (1989).
Padeken, J. & Heun, P. Nucleolus and nuclear periphery: Velcro for heterochromatin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 28, 54–60 (2014).
Mekhail, K. & Moazed, D. The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 317–328 (2010).
Yusufzai, T. M., Tagami, H., Nakatani, Y. & Felsenfeld, G. CTCF tethers an insulator to subnuclear sites, suggesting shared insulator mechanisms across species. Mol. Cell 13, 291–298 (2004).
Branco, M. R. & Pombo, A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol. 4, 780–788 (2006).
Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
Zuin, J. et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 996–1001 (2014).