Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Food addiction and obesity: unnecessary medicalization of hedonic overeating

Abstract

The concept of addiction is loaded with connotations and is often used for its political as much as its medical utility. The scientific case for 'food addiction' as a clinical phenotype currently rests on its association with generic diagnostic criteria for substance-related disorders being applied to everyday foods and eating-related problems. This has fused the concept of obesity with addiction regardless of whether it fits the definition. The hedonic, or reward, system can account for the ingestion of foods and drugs, confirming that they share neural substrates that differentiate liking and wanting. These are normal processes that are recruited for natural homeostatic behaviours and can explain the phenomenon of hedonic overeating as a consequence of human motivation pushed to extremes by an obesogenic environment. Food addiction constitutes a medicalization of common eating behaviours, taking on the properties of a disease. The use of this medical language has implications for the way in which society views overeating and obesity.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Schulte, E. M., Joyner, M. A., Potenza, M. N., Grilo, C. M. & Gearhardt, A. N. Current considerations regarding food addiction. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 17, 1–8 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Carter, A. et al. The neurobiology of “food addiction” and its implications for obesity treatment and policy. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 36, 105–128 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Davis, C. A commentary on the associations among 'food addiction', binge eating disorder, and obesity: overlapping conditions with idiosyncratic clinical features. Appetite http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.001 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Ziauddeen, H., Farooqi, I. S. & Fletcher, P. C. Obesity and the brain: how convincing is the addiction model? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 279–286 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Avena, N. M., Gearhardt, A. N., Gold, M. S., Wang, G.-J. & Potenza, M. N. Tossing the baby out with the bathwater after a brief rinse? The potential downside of dismissing food addiction based on limited data. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 514–514 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Westwater, M. L., Fletcher, P. C. & Ziauddeen, H. Sugar addiction: the state of the science. Eur. J. Nutr. 55, 55–69 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Hebebrand, J. et al. “Eating addiction”, rather than “food addiction”, better captures addictive-like eating behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 47, 295–306 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Albayrak, Ö., Wölfle, S. M. & Hebebrand, J. Does food addiction exist? A phenomenological discussion based on the psychiatric classification of substance-related disorders and addiction. Obes. Facts 5, 165–179 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Rogers, P. J. Food and drug addictions: similarities and differences. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 153, 182–190 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Long, C. G., Blundell, J. E. & Finlayson, G. A. Systematic review of the application and correlates of YFAS-diagnosed 'food addiction' in humans: are eating-related 'addictions' a cause for concern or empty concepts? Obes. Facts 8, 386–401 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Fraser, S. Junk: overeating and obesity and the neuroscience of addiction. Addict. Res. Theory 21, 496–506 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Corwin, R. L. & Hayes, J. E. in Fructose, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Sucrose and Health (ed. Rippe, J. M.) 199–215 (Springer, 2014).

  13. 13

    World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet No 311. WHO http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ (2016).

  14. 14

    Butland, B. et al. Foresight. Tackling obesities: future choices. Project report. Gov.uk https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/287937/07-1184x-tackling-obesities-future-choices-report.pdf (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Levi, J., Segal, L. M., Laurent, R. S., Lang, A. & Rayburn, J. F as in fat: how obesity threatens America's future 2012. Trust for America's Health http://healthyamericans.org/assets/files/TFAH2012FasInFat18.pdf (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Stice, E., Figlewicz, D. P., Gosnell, B. A., Levine, A. S. & Pratt, W. E. The contribution of brain reward circuits to the obesity epidemic. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 2047–2058 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Ziauddeen, H., Alonso-Alonso, M., Hill, J. O., Kelley, M. & Khan, N. A. Obesity and the neurocognitive basis of food reward and the control of intake. Adv. Nutr. 6, 474–486 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    American Medical Association. Recognition of obesity as a disease. Resolution 420 (A-13). National Public Radio http://www.npr.org/documents/2013/jun/ama-resolution-obesity.pdf (2013).

  19. 19

    Allison, D. B. et al. Obesity as a disease: a white paper on evidence and arguments commissioned by the Council of the Obesity Society. Obesity 16, 1161–1177 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Bray, G. A. Medical consequences of obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89, 2583–2589 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®) (American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013).

  22. 22

    Attia, E. et al. Feeding and eating disorders in DSM-5. Am. J. Psychiatry 170, 1237–1239 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Gearhardt, A. N., Grilo, C. M., DiLeone, R. J., Brownell, K. D. & Potenza, M. N. Can food be addictive? Public health and policy implications. Addiction 106, 1208–1212 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Meule, A. How prevalent is “food addiction”? Front. Psychiatry 2, 61 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    DePierre, J. A., Puhl, R. M. & Luedicke, J. A new stigmatized identity? Comparisons of a “food addict” label with other stigmatized health conditions. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 35, 10–21 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Lee, N. M. et al. Public views on food addiction and obesity: implications for policy and treatment. PLoS ONE 8, e74836 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Smith, D. G. & Robbins, T. W. The neurobiological underpinnings of obesity and binge eating: a rationale for adopting the food addiction model. Biol. Psychiatry 73, 804–810 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Ziauddeen, H. & Fletcher, P. C. Is food addiction a valid and useful concept? Obes. Rev. 14, 19–28 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Hone-Blanchet, A. & Fecteau, S. Overlap of food addiction and substance use disorders definitions: analysis of animal and human studies. Neuropharmacology 85, 81–90 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Basurte, I. & Szerman, N. Food addiction: a critical reflexion. Salud Mental 39, 107–108 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Benton, D. & Young, H. A meta-analysis of the relationship between brain dopamine receptors and obesity: a matter of changes in behavior rather than food addiction? Int. J. Obes. 40, S12–S21 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Blundell, J. E. & Finlayson, G. Food addiction not helpful: the hedonic component — implicit wanting — is important. Addiction 106, 1216–1218 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Oxford English Dictionary. “addicted, adj. and n.” http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/2179 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).

  34. 34

    Stepney, R. The concept of addiction: its use and abuse in the media and science. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 11, S15–S20 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Alexander, B. The Globalization of Addiction: A Study in Poverty of the Spirit (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Raymond, K.-L., Kannis-Dymand, L. & Lovell, G. P. A graduated food addiction classification approach significantly differentiates obesity among people with type 2 diabetes. J. Health Psychol. 1, 9 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Gearhardt, A. N., Corbin, W. R. & Brownell, K. D. Preliminary validation of the Yale food addiction scale. Appetite 52, 430–436 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Gearhardt, A. N., Corbin, W. R. & Brownell, K. D. Development of the Yale Food Addiction Scale Version 2.0. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 30, 113 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Schulte, E. M., Grilo, C. M. & Gearhardt, A. N. Shared and unique mechanisms underlying binge eating disorder and addictive disorders. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 44, 125–139 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Marks, I. Behavioural (non-chemical) addictions. Br. J. Addict. 85, 1389–1394 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Blaszczynski, A. Commentary on: are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. J. Behav. Addict. 4, 142–144 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Billieux, J., Schimmenti, A., Khazaal, Y., Maurage, P. & Heeren, A. Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. J. Behav. Addict. 4, 119–123 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Avena, N. M., Rada, P. & Hoebel, B. G. Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 32, 20–39 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Davis, C. Compulsive overeating as an addictive behavior: overlap between food addiction and binge eating disorder. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2, 171–178 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Rogers, P. J. & Smit, H. J. Food craving and food “addiction”: a critical review of the evidence from a biopsychosocial perspective. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 66, 3–14 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Dalton, M. & Finlayson, G. in Satiation, Satiety and the Control of Food Intake: Theory and Practice (eds Blundell, J. E. & Bellisle, F.) 221–237 (Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Berridge, K. C. 'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiol. Behav. 97, 537–550 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Finlayson, G., King, N. & Blundell, J. E. Liking versus wanting food: Importance for human appetite control and weight regulation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 31, 987–1002 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Berridge, K. C. & Kringelbach, M. L. Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals. Psychopharmacology 199, 457–480 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Berridge, K. C. & Robinson, T. E. Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci. 26, 507–513 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res. Rev. 18, 247–291 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Stice, E., Spoor, S., Bohon, C., Veldhuizen, M. & Small, D. Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 117, 924–935 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Cambridge, V. C. et al. Neural and behavioral effects of a novel mu opioid receptor antagonist in binge-eating obese people. Biol. Psychiatry 73, 887–894 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Finlayson, G., King, N. & Blundell, J. E. Is it possible to dissociate 'liking' and 'wanting' for foods in humans? A novel experimental procedure. Physiol. Behav. 90, 36–42 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Rogers, P. J. & Hardman, C. A. Food reward. What it is and how to measure it. Appetite 90, 1–15 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Epstein, L. H., Leddy, J. J., Temple, J. L. & Faith, M. S. Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis. Psychol. Bull. 133, 884–906 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Finlayson, G., King, N. & Blundell, J. The role of implicit wanting in relation to explicit liking and wanting for food: implications for appetite control. Appetite 50, 120–127 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Griffioen-Roose, S., Finlayson, G., Mars, M., Blundell, J. E. & de Graaf, C. Measuring food reward and the transfer effect of sensory specific satiety. Appetite 55, 648–655 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    French, S. A., Mitchell, N. R., Finlayson, G., Blundell, J. E. & Jeffery, R. W. Questionnaire and laboratory measures of eating behavior. Associations with energy intake and BMI in a community sample of working adults. Appetite 72, 50–58 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Gormally, J., Black, S., Daston, S. & Rardin, D. The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons. Addict. Behav. 7, 47–55 (1982).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Dalton, M. & Finlayson, G. Psychobiological examination of liking and wanting for fat and sweet taste in trait binge eating females. Physiol. Behav. 136, 128–134 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Eaton, S. B. & Eaton, S. B. An evolutionary perspective on human physical activity: implications for health. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 136, 153–159 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Tremblay, A. & Doucet, E. Obesity: a disease or a biological adaptation? Obes. Rev. 1, 27–35 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. WHO http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/bluebook.pdf (1992).

  65. 65

    McHugh, P. R. & Slavney, P. R. Mental illness — comprehensive evaluation or checklist? N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 1853–1855 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Cuthbert, B. N. & Kozak, M. J. Constructing constructs for psychopathology: the NIMH research domain criteria. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 122, 928–937 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Rada, P., Avena, N. M. & Hoebel, B. G. Daily bingeing on sugar repeatedly releases dopamine in the accumbens shell. Neuroscience 134, 737–744 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Rada, P., Bocarsly, M. E., Barson, J. R., Hoebel, B. G. & Leibowitz, S. F. Reduced accumbens dopamine in Sprague–Dawley rats prone to overeating a fat-rich diet. Physiol. Behav. 101, 394–400 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Johnson, P. M. & Kenny, P. J. Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 635–641 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Thornley, S., McRobbie, H., Eyles, H., Walker, N. & Simmons, G. The obesity epidemic: Is glycemic index the key to unlocking a hidden addiction? Med. Hypotheses 71, 709–714 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71

    Schulte, E. M., Avena, N. M. & Gearhardt, A. N. Which foods may be addictive? The roles of processing, fat content, and glycemic load. PLoS ONE 10, e0117959 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72

    Goldstone, A. P. et al. Fasting biases brain reward systems towards high-calorie foods. Eur. J. Neurosci. 30, 1625–1635 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73

    Rosenbaum, M., Sy, M., Pavlovich, K., Leibel, R. L. & Hirsch, J. Leptin reverses weight loss–induced changes in regional neural activity responses to visual food stimuli. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 2583–2591 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74

    Blundell, J. et al. The fat paradox: fat-induced satiety signals versus high fat overconsumption. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 19, 832 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75

    Swinburn, B. A. et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 378, 804–814 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76

    Swinburn, B., Sacks, G. & Ravussin, E. Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 90, 1453–1456 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77

    Barrett, D. Supernormal Stimuli: How Primal Urges Overran their Evolutionary Purpose (W. W. Norton & Company, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78

    Goodwin, B., Browne, M. & Rockloff, M. Measuring preference for supernormal over natural rewards: a two-dimensional anticipatory pleasure scale. Evol. Psychol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474704915613914 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks J. Blundell (University of Leeds, UK) for his comments and discussion about this article and acknowledges the contribution of C. Long and M. Dalton (University of Leeds, UK) in its preparation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Finlayson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Finlayson, G. Food addiction and obesity: unnecessary medicalization of hedonic overeating. Nat Rev Endocrinol 13, 493–498 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.61

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing