Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Bone

Which model to predict fracture risk?

Prediction of fracture risk is increasingly used to guide clinical use of antiosteoporosis drugs. Data from a large primary care prospective study in 10 countries has now been used to generate an empirical composite 5-year fracture risk model based on clinical data (excluding BMD). This model performed better than current widely used models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bolland, M. J. et al. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 420–427 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aspray, T. J. New horizons in fracture risk assessment. Age Ageing 42, 548–554 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nayak, S., Edwards, D. L., Saleh, A. A. & Greenspan, S. L. Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review. Osteoporos. Int. 25, 23–49 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. FitzGerald, G. et al. Empirically based composite fracture prediction model from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women (GLOW). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metabol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3468.

  5. Hooven, F. H. et al. The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW): rationale and study design. Osteoporos. Int. 20, 1107–1116 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Harrell, F. E. Jr, Califf, R. M., Pryor, D. B., Lee, K. L. & Rosati, R. A. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA 247, 2543–2546 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis, J. A. et al. The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos. Int. 18, 1033–1046 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brennan, S. L. et al. FRAX provides robust fracture prediction regardless of socioeconomic status. Osteoporos. Int. 25, 61–69 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen, N. D., Frost, S. A., Center, J. R., Eisman, J. A. & Nguyen, T. V. Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos. Int. 19, 1431–1444 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Díez-Pérez, A. et al. Risk factors for treatment failure with antiosteoporosis medication: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). J. Bone Miner. Res. 29, 260–267 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We join the authors of the FitzGerald et al. manuscript in dedicating these comments to our friend Steven Boonen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Bouillon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouillon, R., Vanderschueren, D. Which model to predict fracture risk?. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10, 194–195 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.15

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.15

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing