Abstract
The increasing availability of individual-level data from clinical trials could allow the relative efficacy of new drugs to be assessed in a robust, cost-effective and timely way.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Planning a future randomized clinical trial based on a network of relevant past trials
Trials Open Access 11 July 2018
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Bombardier, C. et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 1520–1528 (2000).
EUnetHTA WP5 Joint Action 2 Strand A. Rapid Relative Effectiveness Assessment of pharmaceuticals. Pilot assessment using the HTA Core Model® for rapid relative effectiveness assessment: canagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [online]
Schneeweiss S. et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 5, 480–486 (2012).
Strom, B. et al. Data sharing, year 1 — access to data from industry-sponsored clinical trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2052–2054 (2014).
Keener, A. B. Group seeks standardisation for what clinical trials must measure. Nature Med. 20, 798–799 (2014).
Acknowledgements
S.S. is partially funded by grants/contracts from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the US Food and Drug Administration and the NIH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
S. S. is a consultant to WHISCON, LLC and to Aetion, Inc., a software manufacturer in which he also owns equity. He is the principal investigator of investigator-initiated grants to the Brigham and Women's Hospital from Novartis, Genentech and Boehringer Ingelheim that are unrelated to the topic of this study.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information S1 (figure)
The trade-off between scientific (internal) validity and feasibility of study designs for Relative Efficacy Assessment (REA). (PDF 111 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eichler, HG., Thomson, A., Eichler, I. et al. Assessing the relative efficacy of new drugs: an emerging opportunity. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14, 443–444 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4664
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4664
This article is cited by
-
The value of anticancer drugs — a regulatory view
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (2022)
-
Network meta-analysis from a pairwise meta-analysis design: to assess the comparative effectiveness of oral care interventions in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients
Clinical Oral Investigations (2021)
-
HTA for pharmaceuticals in Europe: will the mountain deliver a mouse?
The European Journal of Health Economics (2020)
-
Planning a future randomized clinical trial based on a network of relevant past trials
Trials (2018)