Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Accelerating development of scientific evidence for medical products within the existing US regulatory framework

Abstract

Growing access to diverse 'real-world' data sources is enabling new approaches to close persistent evidence gaps about the optimal use of medical products in real-world practice. Here, we argue that contrary to widespread impressions, existing FDA regulations embody sufficient flexibility to accommodate the emerging tools and methods needed to achieve this goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Sherman, R. E. et al. Real-world evidence – what is it and what can it tell us? N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2293–2297 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Califf, R. M. et al. Transforming evidence generation to support health and health care decisions. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2395–2400 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Califf, R. M. et al. Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007–2010. JAMA 307, 1838–1847 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eguale, T. et al. Association of off-label drug use and adverse drug events in an adult population. JAMA Intern. Med. 176, 55–63 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. McCall of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA, for editorial assistance with this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina L. Hunter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

At the time this manuscript was drafted, R.M.C. was the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration. Prior to his appointment to the FDA, he received research grant funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the National Institutes of Health, the US Food and Drug Administration, Amylin, and Eli Lilly and Company; research grants and consulting payments from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Research and Development, Merck, and Novartis; consulting payments from Amgen, Bayer Healthcare, BMEB Services, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Heart.org – Daiichi Sankyo, Kowa, Les Laboratoires Servier, Medscape/Heart.org, Regado, and Roche; he also held equity in N30 Pharma and Portola. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information S1 (box)

Flexibility of the FDA's historical and current evidence standards (PDF 264 kb)

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

National Science Foundation. Business Research and Development and Innovation: 2011 Detailed Statistical Tables. NSF 15-307

Darzalex (daratumumab) prescribing information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sherman, R., Davies, K., Robb, M. et al. Accelerating development of scientific evidence for medical products within the existing US regulatory framework. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16, 297–298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.25

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.25

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research