Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Screening for oesophageal cancer

Abstract

Oesophageal cancer is a global health problem with high mortality due to the advanced nature of the disease at presentation; therefore, detection at an early stage significantly improves outcome. Oesophageal squamous-cell cancer is preceded by dysplasia and oesophageal adenocarcinoma is preceded by Barrett's oesophagus, which progresses to cancer via intermediate dysplastic stages. Screening to detect these preneoplastic lesions has the potential to substantially reduce mortality and morbidity. However, the risks and benefits of such programmes to individuals and to society need to be carefully weighed. Endoscopic screening is invasive, costly and error prone owing to sampling bias and the subjective diagnosis of dysplasia. Non-endoscopic cell-sampling methods are less invasive and more cost effective than endoscopy, but the sensitivity and specificity of cytological assessment of atypia has been disappointing. The use of biomarkers to analyse samples collected using pan-oesophageal cell-collection devices may improve diagnostic accuracy; however, further work is required to confirm this. The psychological and economic implications of screening as well as the feasibility of implementing such programmes must also be considered.

Key Points

  • Oesophageal cancer is a public health concern worldwide

  • With the abysmal outcome for oesophageal cancer (5-year survival <20%) pursuit of a screening strategy is essential

  • Increased public awareness coupled with early diagnosis is likely to have the biggest impact on reducing population mortality from oesophageal cancer

  • Advances in diagnostic technologies and minimally invasive treatments mean that the time is ripe to consider a formalized screening programme for this disease

  • Screening tests should be of low cost and easily administered from the perspective of the patient and the health-care provider

  • Further research in quality of life, economics, biomarkers and device technologies is required to allow screening to be adopted into clinical practice

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Oesophageal cancer incidence and mortality worldwide—2008 estimates.
Figure 2: Pathological sequence of oesophageal cancer progression.
Figure 3: Endoscopic photographs of oesophageal lesions.
Figure 4: Oesophageal cell collection using non-endoscopic devices.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodman, W. L. IV. Cancer and precancerous conditions. Ann. Surg. 59, 47–64 (1914).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer: Early detection of cancer. World Health Organization [online], (2010).

  3. Cancer: Screening for various cancers. World Health Organization [online] (2012).

  4. NHS. NHS Cervical Screening Programme [online], (2012).

  5. Machii, R. & Saito, H. Time trends in cervical cancer screening rates in the OECD countries. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 731–732 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benson, V. S. et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries. Int. J. Cancer 122, 1357–1367 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NHS. NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme [online], (2011).

  8. Fitzgerald, R. C. (Ed.) Pre-invasive disease: pathogenesis and clinical management 1st edn (Springer, London, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferlay, J. et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer 127, 2893–2917 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Day, N. E. Some aspects of the epidemiology of esophageal cancer. Cancer Res. 35, 3304–3307 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, M. et al. A large proportion of esophageal cancer cases and the incidence difference between regions are attributable to lifestyle risk factors in China. Cancer Lett. 308, 189–196 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nasrollahzadeh, D. et al. Opium, tobacco, and alcohol use in relation to oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a high-risk area of Iran. Br. J. Cancer 98, 1857–1863 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamangar, F., Chow, W. H., Abnet, C. C. & Dawsey, S. M. Environmental causes of esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 38, 27–57 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lepage, C., Rachet, B., Jooste, V., Faivre, J. & Coleman, M. P. Continuing rapid increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma in England and Wales. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 103, 2694–2699 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pohl, H., Sirovich, B. & Welch, H. G. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence: are we reaching the peak? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 19, 1468–1470 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Steevens, J., Botterweck, A. A., Dirx, M. J., van den Brandt, P. A. & Schouten, L. J. Trends in incidence of oesophageal and stomach cancer subtypes in Europe. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 22, 669–678 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bosetti, C. et al. Trends in oesophageal cancer incidence and mortality in Europe. Int. J. Cancer 122, 1118–1129 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Devesa, S. S., Blot, W. J. & Fraumeni, J. F. Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83, 2049–2053 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lagergren, J. Oesophageal cancer and gastro-oesophageal reflux: what is the relationship? Gut 53, 1064–1065 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubenstein, J. H., Scheiman, J. M., Sadeghi, S., Whiteman, D. & Inadomi, J. M. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux: synthesis and estimates from population studies. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 106, 254–260 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, J. et al. Major cancer mortality and changes in Yanting, 2004–2009: introduction to cancer challenges in a high risk area. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 12, 409–413 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group. Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359, 1727–1733 (2002).

  23. Aghcheli, K. et al. Prognostic factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma—a population-based study in Golestan Province, Iran, a high incidence area. PLoS One 6, e22152 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Prasad, G. A. et al. Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 137, 815–823 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, G. Q. et al. Long-term results of operation for 420 patients with early squamous cell esophageal carcinoma discovered by screening. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77, 1740–1744 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rex, D. K. et al. Screening for Barrett's esophagus in colonoscopy patients with and without heartburn. Gastroenterology 125, 1670–1677 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerson, L. B. & Banerjee, S. Screening for Barrett's esophagus in asymptomatic women. Gastrointest. Endosc. 70, 867–873 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilson, J. M. G. & Jungner, G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. WHO [online], (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, G. Q. et al. Histological precursors of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a 13 year prospective follow up study in a high risk population. Gut 54, 187–192 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sikkema, M., de Jonge, P. J., Steyerberg, E. W. & Kuipers, E. J. Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 235–244 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yousef, F. et al. The incidence of esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 168, 237–249 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hvid-Jensen, F., Pedersen, L., Drewes, A. M., Sorensen, H. T. & Funch-Jensen, P. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1375–1383 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Desai, T. K. et al. The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus: a meta-analysis. Gut (in press).

  34. National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit. RCS advancing surgical standards [online], (2010).

  35. Rees, J. R., Lao-Sirieix, P., Wong, A. & Fitzgerald, R. C. Treatment for Barrett's oesophagus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD004060 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shaheen, N. J. et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 2277–2288 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaheen, N. J. et al. Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology 141, 460–468 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Brouwers, M. C. et al. Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline. Implement Sci. 6, 112 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Brouwers, M. C. et al. What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? A systematic review. Implement Sci. 6, 111 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Fitzgerald, R. C. in Oxford Textbook of Medicine 5th edn Vol. 2 Ch. 15.7 (ed. Warrell, D. A., Cox, T. M. & John, J. D.) 2286–2304 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dawsey, S. M. et al. Mucosal iodine staining improves endoscopic visualization of squamous dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus in Linxian, China. Cancer 83, 220–231 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, G. Q. et al. Significance of screening by iodine staining of endoscopic examination in the area of high incidence of esophageal carcinoma [Chinese]. Ai Zheng 22, 175–177 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dong Wang, L. et al. Endoscopic screening and determination of p53 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in esophageal multistage carcinogenesis: a comparative study between high- and low-risk populations in Henan, northern China. Dis. Esophagus 15, 80–84 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang, H. et al. Cytologic screening for esophageal cancer in a high-risk population in Anyang County, China. Acta Cytol. 46, 445–452 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bergman, J. J. et al. Outcomes from a prospective trial of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of early squamous cell neoplasia of the esophagus. Gastrointest. Endosc. 74, 1181–1190 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ronkainen, J. et al. Prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology 129, 1825–1831 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kadri, S. R. et al. Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study. BMJ 341, c4372 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Reid, B. J. et al. Endoscopic biopsy can detect high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus without grossly recognizable neoplastic lesions. Gastroenterology 94, 81–90 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. American Gastroenterological Association et al. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 140, 1084–1091 (2011).

  50. Canto, M. I. & Kalloo, A. Chromoendoscopy for Barrett's esophagus in the twenty-first century: to stain or not to stain? Gastrointest. Endosc. 64, 200–205 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Curvers, W. L. et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging is more effective than standard endoscopy in identifying early-stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 139, 1106–1114 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bird-Lieberman, E. L. et al. Molecular imaging using fluorescent lectins permits rapid endoscopic identification of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Nat. Med. 18, 315–321 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Li, M. et al. Affinity peptide for targeted detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 139, 1472–1480 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Thota, P. N. et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation. Endoscopy 37, 559–565 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Catanzaro, A. et al. Prospective evaluation of 4-mm diameter endoscopes for esophagoscopy in sedated and unsedated patients. Gastrointest. Endosc. 57, 300–304 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Faulx, A. L. et al. Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 55, 620–623 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Shariff, M. K. et al. Randomized crossover study comparing efficacy of transnasal endoscopy with that of standard endoscopy to detect Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest. Endosc. (in press).

  58. Jobe, B. A. et al. Office-based unsedated small-caliber endoscopy is equivalent to conventional sedated endoscopy in screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: a randomized and blinded comparison. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101, 2693–2703 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Saeian, K. et al. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy accurately detects Barrett's metaplasia and dysplasia. Gastrointest. Endosc. 56, 472–478 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ramirez, F. C., Akins, R. & Shaukat, M. Screening of Barrett's esophagus with string-capsule endoscopy: a prospective blinded study of 100 consecutive patients using histology as the criterion standard. Gastrointest. Endosc. 68, 25–31 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mylonaki, M., Fritscher-Ravens, A. & Swain, P. Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 52, 1122–1126 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Pan, Q. J. et al. Cytologic detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions using balloon samplers and liquid-based cytology in asymptomatic adults in Llinxian, China. Acta Cytol. 52, 14–23 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Roth, M. J. et al. Cytologic detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions using balloon and sponge samplers in asymptomatic adults in Linxian, China. Cancer 80, 2047–2059 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Falk, G. W. et al. Surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus for dysplasia and cancer with balloon cytology. Gastroenterology 112, 1787–1797 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Qin, D. X. et al. Screening of esophageal and gastric cancer by occult blood bead detector. Cancer 71, 216–218 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hu, N. et al. Quantitative fluorescence image analysis of DNA content and nuclear morphology on esophageal balloon cytology smears and subsequent development of esophageal and gastric cardia cancer in Linxian, China. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 7, 59–64 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Triadifilopoulos, G. Cytosponge for Barrett's esophagus screening: when smart science matches simplicity. Gastroenterology 141, 766–768 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lao-Sirieix, P. et al. Non-endoscopic screening biomarkers for Barrett's oesophagus: from microarray analysis to the clinic. Gut 58, 1451–1459 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Weller, D. et al. The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England. Br. J. Cancer 97, 1601–1605 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Mistry, K. & Cable, G. Meta-analysis of prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate carcinoma. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 16, 95–101 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ferrini, R., Mannino, E., Ramsdell, E. & Hill, L. Screening mammography for breast cancer: American College of Preventive Medicine practice policy statement. Am. J. Prev. Med. 12, 340–341 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bhat, S. et al. Risk of malignant progression in Barrett's esophagus patients: results from a large population-based study. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 103, 1049–1057 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. BEST2. CPTU Cancer Prevention Trials Unit [online], (2011).

  74. Abnet, C. C. et al. A shared susceptibility locus in PLCE1 at 10q23 for gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 42, 764–767 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. von Brevern, M. et al. Loss of heterozygosity in sporadic oesophageal tumors in the tylosis oesophageal cancer (TOC) gene region of chromosome 17q. Oncogene 17, 2101–2105 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kelsell, D. P. et al. Close mapping of the focal non-epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) locus associated with oesophageal cancer (TOC). Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 857–860 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Yokoyama, A. et al. Successful screening for early esophageal cancer in alcoholics using endoscopy and mucosa iodine staining. Cancer 76, 928–934 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Yokoyama, A. et al. Cancer screening of upper aerodigestive tract in Japanese alcoholics with reference to drinking and smoking habits and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 genotype. Int. J. Cancer 68, 313–316 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ban, S., Toyonaga, A., Harada, H., Ikejiri, N. & Tanikawa, K. Iodine staining for early endoscopic detection of esophageal cancer in alcoholics. Endoscopy 30, 253–257 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Shiozaki, H. et al. Endoscopic screening of early esophageal cancer with the Lugol dye method in patients with head and neck cancers. Cancer 66, 2068–2071 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Lee, C. T. et al. Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy for the screening of esophageal cancer in patients with primary head and neck cancers. Endoscopy 42, 613–619 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Petit, T. et al. Systematic esophageal endoscopy screening in patients previously treated for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 12, 643–646 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Morimoto, M. et al. Significance of endoscopic screening and endoscopic resection for esophageal cancer in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer. Jpn J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 938–943 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Makuuchi, H. et al. Endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer in 788 patients with head and neck cancers. Tokai J. Exp. Clin. Med. 21, 139–145 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Murakami, S. et al. The utility of endoscopic screening for patients with esophageal or head and neck cancer. Dis. Esophagus 12, 186–190 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Gerson, L. B., Edson, R., Lavori, P. W. & Triadafilopoulos, G. Use of a simple symptom questionnaire to predict Barrett's esophagus in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 96, 2005–2012 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Rubenstein, J. H. & Taylor, J. B. Meta-analysis: the association of oesophageal adenocarcinoma with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 32, 1222–1227 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Fass, R. & Dickman, R. Clinical consequences of silent gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 8, 195–201 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Shaheen, N. J. Editorial: should women with heartburn undergo screening upper endoscopy for prevention of cancer? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 106, 261–263 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Spechler, S. J., Sharma, P., Souza, R. F., Inadomi, J. M. & Shaheen, N. J. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 140, 1084–1091 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Spechler, S. J., Sharma, P., Souza, R. F., Inadomi, J. M. & Shaheen, N. J. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 140, e18–e52 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Edelstein, Z. R., Bronner, M. P., Rosen, S. N. & Vaughan, T. L. Risk factors for Barrett's esophagus among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a community clinic-based case-control study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 834–842 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Thota, P. N. et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation. Endoscopy 37, 559–565 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Faulx, A. L. et al. Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 55, 620–623 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Whistance, R. N., Potter, S., Eveleigh, M. & Blazeby, J. M. in Pre-invasive disease: pathogenesis and clinical management 1st edn Ch. 13 (ed. Fitzgerald, R. C.) 245–268 (Springer, London, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  96. Barbiere, J. M. & Lyratzopoulos, G. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening followed by surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: a review. Gastroenterology 137, 1869–1876 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Corley, D. A., Kerlikowske, K., Verma, R. & Buffler, P. Protective association of aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 124, 47–56 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Rothwell, P. M. et al. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 377, 31–41 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Flossmann, E. & Rothwell, P. M. Effect of aspirin on long-term risk of colorectal cancer: consistent evidence from randomised and observational studies. Lancet 369, 1603–1613 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Rothwell, P. M. et al. Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials. Lancet 376, 1741–1750 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Cook, N. R. et al. Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer: the Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294, 47–55 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Das, D., Chilton, A. P. & Jankowski, J. A. Chemoprevention of oesophageal cancer and the ASPECT trial. Recent Results Cancer Res. 181, 161–169 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Stoner, G. D., Wang, L. S. & Chen, T. Chemoprevention of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 224, 337–349 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Limburg, P. J. et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, esophageal squamous cell cancer chemoprevention trial of selenomethionine and celecoxib. Gastroenterology 129, 863–873 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Bul, M. & Schroder, F. H. Screening for prostate cancer—the controversy continues, but can it be resolved? Acta Oncol. 50 (Suppl. 1), 4–11 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Weeks, B. E., Friedenberg, L. M., Southwell, B. G. & Slater, J. S. Behavioral consequences of conflict-oriented health news coverage: the 2009 mammography guideline controversy and online information seeking. Health Commun. 27, 158–166 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Cusumano, P. G. & Lifrange, E. The cancer screening controversy. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 20 (Suppl. 1), 1 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Lin, O. S. et al. Blinded comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux. Gastrointest. Endosc. 65, 577–583 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Galmiche, J. P. et al. Screening for esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus with wireless esophageal capsule endoscopy: a multicenter prospective trial in patients with reflux symptoms. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 103, 538–545 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Wang, G., Zhou, M. & Cong, Q. Lugol's solution in endoscopic diagnosis of early esophageal cancer [Chinese]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 75, 417–418 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Wang, G. Q. et al. Long-term results of operation for 420 patients with early squamous cell esophageal carcinoma discovered by screening. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77, 1740–1744 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Wang, L. D. et al. Cytological screening and 15 years' follow-up (1986–2001) for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions in a high-risk population in Anyang County, Henan Province, Northern China. Cancer Detect. Prev. 29, 317–322 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Lazarus, C., Jaskiewicz, K., Sumeruk, R. A. & Nainkin, J. Brush cytology technique in the detection of oesophageal carcinoma in the asymptomatic, high risk subject; a pilot survey. Cytopathology 3, 291–296 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Li, F. P. & Shiang, E. L. Screening for oesophageal cancer in 62,000 Chinese. Lancet 2, 804 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Shen, O. et al. Cytologic screening for esophageal cancer: results from 12,877 subjects from a high-risk population in China. Int. J. Cancer 54, 185–188 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors researched the data for the article, provided substantial contributions to discussions of its content, wrote the article and undertook review and/or editing of the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca C. Fitzgerald.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare grant or research support and patents held with the Medical Research Council (Cell sampling device patent n# PCT/GB2010/002077; Biomarker for Barrett's oesophagus patent n# 12/833,548) and grant support from Cancer Research UK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lao-Sirieix, P., Fitzgerald, R. Screening for oesophageal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9, 278–287 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.35

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.35

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer