Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 7, 44–54 (2010); doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.188

In the January 2010 issue of Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, two errors were published in Table 3 of the Review article by Simon Lo and coauthors. In the sixth column for the study by Herfarth et al. the median follow-up time should have read 5.7 not 5.7.0. In the fifth column for the study by Rusthoven et al. the radiation dose should have read 36–60 Gy in 3 fractions instead of 12–20 Gy in 3 fractions.