Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Management of atrial high-rate episodes detected by cardiac implanted electronic devices

Nature Reviews Cardiology volume 14, pages 701–714 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Key Points

  • Cardiac electronic implanted devices (CIEDs) readily detect atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs), which are fairly common and associated with an increased incidence of clinical atrial fibrillation, stroke, and systemic thromboembolism

  • Up to 20% of automatically detected AHREs reflect something other than an atrial arrhythmia, and inspection of the atrial electrogram is required for verification

  • The absolute risk of stroke associated with AHRE detection is lower than in patients with clinical atrial fibrillation who have similar clinical risk factors for stroke

  • The temporal relationship between AHREs and stroke is poor in most patients with a CIED who develop a stroke

  • In ∼15% of patients with stroke and a high AHRE burden, a close temporal relationship exists between the AHREs and stroke, which declines after 5 days

  • Two large clinical trials of anticoagulant drugs in CIED-detected AHREs are ongoing; their outcomes will inform future management

Abstract

Cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers and implantable defibrillators that perform atrial sensing typically using an atrial electrode, frequently detect subclinical atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs). When the intracardiac electrograms are carefully examined, the majority of AHREs are atrial fibrillation (AF) or other atrial tachyarrhythmias, which have been shown to be associated with both an increased risk of stroke, and subsequent development of clinical AF. However, the absolute risk of stroke among patients with AHREs is less than might be expected for clinically diagnosed paroxysmal AF. In addition, a close temporal relationship between AHREs and stroke is seen in only 15% of strokes in patients with a CIED: the majority have either no AHREs before the stroke, or AHREs very distant from incident stroke, suggesting that AHREs might be more of a risk marker than a risk factor for stroke. Management of AHREs should not be the same as for clinical AF, and a degree of uncertainty underpins the rationale for much-needed, ongoing, randomized trials of oral anticoagulation in patients with CIED-detected AHREs. We propose a management algorithm that takes into account both the stroke risk and the AHRE burden, but highlights the current uncertainty and evidence gaps for this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Cardiac implanted devices and leads.
Figure 2: Examples of appropriate and inappropriate detection of AHREs by CIEDs.
Figure 3: Temporal relationship between CIED-detected AHREs and stroke or systemic embolism.
Figure 4: Temporal relationship between CIED-detected AHREs and stroke or systemic embolism.
Figure 5: Proposed clinical management approach to CIED-detected AHREs.

References

  1. Mond, H. G., Sloman, J. G. & Edwards, R. H. The first pacemaker. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 5, 278–282 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lidwill, M. C. in Transactions of the Third Session, Australasian Medical Congress (British Medical Association), Sydney, September 2 to 7, 1929. 160 (Government Printer, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altman, L. K. Arne H. W. Larsson, 86; had first internal pacemaker. New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/18/world/arne-h-w-larsson-86-had-first-internal-pacemaker.html (2002).

  4. Kirchhof, P. et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur. Heart J. 37, 2893–2962 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katritsis, D. G. C. et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE). Europace 19, 465–511 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Healey, J. S. et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 120–129 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Glotzer, T. V. et al. The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2, 474–480 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vanassche, T. et al. Risk of ischaemic stroke according to pattern of atrial fibrillation: analysis of 6563 aspirin-treated patients in ACTIVE-A and AVERROES. Eur. Heart J. 36, 281–287a (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Daoud, E. G. et al. Temporal relationship of atrial tachyarrhythmias, cerebrovascular events, and systemic emboli based on stored device data: a subgroup analysis of TRENDS. Heart Rhythm 8, 1416–1423 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brambatti, M. et al. Temporal relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation and embolic events. Circulation 129, 2094–2099 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufman, E. S. et al. Positive predictive value of device-detected atrial high-rate episodes at different rates and durations: an analysis from ASSERT. Heart Rhythm 9, 1241–1246 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanna, T. et al. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 2478–2486 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nolker, G. et al. Performance of an implantable cardiac monitor to detect atrial fibrillation: results of the DETECT AF study. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 27, 1403–1410 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mittal, S. et al. Real-world performance of an enhanced atrial fibrillation detection algorithm in an insertable cardiac monitor. Heart Rhythm 13, 1624–1630 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gladstone, D. J. et al. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 2467–2477 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Defaye, P., Dournaux, F. & Mouton, E. Prevalence of supraventricular arrhythmias from the automated analysis of data stored in the DDD pacemakers of 617 patients: the AIDA study. The AIDA Multicenter Study Group. Automatic interpretation for diagnosis assistance. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 21, 250–255 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gillis, A. M. & Morck, M. Atrial fibrillation after DDDR pacemaker implantation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 13, 542–547 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Glotzer, T. V. et al. Atrial high rate episodes detected by pacemaker diagnostics predict death and stroke: report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST). Circulation 107, 1614–1619 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tse, H. F. & Lau, C. P. Prevalence and clinical implications of atrial fibrillation episodes detected by pacemaker in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Heart 91, 362–364 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Capucci, A. et al. Monitored atrial fibrillation duration predicts arterial embolic events in patients suffering from bradycardia and atrial fibrillation implanted with antitachycardia pacemakers. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46, 1913–1920 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Orlov, M. V. et al. Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in pacemaker recipients: incidence, progression, and determinants based on the atrial high rate trial. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 30, 404–411 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Healey, J. S. et al. Pacemaker-detected atrial fibrillation in patients with pacemakers: prevalence, predictors, and current use of oral anticoagulation. Can. J. Cardiol. 29, 224–228 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Turakhia, M. P. et al. Atrial fibrillation burden and short-term risk of stroke: case-crossover analysis of continuously recorded heart rhythm from cardiac electronic implanted devices. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 8, 1040–1047 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Swiryn, S. et al. Clinical implications of brief device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias in a cardiac rhythm management device population: results from the registry of atrial tachycardia and atrial fibrillation episodes. Circulation 134, 1130–1140 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ziegler, P. D. et al. Incidence of newly detected atrial arrhythmias via implantable devices in patients with a history of thromboembolic events. Stroke 41, 256–260 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ziegler, P. D. et al. Detection of previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients with stroke risk factors and usefulness of continuous monitoring in primary stroke prevention. Am. J. Cardiol. 110, 1309–1314 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01694394 (2015).

  28. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01727297 (2017).

  29. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01461434 (2015).

  30. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01851902 (2016).

  31. Healey, J. et al. Prevalence of sub-clinical atrial fibrillation using an implantable cardiac monitor in patients with cardiovascular risk factors: ASSERT II. Circulation 134, e714 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reiffel, J. A. et al. High incidence of previously unknown (“silent”) atrial fibrillation in patients at high risk for atrial fibrillation and stroke: primary results from the REVEAL AF study [abstract]. Heart Rhythm Scientific Sessions http://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/4227/presentation/12996 (2017).

  33. Nasir, J. M. et al. PREdicting Determinants of Atrial fibrillation for Therapy Elucidation in patients at risk for thromboembolic events (PREDATE AF) study. Heart Rhythm http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.026 (2017).

  34. Boriani, G. et al. Asymptomatic lone atrial fibrillation — how can we detect the arrhythmia? Curr. Pharm. Des. 21, 659–666 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boriani, G. & Pettorelli, D. Atrial fibrillation burden and atrial fibrillation type: clinical significance and impact on the risk of stroke and decision making for long-term anticoagulation. Vascul. Pharmacol. 83, 26–35 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Freedman, B. et al. Screening for atrial fibrillation: a report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration. Circulation 135, 1851–1867 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Botto, G. L. et al. Presence and duration of atrial fibrillation detected by continuous monitoring: crucial implications for the risk of thromboembolic events. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 20, 241–248 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shanmugam, N. et al. Detection of atrial high-rate events by continuous home monitoring: clinical significance in the heart failure-cardiac resynchronization therapy population. Europace 14, 230–237 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Boriani, G. et al. Device-detected atrial fibrillation and risk for stroke: an analysis of >10,000 patients from the SOS AF project (Stroke preventiOn Strategies based on Atrial Fibrillation information from implanted devices). Eur. Heart J. 35, 508–516 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gonzalez, M. et al. Newly detected atrial high rate episodes predict long-term mortality outcomes in patients with permanent pacemakers. Heart Rhythm 11, 2214–2221 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Witt, C. T. et al. Early detection of atrial high rate episodes predicts atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm 12, 2368–2375 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Gelder, I. C. et al. Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT. Eur. Heart J. 38, 1339–1344 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Boriani, G. et al. Improving stroke risk stratification using the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk scores in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by continuous arrhythmia burden monitoring. Stroke 42, 1768–1770 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Martin, D. T. et al. Randomized trial of atrial arrhythmia monitoring to guide anticoagulation in patients with implanted defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices. Eur. Heart J. 36, 1660–1668 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Quinn, G. R., Severdija, O. N., Chang, Y. & Singer, D. E. Wide variation in reported rates of stroke across cohorts of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 135, 208–219 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boriani, G. & Padeletti, L. Management of atrial fibrillation in bradyarrhythmias. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 12, 337–349 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Slotwiner, D. et al. HRS expert consensus statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm 12, e69–e100 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wolf, P. A. et al. Duration of atrial fibrillation and imminence of stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke 14, 664–667 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sherman, D. G. et al. Occurrence and characteristics of stroke events in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Sinus Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Arch. Intern. Med. 165, 1185–1191 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Freedman, B., Potpara, T. S. & Lip, G. Y. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Lancet 388, 806–817 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Freedman, B., Martinez, C., Katholing, A. & Rietbrock, S. Residual risk of stroke and death in anticoagulant-treated patients with atrial fibrillation. JAMA Cardiol. 1, 366–368 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Camm, A. J. et al. Atrial high-rate episodes and stroke prevention. Europace 19, 169–179 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Watson, T., Shantsila, E. & Lip, G. Y. Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow's triad revisited. Lancet 373, 155–166 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kottkamp, H. Human atrial fibrillation substrate: towards a specific fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. 34, 2731–2738 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Goette, A. et al. EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: definition, characterization, and clinical implication. Europace 18, 1455–1490 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kamel, H., Okin, P. M., Elkind, M. S. & Iadecola, C. Atrial fibrillation and mechanisms of stroke: time for a new model. Stroke 47, 895–900 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Steinberg, B. A. et al. Higher risk of death and stroke in patients with persistent versus paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the ROCKET-AF Trial. Eur. Heart J. 36, 288–296 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hohnloser, S. H. et al. The effects of apixaban on hospitalizations in patients with different types of atrial fibrillation: insights from the AVERROES trial. Eur. Heart J. 34, 2752–2759 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hindricks, G. et al. Perception of atrial fibrillation before and after radiofrequency catheter ablation: relevance of asymptomatic arrhythmia recurrence. Circulation 112, 307–313 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ganesan, A. N. et al. The impact of atrial fibrillation type on the risk of thromboembolism, mortality, and bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. 37, 1591–1602 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jorgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Reith, J., Raaschou, H. O. & Olsen, T. S. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 27, 1765–1769 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. January, C. T. et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 130, 2071–2104 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Camm, A. J. et al. XANTUS: a real-world, prospective, observational study of patients treated with rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Eur. Heart J. 37, 1145–1153 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Carmo, J., Moscoso Costa, F., Ferreira, J. & Mendes, M. Dabigatran in real-world atrial fibrillation. Meta-analysis of observational comparison studies with vitamin K antagonists. Thromb. Haemost. 116, 754–763 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Potpara, T. S. Dabigatran in 'real-world' clinical practice for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Thromb. Haemost. 114, 1093–1098 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lopes, R. D. et al. Rationale and design of the Apixaban for the Reduction of Thrombo-Embolism in Patients With Device-Detected Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation (ARTESiA) trial. Am. Heart J. 189, 137–145 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kirchhof, P. et al. Probing oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial high rate episodes: rationale and design of the Non-vitamin K antagonist Oral anticoagulants in patients with Atrial High rate episodes (NOAH–AFNET 6) trial. Am. Heart J. 190, 12–18 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Grond, M. et al. Improved detection of silent atrial fibrillation using 72-hour Holter ECG in patients with ischemic stroke: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Stroke 44, 3357–3364 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sposato, L. A. et al. Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation after stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 14, 377–387 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wachter, R. et al. Holter-electrocardiogram-monitoring in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (Find-AFRANDOMISED): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 16, 282–290 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Tayal, A. H. et al. Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke. Neurology 71, 1696–1701 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Elijovich, L., Josephson, S. A., Fung, G. L. & Smith, W. S. Intermittent atrial fibrillation may account for a large proportion of otherwise cryptogenic stroke: a study of 30-day cardiac event monitors. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 18, 185–189 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gaillard, N. et al. Detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with transtelephonic EKG in TIA or stroke patients. Neurology 74, 1666–1670 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bhatt, A. et al. Predictors of occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic strokes detected by long-term noninvasive cardiac monitoring. Stroke Res. Treat. 2011, 172074 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Flint, A. C., Banki, N. M., Ren, X., Rao, V. A. & Go, A. S. Detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by 30-day event monitoring in cryptogenic ischemic stroke: the Stroke and Monitoring for PAF in Real Time (SMART) Registry. Stroke 43, 2788–2790 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kamel, H. et al. Pilot randomized trial of outpatient cardiac monitoring after cryptogenic stroke. Stroke 44, 528–530 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Miller, D. J. et al. Outpatient cardiac telemetry detects a high rate of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke. J. Neurol. Sci. 324, 57–61 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Cotter, P. E. et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders in unexplained stroke. Neurology 80, 1546–1550 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Ritter, M. A. et al. Occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke: detection by 7-day electrocardiogram versus implantable cardiac monitors. Stroke 44, 1449–1452 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Etgen, T., Hochreiter, M., Mundel, M. & Freudenberger, T. Insertable cardiac event recorder in detection of atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke: an audit report. Stroke 44, 2007–2009 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Rojo-Martinez, E. et al. High performance of an implantable Holter monitor in the detection of concealed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke and a suspected embolic mechanism [Spanish]. Rev. Neurol. 57, 251–257 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Christensen, L. M. et al. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurs often in cryptogenic ischaemic stroke. Final results from the SURPRISE study. Eur. J. Neurol. 21, 884–889 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Brachmann, J. et al. Uncovering atrial fibrillation beyond short-term monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients: three-year results from the Cryptogenic Stroke and Underlying Atrial Fibrillation Trial. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 9, e003333 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Haeusler, K. G. et al. Impact of standardized MONitoring for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Ischemic Stroke (MonDAFIS): rationale and design of a prospective randomized multicenter study. Am. Heart J. 172, 19–25 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Frontera, A. et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics to predict paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: insights from an implantable loop recorder population. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 38, 1217–1222 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Favilla, C. G. et al. Predictors of finding occult atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke. Stroke 46, 1210–1215 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Thijs, V. N. et al. Predictors for atrial fibrillation detection after cryptogenic stroke: results from CRYSTAL AF. Neurology 86, 261–269 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Poli, S. et al. Insertable cardiac monitors after cryptogenic stroke — a risk factor based approach to enhance the detection rate for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur. J. Neurol. 23, 375–381 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Cheung, J. W. et al. Newly detected atrial fibrillation following dual chamber pacemaker implantation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 17, 1323–1328 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Mittal, S. et al. Frequency, duration, and predictors of newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation following dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients without a previous history of atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 102, 450–453 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Dion, F. et al. Unexpected low prevalence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic ischemic stroke: a prospective study. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 28, 101–107 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.K. has received grants from several public funding bodies, including EU grant agreement No. 633196 (CATCH ME), British Heart Foundation (FS/13/43/30324), and Leducq Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heart Research Institute, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia

    Ben Freedman

  2. Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Hospital Road, Concord, 2139, NSW, Australia

    Ben Freedman

  3. Cardiology Division, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo, 71, Modena, 41124, Italy

    Giuseppe Boriani

  4. Hackensack University Medical Centre, 20 Prospect Avenue, Hackensack, 07601, New Jersey, USA

    Taya V. Glotzer

  5. Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 30 Birge Street, Hamilton, L8L 0A6, Ontario, Canada

    Jeff S. Healey

  6. Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Wolfson Drive, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    Paulus Kirchhof

  7. Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, Birmingham, UK

    Paulus Kirchhof

  8. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK

    Paulus Kirchhof

  9. Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET), Mendelstraße 11, Münster, 48149, Germany

    Paulus Kirchhof

  10. School of Medicine, Belgrade University, Dr Subotica 8, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia

    Tatjana S. Potpara

Authors
  1. Ben Freedman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giuseppe Boriani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Taya V. Glotzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeff S. Healey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paulus Kirchhof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tatjana S. Potpara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors researched data for the article, discussed its content, wrote the manuscript, and reviewed and edited it before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Freedman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

B.F. declares that he has received speakers' fees and advisory board honoraria from Bayer Pharma AG, BMS/Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. G.B. declares that he has received honoraria (as speakers' fees) from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. T.V.G. declares that she has received a speaking honorarium from Medtronic. J.H. declares that he has received grants from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, and Medtronic. P.K. declares that he has received grants and personal fees from several industry companies involved in producing AF therapies (including Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Servier); grants and personal fees from AFNET, ESC, and other professional societies and academic organizations; and has patents on 'AF therapy' and 'Markers for AF' pending to the University of Birmingham, UK. T.S.P. declares no competing interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freedman, B., Boriani, G., Glotzer, T. et al. Management of atrial high-rate episodes detected by cardiac implanted electronic devices. Nat Rev Cardiol 14, 701–714 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.94

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.94

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing