We read the correspondence regarding the recent Review (The different roles of ER subtypes in cancer biology and therapy. Nature Rev. Cancer 11, 597–608 (2011))1 between Ke-Da Yu and Zhi-Ming Shao and the authors of the Review with great interest1,2,3. The ongoing debate concerning the prevalence and the clinical relevance of oestrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) amplification reflects the highly visible evidence for this genetic aberration despite the challenging data.
There are now three studies from three different groups, which all confirm ESR1 amplification in 20.6%, 22.6% and 21.6% of analysed breast cancers by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)4,5,6, including one study by Tsiambas et al.6 that is only rarely cited. Likewise, it has hardly been recognized that Moelans et al.7 detected 16% and 20%7,8ESR1 (mostly low level) gains and amplifications in two independent multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) studies, which is substantially higher than the 8%9 cited by Thomas and Gustafsson3 and which may be related to the different patient sets in their three publications. Using a cut-off of 2 (for the grade of copy number imbalance) instead of >2, Nessling et al.10 would have found around 19% instead of 10% amplification by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH)10, illustrating that minor changes in the threshold criteria may have major effects on the outcome of ESR1 studies. There are five studies by four different groups using DNA-specific methods that are independent of observer subjectivity, such as Southern blot, aCGH or MLPA PCR, which have found rates of 10% and greater ESR1 amplification7,8,10,11 or increased copy number7,8,12 in breast cancer. Including the 20% increased ESR1 copy numbers in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumours reported by Dunbier et al.12, these studies typically reported low-level copy number gains. It is easily imaginable that there could be copy number gains both just above and just below the detection level and within the background of measurement.
When non-morphological methods are used, contamination with non-tumour cells (which could be resolved by laser microdissection) and intermingled mosaic-patterned intratumoural heterogeneity of copy number status — as also shown in case of ERBB2 (Refs 13, 14) — could obscure the presence of low-level amplification, although this may be readily picked up by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
Evidence of correlation between elevated ESR1 copy numbers and high ER expression was found in five studies from five independent groups4,5,6,9,12, raising the question of whether ESR1 copy numbers could be a better clinical marker for response to hormone therapy than protein expression. In their recent ESR1 study, Ejlertsen et al.15 did not reproduce previously claimed therapeutic resistance of tumours with amplified ESR1, and there was no difference in distribution in the percentage of ER-expressing tumour cells between tumours with amplified ESR1 (13.6% ER+) and those of normal copy number (82.2% ER+). However, they found significantly lower ER expression in ESR1-deleted tumours15,16.
In summary, there is growing evidence that ESR1 gain or amplification is a fairly frequent event in breast cancer, although it is difficult to detect with current analysis and threshold techniques, which were initially established for ERBB2 measurement. The clinical relevance of ESR1 gains and amplifications in the sense of prognostic value and prediction of response to hormonal treatment requires further studies, similar to earlier debates for ERBB2 amplification.
Thomas, C. & Gustafsson, J.-A. The different roles of ER subtypes in cancer biologyand therapy. Nature Rev.Cancer 11, 597–608 (2011).
Yu, K.-D. & Shao, Z.-M. ESR1 gene amplification: another mechanism regulating the cellular levels of ERα. Nature Rev.Cancer 11, 823 (2011).
Thomas, C. & Gustafsson, J.-A. Not enough evidence to include ESR1 amplification. Nature Rev.Cancer 11, 823 (2011).
Holst, F. et al. Estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) gene amplification is frequent in breast cancer. Nature Genet. 39, 655–660 (2007).
Tomita, S. et al. Estrogen receptor α gene ESR1 amplification may predict endocrine therapy responsiveness in breast cancer patients. Cancer Sci. 100, 1012–1017 (2009).
Tsiambas, E. et al. Significance of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR-1) gene imbalances in colon and hepatocellular carcinomas based on tissue microarrays analysis. Med. Oncol. 28, 934–940 (2011).
Moelans, C. B. et al. Molecular profiling of invasive breast cancer by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification-based copy number analysis of tumor suppressor and oncogenes. Mod. Pathol. 23, 1029–1039 (2010).
Moelans, C. B. et al. Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study. Anal. Cell Pathol. (Amst) 33, 165–173 (2010).
Moelans, C. B. et al. ESR1 amplification is rare in breast cancer and is associated with high grade and high proliferation: A multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study. Cell Oncol. 34, 489–494 (2011).
Nessling, M. et al. Candidate genes in breast cancer revealed by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization of archived tissue. Cancer Res. 65, 439–447 (2005).
Nembrot, M., Quintana, B. & Mordoh, J. Estrogen receptor gene amplification is found in some estrogen receptor-positive human breast tumors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 166, 601–607 (1990).
Dunbier, A. K. et al. ESR1 is co-expressed with closely adjacent uncharacterised genes spanning a breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q25.1. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001382 (2011).
Szollosi, J. et al. ERBB-2 (HER2/neu) gene copy number, p185HER-2 overexpression, and intratumor heterogeneity in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 55, 5400–5407 (1995).
Bernasconi, B. et al. Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing may influence therapy eligibility. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 8 Sep 2011 (doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1744-3).
Ejlertsen, B. et al. Prognostic and predictive role of ESR1 status for postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer in the Danish cohort of the BIG 1–98 trial. Ann. Oncol. 10 Oct 2011 (doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr438).
Vang Nielsen, K. et al. Amplification of ESR1 may predict resistance to adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 127, 345–355 (2011).
The University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf has filed a patent application for certain technologies related to this correspondence.
About this article
Cite this article
Holst, F., Moelans, C., Filipits, M. et al. On the evidence for ESR1 amplification in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 12, 149 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3093-c3
This article is cited by
Nature Reviews Cancer (2015)
Prognostic and predictive value of copy number alterations in invasive breast cancer as determined by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Cellular Oncology (2014)
Analysis of gene copy number alterations by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in columnar cell lesions of the breast
Cellular Oncology (2014)